Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Norwegian woman in Dubai raped: gets 1 year 4 months for "sex outside marriage"

1356711

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭A Primal Nut


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Because you are a guest in thier country.



    So does that mean we don't have to respect the cultures of people who visit our country?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 ✭✭✭Sinfonia


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    In Ireland we don't prosecute religious leaders who protect child rapists.

    That's how "progressive" we are. :rolleyes:
    We don't lock up the child either though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,628 ✭✭✭Femme_Fatale


    Guests in their country? Yet when people from Saudi are guests in this country, they're not for instance forced to wear western dress.
    Zebra3 wrote: »
    In Ireland we don't prosecute religious leaders who protect child rapists.

    That's how "progressive" we are. :rolleyes:
    Yeh Ireland is a much better country than Saudi; and any attempt to try and equate the two is just futile.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    I have 2 female, Irish, white friends living in Saudi, and they love the place, they have no problems there at all.

    Oh well then close the thread and let's not speak ill of the medieval ****holes in the Middle East. Two Irish girls had a good time in Saudi Arabia so let's forget about the apartheid against women, the persecution of anyone who'd dare to be openly gay, limb chopping and beheading, the censorship of the media etc.

    Incredible.


  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sinfonia wrote: »
    We don't lock up the child either though.

    That's exactly what the Irish did.

    Rape victims pregnant out of wedlock were locked away in laundries and exploited as slaves for profit.

    It may no longer be the case, but neither is it that long ago.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭darkhorse


    its no different than a jew moving to nazi germany during ww2. if they are not protected by law then why do they go there.

    Talking about which, you can bet your life that they would not get away with it if the woman was an Israeli citizen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,854 ✭✭✭Sinfonia


    Candie wrote: »
    That's exactly what the Irish did.

    Rape victims pregnant out of wedlock were locked away in laundries and exploited as slaves for profit.

    It may no longer be the case, but neither is it that long ago.
    Yes, that happened. It doesn't anymore. Hence, we are progressive.


  • Posts: 168 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    EGriff wrote: »
    If I get shot over there will I be charged with stealing bullets?

    If you have a few drinks in Dubai, and happen to be in a car accident as a passenger, you're likely to be the person arrested. Advice given to westerners is to leave the scene of a car accident in this situation. It doesn't help that they drive like maniacs over there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    If you have a few drinks in Dubai, and happen to be in a car accident as a passenger, you're likely to be the person arrested. Advice given to westerners is to leave the scene of a car accident in this situation. It doesn't help that they drive like maniacs over there.

    The best thing to do is to stay as far away as possible from any of these countries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,390 ✭✭✭clairefontaine


    This is why Islam and "shariah law" should be kept as far away from modern and civilized societies as possible.

    This is also why westerners should stop going to Dubai and enabling the sick practises of that over blown glided ****hole.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I thought tourists could drink in their hotel?

    I don't know why anyone would want to go to these places. I wouldn't step foot in the country, I wouldn't be able to enjoy myself with the fear of doing something wrong and ending up in prison.


    Well a lot of people go for work, most of those 'do a few years' keeping their head down and get out of the place once they've made a bit of cash, it's not somewhere you'd want to retire.
    What get's me are the fools who bough apartments in the middle of a scorching desert during the Dubai building boom and yack endlessly about 'how great the shopping there is!' Ugh. They are invariably the same 'types', absolute tossers, let them have their bling and shiny malls, there is real tension between a very resentful local population and the 'mass migrating' westerners, and cases like this are generally the result.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,390 ✭✭✭clairefontaine


    conorhal wrote: »
    Well a lot of people go for work, most of those do a few years keeping their head down and get out of the place, it's not somewhere you'd want to retire. What get's me are the fools who bough apartments there during the Dubai building boom and yack endlessly about 'how great the shopping is!' Ugh. They are invariably the same 'types', absolute tossers.

    Those same apartments built by slave labour? The westerners nearly make me sicker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,310 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    We dont know the full circumstance of the girl in the articles story.
    It sounds like she made the mistake of telling the police that she got raped.

    =-=

    The f**ked up thing about some interpretations of Sharia Law is that the if the womans family is of high standing within the community, her "dishonour" and his prison sentence gets migated if he marries her o.0
    Sinfonia wrote: »
    Yes, that happened. It doesn't anymore. Hence, we are progressive.
    It happened less than 20 years ago. Not very progressive. And compared to the rest of the ME, SA is progressive, but this is thanks to the Kings view changing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    In Ireland we don't prosecute religious leaders who protect child rapists.

    That's how "progressive" we are. :rolleyes:

    Well Sheeeeeeeit, at least we never went as far as legalizing it, most Arab states are happy to have a consent age of 12 and girls are frequently married off in their early teens to much older men, both sexual and physical abuse is not uncommon in these relationships.

    And now we're importing this disgusting behaviour here:

    http://humanrights.ie/children-and-the-law/forced-marriage-in-the-republic-of-ireland-2/

    This concerns a 15yr old girl forced into an arranged marriage by her parents.
    Permission for her marriage, since she was not of age, had been sought and granted in the Circuit Court after an application for an exemption by her parents.
    The young girl did not wish to marry at all, but the High Court said that her parents's wishes took precedence over their daughter's.
    The young girl ran away after her purported marriage ceremony in September 2010 to a 29yr old man, prompting the HSE to seek care orders for the teen.
    She has since been spirited out of the country to Egypt.


    You can bang on all you like about historical abuses, but things like this are happening today, in feckin' Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭hedgehog2


    Having spent time in an Islamic country as a single male and again with the missus.
    I can honestly say I would never move or travel again in a majority muslim country with my good lady.
    The crap she got from the locals,filthy looks and a general unwelcome feeling because she did not wear the headgear.
    To me its one massively flawed religion,they hate dogs ffs just one example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Nodin wrote: »
    ....bizarre backwards patriarchal crap.
    Are you referring to the handling of the case, or the entirely justified reporting and criticism of it?
    conorhal wrote: »
    Well Sheeeeeeeit, at least we never went as far as legalizing it, most Arab states are happy to have a consent age of 12 and girls are frequently married off in their early teens to much older men, both sexual and physical abuse is not uncommon in these relationships.

    And now we're importing this disgusting behaviour here:

    http://humanrights.ie/children-and-the-law/forced-marriage-in-the-republic-of-ireland-2/

    This concerns a 15yr old girl forced into an arranged marriage by her parents.
    Permission for her marriage, since she was not of age, had been sought and granted in the Circuit Court after an application for an exemption by her parents.
    The young girl did not wish to marry at all, but the High Court said that her parents's wishes took precedence over their daughter's.
    The young girl ran away after her purported marriage ceremony in September 2010 to a 29yr old man, prompting the HSE to seek care orders for the teen.
    She has since been spirited out of the country to Egypt.


    You can bang on all you like about historical abuses, but things like this are happening today, in feckin' Ireland.
    Nodin wrote:
    *deafening silence*

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭BeerWolf


    OP, this is the middle east - are you even remotely surprised ?

    Criminal men have more rights than women there...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    SeanW wrote: »
    Originally Posted by Nodin
    *deafening silence*
    He hasn't been online since that was posted (Last Activity: Yesterday 23:27), at least check that much before having a go at him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭IK09


    I cant believe that nothing is being done about this by Norway, shame on them


  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    conorhal wrote: »
    The young girl did not wish to marry at all, but the High Court said that her parents's wishes took precedence over their daughter's.

    I think that line is probably misleading since I get the impression it was the courts explanation of how this occurred - the parents disregarded the childs wishes in favour of their own, rather than the court deciding the parents wishes superseded the childs, which is how I first read it.

    By that account the court did everything they could to protect the girl.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,052 ✭✭✭Matt_Trakker


    IK09 wrote: »
    I cant believe that nothing is being done about this by Norway, shame on them
    Well that's obviously not true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Candie wrote: »
    I think that line is probably misleading since I get the impression it was the courts explanation of how this occurred - the parents disregarded the childs wishes in favour of their own, rather than the court deciding the parents wishes superseded the childs, which is how I first read it.

    By that account the court did everything they could to protect the girl.

    The parents of the girl were able to apply for an exemption in the courts without the girl herself present. It seems bizzare to me that it is not a requirement that a minor be present to ensure that no coersion is taking place.
    This exemption was put in place to accomodate Travellers and their 'culture' of early marriage to ensure women remained barefoot and pregnant as as early an age as possible, before education and experience gave then notions above their station. It's a handy exemption for our new Islamic immigrants to effect the same result and a fine example of how multiculturalism's exemptions in law designed to accomodate minorities typically do more dammage then good.
    If the court had done everything to protect this 16yr old girl, she probably wouldn't currently be sitting in Egypt married to some 29yr old guy that she was forced to marry right now.


  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    conorhal wrote: »
    The parents of the girl were able to apply for an exemption in the courts without the girl herself present. It seems bizzare to me that it is not a requirement that a minor be present to ensure that no coersion is taking place.
    This exemption was put in place to accomodate Travellers and their 'culture' of early marriage to ensure women remained barefoot and pregnant as as early an age as possible, before education and experience gave then notions above their station. It's a handy exemption for our new Islamic immigrants to effect the same result and a fine example of how multiculturalism's exemptions in law designed to accomodate minorities typically do more dammage then good.

    The court annulled the marriage, issued a care order, and a restraining order preventing the parents from taking her out of the country to sell her off again. I don't see what else they could do.

    All parents can apply to the courts for things that their underage children have an issue with. If a 13 year old with cancer refuses treatment the parents can apply to the court to compel them, if it's ultimately in the childs best interests.

    These parents thought they had a case to make the State exempt them from the status quo, based on religious and cultural grounds. They didn't get that exemption.

    The system didn't fail here, there was no accommodation of forced marriage. The only thing that failed here were the parents. As the judge said
    "a vulnerable, very young woman who was placed in a series of impossible situations and who simply did not receive the parental support she was entitled to expect".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭Sir Humphrey Appleby


    IK09 wrote: »
    I cant believe that nothing is being done about this by Norway, shame on them

    What would you have them do? Invade the Middle East?
    In truth they are probably working behind the scenes to get her home, but there is little that they can do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Nuke the bastards !


  • Posts: 26,219 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What would you have them do? Invade the Middle East?
    In truth they are probably working behind the scenes to get her home, but there is little that they can do.


    You can bet your bottom dollar the diplomatic corp are earning their money in Dubai on behalf of the woman, as is the duty of the Norweigan government when a citizen is mistreated in a foreign country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    I hope people won't use incidents like this to castigate all Muslims, as some are wont to do. Already I've seen posts in which the only apparent concern was in using the plight of this poor woman to have a go at Islam and Muslims.

    Unlike many posting here, I actually live in the UAE and have, I think, a more nuanced outlook on things. Do cases like this arise? Yes, and they shouldn't. However, there are hundreds of thousands of ex-pat woman in the country who enjoy life there, and who wouldn't live anywhere else at the moment. It's completely unfair to label the entire country, its people, and Islam on the basis of this one incident. Are all Americans racist because of the Trayvon Martin verdict? Are all Indians rapists? Are all Irish people backward misogynists because of the Savita Halappanavar incident? Of course not- how then can Islam and Emiratis be condemned because of relatively isolated incidents like this?

    As for te slave labour charges, well there is some merit to them. The average Indian or Pakistani construction worker gets paid approximately €200 a month from what I can gather. Taxi drivers and those in more "professional" jobs get paid more. Those lower down the professional ladder live in workers' camps outside the cities, and yes, their passports are sometimes confiscated.

    Yet, there are nevertheless millions of such workers in the country, with more arriving every day. Their lives are certainly not easy, but it's obviously a better life than staying in their own countries. I did a little bit of research, and found that even those earning very low wages in the UAE are still on multiples of what they'd receive at home. From conversations I've had with such people, they are saving away with a view to building a better life for themselves and their families when they get home. The UAE affords them a brighter future, and quite often, a better quality of life, than if they stayed at home. I was speaking to one taxi driver recently, and he is putting his children to school in Pakistan, and hopes to have saved enough to open a convenience store when he returns to his home country in two years.

    The conditions that workers toil in in the UAE have also been improving. Workers camps now generally have air conditioning, and the conditions, whilst basic, are certainly not squalid. I've travelled throughout Asia, and the conditions I see in the UAE are often a good deal better than those I've seen in many parts of Asia. Furthermore, laws have been enacted to improve the lot of such workers. They are now to have full health insurance; they cannot work in the middle of the day during the summer, and they have rights which can be upheld through recourse to the Labour Board etc. Are these rights universally applied- no. But in my apartment complex, all work on new buildings ceases for three hours around midday, and I know of workers who have had their rights vindicated through appeal to state bodies.

    The UAE has come a massive way in a short few years. Twenty years ago, a huge percentage of the population was illiterate in Arabic, let alone English. The institutions there have been built entirely from scratch, and a society that was destitute, nomadic, and highly conservative a few decades ago, is now open to the world, and gradually maturing. This isn't to defend those who exploit workers, or to gloss over what happened to that Danis woman, or those like her, but rather to give a little context, and point out that entire peoples or religions cannot be condemned on the basis of such isolated incidents.

    By way of aside-: to those criticising the UAE for the wages and conditions paid to workers- who do you think the workers appreciate more, Ireland, which won't let them near the country, or the UAE, where they can go and improve their lot? Easy to carp about the poor Indians and Pakistani while we stand atop our ivory fortress.

    As to those who advocate the boycotting of the UAE, and wonder why woman expats in particular go there- again it's easy to make such statements when in secure employment at home. Some of us have little choice but to seek employment elsewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,745 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    Einhard wrote: »
    The UAE has come a massive way in a short few years. Twenty years ago, a huge percentage of the population was illiterate in Arabic, let alone English. The institutions there have been built entirely from scratch, and a society that was destitute, nomadic, and highly conservative a few decades ago, is now open to the world, and gradually maturing. This isn't to defend those who exploit workers, or to gloss over what happened to that Danis woman, or those like her, but rather to give a little context, and point out that entire peoples or religions cannot be condemned on the basis of such isolated incidents.
    When those bigoted, misogynistic, backward ideals are enshrined in law, I think we can. This isn't 'Law says X, religion says Y', this is 'Religion and law say Y'. A country in which a woman is incarcerated for being raped is bigoted and backward at the highest level; if that is how they choose to portray themselves then I have no choice but to view them that way.
    By way of aside-: to those criticising the UAE for the wages and conditions paid to workers- who do you think the workers appreciate more, Ireland, which won't let them near the country, or the UAE, where they can go and improve their lot? Easy to carp about the poor Indians and Pakistani while we stand atop our ivory fortress.
    So we shouldn't complain about countries using slave labour unless we're willing to take all those people in ourselves?
    As to those who advocate the boycotting of the UAE, and wonder why woman expats in particular go there- again it's easy to make such statements when in secure employment at home. Some of us have little choice but to seek employment elsewhere.

    Right now I would rather starve on the streets of Ireland than go to a country that would lock me up for being raped.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,124 ✭✭✭wolfpawnat


    I do not agree with this HOWEVER it is an added risk travelling to these area and it is well known their human rights are completely upside down and this sort of thing can happen. Travelling to that area has the added risk of this sort of madness happening.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    What would you have them do? Invade the Middle East?
    In truth they are probably working behind the scenes to get her home, but there is little that they can do.

    While not in the EU, Norway is a member of NATO. I'm sure they can get their buddies in the US and the EU to apply some pressure here. I'd say there's significant diplomatic efforts being made to repatriate her at the moment.


Advertisement
Advertisement