Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

SYRIA WAR MEGATHREAD - Mod Note First Post

1246733

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 62 ✭✭NoNewFriends


    There are thousands of gay Palestinians and Arabs living in Tel Aviv. 20% of the Israeli population is Arab. If only the neighbouring Arab nations were as tolerant of the Jews...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    There are thousands of gay Palestinians and Arabs living in Tel Aviv. ...

    It's the ones in the occupied territories I was thinking of. And its not all love and hugs for those inside Israeli borders either.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 62 ✭✭NoNewFriends


    You still haven't answered the question: Do you support the Palestinians or do you support gay rights?

    It's hypocritical to claim to support both. If you think otherwise, you will have to elaborate.

    Re gay Palestinians in the Occupied Territories: Nice whataboutery. Israel has no problem with Palestinians who can peacefully co-exist with the Jewish majority. As I've already said, there are Palestinians footballers, models and politicians all living happily in Israel and the West Bank.

    I feel we're veering off-topic now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    You still haven't answered the question: Do you support the Palestinians or do you support gay rights?

    It's hypocritical to claim to support both. If you think otherwise, you will have to elaborate..

    I support both. I don't see the contradiction. You may be confusing support for Palestinians with support for Hamas.
    Re gay Palestinians in the Occupied Territories: Nice whataboutery.

    emmm....this was you, wasn't it?
    If only the neighbouring Arab nations were as tolerant of the Jews...
    Do they not realise that Israel is the only country in the Middle East where homosexuals can be free, where women aren't forced to wear bin bag liners in 40°C heat and where logic and science comes before religious belief.
    Israel has no problem with Palestinians who can peacefully co-exist with the Jewish majority..

    Alas no
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/13/AR2010111303776.html?hpid=topnews

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12837953

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7136068.stm

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4198754.stm

    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/bedouin-to-submit-counter-report-to-un-panel-on-discrimination-1.192058#Scene_1

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/19/AR2007121902681.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2007121902748
    As I've already said, there are Palestinians footballers, models and politicians all living happily in Israel and the West Bank..

    ....well there would be Palestinians in the West Bank, because its Palestinian territory. How happy they are is debatable.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 62 ✭✭NoNewFriends


    Wow I never looked at it that way before. I've completely reversed all my beliefs and opinions. Thanks dude.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Wow I never looked at it that way before. I've completely reversed all my beliefs and opinions. Thanks dude.

    A stunning counter-argument, made all the better by the absence of "but the arabs....".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,732 ✭✭✭Toby Take a Bow


    Nodin wrote: »
    A stunning counter-argument, made all the better by the absence of "but the arabs....".

    And yet the accusation will be made that the 'liberal lefty anti-war movement' refuses to engage in meaningful discussion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭Femme_Fatale


    How on earth is it hypocritical to simultaneously support gay rights and the rights of civilian Palestinians? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    jank wrote: »
    I am just highlighting the maybe uncomfortable truth that most people don't really care about this attack or other conflicts in the world.

    Don't you really think its a bit odd that the biggest anti-war movement in the country is being silent on the biggest chemcial attack on humans since Saddam used them aggainst the Kurds

    You arent in a position to speak for most people in fairness unless of course you can read minds which Im guessing you cant how you can make such a statement is a little bit mystifying.

    The story goes that the evil Saddam , and he was evil , gased his own people as an act of genocide in the town of Halabja. This pretext was then used and rolled out to justify and build consesus against him for future aggression against his country.

    According to people in a position to speak factually, Saddam did not intentionally target the Kurds. The attack happened toward the end of the Iran/Iraq war it was a battle between the two of them and the Kurds unfortunately for them got caught in the middle of it. The Iraqis used chemical weapons , supplied by the west , to attack the Iranians who had taken over the town of Halabja. Both sides used chemical weapons in the battle a follow up study found that a large proportion of the people killed died from cyanide, a blood agent, the Iranians were known to have this the Iraqis were not they had mustard gas which is a nerve agent. The people of Halabja died from both cyanide and mustard gas.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/31/opinion/a-war-crime-or-an-act-of-war.html

    First casualty of war is the truth. Who knows who carried out the attack in Syria in my opinion Assad would want to be a foolish man to use that sort of weapon. Maybe he is, but who knows. Though the Americans are now moving their ships into place and putting a plan together to carry out targeted cruise missile strikes against Assad and his infrastructure a decision has not been made but the plan is being put together. History shows us an attack is highly likely. What happens after that is anyones guess but its going to be bad for all concerned that much is certain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy


    This crisis in Syria is as conflicting as what's going on in Egypt at the moment. Although it is clear to all Assad has the defining qualities of a dictator, it's hard to avoid the glaring reality of the fact that large swathes of their rebels are Muslim mercenaries. also , and this is not a rhetorical question, but should people take up arms every time they disagree with the rule of a leader, even a dictator? Like in Egypt where i feel the destruction of democracy is being generally ignored in an attempt to destroy the Muslim Brotherhood (no surprise at the weak response of the Western World to it) , this Syria crisis is too complicated and multi dimensional to see it merely as a dictator crushing the weak defenceless freedom fighters. I predict the Western World will try to sit this one out as there's no strategic advantage to entering this conflict, and i imagine it would be quite tough for obama to drum up a sufficient level of support at home for major involvement with the disasters of previous invasions in the Middle East still fresh in peoples minds.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    This crisis in Syria is as conflicting as what's going on in Egypt at the moment. Although it is clear to all Assad has the defining qualities of a dictator, it's hard to avoid the glaring reality of the fact that large swathes of their rebels are Muslim mercenaries. also , and this is not a rhetorical question, but should people take up arms every time they disagree with the rule of a leader, even a dictator? Like in Egypt where i feel the destruction of democracy is being generally ignored in an attempt to destroy the Muslim Brotherhood (no surprise at the weak response of the Western World to it) , this Syria crisis is too complicated and multi dimensional to see it merely as a dictator crushing the weak defenceless freedom fighters. I predict the Western World will try to sit this one out as there's no strategic advantage to entering this conflict, and i imagine it would be quite tough for obama to drum up a sufficient level of support at home for major involvement with the disasters of previous invasions in the Middle East still fresh in peoples minds.

    Well he was gunning them down in the streets during peaceful protests. In addition Syria had a rather brutal secret police force.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭UCDVet


    Put me down in the category of 'Do not care'.

    I mean, don't get me wrong, I hope it all works out for them....but really, as long as they leave us alone, I'm happy to leave them alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqtCOxeGAHE

    A helpful documentary in understanding the historical background to Syria and the conflict


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy


    Nodin wrote: »
    Well he was gunning them down in the streets during peaceful protests. In addition Syria had a rather brutal secret police force.

    And the United States spies intensively on its own citizens to keep control, same idea, just less blood. Its the typical painfully repetitive process of the dictator gripping to power desperately that will repeat itself time and time again. UCDvet has the attitude of a lot of the world to this crisis, the Arab spring was fresh and new in 2011..is the world just growing tired of it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    WakeUp wrote: »

    The story goes that the evil Saddam , and he was evil , gased his own people as an act of genocide in the town of Halabja. This pretext was then used and rolled out to justify and build consesus against him for future aggression against his country.

    The whole Anfal campaign has been recognised as genocide. Tens of thousands were killed and injured.

    When there was an assassination attempt on Saddam in a Shiite town, he had all the families of those involved - some 400 people rounded up and sent into detention, many were tortured and killed.

    When US forces withdrew in '91, the Shia rose up.. what happened in the next few weeks was nothing short of Stalinesque slaughter - the Republican guard were largely intact and crushed the uprising, it's estimated as many as 250,000 were killed, helicopter gunships were firing on refugees - whom numbered in their millions.

    Don't get me started on Uday and Qusay, they had people chopped up and sent back to their families in boxes.

    Saddam Hussein was ****ing brutal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 62 ✭✭NoNewFriends


    The UN lol...what a useless, pointless organisation. Unable to stop the Iraq war; unable to stop North Korea conducting missile tests dangerously close to its neighbours; unable to stop Iran making nuclear weapons. "Condemnations" are only words...they mean nothing, especially when they're not followed up by action when ignored. Anywhere that invites Ahmadinejad to spread his hate speech should not be taken seriously. Ireland please withdraw all funding immediately and stop sending our troops overseas to die in the name of this bureaucratic mess.

    >Criticizes Israel everyday for building houses
    >Gives China a security council seat despite their government bulldozing houses to build motorways and outrageous human rights abuses

    Seems legit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy


    I wasn't supporting the UN or showing any sympathy for them. I've studied their role in the Congo in the early 60s and anyone who looks at their actions and motives in the COngo could plainly see the're merely another armed wing for the US forces, one that can't be critisized. JFK played the UN as a puppet in the early 60s and i feel it's the same now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    The UN lol...what a useless, pointless organisation. Unable to stop the Iraq war; (...........)
    >Criticizes Israel everyday for building houses
    >Gives China a security council seat despite their government bulldozing houses to build motorways and outrageous human rights abuses
    Seems legit.

    Israel bulldozes Palestinian and Bedouin houses, as well as providing them for its colonists, as I included links about earlier.

    I was unaware that Chinas many faults as a state cancelled out Israels. Is this some effect of quantum physics unknown to the rest of us?

    It's rather interesting you condemn the UN's powerlessness in various situations, considering Israel has benefited from that for well over four decades now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭tipperaryguy


    >Criticizes Israel everyday for building houses

    ...in Palestinian territory


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭Amerika


    Personally, I don’t care about the leadership of the Syrian factions, as they are all enemies of the US. A thinning out of both ranks I see as a positive thing.

    I do care about the innocent Syrian people though, and do a little to help out. We have been helping to care for a young Syrian girl several days a week until her parents can safely transition and relocate to Texas, where jobs are aplenty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,743 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    RachaelVO wrote: »
    I do care but I can't look at the pics, they're heart wrenching!


    With respect Rachael, that attitude just annoys me so much. And its not a personal thing against you because so many people take this view on so many subjects.

    Here is the thing. If its so bloody hard to even look at the photos of it, then think how many times harder it is to be in the middle of it.

    My own view is that people just prefer to avoid the story and not think about it.

    Thats fine until someone comes over to Ireland and starts gassing us, and no one else wants to look at the photos of it (i.e. think about it).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 62 ✭✭NoNewFriends


    You can't win with these anti-West headbangers. America intervenes in the Middle East and they are criticised for the being "World Police". America does nothing and they're criticised for standing idly by.

    If you support American intervention in Syria, then you must have supported the Iraq war against Saddam Hussein who also used chemical weapons. It would be hypocritical to state otherwise. And that's if the UN can prove beyond reasonable doubt that Assad was indeed responsible for the gas attacks, which I'm personally not convinced of. The West should stay out of other country's affairs full stop. Forget Syria; forget gay rights in Russia; forget incessant Israel bashing; forget famine and AIDS in Africa. We have enough of our own problems to worry about.

    Finally, so as not to be hypocritical, other countries in the region should also stay out of Syria's affairs. The rebels are a rag tag bunch of opportunistic thugs looking to push their own agenda in the region. Egypt is a case in point. A suit-wearing, Western educated dictator is infinitely more preferable than a backward, towel wearing terrorist scream Allah Akbar. Have a look at the attached photo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Why would Assad's regime use chemical weapons when 1) he is, or at least appears to be, winning the "war" and 2) this is the one guaranteeed way to get the US and allies to intervene against him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Not very sure what would constitute winning at this stage for Assad. Preserving the regime seems very unlikely (even the Russians would want him eventually replaced) and regaining full control of the country would be next to impossible.

    Even if he does regain some semblence of control, the regime would be international and regionally very isolated.

    Also there would most likely be a heavy and perpetual insurgency, bolstered by extremists and jihadists flooding in.

    If the rebels "win", then they still have to contend with Islamic hardliners and extreme groups who want to build some sort of religious state - that would be the next conflict.

    Alternatively, the West steps in and rolls the dice.

    The best option would be a unified response from all UN members (including Russia and China) to create safe enclaves and work toward ending the conflict - however this is constantly hampered by petty politics, and also by the fact that Assad stepping down or transitioning is not an option, in fact it's the fundamental root cause of the whole problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    Alexei Pushkov, chair of the Russian Federation State Duma's international affairs committee,
    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2013/0826/As-world-prepares-to-act-on-Syria-Russia-scrambles-to-apply-brake

    "To us, it looks as though [George W.] Bush, [Dick] Cheney and [Donald] Rumsfeld never left the White House," says Alexei Pushkov, chair of the State Duma's international affairs committee.

    "It's basically the same policy, as if US leaders had learned nothing and forgotten nothing in the past decade. They want to topple foreign leaders they regard as adversaries, without even making the most basic calculations of the consequences. An intervention in Syria will only enlarge the area of instability in the Middle East and expand the scope of terrorist activity. I am at a complete loss to understand what the US thinks it is doing,"

    The US is just hell bent on going to War. They're backing Russia into a corner every time they do.
    Poke a stick at a bear long enough and it will eventually get you killed. Just ask any German.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    I'm surprised Russia isn't criticized more for their role in all this. Their relationship with Assad and this conflict doesn't seem to come under the same amount of scrutiny the US would if they were in Russias position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7



    The US is just hell bent on going to War. There backing Russia into a corner every time they do.
    Poke a stick at bear long enough and it will eventually get you killed. Just ask any German.

    In fairness Russia are selling arms to Assad like there's no tomorrow. They are also one of the few countries which openly support the Syrian government, Iran and Lebanon being the others, not exactly a strong moral position.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    I wonder will the Syrians use these if the US/UK do kick off.
    “The supersonic and long-range anti-ship Yakhont missiles of the Syrian army and the Lebanese Hezbollah (resistance movement) are serious deterrents to a US naval attack by its warships in the Mediterranean Sea,” Dr. Mostafa Zahra, a military analyst and strategic studies expert, told FNA on Monday.

    english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13920604001374


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭jank


    I'm surprised Russia isn't criticized more for their role in all this. Their relationship with Assad and this conflict doesn't seem to come under the same amount of scrutiny the US would if they were in Russias position.

    Nah nobody cares what the Russians do, much easier to blame those American capitalists.


Advertisement