Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What happened to TV3 HD ?

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭channelsurfer2


    tv3 is not a public service broadcaster so wont spend money if it feels that its not worth their while. In fairness to them(and I dont often defend them) why should they pay a vast amount of money for transmission on mux two to 2RN. that being said I will continue to enjoy all the tv3 programmes on ITVHD instead, when that option is available.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,493 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    But they should pay 2RN (RTE NL) for Saorview, and it should be a condition of all broadcasters in the state to broadcast on Saorview.

    (... and pay transmission charges!)

    Just for clarity, the TV channels pay a multiplexing charge (the DTT Tariff) to a licensed/contracted multiplex operator for carriage on a multiplex, currently RTÉ are the only licensed DTT multiplex operator.

    The licensed/contracted multiplex operator in turn enters into a separate contract with 2RN/RTÉNL for broadcast transmission and distribution.

    All there in the Comreg Decision document we discussed earlier in the thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,068 ✭✭✭✭lertsnim


    If they aren't paying for DTT then they should be dropped from it and their licence scrapped


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    As was well vented at the time, the whole DTT launch was mishandled. (No surprise there!)

    Saorview was launched in May 2011, but not really as TV3 refused to pay carriage on it. RTE NL should have dropped them from it there and then, or dropped them from the analogue legacy service, but that was not allowed to happen. Neither actually happened because the analogue 'legacy' service was considered by all the operators, RTE, TG4, TV3, BAI and Comreg to be THE service with the launch part of the never ending 'trial'. The real launch would happen when the analogue service was turned off.

    Meanwhile TV3 said 'Can't pay, wont pay', which was probably true, which is where we are today.

    TV3 never fail to threaten to sue RTE (but never actually do so), to complain about the 'unfair' division of licence money, to complain about the 'unfair' monopoly that RTE has over advertising, etc. etc. No mention of TV3's parked debt to NAMA, nor their failure to pay for DTT. Nor their utter dependancy on ITV originated programming. They have been trumpeting on about their HD Studio for over a year now, but no HD service yet.

    Whatever did happen to TV3 HD?

    Whatever happened to RTE NN? It took two years for RTE to actually mention it on air. It was on DTT being broadcast but nowhere else in RTE. Sean O'Rourke, after the ASO on the One O'Clock News (The World at One) mentioned the 'NEW' channel RTE News Now, and him in the newsroom! It had only been on the air for two years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    But they should pay 2RN (RTE NL) for Saorview, and it should be a condition of all broadcasters in the state to broadcast on Saorview.

    (... and pay transmission charges!)
    Of course you are right, a date should be giving to TV3 and if that date is passed without all outstanding fees being paid then TV3 should be taken off Saorview... after another period of time say a month after they should also be given a date where their current broadcasting licence would be suspended by the BAI.

    I do though think that no Irish channel should pay be be on the sky platform, sky make massive money out of the fact RTE,TV3 and TG4 are available... they should continue to play hardball with sky and if it came to it threaten to leave the platform if sky ever wanted them to pay costs.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    TV3 having a HD channel on Saorview (and indeed 3e HD) should still be cheaper than paying for their analogue channel, so "can't pay, won't pay" is hardly an excuse unless they were not paying for analogue carriage either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    byte wrote: »
    TV3 having a HD channel on Saorview (and indeed 3e HD) should still be cheaper than paying for their analogue channel, so "can't pay, won't pay" is hardly an excuse unless they were not paying for analogue carriage either.
    ... its TV3, they are a joke of a broadcaster who prefer to give out about RTÉ rather then actually making programmes that people might actually want to watch.... the sooner they realise that people don't want to watch celebrity trash television the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,068 ✭✭✭✭lertsnim


    irishfeen wrote: »
    I do though think that no Irish channel should pay be be on the sky platform, sky make massive money out of the fact RTE,TV3 and TG4 are available... they should continue to play hardball with sky and if it came to it threaten to leave the platform if sky ever wanted them to pay costs.

    I did read about the BBC saying that Sky should be paying them to be on their platform. Interested to see how that pans out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    lertsnim wrote: »
    I did read about the BBC saying that Sky should be paying them to be on their platform. Interested to see how that pans out.
    I think that was about paying for the carriage fees, the BBC want the equivalent of what sky are doing for RTÉ, TV3 and TG4. To be honest the Irish channels should come together to get an even better deal because without the Irish channels sky would loose tens of thousands of customers over a very short space of time... Sky needs the Irish channels much more then the Irish channels need sky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Sky will be slow to take up TV3 HD if it does not provide what Sky consider a full HD service. In the case of RTÉ TWO HD it took the summer of 2012 before theY even considered it a HD channel, and that was down to sporting events such as GAA, EURO 2012 and The London Olympic Games.

    TV3 are unlike to move their massive amount of daytime programmes into the new HD Studio, as TV3 plan to use this to film HD products away from TV3 as a broadcaster, e.g. RTÉ's School Around The Corner, a BBC science show. TV3 will need to upgrade their older studio to HD.

    Note the changes to TV3's daytime schedule

    07:00 - 08:00 Ireland AM with Anton Savage
    08:00 - 10:45 Ireland AM
    10:45 - 11:45 Human Bearbating with with Jeremy Kyle
    11:45 - 12:45 Midday
    12:45 - 13:00 News at 12:45 (Rather than The 12:45 :rolleyes:)
    13:00 - 14:00 Ellen (so something similar)
    14:00 - 16:00 Late Lunch Live with Martin King and Lucy Kennedy
    16:00 - 17:30 Soap Repeats ???
    17:30 - 18:00 The 5:30 (Because they is so hip)
    18:00 - 18:30 Xposé

    That's nearly the whole day and they can't possible afford to bring them into a Studio they plan to use to for hire.

    UPC might take TV3 HD but only because it is desperately looking for HD services. Surprising that UPC have yet to make an agreement with Sky for their HD channels when their recently acquired Virgin Media operator in the UK has benefited from sky's HD services.
    tv3 is not a public service broadcaster so wont spend money if it feels that its not worth their while. In fairness to them(and I dont often defend them) why should they pay a vast amount of money for transmission on mux two to 2RN. that being said I will continue to enjoy all the tv3 programmes on ITVHD instead, when that option is available.

    Why did they ask for 3E to go to Channel 5 on Saorview? IMO 3E has only grown in the last year due to their availability on Soarview.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    Elmo wrote: »
    Sky will be slow to take up TV3 HD if it does not provide what Sky consider a full HD service. In the case of RTÉ TWO HD it took the summer of 2012 before theY even considered it a HD channel, and that was down to sporting events such as GAA, EURO 2012 and The London Olympic Games.

    TV3 are unlike to move their massive amount of daytime programmes into the new HD Studio, as TV3 plan to use this to film HD products away from TV3 as a broadcaster, e.g. RTÉ's School Around The Corner, a BBC science show. TV3 will need to upgrade their older studio to HD.

    Note the changes to TV3's daytime schedule

    07:00 - 08:00 Ireland AM with Anton Savage
    08:00 - 10:45 Ireland AM
    10:45 - 11:45 Human Bearbating with with Jeremy Kyle
    11:45 - 12:45 Midday
    12:45 - 13:00 News at 12:45 (Rather than The 12:45 :rolleyes:)
    13:00 - 14:00 Ellen (so something similar)
    14:00 - 16:00 Late Lunch Live with Martin King and Lucy Kennedy
    16:00 - 17:30 Soap Repeats ???
    17:30 - 18:00 The 5:30 (Because they is so hip)
    18:00 - 18:30 Xposé

    That's nearly the whole day and they can't possible afford to bring them into a Studio they plan to use to for hire.

    UPC might take TV3 HD but only because it is desperately looking for HD services. Surprising that UPC have yet to make an agreement with Sky for their HD channels when their recently acquired Virgin Media operator in the UK has benefited from sky's HD services.



    Why did they ask for 3E to go to Channel 5 on Saorview? IMO 3E has only grown in the last year due to their availability on Soarview.
    Surely though with Emmerdale, Coronation street, all the other ITV imports, films and CL/EL matches in HD then they would cover the minimum native HD broadcasting arrangements set out by sky.

    From Sky -(http://corporate.sky.com/documents/pdf/20c24d2e1c62406594e1a79de5f917db/Allocating_listings_EPG
    the channel may include no less than 320 hours of nonrepeating native HD programmes in each 12 month period
    provided that the channel includes no less than 70 hours of
    non-repeating native HD programmes in each 3 month
    period

    ... they would easily cover them numbers with ITV imports alone.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Unless UTV gets the all-Ireland rights to ITV programmes. They could then apply for a Saorview licence for UTV HD, and its bye-bye TV3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    Unless UTV gets the all-Ireland rights to ITV programmes. They could then apply for a Saorview licence for UTV HD, and its bye-bye TV3.
    To be honest it seems to be all unfounded rumours about UTV launching down here... I have never heard them come out and actually say they are interested in any real way about entering the Irish television market.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Yes, but they are heavily invested in radio in the republic. Makes sense to have a UTV Ireland channel. It improves ad revenue, and could add radio plugs for TV programmes. Would be cheap to set-up as they already have the infrastructure in NI to start with, together with radio studios around the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Yes, but they are heavily invested in radio in the republic. Makes sense to have a UTV Ireland channel. It improves ad revenue, and could add radio plugs for TV programmes. Would be cheap to set-up as they already have the infrastructure in NI to start with, together with radio studios around the country.

    The last rumour I heard was UTV eyeing up the TV3 debt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Small mention of TV3 HD in an interview with marketing.ie from Pat Keily

    http://blog.marketing.ie/?p=15854
    Kiely said TV3 expects to roll out HD in a few years from now.

    What is a few years?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭channelsurfer2


    Elmo wrote: »
    Small mention of TV3 HD in an interview with marketing.ie from Pat Keily

    http://blog.marketing.ie/?p=15854



    What is a few years?

    they might not even be around in a few years???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,068 ✭✭✭✭lertsnim


    In other words, "we will launch TV3 HD if someone pays for it"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭Rick_


    The way I read it, it was more like

    "TV 3 HD will never launch".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭channelsurfer2


    Paddy C wrote: »
    The way I read it, it was more like

    "TV 3 HD will never launch".

    It is dead in the water if UTV take most of the main primetime advertising revenue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭mackersdublin


    Paddy C wrote: »
    The way I read it, it was more like

    "TV3 HD will never launch".

    Why on earth did they spend so much money on their Sony HD studios, if they might launch a HD channel in a few years...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    Why on earth did they spend so much money on their Sony HD studios, if they might launch a HD channel in a few years...
    Its TV3! - don't ask stupid questions like that :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    Why on earth did they spend so much money on their Sony HD studios, if they might launch a HD channel in a few years...

    They want to use it for production for programming on other tv channels and a place to produced pilots for format programming like the lie and crossfire. Nothing to do with there own plans for HD broadcasting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 494 ✭✭EdmondShiels3


    I think i read that they are going to use it for the production of their new soap. They also said they were looking at selling the soap abroad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 rev1890


    If TV3 want to stay in the game they should be looking at HD as soon as possible. I have found since UTV HD was launched on UPC that I rarely watch TV3 now. Previously UTV SD was dreadful, especially for football, but I now ignore champions league on TV3 as the picture is now so much better on UTV HD. In fact since all the HD channels are clustered together on UPC I don't tend to deviate much from them. I don't even watch Channel 4 as much as I used to.
    But for TV3 to be talking about HD in a few years time is ridiculous, I think with that sort of thinking they won't be around in a few years!
    I suspect they may eventually give up being a broadcaster and just turn to being a production company. Their plans for the HD studios would suggest this is more in their thinking.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think i read that they are going to use it for the production of their new soap. They also said they were looking at selling the soap abroad.

    Watch out Proctor and Gamble and Lever Bros then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,272 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Picture quality is the least of your worries with sport on TV3. The commentary and analysis are abysmal.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭mark_jmc


    just read that TV3 have won the broadcasting rights for the rugby world cup 2015,if they dont have HD by then the picture quality will be crap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    mark_jmc wrote: »
    just read that TV3 have won the broadcasting rights for the rugby world cup 2015,if they dont have HD by then the picture quality will be crap

    They have said they will launch TV3 HD in mid-2015. 23 games on 3E!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 230 ✭✭seanp_25


    Is there any stipulation in the rights sold for the RWC that it has to be available to viewers in HD?

    Surely RWCL would set out a minimum level of production quality required by the winning bidder.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement