Do girls think its ok to kick boys in the nuts?

rubadub wrote: »

Some people have this puzzling rule of "you should never hit a woman", when questioned further it often turns out the rule they really mean is actually "you should never hit somebody weaker than you". So these people are being prejudiced/sexist in their presumption that women will be weaker than men.

I'll try answer this post for you rubadub best I can, because I can only speak from my own perspective. My own belief that a man should never hit a woman is just that- under no circumstances should a man ever hit a woman. It's not just that men are generally physically stronger, it's just a scummy thing to do.

A few months of weight training and you can increase your strength very significantly, as weight training for women is more popular these days there must a lot of women out there these days who are stronger than the average untrained male. So it seems weird that people still stick to this sexist notion, and why they do not say the rule they really mean.

Weight training has also increased in popularity for men, so there must be a lot of men out there that are stronger than your average untrained male, and certainly stronger than your average untrained female. See how that works?

The rule is very strange, as it is usually stated after a weak person hits a stronger person. Why did they hit them? on the presumption the victim will also follow this ridiculous rule and will not retaliate? Do unto others and all that.

Do unto others what? Some men don't know how to behave like men and some women don't know how to behave like women, there's nothing surprising or puzzling about that.

How do you determine if the person is stronger that you, and therefore fair game for a beating, do they have an armwrestle or something? Do they take weapons into account, is it just a stronger person or one with the greater advantage at that time which you must not hit. If the hammer drops do you have to stop. If the weak woman/man hits you is it acceptable to put one hand behind your back to be on a level pegging, and then start a fair fight back? Can you hand the weak person a big stick and then beat the crap out of them.

This is one I can't answer as there are far too many silly hypotheticals to even consider. Suffice to say I've always advocated restraining the person rather than beating them. Only once have I ever broken that rule, when after months of intimidation, this particular chap I worked with he made threats against my wife. He got €16k in compensation and no permanent injuries.

My old man was twice my size at 26 stone and 6ft 8in could inflict serious physical damage when he wanted to, and only once did I fight back against him too, and once he was down, I didn't see any need to finish him off, much as part of me wanted to.

I was up in Dublin a couple of months back and standing at George's Quay waiting for the bus when a young lad tried to whip my phone out of my hand. I was having none of it and managed to restrain him when two more young lads came out of nowhere and proceeded to kick seven shades out of me. I was at a disadvantage being on crutches, they got away with the phone, but they didn't manage to get their hands on my laptop in my backpack.

So as you can see, for me personally, it isn't just about who's weaker or who's stronger - it's about using appropriate force to neutralise the immediate threat.

I still meet the guy I used work with around town, and he's still an arrogant little prick, but because I don't consider him an immediate threat any more, I don't entertain his nonsense.

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Ok.

I take it you would be of the same opinion if a woman shoved her vag in a mans face.

Would it be ok for him to give her a wallop to the box?

If some woman shoved her vag in my face I would eat that bitch out.


non AH answer :-I've kicked two guys in the nuts in my life so far, first was my bro who thought he was Bruce Lee when he was young and I used to be his sparring partner when we were about same age as the kids in the story. It was childs play but I never felt lesser than his equal and responded with the same level of determination as he did, which one day led to him receiving a kick in the nuts. My pa went ape****. (for the life of me I couldn't understand why, it was perfectly acceptable to be on the receiving end of my bro's punches/throws and in my mind he should have been able to take one in return)

The other one was a guy who had physically assaulted me on several occasions previously. He deserved several kicks in the nuts but unfortunately I didn't connect well enough to down him.


If today some guy shoved his cock in my face and told me to talk to it I'd go tell one of my male friends and let him deal with it.
If some woman shoved her vajayjay in my face and told me to talk to it, I would whisper sweet nothings to it and ask her did she like it. (or tell her to fcuk off, depends on the nature of her asking)

I'm amazed at the amount of ignorance being displayed in this thread about NUTS. Could we please have some input from Vegans (or at least Vegetarians/Fruitarians) to give a little balance.
On a more serious note ......... an obese friend of mine got into a heated debate with a female heavyweight at his very first Weightwatchers meeting. Resulted in pushing/shoving, insults traded 'til eventually she managed to lift her leg high enough to give him a kick in the ball-sack. Long story short ......... he lost a stone in ICU the following day. Even by Weightwatchers standards this has got to be success gone wild.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Bad parenting is allowing your Children to watch unsuitable TV and play unsuitable computer games and have unsupervised access to the internet !

I've seen Children as young as 5 having complete access to sky tv in their bedrooms, not that alone says a lot.

It doesn't really, my child has had his own Sky box in his bedroom since he was four, because I couldn't be arsed watching any more Disney, Tiny Pop and Cbeebies. He doesn't bother with the 900+ channels as he has no interest in them.

He also has his own laptop and mobile phone with unrestricted access to the internet and he has no interest in pornography. He uses the internet for educational as well as entertainment purposes.

In his school they have the most useless filters known to man, provided by HEANET, and children as young as six and seven are able to proxy and VPN past the filters, just to be able to say they can, not because they want to access pornography.

There's far too much of this "won't somebody think of the children" nonsense about nowadays, when what they should really be focussing on is "won't the parents take some responsibility and not be expecting everyone else to do it for them!".

If the parents of the boy in this story had taught him that his behaviour was wrong, he never would've gotten punched in the nuts. The woman who is proud of her "dick punching daughter" shouldn't be encouraged either as her philosophy is just as dim witted as the parents who didn't take responsibility for teaching their child the meaning of manners and respect for other people.

Czarcasm wrote: »

A boy could possibly do the very same thing Dave in fairness by sitting on a persons face!

Exactly, its still a threat.

Czarcasm wrote: »

This is getting a bit silly now but honestly, which of the sexes do you think would generally be more capable of sitting on a person's face? A person would have to be able to restrain the person first, then get them down on the ground, pin their arms down with your knees, and even then a man will be more capable than a woman of flipping her off.

We're not talking the extremes of a BBW and a seven stone wisp. We're talking your average guy and girl. Men are generally speaking physically bigger in stature and strength than women, and to try and say a man should be able to punch a woman if she punches him is just crazy IMO. It's crazy and it's a justification to be a scumbag.

If that's what anyone would consider equality and political correctness, then I'm quite satisfied to have no part in it. I have no problem being considered sexist if it means I'm against the idea of advocating men becoming scumbags.

I don't see it as been crazy at all. What is a man supposed to do if a woman attacks him on the street or if she keeps punching him repeatedly? Should he just take it?

This sort of thinking is a big problem. If a woman slaps a man in a night club or gropes him, nothing is done about it. In the reverse situation the man would be thrown out immediately. Now I'm not saying a man should punch every woman he gets into an altercation with, but there's no reason why anyone, (man or woman) should have to put up with that sort of assault.

pharmaton wrote: »

if someone is assaulted by somebody else, male of female they should report it ffs, what is the problem here? This isn't about gender, this is about assault. If you want to punch someone back after they punch you go for it, if you don't contact the gardaí, it's that easy.

100% agreed, although the gardai may be of little help depending on the situation.

tritium wrote: »

So do you think that an environment where her mother celebrates an act of violence on her daughters part is a healthy stable environment where she is likely to have the supports to turn into a balanced member if society?




There's no assumption here beyond that the little girls story is accurate. Its simple, its excessive to assault someone just because you feel they insulted or humiliated you- you should realise this given your € 16k example later in this thread. Once the daughter hits age of legal responsibility, actions like this have a tendency to earn a criminal record. And no it will likely not be seen as porportionate by a judge who has to weigh up the level of threat she faced. If you don't believe me then Google one of the many assault convictions in this country that are based on the same "I felt insulted " premise


No on that thread I see a story of someone who was actually assaulted and did use a proportionate level of force to defend themselves - notwithstanding the bragging element there's not a hope in hell they could be convicted for assault for what they did. Not the difference; porportionate response to the level of threat. As opposed to a ten year old receiving praise from her mum for behaving like a thug



I guess your OK with beating children who misbehave too. We differ on that....



I think it's wholly unreasonable to question it seeing as there are potentially limitless answers to limitless possible scenarios and you could very easily end up saying things like "but what if the boy had tried to have anal sex with her while dressed in a gimp suit?", "ohh well in that case I'd run the little fcuker over with an army tank"...

Like I suggested earlier, lets try and keep the discussion somewhat within the bounds of reality.

[/QUOTE]
I don't know what country you're living in but if the boy performed the same act at 16 it would be considered a sexual assault. Whether a judge would find her response an act of self defense is debatable but legitimate. This is not a one sided event and while you can manage to muster a musing of a violent woman somewhere down the line, by the same token the boy could well be considered a sexual offender at a later age.

Daveysil15 wrote: »

I don't see it as been crazy at all. What is a man supposed to do if a woman attacks him on the street or if she keeps punching him repeatedly? Should he just take it?

If he has the ability to hit her, he also has the ability to restrain her.

This sort of thinking is a big problem. If a woman slaps a man in a night club or gropes him, nothing is done about it. In the reverse situation the man would be thrown out immediately. Now I'm not saying a man should punch every woman he gets into an altercation with, but there's no reason why anyone, (man or woman) should have to put up with that sort of assault.

I've worked as a bouncer in various clubs and I've never experienced an instance where a girl would launch an unprovoked attack on a guy, but there have been plenty of times I'd see a girl slap a guy and by the time I'd got over there to break it up, the guy would've laid her out with a punch.

I've also had to escort girls out of the club and while restraining them, you could have two or three of her friends pulling out of you and punching you and a couple of times I'd have had to fend off a stiletto to the face.

I've worked with bouncers who used conceal razor blades under their jacket lapels just in case a guy grabbed them for a headbutt. I've told them that as well as being illegal, the blades are just a scummy idea.

You're right Dave, nobody should have to put up with that sort of assault, but men very, very rarely ever report or complain that they've been assaulted, and tbh those that did, were just looking to have the girl thrown out as opposed to actually having felt violated. Women were much more put out by the actual groping, whereas men were more put out that they were groped by a girl they didn't find attractive and were just being spiteful about it wanting her thrown out.

I found that the reason men who were groped weren't taken seriously was because they themselves were very petty about it.