Bottom feeders.

Karl Stein

Jeremy Kyle and Jerry springer are bottom feeders.
Dog the Bounty is a bottom feeder.
Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Can you think of any other examples of bottom feeders?

wazky

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Since when did parsnips become illegal!?

electrobanana

Thanks whores

For Forks Sake

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Jeremy Kyle and Jerry springer are bottom feeders.
Dog the Bounty is a bottom feeder.
Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Can you think of any other examples of bottom feeders?

Something, something, fish.

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy

Them two out of 2 girls 1 cup

Sulla Felix

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Surely you mean: voluntarily taking part in an illegal industry that brings misery to millions worldwide just to make a quick buck is bottom feeding.

KKkitty

Louis Walsh

Karl Stein

Sulla Felix wrote: »

Surely you mean: voluntarily taking part in an illegal industry that brings misery to millions worldwide just to make a quick buck is bottom feeding.

No. I mean that those who make a living out of peaceful people's lifestyle choices are bottom feeders.

Illegal =/= immoral.

Red Kev

8-10 pints of Guinness followed by an Iskanders kebab has fed my bottom on a number of occasions.

The Backwards Man

I love a good arse, I do.:)

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy

KKkitty wrote: »

Louis Walsh

How come?

Pay day loan companies must fit the bill!

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Jeremy Kyle and Jerry springer are bottom feeders.
Dog the Bounty is a bottom feeder.
Busting young people for possession of illegal vegetation is bottom feeding.

Can you think of any other examples of bottom feeders?

See this could've been a thread about bottom feeders if you hadn't included that "illegal vegetation" nonsense.


He's a bounty hunter, so he captures criminals after they've skipped bail for growing green because it's umm... illegal!

gammygils

Johnny Electricity wrote: »

How come?

Because he loves a good arse! Male of course!

LETHAL LADY

Joe Duffy and Seamus Martin.

Renegade Mechanic

Psychics

Jimoslimos

2/3rds of The Human Centipede

(must resist obvious pun...)

stmol32

electrobanana wrote: »

Thanks whores

Fair play to you man, you're spot on.

I never give my whores the thanks they deserve for all the horrible shamefully degrading things i make them do for only little a bit of money.

Cee-Jay-Cee

Haddock, bass, carp, and bream are all bottom feeders.

Karl Stein

Czarcasm wrote: »

See this could've been a thread about bottom feeders if you hadn't included that "illegal vegetation" nonsense.

So you think that making criminals out of people because of their choice of drug doesn't create misery and isn't bottom feeding? Do me a favour - watch COPS and see how much of their work is bottom feeding that btw most cops know is a waste of the public's money.

He's a bounty hunter, so he captures criminals after they've skipped bail for growing green because it's umm... illegal!

He's a bum-catcher. He catches down-and-outs and profits from their misery.

CJC999

CJC999 wrote: »

Haddock, bass, carp, and bream are all bottom feeders.

Fishy! :pac:

Jester252

Charlie Rock wrote: »

So you think that making criminals out of people because of their choice of drug doesn't create misery and isn't bottom feeding? Do me a favour - watch COPS and see how much of their work is bottom feeding that btw most cops know is a waste of the public's money.



He's a bum-catcher. He catches down-and-outs and profits from their misery.

What about the family and victims of gang land crime?

As for Dog the "down and outs" are people who skipped bail.

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

So you think that making criminals out of people because of their choice of drug doesn't create misery and isn't bottom feeding? Do me a favour - watch COPS and see how much of their work is bottom feeding that btw most cops know is a waste of the public's money.

He's a bum-catcher. He catches down-and-outs and profits from their misery.

Charlie stop watching shìte tv! :pac:


Bottom feeders - Producers of shìte tv.

Czarcasm

Czarcasm wrote: »

Charlie stop watching shìte tv! :pac:


Bottom feeders - Producers of shìte tv.

You know that you've hit bottom when you look forward to watching that stuff.

Karl Stein

Jester252 wrote: »

What about the family and victims of gang land crime?

Stop giving them a revenue stream by criminalising normal behaviour and making criminals out of peaceful people.

As for Dog the "down and outs" are people who skipped bail.

Your hero makes a living off desperate people. The vast majority of the people your hero makes a living from need treatment not prison.

Karl Stein

Czarcasm wrote: »

Charlie stop watching shìte tv! :pac:


Bottom feeders - Producers of shìte tv.

I watched it once or twice and and concluded that DTBH is a bottom feeding scumbag who's worse than the vast majority of people he makes a living from.

Charlie Rock

Charlie Rock wrote: »

I watched it once or twice and and concluded that DTBH is a bottom feeding scumbag who's worse than the vast majority of people he makes a living from.

From what I've heard, he's a classic "poacher turned gamekeeper" type.

Ruu

Litter patrol, little bollox in his van taking pictures of cigarette butts on the ground!

Nearly as bad as the little feckers in their vans with their cameras parked just around the bend!

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

I watched it once or twice and and concluded that DTBH is a bottom feeding scumbag who's worse than the vast majority of people he makes a living from.

Charlie if you'd like to come spend the day with me I can introduce you to plenty of people who are far from the peace loving normal people you describe, many of whom society would consider scumbags, because they have to find some way to pay bottom feeding scumbags for their "illegal vegetation".

DTBH, COPS, Jeremy Kyle and Jerry Springer are shìte tv shows aimed at complete luddites who are actually foolish enough to take them seriously.

Jester252

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Stop giving them a revenue stream by criminalising normal behaviour and making criminals out of peaceful people.

That a reason for legalization not possession. If you have any weed right now you knowingly supported a criminal gang. People who support criminal are bottom feeders.

Your hero makes a living off desperate people. The vast majority of the people your hero makes a living from need treatment not prison.

The vast majority committed a crime and than took a loan to go on the run. Should they just be let off?

GerB40

The scumbags who rob shît from cemeteries. Im in no way religious but have some respect you filthy wánkers..

darlett

Deleted User wrote: »

Nearly as bad as the little feckers in their vans with their cameras parked just around the bend!

One of them little bolloxs cut me (travelling below the 80km limit at that time!) off a couple of weeks ago resulting in me having to break bloody hard. I flashed the ****er a few times and a wee bit later he pulled in. To set up his van to catch the killers doing 61 in a 61km zone. I 'heart' him.

The dirty hypocritical illegal incapable driving bollox.

downonthefarm

people who rob off the elderly ,that show cheaters,them chuggers,people who sponge off the state,john gilligan,tony feloni
the fsa,

Karl Stein

Jester252 wrote: »

That a reason for legalization not possession.

Absolutely.

If you have any weed right now you knowingly supported a criminal gang.

If you support making criminals out of peaceful people you're worse than any criminal gang.

People who support criminal are bottom feeders.

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Cody Pomeray

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

Cody Pomeray

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

Well you're looking into a bottomless pit using that logic!
Just look at all "exported jobs" to Asia, just so you can get cheap jeans in the discount shops.

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Yeah Charlie, fairness now, all those weed growing grannies with their arthritis, sure they haven't a hope of making a run for it really, do they?

Because grannies when they're not knitting shredded wheat like to tend to their acres of herb gardens out the back of their little whitewashed thatch cottages...

Stop for Christ sake :pac:

Jester252

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If you support making criminals out of peaceful people you're worse than any criminal gang.

Right now possession of an illegal drug is against the law. I doubt many of these "peaceful people" don't know that possession is illegal
Is weed addictive?

People who support making criminals out of peaceful people for their choice of drug are despicable scum. If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple yes/no answer will suffice.

Its not "kidnapping" its arresting her relax on the amateur dramatics. Growing weed is against the law for now. In theory everyone is equal in front of the court. So should a major gangster be allowed to continue his weed growing operation along with all the nasty side effects that such an operation brings?

Karl Stein

Czarcasm wrote: »

Stop for Christ sake :pac:

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

KERSPLAT!

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

Yes





:pac:

Karl Stein

Jester252 wrote: »

Right now possession of an illegal drug is against the law. I doubt many of these "peaceful people" don't know that possession is illegal

Appeal to law fallacy. You might want to google that.

Is weed addictive?

It doesn't matter. How we treat addicts does.

Its not "kidnapping" its arresting her relax on the amateur dramatics.

It is kidnapping. If an alien was watcing it they would see a peaceful person being kidnapped.

In theory everyone is equal in front of the court.

Bollocks. This is demonstrably incorrect. Tell Gay couples who want to adopt that everyone is equal. Tell people who want to grow weed instead of brew beer that they are equal.

So should a major gangster be allowed to continue his weed growing operation along with all the nasty side effects that such an operation brings?

The nasty side effects are due to illegality. When was the last time there was a shoot-out between people selling the alcohol drug?

KERSPLAT!

Aliens!? You on the ganja yourself?

Karl Stein

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

Yes :pac:

People who would support that are the real scumbags though.

cooperguy

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

any person who can co-erce labour into working for less than the value of his work?

the fat potato farmer who hires young lads to harvest his crop. bottom feeder.
the factory owner who can oversee shareholder profits ,whilst paying labourers the minimum he can get away with. bottom feeder.
the property owner who uses his inherited wealth to extract rents from students and low paid workers. bottom feeder.

it's hard to know where the list ends tbh.

any man who is born into debt owes that debt to a bottom feeder.

What you are describing there is somebody who is providing accommodation to people who either dont want to or cant afford to buy their own. Nothing wrong with that.

Karl Stein

Princess Petulia Pissy Pants wrote: »

You on the ganja yourself?

Are you accusing me of being involved in criminal activity?

Are you calling me a criminal?

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

If my Granny was growing some weed for her arthritis would you support that people could kick down her door, kidnap her, and lock her in a room?

Simple question.

Wait a minute, we've gone from Jeremy Kyle and Jerry Springer to a TV show bounty hunter who legally apprehends bail jumpers... to your granny growing weed being kidnapped by illegal aliens?


I'm getting the munchies for Mexican bail jumping beans now

Karl Stein

Czarcasm wrote: »

Wait a minute, we've gone from Jeremy Kyle and Jerry Springer to a TV show bounty hunter who legally apprehends bail jumpers... to your granny growing weed being kidnapped by illegal aliens

Lol, hah ha, ah hah lol, jail, ruined lives, lol people profiting from misery, hehe lol.

Jester252

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Appeal to law fallacy. You might want to google that.

Maybe you should look it up.
Right/wrong and illegal/legal are not linked. Its doesn't make is right to break a wrong law.

It doesn't matter. How we treat addicts does.

Does someone have an overbearing need to smoke weed like smoke tobacco and alcohol.

It is kidnapping. If an alien was watcing it they would see a peaceful person being kidnapped.

So we shouldn't "kidnap" people who have sex with kids?

Bollocks. This is demonstrably incorrect. Tell Gay couples who want to adopt that everyone is equal. Tell people who want to grow weed instead of brew beer that they are equal.

I see you forgot the word theory in my sentence. I suggest you look up Irish adoption laws. A single person or a married couple can adopt. As for the weed/beer equality "issue"
Weed illegal for now
Beer legal for now
Do I need to explain it to you again?

Why should your grandmother get away with committing a crime?

The nasty side effects are due to illegality. When was the last time there was a shoot-out between people selling the alcohol drug?

Yet again that an argument for legalization not for doing it. Why should your granny not be held to the same standards as other people in Ireland?

Karl Stein

Jester252 wrote: »

Maybe you should look it up.
Right/wrong and illegal/legal are not linked. Its doesn't make is right to break a wrong law.

What is this gibberish? It makes no sense.

Does someone have an overbearing need to smoke weed like smoke tobacco and alcohol.

What? Does someone have an overbearing compulsion to stop them?

So we shouldn't "kidnap" people who have sex with kids?

Yes because they're hurting children who need to be protected. This is so typical of numb-skulls with a dead-end argument.

I suggest you look up Irish adoption laws. A single person or a married couple can adopt.

You've avoided gay people there I see.

As for the weed/beer equality "issue"
Weed illegal for now
Beer legal for now
Do I need to explain it to you again?

*sigh*

Appeal to law fallacy. Google how bad your 'logic' is.

Why should your grandmother get away with committing a crime?

Why should people who want to kick her door down, kidnap her and lock her in a room get away with being the bottom feeders they are?

Yet again that an argument for legalization not for doing it.

What? Make sense.

Why should your granny not be held to the same standards as other people in Ireland?

She isn't. She's being treated as a criminal because people like you have limited understanding of how hypocritical you are.

Czarcasm

Charlie Rock wrote: »

Lol, hah ha, ah hah lol, jail, ruined lives, lol people profiting from misery, hehe lol.

You think drug dealers are peace loving types?

There are far more ruined lives caused by people profiting from misery than there are grannies growing their own personal stash and smoking green for their arthritis.

If this was yet another attempt at a "legalise weed" thread, tbh Charlie twas a piss poor effort, made even worse by the fact that you're all over the place with your gay aliens.