Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Noonan: Property Tax wont be used for Local Services

2456713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I'm waiting until someone actually posts up a relevant link before making any comment.

    You know, cos commenting on something before you've even seen it is just plain stupid.

    Like those idiots who tell you a movie is crap 3 months before it's even been released.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Irishcrx


    Did anybody seriously believe that it would? And I mean really, did you think it was going to go to any kind of service.

    I always just thought of it as another tax being forced on me to recoup money for our debt and that it was just called 'Property tax' could have been called 'popcorn tax' or 'Painting interier room in house tax' same idea, I'll never see any use of the money other than servicing debt.

    It was just a way around not supercharging USC and income tax, the same way USC is income tax, they think were all muppets and by branching them all out we'll think were gaining something but it's really just all one big tax.

    Next up.......Universal social media tax.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭donegal_road




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,964 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    As I find myself saying an increasing amount lately (whenever the latest scandal/farce emerges from our "leaders")...

    Remind me again why it's so important we have our Independence?

    Cause it seems all we've managed to do with it was:

    - first hand it to the Church for them to abuse generations of innocent kids, treat others as slave labour (and then give the same people a big F.U when called to pay for it), and hold the social development of the country back for decades

    - then hand it to the EU who subsequently forced our gombeen teachers/lawyers/publican TD's to socialise private debt onto the next generation or two of Irish people

    - elect the aforementioned gombeen TD's time and again thinking that something might change this time (flipping between FF and FG will never change this btw - two sides of the same coin.. they might as well merge and get it over with!), and whinging when they unsurprisingly fill their pockets with our taxes, as well as the pockets of their friends and relatives too of course!

    - set up a system that's inefficient, hugely expensive and rotten to the core where everything runs on the "who you know" approach combined with the "ah shure it'll be grand.." attitude

    Didn't even take 100 years to wreck the place either. I guess we achieved something anyway!

    So again, why should we be let at the controls of a country again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    Doesn't matter to me as the goverment doesn't supply anything in my area.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Jester252 wrote: »
    Doesn't matter to me as the goverment doesn't supply anything in my area.

    They're supplying themselves with your wage packet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,079 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Is Noonan talking about the 'property tax' that was brought in as an intermediate tax and is now gone, or the 'Household Charge' which is the current property tax?

    On the household charge website, the banner of the website states
    "Household Charge, Funding your local services"

    https://www.householdcharge.ie/default.aspx

    Ban billionaires



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Also.....Nessa Childers has resigned. Labour MEP quits.
    Letter from Nessa Childers MEP to Eamon Gilmore TD

    24 Jul 2013

    24th July 2013

    Dear Eamon,

    I am writing to inform you of my resignation from the Labour party and to state my reasons for doing so.

    I have increasingly found myself discouraged and prevented from advocating a distinctive social democratic position within the party. While I have remained constant in my views, the Labour leadership has drifted away from a progressive policy approach. My attitude is vilified as disloyal or opportunistic when, in fact, I am defending and promoting the party’s core values. For example, a particularly low point for me was when I was abandoned by the party leadership for taking a principled stance of opposition to the appointment to the EU Court of Auditors of Mr Kevin Cardiff, who was Secretary General of the Department of Finance when the bank bailout was decided on.

    In 2009 I stood for election to the European Parliament in support of progressive and social democratic policies that were designed to put people, jobs and fairness at the heart of Europe. I stood for a progressive Europe, working in the interests of its people. In our manifesto, the number one priority was to safeguard jobs, create new ones and promote smart, environmentally sustainable growth.

    I still believe in those principles and policies. Since my election, I have consistently worked in Europe and at home to support and achieve those aims. However, I believe that my ability to work for the policies I was elected on, and still support, is no longer compatible with membership of the party.

    I did not support the decision to enter into coalition with Fine Gael in 2011 but I still hoped that Labour would shape its policy in accordance with our social democratic values and help bring the country back from bankruptcy and rebuild our economy in a way that would be fair and would support communities. I acknowledge that Labour ministers have done some good work. However, the government’s overall policy now seems to be one of never-ending, pointless austerity for austerity’s sake – a reckless pursuit of moveable economic targets that has failed on unemployment and emigration and is imposing unfair and frankly unsustainable pressures on hundreds of thousands of men, women and children. It is a policy of cutting services like health, education and social protection, while bankers, big corporates and the wealthy are allowed dodge their share of the burden.

    This is a profoundly immoral way to run our country. It is not compatible with Labour’s traditional policies or with the manifesto on which I was elected with the Socialists and Democrats Group of the European Parliament. Unfortunately, the party leadership seems determined to pursue that course in the hope that ‘it will all sort itself out’ in time for an election in 2016, even though it has manifestly failed.

    The policy of austerity is discredited in Europe and, increasingly, at home. Reputable bodies like TASC, the Nevin Economic Research Institute and Social Justice Ireland have demonstrated that there is a viable alternative to the policies of ‘slash and cut’:

    no more cuts in public spending,
    an increase in social protection,
    make the wealthiest ten per cent pay more taxes,
    make banks pay more through a Financial Transactions Tax,
    make sure multinationals pay a minimum of 10% in profits tax,
    and invest in a jobs/economic stimulus package.
    Last April, I made an initial stand against the government’s direction by resigning from the Parliamentary Labour Party. I said that I no longer wanted to support a government that is implementing harmful, conservative policies and is actually hurting people. Since then, Labour’s failure in government has gone from bad to worse and the party has committed to even more austerity in the next Budget and beyond. Since that point I have experienced what could be termed a progressive destruction of hope that the situation would improve. Therefore I am following through on my earlier decision and from now on I intend to work independently within the Socialists and Democrats Group for the principles and policies I believe in.

    Unlike the Labour leadership, I want to fight for a progressive and fairer alternative to austerity and I want to continue to work for it in the European Parliament with my Social Democratic colleagues. As you discovered recently in the negotiations on the EU Budget, the Parliament now has robust lawmaking powers and is arguably more influential on our lives than even the Dáil.

    I know that there are many party members who believe as I do about government policy. I wish them well in their continuing membership of the party, and will continue to be available to them, and work with them, as their elected representative in Europe but, regrettably, I cannot remain in the party. For the sake of our people, it is critical that the 2014 elections to the Parliament are a first step in breaking the conservative free-marketers majority in the Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the Commission. That is what I plan to work and campaign for, and in next year’s European elections I will do so as an independent candidate within the European Socialists and Democrats Group.

    Yours sincerely,

    Nessa Childers MEP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭bbam


    squod wrote: »
    To everyone who insisted this wouldn't happen in various property tax threads on boards........


    In yer face people.
    zerks wrote: »
    I see the champions of this tax are very thin on the ground here this morning.

    I'll come out and say I paid up.
    I didn't chanpion the tax , nor did I come on insisting this farce definitely wouldn't happen..

    I did beleive the lies that were spun about using local money to maintain local amenaties. I provide my own water and sewerage but we extensively use our local library, playgrounds etc.
    In an effort to be an upstanding citizen I paid up..

    I can't say that I'm shocked, I have memory enough that politicians can't really be trusted in anything they say.. I'm supprised in the openness in which it happens now, it seems very casual and easy for those in power to collect our money under false pretences, one wonders now was this the plan all along - they aren't really in a position to deny this was the intention, honesty and trustworthy aren't exactly what they are building a reputation of..

    So what happens now ??

    I shouted at the radio in my jeep quite a bit when I herd it... Moaned a bit over morning coffee.. Yet here I am at my desk as ever.. there in lies the problem!!
    My bigest protest will be I'm done voteing. On anything, it seems to matter less what we do as there are no options to replace our current corrupt system with anyone, as those waiting in the wings are made of the dame dubious stuff..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭donegal_road


    its on the front of todays Daily Mail. I think this might decide things for me, we have been talking about moving out of the Ireland this last year or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    its on the front of todays Daily Mail. I think this might decide things for me, we have been talking about moving out of the Ireland this last year or so.
    Can you post up something which actually contains readable text?
    zerks wrote: »
    I see the champions of this tax are very thin on the ground here this morning.
    Very difficult to comment on something which doesn't exist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    So last week we found out the Dept of Finance was aiding and abetting Quinn's Contracts for Difference gamble on Anglos share price, today we find out that Revenue is scamming people out of their money to give to some 'aul bank.

    Whats next? Should PS workers just start roaming the streets in gangs and start mugging old dears for their pension?

    It's time the Army took control of this place in some kind of military coup, 'till law and order is restored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    squod wrote: »
    ...Should PS workers just start roaming the streets in gangs and start mugging old dears for their pension?

    That's hardly necessary, is it? There's an entire framework facilitating this already, and it's 100% legal!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭donegal_road


    seamus wrote: »
    Can you post up something which actually contains readable text?Very difficult to comment on something which doesn't exist.

    sorry Seamus, thats as clear as I can find it. I will take a photo of the front page when Im down in the shop and will post it up here in a while.

    The sub-heading reads:

    'All of the €175 million paid in property tax so far, is going towards our bailout debt, and not - as was promised - to fund badly needed local services.'

    it goes on:

    'Michael Noonan has admitted that the money has been kept in the state coffers and will be used to reduce the deficit. However as recently as January the Finance Minister insisted that the proceeds of the local property tax will be given to local authorities, and will support local services'

    I am one or two words out, but that is the jist of it.


  • Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As I type this, there is a fella from the council taking pictures of the water meters and then he is taking a picture of each house.

    Why is he taking a pic of the house and shouldn't he be asking my permission first? It's a private estate and the council have not taken over the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    'Michael Noonan has admitted that the money has been kept in the state coffers and will be used to reduce the deficit. However as recently as January the Finance Minister insisted that the proceeds of the local property tax will be given to local authorities, and will support local services'

    I am one or two words out, but that is the jist of it.
    Unfortunately the devil is in the details, I don't trust a journalist's reinterpretation of whatever has been said to represent the situation fairly.

    I imagine that was Noonan has said is that €175m less will be paid to local authorities out of the central fund.
    As I type this, there is a fella from the council taking pictures of the water meters and then he is taking a picture of each house.

    Why is he taking a pic of the house and shouldn't he be asking my permission first?
    You'll have to ask him what he's doing, but taking pictures in public is perfectly legal unless he's trying to take pictures of the inside of your house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Didn't pay :D

    Yet. You won't avoid it and you will pay the fines.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    Yet. You won't avoid it and you will pay the fines.

    Jayzus........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭mr kr0nik


    jimgoose wrote: »
    Frankly I am shocked and stunned that anyone could be shocked and stunned by this.

    I am shocked and stunned that anyone could be shocked and stunned by people being shocked and stunned by this.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    Yet. You won't avoid it and you will pay the fines.

    Nope i won't. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Nope i won't. ;)

    Don't own a property?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    Don't own a property?

    Like many people who give a crap about this country, he has decided to take a stand maybe?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    Don't own a property?

    Nope and my name is on nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    squod wrote: »
    Like many people who give a crap about this country, he has decided to take a stand maybe?

    like the old man and the sea.

    They can and will take it directly from your wages.
    They can and will take it from and social welfare payments.
    If self employed they will audit you.

    You can't really take a stand against that as they can just take the money


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    As I type this, there is a fella from the council taking pictures of the water meters and then he is taking a picture of each house.

    Why is he taking a pic of the house and shouldn't he be asking my permission first? It's a private estate and the council have not taken over the road.

    Before work commences you should get the council to put up a bond. In case any damage is done to your property when them or their contractors install those meters.

    Council would want from from you if you were to go messing with their stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    like the old man and the sea.

    They can and will take it directly from your wages.
    They can and will take it from and social welfare payments.
    If self employed they will audit you.

    You can't really take a stand against that as they can just take the money

    Take it for what? I don't own a property.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Nope and my name is on nothing.

    Not exactly not paying, you don't have to. Strange thing to gloat about


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,702 ✭✭✭squod


    Ray Palmer wrote: »
    like the old man and the sea.

    They can and will take it directly from your wages.
    They can and will take it from and social welfare payments.
    If self employed they will audit you.

    You can't really take a stand against that as they can just take the money

    If you haven't authorised the payment to be deducted from your wages they can't take it. I know as many self employed people who struggle to make a wage. An ''audit'' will lead to an over all negotiation of their debt to revenue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    squod wrote: »
    If you haven't authorised the payment to be deducted from your wages they can't take it.
    This is not correct.

    Taxation is exempt from the "no deduction without authorisation" requirement of the Payment of Wages Act.
    5.—(1) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages of an employee (or receive any payment from an employee) unless—

    (a) the deduction (or payment) is required or authorised to be made by virtue of any statute or any instrument made under statute,


Advertisement
Advertisement