Bottom feeders.

GerB40 · 13-10-2013 01:26AM

The scumbags who rob shît from cemeteries. Im in no way religious but have some respect you filthy wánkers..

darlett · 13-10-2013 01:31AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Nearly as bad as the little feckers in their vans with their cameras parked just around the bend!

One of them little bolloxs cut me (travelling below the 80km limit at that time!) off a couple of weeks ago resulting in me having to break bloody hard. I flashed the ****er a few times and a wee bit later he pulled in. To set up his van to catch the killers doing 61 in a 61km zone. I 'heart' him.

The dirty hypocritical illegal incapable driving bollox.

downonthefarm · 13-10-2013 01:33AM

people who rob off the elderly ,that show cheaters,them chuggers,people who sponge off the state,john gilligan,tony feloni
the fsa,

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 01:38AM

Jester252 wrote: »

That a reason for legalization not possession.

Absolutely.

If you have any weed right now you knowingly supported a criminal gang.

If you support making criminals out of peaceful people you're worse than any criminal gang.

People who support criminal are bottom feeders.

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Cody Pomeray · 13-10-2013 01:40AM

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

13-10-2013 01:46AM

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

Well you're looking into a bottomless pit using that logic!
Just look at all "exported jobs" to Asia, just so you can get cheap jeans in the discount shops.

Czarcasm · 13-10-2013 01:57AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Yeah Charlie, fairness now, all those weed growing grannies with their arthritis, sure they haven't a hope of making a run for it really, do they?

Because grannies when they're not knitting shredded wheat like to tend to their acres of herb gardens out the back of their little whitewashed thatch cottages...

Stop for Christ sake :pac:

Jester252 · 13-10-2013 02:00AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If you support making criminals out of peaceful people you're worse than any criminal gang.

Right now possession of an illegal drug is against the law. I doubt many of these "peaceful people" don't know that possession is illegal
Is weed addictive?

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Its not "kidnapping" its arresting her relax on the amateur dramatics. Growing weed is against the law for now. In theory everyone is equal in front of the court. So should a major gangster be allowed to continue his weed growing operation along with all the nasty side effects that such an operation brings?

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:00AM

Czarcasm wrote: »

Stop for Christ sake :pac:

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

KERSPLAT! · 13-10-2013 02:07AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

Yes

:pac:

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:08AM

Jester252 wrote: »

Right now possession of an illegal drug is against the law. I doubt many of these "peaceful people" don't know that possession is illegal

Appeal to law fallacy. You might want to google that.

Is weed addictive?

It doesn't matter. How we treat addicts does.

Its not "kidnapping" its arresting her relax on the amateur dramatics.

It is kidnapping. If an alien was watcing it they would see a peaceful person being kidnapped.

In theory everyone is equal in front of the court.

Bollocks. This is demonstrably incorrect. Tell Gay couples who want to adopt that everyone is equal. Tell people who want to grow weed instead of brew beer that they are equal.

So should a major gangster be allowed to continue his weed growing operation along with all the nasty side effects that such an operation brings?

The nasty side effects are due to illegality. When was the last time there was a shoot-out between people selling the alcohol drug?

KERSPLAT! · 13-10-2013 02:10AM

Aliens!? You on the ganja yourself?

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:10AM

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

Yes :pac:

People who would support that are the real scumbags though.

cooperguy · 13-10-2013 02:11AM

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

What you are describing there is somebody who is providing accommodation to people who either dont want to or cant afford to buy their own. Nothing wrong with that.

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:12AM

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

You on the ganja yourself?

Are you accusing me of being involved in criminal activity?

Are you calling me a criminal?

Czarcasm · 13-10-2013 02:17AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

Wait a minute, we've gone from Jeremy Kyle and Jerry Springer to a TV show bounty hunter who legally apprehends bail jumpers... to your granny growing weed being kidnapped by illegal aliens?

I'm getting the munchies for Mexican bail jumping beans now

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:23AM

Czarcasm wrote: »

Wait a minute, we've gone from Jeremy Kyle and Jerry Springer to a TV show bounty hunter who legally apprehends bail jumpers... to your granny growing weed being kidnapped by illegal aliens

Lol, hah ha, ah hah lol, jail, ruined lives, lol people profiting from misery, hehe lol.

Jester252 · 13-10-2013 02:25AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Appeal to law fallacy. You might want to google that.

Maybe you should look it up.
Right/wrong and illegal/legal are not linked. Its doesn't make is right to break a wrong law.

It doesn't matter. How we treat addicts does.

Does someone have an overbearing need to smoke weed like smoke tobacco and alcohol.

It is kidnapping. If an alien was watcing it they would see a peaceful person being kidnapped.

So we shouldn't "kidnap" people who have sex with kids?

Bollocks. This is demonstrably incorrect. Tell Gay couples who want to adopt that everyone is equal. Tell people who want to grow weed instead of brew beer that they are equal.

I see you forgot the word theory in my sentence. I suggest you look up Irish adoption laws. A single person or a married couple can adopt. As for the weed/beer equality "issue"
Weed illegal for now
Beer legal for now
Do I need to explain it to you again?

Why should your grandmother get away with committing a crime?

The nasty side effects are due to illegality. When was the last time there was a shoot-out between people selling the alcohol drug?

Yet again that an argument for legalization not for doing it. Why should your granny not be held to the same standards as other people in Ireland?

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:35AM

Jester252 wrote: »

Maybe you should look it up.
Right/wrong and illegal/legal are not linked. Its doesn't make is right to break a wrong law.

What is this gibberish? It makes no sense.

Does someone have an overbearing need to smoke weed like smoke tobacco and alcohol.

What? Does someone have an overbearing compulsion to stop them?

So we shouldn't "kidnap" people who have sex with kids?

Yes because they're hurting children who need to be protected. This is so typical of numb-skulls with a dead-end argument.

I suggest you look up Irish adoption laws. A single person or a married couple can adopt.

You've avoided gay people there I see.

As for the weed/beer equality "issue"
Weed illegal for now
Beer legal for now
Do I need to explain it to you again?

*sigh*

Appeal to law fallacy. Google how bad your 'logic' is.

Why should your grandmother get away with committing a crime?

Why should people who want to kick her door down, kidnap her and lock her in a room get away with being the bottom feeders they are?

Yet again that an argument for legalization not for doing it.

What? Make sense.

Why should your granny not be held to the same standards as other people in Ireland?

She isn't. She's being treated as a criminal because people like you have limited understanding of how hypocritical you are.

Czarcasm · 13-10-2013 02:35AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Lol, hah ha, ah hah lol, jail, ruined lives, lol people profiting from misery, hehe lol.

You think drug dealers are peace loving types?

There are far more ruined lives caused by people profiting from misery than there are grannies growing their own personal stash and smoking green for their arthritis.

If this was yet another attempt at a "legalise weed" thread, tbh Charlie twas a piss poor effort, made even worse by the fact that you're all over the place with your gay aliens.

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 02:43AM

Czarcasm wrote: »

You think drug dealers are peace loving types?

What drugs? Are most alcohol and alcohol suppliers peace loving types? Simple question.

There are far more ruined lives caused by people profiting from misery than there are grannies growing their own personal stash and smoking green for their arthritis.

Who causes this misery?

If this was yet another attempt at a "legalise weed" thread, tbh Charlie twas a piss poor effort

I don't even smoke weed fwiw. I'm against scumbags making a living off peaceful people, be they weed smokers or otherwise.

made even worse by the fact that you're all over the place with your gay aliens.

You shouldn't try to be funny, it's full of fail.

Iwasfrozen · 13-10-2013 02:48AM

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

Young lads offered the chance to work by the fat farmer but turn it down in favour of free money from their parents. Bottom feeder.
The factory labourers who benefit from government incentives given to grow business. Who complain about their lot in life while not having the work ethnic or intellect to take a course in business management. Bottom feeders.
Students and low paid workers who want accommodation but don't want to pay for it.

Yes shock horror the working class can be greedy bottom feeders too!

Jester252 · 13-10-2013 02:53AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

What is this gibberish? It makes no sense.

Right or wrong have no connection to legal or illegal

What? Does someone have an overbearing compulsion to stop them?

Is weed addictive? Can someone get addicted to weed? How hard is it to supply a simple yes or no

Yes because they're hurting children who need to be protected. This is so typical of numb-skulls with a dead-end argument.

Your the one equaling an arrest to kidnap. Should we not kidnap some who kill a person, assaulted a person, raped a person etc.?

You've avoided gay people there I see.

Gay people can be single. Do read up on Irish adoption law before you try and use it again to back up your gay alien granny kidnap argument for weed

*sigh*

Appeal to law fallacy. Google how bad your 'logic' is.

Is weed illegal?
If yes should a person that committed the crime not be charged if caught?

Why should people who want to kick her door down, kidnap her and lock her in a room get away with being the bottom feeders they are?

Because the people that do that are call gardas and are doing their jobs.
Why should your granny who funds and encourages gang activity get away with being a bottom feeder?

What? Make sense.

It lost all sense why the gay aliens showed up to watch your drug dealing granny get kidnapped by shellfish, crayfish, starfish, snails and sea cucumbers

She isn't. She's being treated as a criminal because people like you have limited understanding of how hypocritical you are.

She been treated as a criminal because she committed a crime and is involved in criminal activity.

Czarcasm · 13-10-2013 02:56AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

What drugs? Are most alcohol and alcohol suppliers peace loving types? Simple question.

Lets at least TRY and stick to one drug at a time shall we? You're not fond of fallacies, I'm not fond of strawmans.

Who causes this misery?

People who see it as their right to flout the law by supplying drugs to people who are also willing to flout the law to pay for their drugs.

I don't even smoke weed fwiw. I'm against scumbags making a living off peaceful people, be they weed smokers or otherwise.

Glad to hear it, I'm against scumbags who mug peaceful people too and thieve houses to pay for their habit.

You shouldn't try to be funny, it's full of fail.

I was actually quite serious when I invited you to come work with me for a day. Would you like to join me for a day Charlie?

Simple question.

Karl Stein · 13-10-2013 03:08AM

Jester252 wrote: »

Right or wrong have no connection to legal or illegal

Is weed addictive? Can someone get addicted to weed? How hard is it to supply a simple yes or no

It doesn't matter. If scumbags want to ban stuff for its being addictive then those scumbags should ban lots of stuff.

Your the one equaling an arrest to kidnap. Should we not kidnap some who kill a person, assaulted a person, raped a person etc.?

When a person who has no interest in hurting another human being is put in jail for a moral crime what is it only kidnap? Would you advocate that a child be deprived of his Dad because he choose marijuana over fermented plants? Another simple question you can't answer because of your pussy-ass conservitardism.

If yes should a person that committed the crime not be charged if caught?

Appeal to law fallacy. Don't make me you pull you by the nose into the enlightened zone.

Because the people that do that are call gardas and are doing their jobs.

Just doing my job Sir. Can you think of a time when that lame excuse got you hanged?

Why should your granny who funds and encourages gang activity get away with being a bottom feeder?

Why should the person who tries to deny her acces to something that she enjoys not be considered an utter scumbag?

It lost all sense why the gay aliens showed up to watch your drug dealing granny get kidnapped by shellfish, crayfish, starfish, snails and sea cucumbers

This isn't funny. Don't try to make a living as a comedian - you'll fail miserably.

SparkySpitfire · 13-10-2013 04:14AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Jester252 wrote: »

Right or wrong have no connection to legal or illegal

It doesn't matter. If scumbags want to ban stuff for its being addictive then those scumbags should ban lots of stuff.

When a person who has no interest in hurting another human being is put in jail for a moral crime what is it only kidnap? Would you advocate that a child be deprived of his Dad because he choose marijuana over fermented plants? Another simple question you can't answer because of your pussy-ass conservitardism.

Appeal to law fallacy. Don't make me you pull you by the nose into the enlightened zone.

Just doing my job Sir. Can you think of a time when that lame excuse got you hanged?

Why should the person who tries to deny her acces to something that she enjoys not be considered an utter scumbag?

This isn't funny. Don't try to make a living as a comedian - you'll fail miserably.

You were so adamant that someone answer your "granny" question, so stop avoiding the addictive question.

You know why the other posters are trying to be "comedians"? Because this thread is a joke with your legalize weed agenda.

Esel · 13-10-2013 04:30AM

1. You lost any moral high ground that you may have held when you brought aliens into the equation. Unless you meant illegal aliens.

2. Can I have your granny's number? I promise not to kick, kidnap etc.

PopePalpatine · 13-10-2013 08:40AM

The Waily Mail and Waily Express.

Annasopra · 13-10-2013 09:19AM

My head hurts - this thread is just mindless gibberish

biko · 13-10-2013 10:14AM

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Jeremy Kyle and Jerry springer are bottom feeders.
Dog the Bounty is a bottom feeder.
Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Can you think of any other examples of bottom feeders?

So you make some wild arbitrary statements and we're just supposed to agree and add more?

Did you just get nabbed by the gardai with illegal drugs on you?

Bottom feeders.

Comments