Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why can nobody speak Irish?

1222325272855

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    An Coilean wrote: »
    That was in relation to your comment regarding the Governments approch, essentially you suggested that the government was just reacting to the will of the populous, my comment was that government is not just engaged in trying to promote Irish to create an Irish speaking populous (or not as the case may be) but it also has a duty to respect the right of the existing Irish speaking community to use Irish when carrying out their business with the state.

    In cases where this right is not being accomodated by the state, which is still quite common, there are official channels through which a greviance can be brought.

    Then, as you have no problem speaking English in the commerical world, it goes back to your points about Irish being treated as a second class langauge.

    If the government is going to the extent of providing services for people who mere WISH to conduct their business in Irish, at quiet an expense, then it is hardly treating Irish as a second class langauge - it is doing a lot to accomdate you, and I have no problem with it as such, as long as the average Irish speaker accepts that there are times when such things are neither practical (e.g. - making an emergency 999 call, reporting to guards).

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    Then, as you have no problem speaking English in the commerical world.

    You seem to have a habit of infering things from my post that I never wrote.

    If the government is going to the extent of providing services for people who mere WISH to conduct their business in Irish, at quiet an expense, then it is hardly treating Irish as a second class langauge - it is doing a lot to accomdate you, and I have no problem with it as such, as long as the average Irish speaker accepts that there are times when such things are neither practical (e.g. - making an emergency 999 call, reporting to guards).


    It is the lenghts that had to be gone to to get even a basic level of services such as this, the state did not provide these by choice, it came about on foot of a supreme court ruling that forced their hand, the existing structure is an attempt to provide the minimum they can get away with as the supreme court actually placed a greater obligation on them than they are currently fulfilling.

    Lets not kid ourselves, the state is still quite a distance away from treating both official languages with anything like parity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 141 ✭✭BognarRegis


    An Coilean wrote: »
    When this happens it is cost effective to hire an Irish speaker asuming they are capable of doing the job. You had to hire someone anyway and your not paying them any more than you would have had to pay anyway..
    In purely business terms, looking at demographics, would it not be better to favour Mandarin or Polish speakers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Dunno whether this has been posted already:

    http://www.endangeredlanguages.com

    Pretty interesting site. Who knew there were ten times the amount of Waloon speakers in Belgium than Irish speakers in ireland.

    Or that there's four times the amount of Picard speaker in France than Irish speakers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭shleedance


    English is the Lingua Franca these days and it's quickly becoming a universal language. English is not even "English" anymore since it uses so many loanwords from other languages, ie. doppelganger, zeitgeist etc, making it a mongrel language that has no real cultural ties apart from it's name.

    So in this sense, Irish is quite a useless language these days, especially when the majority of the population do not speak it. You can learn it if you want, and all the power to you if you enjoy it, but remember that it's not going to provide anything useful apart from novelty value for interested foreigners and like-minded Irish people.

    Personally, I do not subscribe to Irish culture or pride. I only identify myself as "Irish" because of the coincidence that I was born in Ireland, but overall I just say I'm "human".


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Dunno whether this has been posted already:

    http://www.endangeredlanguages.com

    Pretty interesting site. Who knew there were ten times the amount of Waloon speakers in Belgium than Irish speakers in ireland.

    Or that there's four times the amount of Picard speaker in France than Irish speakers.

    Yes but those figures are pointless without having regard to populations.

    According to that site, there are three times as many Irish speakers as there are Picard speakers per head of population.

    While it is true that Walloon speakers are five times more numerous than Irish speakers per head of population, this may possibly be explained in light of Walloon's over-arching similarity to the French language. A French speaking stranger can hear Walloon and comprehend it - even, perhaps, claim to speak it.

    Irish, on the other hand, is profoundly different to the English language in every sense, which explains why it is more difficult for locals to claim proficiency.

    Obviously this is only of fringe statistical interest, and has no bearing on the importance of the Irish language in its own right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 390 ✭✭Rubeter


    shleedance wrote: »
    English is not even "English" anymore since it uses so many loanwords from other languages, ie. doppelganger, zeitgeist etc, making it a mongrel language that has no real cultural ties apart from it's name.
    Nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭shleedance


    Rubeter wrote: »
    Nonsense.

    Explain.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 390 ✭✭Rubeter


    shleedance wrote: »
    Explain.
    The newborn you was given a name and just because baby you no longer exists doesn't mean you can no longer be called by that name.

    As you read this post remember that many words you are reading are actually words from languages other than the Germanic Old-English, you don't have to look for words like doppelganger or zeitgeist, "Just" "Because" "Exist" "Change" "Remember" "Post" "Actual" and "Language" are all from French or Latin.
    That is what English is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    An Coilean wrote: »
    You seem to have a habit of infering things from my post that I never wrote.

    It is the lenghts that had to be gone to to get even a basic level of services such as this, the state did not provide these by choice, it came about on foot of a supreme court ruling that forced their hand, the existing structure is an attempt to provide the minimum they can get away with as the supreme court actually placed a greater obligation on them than they are currently fulfilling.

    Lets not kid ourselves, the state is still quite a distance away from treating both official languages with anything like parity.

    You made numerous references to cosutomers going into shops - what am I supposed to infer from these, if not a sene of commerce?

    Regarding the later, I don't know, so I'll take your word, but the governments' have had a lot on their hands lately. Anyway, water under the bridge: rights are preserved, are they not?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    shleedance wrote: »
    English is not even "English" anymore since it uses so many loanwords from other languages, ie. doppelganger, zeitgeist etc, making it a mongrel language that has no real cultural ties apart from it's name.
    Lots of languages have large amounts of borrowed vocabulary. Even Irish traces a large portions of its lexicon to Latin, French and Norse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    shleedance wrote: »
    English is the Lingua Franca these days and it's quickly becoming a universal language.


    Nonsense. English will never be a universal language, there will never be a universal language, unless the vast majority of humanity disapears then its not going to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    The_Gatsby wrote: »
    Why is it that people in Ireland start learning Irish at the age of 5 and most never learn to speak it fluently? In Europe they do pretty much the same with English and most Europeans can hold a decent conversation in English.

    Is it the way Irish is taught? I didn't grow up in Ireland so I'm curious to know why so many people seem to have difficulty with it, given that it's taught at such a young age.

    Haven't read the whole thread, in answer to the op nobody can speak it because the focus from primary school right through to the leaving is on rote learning vocabulary and grammar, not on actually speaking the language. Added to this many teachers at primary level can't speak the language fluently themselves, so how in gods name could they pass it on to children.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Haven't read the whole thread either but would just like to make a couple of points, largely to increase consciousness of some Irish language related matters.

    - Three new second-level gaelscoileanna or gaelcholáistí are opening in September next year- in Dundrum, Balbriggan and Carrigaline. Gaelcholáistí may well open also in Maynooth, Mullingar and Drogheada in the short years ahead of us also.

    -I love the education system in Ireland but I am frustrated in relation with the Gaelscoileanna that in most areas with them there are no initiaitves to promote or use the language outside of the schools. I know Cumann na bhFiann, Ógras and Feachtas have groups in some (maybe many?) areas with gaelscoileanna but they seem to be very quiet and there only seem to be a handful of areas with good groups of adults promoting the Irish language in the Republic.

    - Belfast and Derry both have Cultúrlainn- Irish language cultural centres. Dublin ideally should have two I think and there should be one in Cork, Galway, Limerick, Letterkenny and perhaps a couple or few other areas when they get second level gaelscoileanna e.g. Mullingar.

    Seriously? May I ask why...??

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    oldyouth wrote: »
    I couldn't get on with any Irish teacher I ever had. It was assumed that there would be someone at home who had Irish and could assist me with my homework. When I pointed out that this was not the case and I needed additional help, I was sneered at and comments were often made about my heritage. I fell too far behind in primary school to ever catch up

    To cut a long story short, I wouldn't let that slide and this led to me being granted permission to absent myself from all Irish classes from 3rd year onwards

    Gotta love the Christian Brothers...

    Could be worse, the brothers could have raped you. Repeatedly

    Teaching Irish badly is low down on that particular bunch of criminals rap sheet


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 141 ✭✭BognarRegis


    mickeyk wrote: »
    Haven't read the whole thread, in answer to the op nobody can speak it because the focus from primary school right through to the leaving is on rote learning vocabulary and grammar, not on actually speaking the language. Added to this many teachers at primary level can't speak the language fluently themselves, so how in gods name could they pass it on to children.
    There's also the possibility that the children simply do not wish to speak Irish.

    For the Irish lobby, that's an 'appalling vista', as they would rather believe that the teaching method just needs more work and given a few more decades, Irish will once again be our common language.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    There's also the possibility that the children simply do not wish to speak Irish.

    For the Irish lobby, that's an 'appalling vista', as they would rather believe that the teaching method just needs more work and given a few more decades, Irish will once again be our common language.

    Not likely, I'm a fluent Irish speaker myself but don't believe in forcing it on anybody. Most of the teachers I know struggle to hold a conversation or string a proper sentence together. I have a neighbour with a ten year old in a gaelscoil and the child stutters through a response if you try to talk to him in irish. not the childs fault and possiblly not the teachers fault either, but the system definately is not working at present. Then there is the fact that kids don't want to speak it as you say. No idea how to fix it, or even if it should be fixed, personally I'd prefer if my kids learned the basics of some European languages at school much earlier rather than a language the will be utterly useless to them in their working lives. If they want to learn Irish then great, I can speak it to them at home.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    mickeyk wrote: »
    Not likely, I'm a fluent Irish speaker myself but don't believe in forcing it on anybody. Most of the teachers I know struggle to hold a conversation or string a proper sentence together. I have a neighbour with a ten year old in a gaelscoil and the child stutters through a response if you try to talk to him in irish. not the childs fault and possiblly not the teachers fault either, but the system definately is not working at present. Then there is the fact that kids don't want to speak it as you say. No idea how to fix it, or even if it should be fixed, personally I'd prefer if my kids learned the basics of some European languages at school much earlier rather than a language the will be utterly useless to them in their working lives. If they want to learn Irish then great, I can speak it to them at home.


    How is it that you came to be fluent in a language you think is utterly useless?

    As for this stuttering ten year old? Perhaps they just have a stutter, that Gaelscoils produce fluent Irish speakers is a long established fact that your anecdotal evidence is not likely to overturn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭conorhal


    mickeyk wrote: »
    Not likely, I'm a fluent Irish speaker myself but don't believe in forcing it on anybody. Most of the teachers I know struggle to hold a conversation or string a proper sentence together. I have a neighbour with a ten year old in a gaelscoil and the child stutters through a response if you try to talk to him in irish. not the childs fault and possiblly not the teachers fault either, but the system definately is not working at present. Then there is the fact that kids don't want to speak it as you say. No idea how to fix it, or even if it should be fixed, personally I'd prefer if my kids learned the basics of some European languages at school much earlier rather than a language the will be utterly useless to them in their working lives. If they want to learn Irish then great, I can speak it to them at home.

    This is the circular argument that's been going on for decades, it seems that there is no desire to 'fix it', no will whatsoever, which leads me to believe that intentional neglect is destroying the language. Hebrew was all but a dead language but the Israeli's ressurected it and it is now the spoken language of Israel simply because the will to do so was there.

    As for the argument that it's 'utterly useless in business', there's a cultural, social and intelectual element to learning, it's depressing to think that human developement should be so reductive as to make learning all about plugging workers into a factory floor. To say that learning is only about manufacturing workers for the system is like saying sex should only be about procreation or eating should only be about consuming enough nutrients to stay alive.
    This attitude seems to be a product of the necon libertarian elites that talk about 'Ireland Inc.' a phrase that sickens me and a mentality that created the bust, the attitude that anything that isn't making me money is dispensable, we work in an economy, we don't live in one and schooling is as much about creating a society as it is about creating an employee.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    conorhal wrote: »
    Hebrew was all but a dead language but the Israeli's ressurected it and it is now the spoken language of Israel simply because the will to do so was there.
    God not Hebrew again. It's a completely different historical environment and the comparison is lazy and ill informed.

    The will wasn't the thing, the need was. The returning Jewish diaspora were made up of many different groups with different languages. They required a lingua franca in a deeply practical way and Hebrew was it. We already have a lingua franca it just happens not to be Irish.

    I'm sure there is an equivalent to "apples and oranges" as Gaelige and it applies to this argument.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    conorhal wrote: »
    This is the circular argument that's been going on for decades, it seems that there is no desire to 'fix it', no will whatsoever, which leads me to believe that intentional neglect is destroying the language. Hebrew was all but a dead language but the Israeli's ressurected it and it is now the spoken language of Israel simply because the will to do so was there.

    Maybe, but you can't argue with will. If the will to learn Irish is simply not there, there's not much you can do about it.
    As for the argument that it's 'utterly useless in business', there's a cultural, social and intelectual element to learning, it's depressing to think that human developement should be so reductive as to make learning all about plugging workers into a factory floor. To say that learning is only about manufacturing workers for the system is like saying sex should only be about procreation or eating should only be about consuming enough nutrients to stay alive.
    This attitude seems to be a product of the necon libertarian elites that talk about 'Ireland Inc.' a phrase that sickens me and a mentality that created the bust, the attitude that anything that isn't making me money is dispensable, we work in an economy, we don't live in one and schooling is as much about creating a society as it is about creating an employee.

    You've kind of gone off an a tangent there, starting with business and moving on to learning/education.

    Yes, Irish is of little use in business. Most people in business look to earn money, and to earn it as quickly and as easily as possible, and so will do it in a common language where possible. That's reality.

    But it doesn't mean said businessmen do not like or use Irish - they may well do so in other aspects of their lives.

    I agree with you completely that education is more than just learning employment skills. But that said, it should be learnign somethign of value to the student, be it a hobby, an interest or something they just like. Some students like art, some like history, some like woodwork and sometimes with no professional goals in mind. If we're using learnign to create a society, then we need to look at what those individuals want to contribute to that society and not TELL THEM what we think that shold be contributing. Because that clearly isn't working.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    @Conorhal. And what about people who simply don't want to learn Irish?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Crea


    My kids level of Irish is woeful. The teachers in their school hardly ever speak Irish to them. There is no "An bhfuil cead agam dul amach". My sons irish last year was learning to spell 10 words. The words are in a workbook which he fills in the 1 word beside the picture. He can't put the words into sentences or pronounce them when I ask him. He is now going into 4th class and can't string a sentence together and this is not uncommon in his class. From speaking to past pupil they even say the level of Irish taught in the primary school is very poor.
    Irish should not be taught out of books until at least 4th class. The children should be spoken to in Irish to give them an ear for the language, then the reading/writing and spelling. At least them the kids would have some idea what they are actually reading and spelling.
    I don't know what to do about my kids Irish - go to the principal and tell her that all the teachers are ****e at teaching Irish?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    An Coilean wrote: »
    How is it that you came to be fluent in a language you think is utterly useless?

    As for this stuttering ten year old? Perhaps they just have a stutter, that Gaelscoils produce fluent Irish speakers is a long established fact that your anecdotal evidence is not likely to overturn.

    I am fluent as I grew up with the language. The ten year old does not have a stutter, he simply doesn't have enough Irish to speak confidently. He has perfect English. Can't argue with your last point, perhaps he is the exception.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    conorhal wrote: »
    This is the circular argument that's been going on for decades, it seems that there is no desire to 'fix it', no will whatsoever, which leads me to believe that intentional neglect is destroying the language. Hebrew was all but a dead language but the Israeli's ressurected it and it is now the spoken language of Israel simply because the will to do so was there.

    As for the argument that it's 'utterly useless in business', there's a cultural, social and intelectual element to learning, it's depressing to think that human developement should be so reductive as to make learning all about plugging workers into a factory floor. To say that learning is only about manufacturing workers for the system is like saying sex should only be about procreation or eating should only be about consuming enough nutrients to stay alive.
    This attitude seems to be a product of the necon libertarian elites that talk about 'Ireland Inc.' a phrase that sickens me and a mentality that created the bust, the attitude that anything that isn't making me money is dispensable, we work in an economy, we don't live in one and schooling is as much about creating a society as it is about creating an employee.

    I have kids and one of the things I want for them is to have a good education and job prospects, as any parent. They have a good amount of irish as I speak it to them often, it would be a waste not to especially as it will help them through our education system in the points race assuming that is still in place when they come to leavibg cert. i do feel however that ramming the language down every students throat as a compulsory subject up until leaving cert is wrong and it clearly doesn't work anyway. The average leaving cert student cannot hold even a basic conversation about the weather in my experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,746 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The Irish lovers like to blame poor teaching on the unpopularity of the Irish language when we know there's more important factors i.e. the general lack of interest in a language that no one wants to speak.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Satts


    Because most payslips are printed in English.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 71 ✭✭Kicking Bird


    The Irish lovers like to blame poor teaching on the unpopularity of the Irish language when we know there's more important factors i.e. the general lack of interest in a language that no one wants to speak.

    Plenty can and do speak Irish on a daily basis!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Plenty can and do speak Irish on a daily basis!

    Enough to sopt it from dying out then. Good. Let the rest of us get on with our lives.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Plenty can and do speak Irish on a daily basis!
    Very few.


Advertisement
Advertisement