Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

No blackfaces allowed.

1356713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 535 ✭✭✭NoCrackHaving


    Kiss the egg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,484 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Some jumps in logic here.

    Should I avoid dressing as Charlie Chaplain as my moustache may have "connotations" that offend Jewish people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    WindSock wrote: »
    People in blackface costumes
    They were in bobsleigh costumes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭Smiles35


    They should seek consular assistance from the Jamaican embassy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    Reekwind wrote: »

    Maybe it will one day,

    When? When there's a black US president?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,337 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Muise... wrote: »
    nah, it's cos I'm a redhead with a black-faced avatar.

    Oh.

    feck.

    see you outside.

    Wait....Wait....
    I'm being invited outside by a redhead with black faced intentions!!!!
    Please please please be a woman! :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭Drexel


    Feel sorry for the lads. They really haven't done anything wrong but they should have known some idiot would be offended


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,166 ✭✭✭Tasden


    WindSock wrote: »
    Really? It's that odd to see why using racial characteristics as costumes may be offensive? I didn't even have to stretch my imagination much for that one.

    Actually WS, I would've thought the same as the op in that its ridiculous but your post kinda gave me a different perspective on it. I still think nobody's job should be affected by it though because its a thin line between being offensive to some and blatant racism.

    One of my closest friends is black, her and I would slag each other which would involve black/white jokes or whatever, because that's the kind of friendship we have, I would never say similar stuff to a black person I didn't know because they may not appreciate that humour. I wouldnt say it to the same friend in front of say a manager- white or black- as its not professional. Its about knowing your audience and the right time and place. I would've thought Halloween was an ok time and place. In this case its not even about race, its about the characters that happen to be black. Had he come in to the office dressed "as a black man" on a regular Thursday then of course its racist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Sofaspud


    What about if they'd dressed as women?

    A similarly historically oppressed group, who still often have caricatures of them performed by men in costume.

    If they'd dressed up as, for example, the Spice Girls, should they be fired? Or only the one dressed as Scary Spice?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    But nobody gets suspended for that?

    In fact you can to Tesco and buy an outfit and face paint for it. Why the exception?

    Should Germans not go out as Rabbi's? Or even Moses, just in case it offends?

    I don't agree the people should have gotten suspended over their choice of costume.
    wexie wrote: »
    hmm....

    See I can kinda see where you're coming from. The bit I disagree with though is that, if someone actually had any racist feelings towards a particular group (like first nations people f.e.) then I much doubt they'd be dressing up as them.

    To be honest, if you had racist feelings towards 'indians' they'd be more easily expressed by dressing up as a cowboy......
    IvySlayer wrote: »
    They are depicting a black bob sleigh team, to do that you need to be......black.

    I call all black santas as racist from now on. It offends me and I want them all sacked.

    I don't think people dressing up as characters who are also black and using blackface are doing so out of racial hatred though. It's just a bit thoughtless to black up. I mean, it would be funny to dress as Diana Ross a la Dick Byrne in Fr. Ted, but not really wise to do it in certain places where it would be taken up wrongly. And it's easy to see why blacking up can be taken offensively, even if it wasn't your intent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭fearcruach


    I saw this on Reddit when someone asked a similar question. It nicely sums up why it's not ok.

    –]open_sketchbook 2844 points 3 days ago*x13
    In the United States, blackface was used as part of Minstrel Shows, which is basically a comedy show where the only joke was basically "Wow, black people sure are stupid!" As you can imagine, incredibly ****ing offensive. Blackface was also used on stage or screen so that a show could have black characters, without having to actually, you know, hire black people. The white actors would then usually play up negative black stereotypes in the process.

    So there is a lot of history of blackface being used as a method of mocking black people. But, hey, that's just history. Why would it be offensive today?
    Your point that you wouldn't be offended by a black person in "whiteface", or that it is the same as wearing a red wig, is what we might call 'false equivalency'; within a larger cultural context, it isn't the same thing. There are several reasons for this.

    The first and most straightforward is that the mentality of the ministrel show hasn't disappeared. A lot of people who wear blackface in their costumes for Halloween or whatever use it as an excuse to make fun of black people, so people are wary of it. But that doesn't make in intrinsically racist, right?
    Well, no, nothing is "intrinsically" anything when talking about race, because race isn't skin deep. You appear to believe in a sort of colourblind mentality towards race, in that it doesn't matter at all what race you are. Well, race is kind of an absurd concept (see below the break) because humans pretty much just made it up, but humans also just sort of made up things like governments, laws and economies, which are also important and "real" things. So let's talk about race. Really talk about it.

    To many people, especially people of colour, race matters. It can matter in a lot of negative ways, manifesting in poor treatment, harassment, or simply the circumstances into which they were born, statistically. It can also matter in many positive or affirmative ways; concepts like "Black culture" or "Black pride" exist as a counterpoint, a way for Black people to take pride in themselves and their experiences, and to explore concepts that dominate culture, white culture, doesn't have experience with that many Black people do. Serious stuff, like mistreatment by the police and justice system, or basic stuff, like hair. Hair! Bet that's something you've never thought about at length (lol) but it's a pretty important issue for Black folks in America.
    To white folks like us, this often doesn't make a lot of sense; we were taught as kids that race doesn't matter. But it's very easy to say that something that rarely seems to affect us doesn't matter; our race as white people is seen by society as default, our experiences as normal. Our stories get to be the ones that get retold and remembered, and we retell and remember them quite frequently. It's like saying it doesn't matter who wins or loses, after collecting the trophy and the prize money.

    So something like whiteface doesn't affect us; it's just skin tone, after all. It's also why, as Americans who are very disconnected, often by generations, from our European ancestors, we often don't give a **** about those stereotypes either. I don't give a **** when people make Scottish jokes, and I wouldn't give a **** if people made Czech jokes, if those were jokes people over here made. It's not all that important to me.

    If you are a person of colour in America, it is impossible not to notice race. Even if you've never been subject to malicious racism, you know that you are perceived as an outsider to the dominant culture. Even if you didn't want to care about race, race has been made important for you, personally. You've experienced a lot of **** you know is basically invisible to white people because of "just" your skin tone.
    So when some white guy rolls along in blackface, or using black slang or trying to use the n-word positively or neutrally, it rings hollow. It's a mockery, somebody who thinks that all you need to emulate this giant, deeply personal and nuanced concept of Blackness is some shoe polish.

    That's what's offensive.

    If you look at history, race is often only tangentially related to skin colour. A century ago, the Irish weren't considered "white." A hundred years before that, there was no such thing as "white people"; the concept that all people of European descent were one "race" would have been incredibly insulting, in fact. The concept of "whiteness" or of a "white race" is a very, very recent invention which was essentially cooked up as part of racist justification for 19th century top-down colonialist structure. It's also a somewhat American idea, a result of a whole jumble of people rubbing shoulders off boats from Europe (yay!) and elsewhere (boo!), and segregating themselves based on that. You might find European conceptions of race to be somewhat different.
    It's the same for Black people in the United States. There is a conception of a singular black race in the United States, including everyone with roots in Africa (usually excluding the northern bits). Any African would tell you that is absurd; there are lots of races in Africa! Who's right? Well, nobody, really. Racial classification is mostly something that people just made up, and it varies immensely from culture to culture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,186 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Saw a bunch of black guys dressed up in KKK costumes. That would be a mindphuck for any teacher looking to champion racial harmony. Would it be worse if their white friend had joined in, or if the white friend dressed up as a slave?
    Either way, I laughed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    fearcruach wrote: »
    I saw this on Reddit when someone asked a similar question. It nicely sums up why it's not ok.

    –]open_sketchbook 2844 points 3 days ago*x13
    In the United States, blackface was used as part of Minstrel Shows, which is basically a comedy show where the only joke was basically "Wow, black people sure are stupid!" As you can imagine, incredibly ****ing offensive. Blackface was also used on stage or screen so that a show could have black characters, without having to actually, you know, hire black people. The white actors would then usually play up negative black stereotypes in the process.

    So there is a lot of history of blackface being used as a method of mocking black people. But, hey, that's just history. Why would it be offensive today?
    Your point that you wouldn't be offended by a black person in "whiteface", or that it is the same as wearing a red wig, is what we might call 'false equivalency'; within a larger cultural context, it isn't the same thing. There are several reasons for this.

    The first and most straightforward is that the mentality of the ministrel show hasn't disappeared. A lot of people who wear blackface in their costumes for Halloween or whatever use it as an excuse to make fun of black people, so people are wary of it. But that doesn't make in intrinsically racist, right?
    Well, no, nothing is "intrinsically" anything when talking about race, because race isn't skin deep. You appear to believe in a sort of colourblind mentality towards race, in that it doesn't matter at all what race you are. Well, race is kind of an absurd concept (see below the break) because humans pretty much just made it up, but humans also just sort of made up things like governments, laws and economies, which are also important and "real" things. So let's talk about race. Really talk about it.

    To many people, especially people of colour, race matters. It can matter in a lot of negative ways, manifesting in poor treatment, harassment, or simply the circumstances into which they were born, statistically. It can also matter in many positive or affirmative ways; concepts like "Black culture" or "Black pride" exist as a counterpoint, a way for Black people to take pride in themselves and their experiences, and to explore concepts that dominate culture, white culture, doesn't have experience with that many Black people do. Serious stuff, like mistreatment by the police and justice system, or basic stuff, like hair. Hair! Bet that's something you've never thought about at length (lol) but it's a pretty important issue for Black folks in America.
    To white folks like us, this often doesn't make a lot of sense; we were taught as kids that race doesn't matter. But it's very easy to say that something that rarely seems to affect us doesn't matter; our race as white people is seen by society as default, our experiences as normal. Our stories get to be the ones that get retold and remembered, and we retell and remember them quite frequently. It's like saying it doesn't matter who wins or loses, after collecting the trophy and the prize money.

    So something like whiteface doesn't affect us; it's just skin tone, after all. It's also why, as Americans who are very disconnected, often by generations, from our European ancestors, we often don't give a **** about those stereotypes either. I don't give a **** when people make Scottish jokes, and I wouldn't give a **** if people made Czech jokes, if those were jokes people over here made. It's not all that important to me.

    If you are a person of colour in America, it is impossible not to notice race. Even if you've never been subject to malicious racism, you know that you are perceived as an outsider to the dominant culture. Even if you didn't want to care about race, race has been made important for you, personally. You've experienced a lot of **** you know is basically invisible to white people because of "just" your skin tone.
    So when some white guy rolls along in blackface, or using black slang or trying to use the n-word positively or neutrally, it rings hollow. It's a mockery, somebody who thinks that all you need to emulate this giant, deeply personal and nuanced concept of Blackness is some shoe polish.

    That's what's offensive.

    If you look at history, race is often only tangentially related to skin colour. A century ago, the Irish weren't considered "white." A hundred years before that, there was no such thing as "white people"; the concept that all people of European descent were one "race" would have been incredibly insulting, in fact. The concept of "whiteness" or of a "white race" is a very, very recent invention which was essentially cooked up as part of racist justification for 19th century top-down colonialist structure. It's also a somewhat American idea, a result of a whole jumble of people rubbing shoulders off boats from Europe (yay!) and elsewhere (boo!), and segregating themselves based on that. You might find European conceptions of race to be somewhat different.
    It's the same for Black people in the United States. There is a conception of a singular black race in the United States, including everyone with roots in Africa (usually excluding the northern bits). Any African would tell you that is absurd; there are lots of races in Africa! Who's right? Well, nobody, really. Racial classification is mostly something that people just made up, and it varies immensely from culture to culture.

    Goes to show, just because someone writes a lot doesn't mean they make a good point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 ✭✭✭Sinfonia


    smcgiff wrote: »
    Goes to show, just because someone writes a lot doesn't mean they make a good point.

    Why don't you make a thoughful rebuttal?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    humbert wrote: »
    They were in bobsleigh costumes.

    They were. With blackfaces. Isn't that not what the issue was?
    Tasden wrote: »
    Actually WS, I would've thought the same as the op in that its ridiculous but your post kinda gave me a different perspective on it. I still think nobody's job should be affected by it though because its a thin line between being offensive to some and blatant racism.

    I agree with you there. Again, I don't think it was done so to be offensive or because they were racist. Just a bit insensitive.
    One of my closest friends is black, her and I would slag each other which would involve black/white jokes or whatever, because that's the kind of friendship we have, I would never say similar stuff to a black person I didn't know because they may not appreciate that humour. I wouldnt say it to the same friend in front of say a manager- white or black- as its not professional. Its about knowing your audience and the right time and place. I would've thought Halloween was an ok time and place. In this case its not even about race, its about the characters that happen to be black. Had he come in to the office dressed "as a black man" on a regular Thursday then of course its racist.

    What if you dress as characters who happen to be Oriental Asian though? You don't see many people dressing as Bruce Lee and doing things to their eyes, like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,194 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    WindSock wrote: »
    I don't agree the people should have gotten suspended over their choice of costume.





    I don't think people dressing up as characters who are also black and using blackface are doing so out of racial hatred though. It's just a bit thoughtless to black up. I mean, it would be funny to dress as Diana Ross a la Dick Byrne in Fr. Ted, but not really wise to do it in certain places where it would be taken up wrongly. And it's easy to see why blacking up can be taken offensively, even if it wasn't your intent.

    Just because people are outraged does not mean they are right.

    There was no racist intent whatsoever. There is nothing to understand, acknowledge, it was an overreaction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    His argument seems to be that 'blacking up' isn't intrinsically racist. That race is only skin deep. Race is actually an absurd made up concept. But laws and governments are made up concepts. So 'blacking up' is therefore intrinsically racist. QED.

    Then lots and lots of irrelevant stuff.
    WindSock wrote: »
    They were. With blackfaces. Isn't that not what the issue was?
    You said that skin colour was the costume, which it isn't, but simply is a prominent feature of the characters they were dressed up as and it wasn't ignored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭ElvisChrist6


    I hate when white people get offended on behalf of black people. That's what's moronic to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,967 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    I hate when white people get offended on behalf of black people. That's what's moronic to me.

    Some people love to get offended and claim the moral high ground.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,736 ✭✭✭Irish Guitarist


    Blackface was a form of American vaudeville in which white Americans donned black makeup and portrayed black people as stupid.

    This wasn't 'blackface'. It was people dressing up as characters from a film where a team of black Jamaicans were portrayed in a positive light.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭Napper Hawkins


    I don't remember too many sandy vaginas when Nelly released this gem, but then it's black people dressing as the white devil so it's ok.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭Drexel


    WindSock wrote: »
    They were. With blackfaces. Isn't that not what the issue was?



    I agree with you there. Again, I don't think it was done so to be offensive or because they were racist. Just a bit insensitive.



    What if you dress as characters who happen to be Oriental Asian though? You don't see many people dressing as Bruce Lee and doing things to their eyes, like.

    There is a big difference in a different eye shape and skin colour tho. People are still goina know you're supposed to be Bruce lee without doing something to your eyes.

    If they didn't have dark makeup or whatever they used on their face they are just 4 guys in Lycra outfits.

    Believe it or not but black people have different skin colour to us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    I hate when white people get offended on behalf of black people. That's what's moronic to me.

    I wouldn't agree with you there. It's good to have empathy, and I understand the affect of the music hall blackface had. However, we need to be able to differentiate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Sofaspud wrote: »
    What about if they'd dressed as women?

    A similarly historically oppressed group, who still often have caricatures of them performed by men in costume.

    If they'd dressed up as, for example, the Spice Girls, should they be fired? Or only the one dressed as Scary Spice?


    If lads like to wear dresses, tights and wigs then let them explore that side of their identity I say. I don't feel particularly insulted by men dressing as women. I do when they stereotype me as being oversensitive, irrational and inferior or weaker in my abilities and opinions though. (see White Chicks)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    Sinfonia wrote: »
    Why don't you make a thoughful rebuttal?

    Don't feel the need, not even a thoughtful one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Sofaspud


    Sinfonia wrote: »
    Why don't you make a thoughful rebuttal?

    "No Blacks,
    No Dogs,
    No Irish."

    Irish people were also oppressed and enslaved by America and England. They've also been caricatured and belittled, and continue to be to this day. Yet people dress up as leprachauns (a clear caricature of the Irish) and this isn't seen as offensive, due to us having the same skin colour.

    Nowadays, most of the time there's no malicious intent behind people dressing as Irish caricatures, just like there's no malicious intent behind people wearing makeup to have a more accurate costume. If they wish to dress like Mr T, the Jamaican Bobsled Team or Tupac, makeup is required, just like people dressing as women (or long haired men) might need a wig.

    If there's no malicious intent, it's not racist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,166 ✭✭✭Tasden


    WindSock wrote: »
    They were. With blackfaces. Isn't that not what the issue was?



    I agree with you there. Again, I don't think it was done so to be offensive or because they were racist. Just a bit insensitive.



    What if you dress as characters who happen to be Oriental Asian though? You don't see many people dressing as Bruce Lee and doing things to their eyes, like.

    If I was dressing up as someone who is Asian I'd prob line my eyes to look like theirs. Theres not alot you can do to your eyes though. Same as if I was dressing up as someone from say Spain, I'd wear fake tan.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    WindSock wrote: »
    If lads like to wear dresses, tights and wigs then let them explore that side of their identity I say. I don't feel particularly insulted by men dressing as women. I do when they stereotype me as being oversensitive, irrational and inferior or weaker in my abilities and opinions though. (see White Chicks)

    So what was the offensive stereotype in dressing up as the guys from Cool Runnings? That black guys are good at bobsleighing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭Muise...


    WindSock wrote: »
    If lads like to wear dresses, tights and wigs then let them explore that side of their identity I say. I don't feel particularly insulted by men dressing as women. I do when they stereotype me as being oversensitive, irrational and inferior or weaker in my abilities and opinions though. (see White Chicks)

    Drag is far from oversensitive, irrational, inferior or weaker stereotypes - not in the gay scene anyway. I've also found that most straight men who dress in drag for a party (as long as there's a good excuse :)) carry on like demented nymphomaniacs on a day release from the convent. :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,944 ✭✭✭✭Links234


    You can argue back and forth over whether you find it offensive or not, and you might even point to some examples where blackface is used in an ironic way, to sort of poke fun at it, such as Tropic Thunder or in It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, but what you can't do is ignore the fact that there are a huge amount of people who do find it offensive, will be angry over it, and that you may indeed get in trouble for it. You really, really can't claim to be ignorant that people will be pissed, and you'd have to be a real prize idiot to go and do a blackface costume for halloween, then act like the aggrevied party when people get pissed off with you.


Advertisement
Advertisement