Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Maggie Thatcher death discussion thread - Mod rules in first post

1383941434459

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    Pinocet was a great man, Thatcher said so....
    do you have a link for that?

    No? i thought so.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    FTA69 wrote: »
    So when Argentina engaged in murdering its own citizens you laud Thatcher for going head to head with such a regime, but when she supported Chile who was doing the same your answer is "whataboutery"?

    You do not remember or know that the reason the UK went "head to head" with Argentina was because Argentina invaded the Falklands.

    The UK did not go "head to head" with every imperfect regime in the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    true wrote: »
    do you have a link for that?
    Yes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    true wrote: »
    do you have a link for that?

    No? i thought so.

    You really need to stop doffing your hat, we don't have to do that anymore.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/304516.stm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Your hypocrisy is glaring. You rightly criticise Argentina for the appalling record of the junta in power at the time, you've brought up the disappearances several times in several thread. Chile did the same with the support of Thatcher but you attempt to gloss over it with sh*te-talk.

    The fact she supported a regime which tortured thousands of people to death must surely rankle a committed and principled democrat such as yourself.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    FTA69 wrote: »
    I was talking about Pinochet and the Chilean regime which Thatcher supported vehemently to the point of her death.
    I thought she had alzimers / dementia for the last few years at least so how do you know what she supported vehemently to the point of her death?
    Mrs Thatcher also said she was very much aware that it is Pinochet who brought democracy to Chile, and who set up a constitution suitable for democracy, who put it into effect, elections were held, and then, in accordance with the result, he stepped down.
    Gorbachev was another person who visited Thatcher before the Berlin Wall came down, and she was able to help convince him to move more towards a little democracy. Same with persuading the leader of Apartheid in s. africa to give up Apartheid / release Mandela etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    You really need to stop doffing your hat, we don't have to do that anymore.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/304516.stm

    Ah well. She wasn't perfect lads. Hard decisions had to be made on the international stage. If she was so bad why were Irish builders working on the Victoria line etc etc etc.

    I think this lad is on a wind up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    true wrote: »
    I thought she had alzimers / dementia for the last few years at least so how do you know what she supported vehemently to the point of her death?

    Because she was inviting the f*cker to tea up until a few years ago. Long after he was deposed and the record of his government was there for the whole world to see. Obviously any right thinking person would oppose rounding people up and torturing them in the national stadium but not Thatcher apparently.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    FTA69 wrote: »
    I think this lad is on a wind up.

    Nope, don't think so, I recognise this peculiarly Irish delusion and blindness, it has plagued the country for centuries now, but the careers of the likes of Thatcher means it is slowly disappearing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Nope, don't think so, I recognise this peculiarly Irish delusion and blindness, it has plagued the country for centuries now, but the careers of the likes of Thatcher means it is slowly disappearing.

    An earlier reply was along the lines of "people in South America going about human rights etc were usually the same people going on about the human rights of IRA hunger strikers".

    It must be a wind up. Surely even the most fawning West Brit couldn't believe in sentiments like the above?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    FTA69 wrote: »
    An earlier reply was along the lines of "people in South America going about human rights etc were usually the same people going on about the human rights of IRA hunger strikers".

    It must be a wind up. Surely even the most fawning West Brit couldn't believe in sentiments like the above?

    The primary objective is to defend the British from the rabid Republican hordes, anything can be said and done in that quest.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    As regards defeating the Junta of argentina ( responsible for more suffering, not to mention the invasion of the Falklands ), it looks like Chile did help the UK and Falkland islanders in their hour of need.

    Chile was officially neutral during the Falklands War, but Chile's Westinghouse long range radar that was deployed in the south of the country gave the British task force early warning of Argentinian air attacks. This allowed British ships and troops in the war zone to take defensive action. Margaret Thatcher, the British prime minister at the time of the war, has said that the day the radar was taken out of service for overdue maintenance was the day Argentinian fighter-bombers bombed the troopships Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram, leaving 53 dead and many injured. According to Chilean Junta and former Air Force commander Fernando Matthei, Chilean support included military intelligence gathering, radar surveillance, allowing British aircraft to operate with Chilean colours, and facilitating the safe return of British special forces, among other forms of assistance.[49] In April and May 1982, a squadron of mothballed British Hawker Hunter fighter-bombers departed for Chile, arriving on 22 May and allowing the Chilean Air Force to reform the No. 9 "Las Panteras Negras" Squadron. A further consignment of three frontier surveillance and shipping reconnaissance Canberras left for Chile in October. Some authors have speculated that Argentina might have won the war had the military felt able to employ the elite VIth and VIIIth Mountain Brigades, which remained sitting in the Andes guarding against possible Chilean incursions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,101 ✭✭✭Weathering


    true wrote: »
    do you have a link for that?

    No? i thought so.

    Newsflash everyone. M.T isn't dead after all. She's alive and well and has taken up this users account. Personally I could of thought of more apt names for the account.

    Links? You can talk,you've have spouting figures for days and you have never supplied links when asked to back up your ludicrous claims.

    You made the point of her being the longest serving pm of the 20th century and the first ever woman pm and she should be respected for this. So longevity and gender equates to respect in your book..okay..actions do in mine. You're simply ridiculous. I look forward to your reply,I wonder which false lying road,filled of untrue statements you'll dander down this time.

    To quote the honourable mp Glenda Jackson "to pay tribute to first female prime minister duputed by gender,okay. But a woman,not on my terms"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    The primary objective is to defend the British from the rabid Republican hordes, anything can be said and done in that quest.

    or, you know, the reverse...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    Weathering wrote: »
    To quote the honourable mp Glenda Jackson "to pay tribute to first female prime minister duputed by gender,okay. But a woman,not on my terms"
    lol. Whio cares if mp Glenda Jackson pays tibute or not, on her terms or not. Glenda Jackson only got 15,000 votes in the last election she stoood in. She was nobody on the world stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    true wrote: »
    As regards defeating the Junta of argentina ( responsible for more suffering, not to mention the invasion of the Falklands ), it looks like Chile did help the UK and Falkland islanders in their hour of need.

    Chile was officially neutral during the Falklands War, but Chile's Westinghouse long range radar that was deployed in the south of the country gave the British task force early warning of Argentinian air attacks. This allowed British ships and troops in the war zone to take defensive action. Margaret Thatcher, the British prime minister at the time of the war, has said that the day the radar was taken out of service for overdue maintenance was the day Argentinian fighter-bombers bombed the troopships Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram, leaving 53 dead and many injured. According to Chilean Junta and former Air Force commander Fernando Matthei, Chilean support included military intelligence gathering, radar surveillance, allowing British aircraft to operate with Chilean colours, and facilitating the safe return of British special forces, among other forms of assistance.[49] In April and May 1982, a squadron of mothballed British Hawker Hunter fighter-bombers departed for Chile, arriving on 22 May and allowing the Chilean Air Force to reform the No. 9 "Las Panteras Negras" Squadron. A further consignment of three frontier surveillance and shipping reconnaissance Canberras left for Chile in October. Some authors have speculated that Argentina might have won the war had the military felt able to employ the elite VIth and VIIIth Mountain Brigades, which remained sitting in the Andes guarding against possible Chilean incursions.

    Great comfort to the thousands of people murdered in Chile. Imagine being a family member of one of the people killed in Chile and seeing Pinochet invited to tea by Thatcher? Would you not consider that a slap in the face?

    Then again you've previously tried to gloss over Pinochet's record and write the victims off as "IRA supporters" so there's no point in expecting any logic from you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,101 ✭✭✭Weathering


    true wrote: »
    lol. Whio cares if mp Glenda Jackson pays tibute or not, on her terms or not. Glenda Jackson only got 15,000 votes in the last election she stoood in. She was nobody on the world stage.

    Actually Mrs Jackson was re-elected for her north London seat with 17,332 votes. Further proof of your made up "facts" and "figures"

    A "nobody" ,that mentality epitomises Margaret Thatcher so why am I not surprised. I think you should write an autobiography on M.T,just be sure to sell in the the Fiction section,we wouldn't want to mislead customers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Great comfort to the thousands of people murdered in Chile. Imagine being a family member of one of the people killed in Chile and seeing Pinochet invited to tea by Thatcher? Would you not consider that a slap in the face?.
    If thats the greatest fault you can find in someone who once served as prime minister in a G7 country - that she offered tea to the person - controversal though he was, but who brought democracy to Chile, and who set up a constitution suitable for democracy, who put it into effect, elections were held, and then, in accordance with the result, who stepped down.

    I think the cup of tea was more a way of saying thanks for saving so many British lives during the Falklands etc
    FTA69 wrote: »
    Then again you've previously tried to gloss over Pinochet's record and write the victims off as "IRA supporters" so there's no point in expecting any logic from you.
    you have the wrong end of the stick there. Of course according to yopu Thatcher is responsible for thousands of deaths in Ireland so if you went to Chile you could tell the people there that herself and Pinochet were well matched;) Every coin only has one side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    If thats the greatest fault you can find in someone who once served as prime minister in a G7 country - that she offered tea to the person

    It wasn't the tea; rather the political and military support toward Suharto and Pinochet is what rankles most normal-minded people.
    but who brought democracy to Chile

    You realise he led a military coup against the democratically-elected Allende and then went about killing his opponents?

    Victor Jara - Folksinger
    On the morning of September 12, Jara was taken, along with thousands of others, as a prisoner to the Chile Stadium (renamed the Estadio Víctor Jara in September 2003[5] ). In the hours and days that followed, many of those detained in the stadium were tortured and killed there by the military forces. Jara was repeatedly beaten and tortured; the bones in his hands were broken as were his ribs.[6] Fellow political prisoners have testified that his captors mockingly suggested that he play guitar for them as he lay on the ground with broken hands. Defiantly, he sang part of "Venceremos" (We Will Win), a song supporting the Popular Unity coalition.[6] After further beatings, he was machine-gunned on September 16, his body dumped on a road on the outskirts of Santiago and then taken to a city morgue where 44 bullets were found in his body.
    Of course according to yopu Thatcher is responsible for thousands of deaths in Ireland

    Never said thousands. A few hundred definitely.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Never said thousands. A few hundred definitely.

    Whenever Irish army / Gardai killed PIRA / INLA, do you hold the Taoiseach of Ireland responsible for those deaths?

    And you may be surprised that DeValera was responsible for the deaths of IRA men in Irish prisons during "the emergency"....do you hold DeValera responsible for those too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    You're a crackpot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    true wrote: »
    If thats the greatest (.........) one side.

    Firstly, she lifted the arms embargo before the falkands war.

    Secondly, Pinochet only stepped aside when his Generals refused to support him further, so you can forget this "conditions" for democracy crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Because she was inviting the f*cker to tea up until a few years ago. Long after he was deposed and the record of his government was there for the whole world to see. Obviously any right thinking person would oppose rounding people up and torturing them in the national stadium but not Thatcher apparently.

    He was never deposed he transitioned the Chilian Government from Junta to democracy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    He was never deposed he transitioned the Chilian Government from Junta to democracy

    Yeah, after he lost support of the army. Great democrat altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭Duck Soup


    I'm genuinely astonished that anyone should try to represent Pinochet and his regime as a democrat and force for good. America was quite happy to see the democratically elected Allende forced out in a coup, as it allowed them to use Chile as a petri dish for the newly popular monetarist theories. Milton Friedman even went down there to chinwag and give him a few pointers. That was Pinochet's use to western powers - a right-winger friendly to America and a sap willing to try neoliberal economic policies in the raw.

    He wasn't so fond as democracy as to allow people to disagree with him, mind you. Take for example, just one case from the Amnesty International files on torture in Pinochet's Chile. [Warning: graphic descriptions of torture techniques follow].

    The political prisoner was a 19 year-old girl.
    During interrogation she was slapped all over the body and punched in the face, breasts and abdomen. She was kicked on the buttocks and backs of the thighs, usually while lying down. On one occasion when she was in her cell an interrogator seized her hair and banged the back and right side of her head against the wall. She did not lose consciousness. She was electrically tortured. She was stretched out on a metal bed with hands and feet bound. She was given shocks on the temples, chest and heel. A metal object was applied to her vaginal labia and she was electrically tortured there, but the device was not forced inside.

    On about the eighth day she was sexually tortured. She was stripped naked and her blind-fold was removed. She was made to lie on the floor then kicked and raped by four men, one of whom subjected her to fellatio. This type of torture lasted about an hour. They also threatened to violate her with a dog and to lock her in a room with rats.

    She was told the man she had been living with had been killed. She was then taken into a room where a corpse lay with its face covered and told it was this man. She knew it was not however, as the body's height and build were different from his. The corpse had been split open down the middle and there were wounds on the abdomen. It was beginning to decompose, and she was forced to lie right by it facing it. At one stage the towel was removed from its decomposing face.

    On five occasions she was taken into a small, very hot room and left there for a few minutes. She had a burning feeling all over but did not think she actually was burned.

    She was taken into a room full of rats, but managed to jump up on a bed and so escaped from them. She was threatened: the interrogators said they would kill her, the man she had been living with and her parents. She was also insulted and called a whore.

    She was partially deprived of sleep for the first 14 days, getting only a few hours' sleep between each interrogation session. She was held incommunicado throughout her 19 days at the CNI centre. She was blindfold all the time except when in her cell, when being sexually tortured and when confronted with the corpse. She was naked during several of the torture sessions; the rest of the time she wore overalls and zapatillas.

    She was handcuffed all the time (including when she ate) except when she went to the toilet.

    This was Pinochet's Chile. This was the type of person Margaret Thatcher felt very comfortable sitting down to tea with.


  • Posts: 1,654 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    She was one of the last politicians who actually believed what she said and had the balls to implement it.

    Fair dues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    FTA69 wrote: »
    Yeah, after he lost support of the army. Great democrat altogether.


    Was he deposed yes or no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    Was he deposed yes or no?

    One might say that he was, given he wanted to stay on but couldn't get the backing.
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/02/23/report-chiles-pinochet-wanted-anti-vote-violence/1941493/


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭true


    Duck Soup wrote: »
    This was the type of person Margaret Thatcher felt very comfortable sitting down to tea with.

    Nobody said she was perfect or always made the correct decision. Nobody said she never, over the course of a very long career in politics, sat down for tea with someone who came from a country with shady politics. I think all of the G7 countries in the world have had shady associations with some third world countries over the decades. Get real. Look at the bigger picture. She was elected in the UK to look after UK interests. She stood by the inhabitants of the Falklands because they were loyal to her. Chile helped in the fight against the agressor there, the country which invaded the Falklands, and do not forget there were more human rights abuses in Argentina than in Chile. If Chile did not help the UK as it did, the the UK may have lost the war, at a cost of thousands of UK (and some Irish, because there were some Irishmen serving in the taskforce) lives.
    Many politicians have sat down and had tea with Gerry Adams, who many believe to have been the leader of PIRA in Belfast, and one of those who abducted Jean McColville. Would a British p.m. be justified in having tea with him? Yes, I think.

    Maggie sat down and had tea with Gorbachev during the cold war, invited him to London....and the next year the Berlin wall came down. Enough said about one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century.


Advertisement
Advertisement