Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why would anyone want to get married??

189101113

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 30,731 ✭✭✭✭princess-lala


    pharmaton wrote: »
    I love hearing about people who are happily married, gives me the warm feels.

    Its lovely to hear :D


  • Site Banned Posts: 51 ✭✭Tom M


    If you are forced to stay in a marriage it's not a commitment. Commitment is born of choice.

    If you give yourself the option to back out of your commitment then by definition you never made the commitment in the first place.

    If you tell yourself that you can leave the relationship if it gets really bad somehow then you haven't committed. If you commit to a choice you have to stick to it regardless, that's commitment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,390 ✭✭✭clairefontaine


    Tom M wrote: »
    If you give yourself the option to back out of your commitment then by definition you never made the commitment in the first place.

    If you tell yourself that you can leave the relationship if it gets really bad somehow then you haven't committed. If you commit to a choice you have to stick to it regardless, that's commitment.

    There is no such thing as "no matter what" in any kind of relationship, whether spousal, parental, sibling, romantic or friend.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    seenitall wrote: »
    How is it shifting goalposts to point out that divorce makes a bit of a mockery of the original idea of marriage ("til death do us part")? I knew you wouldn't like THAT, but calling it shifting goalposts is a tiiiiny bit off. I never said it's impossible to get out of a marriage either, so I don't know where you got that from. But the more traditional a society is, the more important it is to follow the script, to not question the institutions, and the harder it, and its laws (4 years separated before contemplating divorce??), will work at maintaining the status quo. (Not talking about Zanzibar here.)


    I think the idea of divorce is a great idea for those that feel they need it. I know plenty of people that are separated a lot longer than four years that still never bothered with divorce, and I was at the divorce party of one woman who used the four year technically separated but still living together to get a divorce from her husband not long after it became legal here. So I'm absolutely not opposed to divorce, what I am opposed to is this idea that people are forced to stay in situations they're not happy in. As you quite rightly point out- we're not living in Zanzibar.

    Divorce doesn't make a mockery of marriage either, because people who get married, don't do so with the intention of getting divorced. They're still making a commitment, but when circumstances change beyond a point where they are subjected to something they didn't sign up for (such as if one person breaks their marriage vows by cheating, etc), then they have changed the agreement, and so divorce is there as a means to dissolve the originally binding legal contract.

    Good point about the mortgage. Once that most, or even a big enough number of people renege on their mortgage commitments all at about the same time, though, something in the system will have to change accordingly. Things will not be able to just get done because that's the way they've always been done. I think your esteemed institution is on the way of change too, and that's a good thing. That's how it will survive. The divorce is the beginning.


    Ahh here seenitall, I think your inherent negative prejudices towards marriage may be coloring your judgement of my opinion. Marriage isn't MY "esteemed institution" at all. I'll be only too happy when the LGBT community has the same legal recognition of marriage as the heterosexual community. Off the top of my head I know of one lesbian couple who are legally married in another jurisdiction, but their marriage isn't legally recognised in this jurisdiction. The same for my brother in law and his boyfriend, they're due to be married in Scotland in the new year (fcukers keep putting it off, I hate travelling abroad so every time I get hyped up to go, they've put it off again! :pac:).

    They too will have the option of divorce should their relationship not work out.

    In other words, my point, that you keep missing somehow, is, personal responsibility or not, marriage is simply not as suited as it used to be, to the reality of modern life and the nature of a huge number of relationships nowadays. That's all. I'm not attacking you, your marriage, or anyone's decision to get married, especially. I may question it, but I find it lovely how well some marriages work and for how long they work. It's just that I find marriage a bit, uh, irrelevant these days, a bit redundant. But that's my opinion, only my opinion. wink.png


    Ahh I know you're not personally attacking or any of the rest of it seenitall, I still loves ya (don't worry, that's not a marriage proposal :pac:), and certainly I agree with you that the legislation and the definition of marriage needs to change to accommodate the needs of a modern society (they could do too with having a look at doing away with the separation clause in divorce laws and looking at family and adoption laws while they're at it!), but I think you're far wide of the mark in saying that marriage is redundant and irrelevant as an institution. The current legislation certainly is redundant and irrelevant in some quarters, but that's nothing that can't be changed and updated to reflect the changes in modern relationships in a modern society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Divorce doesn't make a mockery of marriage

    In your opinion. I deffo think it shows it up a bit, kinda. :P But anyway, this thread's been getting a bit semanticky and circles-running for a while, so I'll say no more.

    Happy marriages, singledoms, co-habitations and civil partnerships all round!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Tom M wrote: »
    If you commit to stay together for life that means to stick to it regardless. That's what commitment is, otherwise it's not commitment. Things change why make such huge commitment.


    Yeah, that only works though if the TWO people who made the commitment in the first place remain true to that commitment. Some people don't remain true to that commitment because they lack, well, as you say- commitment. So if one person breaks the terms of that commitment, then the other person has a choice as to whether they want to stay committed to that relationship, or not.

    Some people choose to stay committed to the relationship and try to work out their issues, some people choose to leave the relationship because the change in the nature of the relationship is not what they agreed to or signed up for so they cannot give it the same level of commitment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭JenEffy


    bizmark wrote: »
    Cause you love someone if you dont understand that then i feel deeply sorry for you

    Loving someone and wanting to be with them has nothing to do with actually getting married. I love my boyfriend but I don't need to have a ceremony to prove that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    people don't need a piece of paper to "commit" to each other. Marriage is an old fashioned idea geared towards taking care of the male, and is raplidy declining as there are all kinds of different "families" now.

    And before anyone says oh this is selfish and if you don't get married you cannot work out your problems..........people who are NOT married and live together have the freedom to walk away any time they want - they don't tho - they stay together for years and work out their problems too - its about love, not a contract.

    Get married if you wish - your choice - but remember life is long and people change - you are not the same person you were in your 20's and 40's. By all means get married, but start saving for the divorce once the marriage contract is signed. There are too many options in life now to not get divorced - we're not back in the dark ages anymore.

    THe only people that gain from people getting married are the salespeople who promote it and the priests that know nothing about marriage at all - won't see them for dust at the divorce. :D:D


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    THe only people that gain from people getting married are the salespeople who promote it and the priests that know nothing about marriage at all - won't see them for dust at the divorce. :D:D

    Well the majority of people who get married gain from it. From the enjoyment of the big day, to being officially with the person you want to spend your life with and being able to call them your husband or wife rather than "partner" and then there are all the legal gains from income tax infinitives to being the next of kin etc etc.

    I think a people saying they don't want to get married if they plan on spending their life with someone are doing so to be a bit rebellious, just doing something different and I'd imagine there is an anti-catholic sintement in there too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    Well the majority of people who get married gain from it. From the enjoyment of the big day, to being officially with the person you want to spend your life with and being able to call them your husband or wife rather than "partner" and then there are all the legal gains from income tax infinitives to being the next of kin etc etc.

    I think a people saying they don't want to get married if they plan on spending their life with someone are doing so to be a bit rebellious, just doing something different and I'd imagine there is an anti-catholic sintement in there too.[/QUOTE]

    I think a read through the thread would show that that is not the case. Valid and sensible reasons for not getting married have been presented, and religion has barely got a mention until this page


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    Well the majority of people who get married gain from it. From the enjoyment of the big day, to being officially with the person you want to spend your life with and being able to call them your husband or wife rather than "partner" and then there are all the legal gains from income tax infinitives to being the next of kin etc etc.

    I think a people saying they don't want to get married if they plan on spending their life with someone are doing so to be a bit rebellious, just doing something different and I'd imagine there is an anti-catholic sintement in there too.

    they may gain from it - they may think it will be bliss forever but it won't. Your husband/wife in your 20's is a lot different to your husband wife in your 40's. People grow and evolve. Why should people have to stay with one person for the rest of their lives - you only get once chance at life - live it.

    Anyone can have a "next of kin" - you don't have to be married for that.

    If you are only getting married for "income tax" reasons then fair enough - it means that the marriage is only on paper, but you can actually live your life the way you want.

    What's with the anti-catholic comment - marriage is not exclusive to catholicism - all kinds of religions gets married. However the catholic way is to endure all kinds of abuse but you gotta stay married, no matter what.As I say, more suited to the 1950's era.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    Pledges mean very little when you know you can get out of it anyway if the going gets tough. Nice to make a bit of money from the guests though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    people don't need a piece of paper to "commit" to each other. Marriage is an old fashioned idea geared towards taking care of the male, and is raplidy declining as there are all kinds of different "families" now.


    What utter nonsense. You do realise there's a fight going on for LGBT marriage equality don't you? LGBT people want to have the option to marry with the same rights as heterosexual couples. Marriage isn't going anywhere, and it was never "geared towards taking care of the male". Jesus, where do people come up with this stuff? :pac:

    And before anyone says oh this is selfish and if you don't get married you cannot work out your problems..........people who are NOT married and live together have the freedom to walk away any time they want - they don't tho - they stay together for years and work out their problems too - its about love, not a contract.


    As Tina Turner would say- "What's love got to do with it?". I don't love my wife any more or any less since I married her, and would have continued to love her regardless of marriage or not. BUT, marriage IS a contract that solidifies in law my rights, her rights, and the rights of our children. It's quite a powerful contract actually that has a lot less to do with love and a lot more to do with legal rights and responsibilities.

    Get married if you wish - your choice - but remember life is long and people change - you are not the same person you were in your 20's and 40's. By all means get married, but start saving for the divorce once the marriage contract is signed. There are too many options in life now to not get divorced - we're not back in the dark ages anymore.


    Why would anyone start saving for a divorce the minute they got married? Why would they add to their assets only to have them halved in a divorce settlement? I presume you've heard of DIY divorces that can be done on a shoestring? Divorce, just like marriage, is only as expensive as you make it.

    I think it's yourself is still stuck in the dark ages tbh, but I'm sure you meant plenty other options besides marriage? The only other way I know how to get out of a marriage contract besides divorce is if one or other parties to the contract were to die.

    THe only people that gain from people getting married are the salespeople who promote it and the priests that know nothing about marriage at all - won't see them for dust at the divorce. :D:D


    Yeah, that €20 backhander to the Registrar of Civil Marriages for keeping the ceremony short and simple really broke me. 15 minutes, no need for all the pomp and circumstance and my marriage is just as legally valid as my brother who spent €42k on a day out for the mother.

    See? Only as expensive as you make it, personal responsibility and all that jazz.


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    they may gain from it - they may think it will be bliss forever but it won't.

    I assume you know all these people intimately and are on the receiving end of their marital confidences. Otherwise making a statement like that is ridiculous.


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    they may gain from it - they may think it will be bliss forever but it won't. Your husband/wife in your 20's is a lot different to your husband wife in your 40's. People grow and evolve. Why should people have to stay with one person for the rest of their lives - you only get once chance at life - live it.

    How do you know it won't be bliss forever? The majority of marriages do last forever (i.e. until death) in case you hadn't noticed.

    As far as people changing, yes they change but that doesn't mean they will want to break up and by the time people get to their 50's do they really want to be going back on the market? Most are happy to have a companion as they get older rather than be alone.

    When you meet the right person maybe you will change your views on staying with the one person.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    nicegirl wrote: »
    I appreciate and respect your opinion, and thanks for your contribution. The reasons you stated are of course why many people get married, and all that, which is understandable.

    I'm the opposite though. Been stuck with the one person for the rest of your life. If children come along, you are completely stuck with that person - even if you love them.

    To me, its a ball and chain for life, effectively signing your life away bound legally, which also puts me off it.

    I have seen far too many marriages that are in absolute despair, and many many people cheating to see its the last thing I would do in my life. My opinion anyways.

    So it's not marriage you have a problem with, it's monogamy?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    What utter nonsense. You do realise there's a fight going on for LGBT marriage equality don't you? LGBT people want to have the option to marry with the same rights as heterosexual couples. Marriage isn't going anywhere, and it was never "geared towards taking care of the male". Jesus, where do people come up with this stuff? :pac:

    Having a "right" to do something does not mean that people are going to rush out and do it. Thats about equality - not marriage. Don't you get that. Marriage was always geared towards the male - leaving mammy doing all the work for him into a wife who did all the work for him - thankfully with EQUALITY that has now disappeared and the wife will tell him to do his own &*^^*^ laundry - sorry if that offends but it's true.



    As Tina Turner would say- "What's love got to do with it?". I don't love my wife any more or any less since I married her, and would have continued to love her regardless of marriage or not. BUT, marriage IS a contract that solidifies in law my rights, her rights, and the rights of our children. It's quite a powerful contract actually that has a lot less to do with love and a lot more to do with legal rights and responsibilities.

    go to a solicitor and get a contract drawn up - you don't have to marry someone to have "rights". Plenty of people live together and have contracts for "rights". Marriage is not the only solution to legalities





    Why would anyone start saving for a divorce the minute they got married? Why would they add to their assets only to have them halved in a divorce settlement? I presume you've heard of DIY divorces that can be done on a shoestring? Divorce, just like marriage, is only as expensive as you make it.

    you don't really know how this marriage/divorce thing goes, do you? being with someone for the rest of your life is un-natural - you only get one life - go and experience it - don't stick with the same person for the rest of your life if you are not happy. Live a little. It will be worth it. Don't get into a legal contract that you have to get out of later on and that will cost you. Don't endure - live!

    I think it's yourself is still stuck in the dark ages tbh, but I'm sure you meant plenty other options besides marriage? The only other way I know how to get out of a marriage contract besides divorce is if one or other parties to the contract were to die.

    divorce or death - you really are a marriage advocate. lol. I'd rather NOT get into the situation in the first place.





    Yeah, that €20 backhander to the Registrar of Civil Marriages for keeping the ceremony short and simple really broke me. 15 minutes, no need for all the pomp and circumstance and my marriage is just as legally valid as my brother who spent €42k on a day out for the mother.

    backhanders to the registrar - already you are cheating - you are going in to fill out a legal contract and you are giving backhanders at the door - if you can't stay straight on the actual day of your legal contract, then get saving for the divorce. :P:P

    See? Only as expensive as you make it, personal responsibility and all that jazz.

    or as cheap

    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    How do you know it won't be bliss forever? The majority of marriages do last forever (i.e. until death) in case you hadn't noticed.

    nothing is bliss forever - anyone that says any different is not being truthful - people like each other, hate each other, abuse each other, hurt each other - the difference is that people in a "marriage" seem to think they have to put up with it - they don't.

    As far as people changing, yes they change but that doesn't mean they will want to break up and by the time people get to their 50's do they really want to be going back on the market? Most are happy to have a companion as they get older rather than be alone.

    true - some people might want to settle in their 50's with a "companion" - others are having more fun in their 50's than they ever did in their 20's - why curtail that - life is for living - why settle for a 'companion'

    When you meet the right person maybe you will change your views on staying with the one person.

    I have and have been with that person for years - that is of course after meeting "not the right person" - but at least I had a choice .

    For those who want to get married - go ahead. For those who want to live their own lives the way they want without being legally bound to another person - go for it. I choose freedom myself :D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,816 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    For those who want to get married - go ahead. For those who want to live their own lives the way they want without being legally bound to another person - go for it. I choose freedom myself :D:D
    And nobody has suggested you should do any different. Get married if you want to. Don't if you don't want to.

    Most of the bile on this thread has been from people who not only don't want to get married, but want to insult/criticise those who do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    osarusan wrote: »
    Most of the bile on this thread has been from people who not only don't want to get married, but want to insult/criticise those who do.

    Funny, I got the same impression from the "If you don't want to get married, you're just being selfish/you just haven't met the right person yet" brigade.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    osarusan wrote: »
    And nobody has suggested you should do any different. Get married if you want to. Don't if you don't want to.

    Most of the bile on this thread has been from people who not only don't want to get married, but want to insult/criticise those who do.

    There are a few who hurl thinly veiled insults alright. But there are a fair few sanctamonious barbs thrown the other way as well, such as suggesting that the rest of us are immature, need to grow up, and will change our minds once we meet 'the one'. As though we just dont get it

    For the record, I am in my later 30's and have met the person I want to spend the future with, but neither of us wants to get married for all the reasons I already articulated. But I enjoy the weddings of those that do


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭StephenHendry


    sex on tap if you're lucky :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    sex on tap if you're lucky :P

    Can - worms - open! :eek::D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Wacker The Attacker


    To me, marriage is a glorified business arrangement loaded in favour of women in the majority of cases. They are guaranteed 50% of everything from the get go regardless of their contribution and, unless they are myra hindley, they are guaranteed custody of the kids in the event of divorce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    To me, marriage is a glorified business arrangement loaded in favour of women in the majority of cases. They are guaranteed 50% of everything from the get go regardless of their contribution and, unless they are myra hindley, they are guaranteed custody of the kids in the event of divorce.

    Yes, and it would be 'loaded in the favour of men' if women comprised the majority of the primary breadwinners, and men were seen as legitimate primary caregivers by this society.

    Also, if my auntie had balls, she'd be my uncle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭Wacker The Attacker


    seenitall wrote: »
    Yes, and it would be 'loaded in the favour of men' if women comprised the majority of the primary breadwinners, and men were seen as legitimate primary caregivers by this society.

    Also, if my auntie had balls, she'd be my uncle.


    What I stated is the way the cookie crumbles when it comes to divorce in this country.

    Any attempt to gloss over this is futile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭fishy fishy


    osarusan wrote: »
    And nobody has suggested you should do any different. Get married if you want to. Don't if you don't want to.

    Most of the bile on this thread has been from people who not only don't want to get married, but want to insult/criticise those who do.

    na, the people who don't believe in the marriage trap are way more chilled out than that. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    What I stated is the way the cookie crumbles when it comes to divorce in this country.

    Any attempt to gloss over this is futile.

    What I stated is the reason why the things are as they are in this country.

    Any attempt to dismiss it as glossing over anything is futile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,773 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    How do you know it won't be bliss forever? The majority of marriages do last forever (i.e. until death) in case you hadn't noticed.

    Do you have stats for that? Just because a marriage lasts until a person dies doesn't mean that it's happy. My parents hated each other. They had separate rooms. They stuck together because of the children and because it was the done thing.

    I'd say a lof of marriages are like that. Two people who hate each other but are stuck together until death because of societal, family or economic pressures.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭Splendour


    To me, marriage is a glorified business arrangement loaded in favour of women in the majority of cases. They are guaranteed 50% of everything from the get go regardless of their contribution and, unless they are myra hindley, they are guaranteed custody of the kids in the event of divorce.

    Usually joint custody is given.


Advertisement