Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Maggie Thatcher death discussion thread - Mod rules in first post

1141517192059

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 663 ✭✭✭space_man


    Many people on here know or experienced little of Thatcher other than the revisionist/glorification tripe spouted by most of the British press.

    i lived in England during the '80s and i can attest to the fact that she was a malignant creature.

    she set neighbour against neighbour, friend against friend and worker against worker. she was poisonous.

    she directly engendered and promoted the neo-liberal agenda, its' soft(no)-touch regulation, the bankster, greed is good, money above all else "culture", the price of which we are continuing to reap the "rewards" (and will continue to do so btw).

    i wont even mention her suport of dictators, mass murderer, and loyalist death-squads.

    oh! she did deregulate the water and telecoms industries though .......LOL


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    So George Galloway and Gerry Adams have spoken out against Thatcher?
    Two individuals I would not piss on if they were on fire

    So you'd throw water on them instead? That's very thoughtful of you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    freddiek wrote: »
    the fawning Anglophile lackeys are very busy on this thread. I'm with Galloway on this one.

    http://redmolucca.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/tramp-the-dirt-down/


    That would be this Galloway...
    galloway8.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    --Kaiser-- wrote: »
    So George Galloway and Gerry Adams have spoken out against Thatcher?
    Two individuals I would not piss on if they were on fire
    To be fair, Galloway does bring a bit of unintentional comedy to the table.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    She stepped up and did it.

    ......and failed.
    Her 'society' is more divided than when she arrived, more embittered and disenfranchisment is now generational as a result. The free market policy she created (and which has had to be fed and fed by successive governments) has seen all of Europes economies lying in tatters.
    She sold out every political and moral principle to expediency (the Unionists, being a prime example, but also would have sold the Falklanders if things had been more advantageous to her aims) and we should always remember that. Fair play to those who will not let her legacy be revised or forgotten, just because she has died.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 663 ✭✭✭space_man


    I think Alexi Sayle summoned it up well when he said Thatcherism was bigotry and prejudice dressed up as policy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 444 ✭✭AEDIC


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    ......and failed.
    Her 'society' is more divided than when she arrived, more embittered and disenfranchisment is now generational as a result. The free market policy she created (and which has had to be fed and fed by successive governments) has seen all of Europes economies lying in tatters.
    She sold out every political and moral principle to expediency (the Unionists, being a prime example, but also would have sold the Falklanders if things had been more advantageous to her aims) and we should always remember that. Fair play to those who will not let her legacy be revised or forgotten, just because she has died.

    I see what you are saying, however there is a little bit of the evolution of embitterment at work here.

    If you actually look at how divided the UK was at the end of her spell as PM and compared it to now I would wager the divide is bigger now. Simply because children (and sometimes sadly granchildren) of those that lived through the Thatcher era have just grown up with 'we hate Thatcher' on their t-shirts without really knowing why.

    Dont get me wrong, she wasnt popular even with her own party towards the end, but the number of people that I have heard spewing absolute hatred over the past 24 hours that could have only been toddlers (or werent even born) is staggering.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,924 ✭✭✭wonderfullife


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    ......and failed.
    Her 'society' is more divided than when she arrived, more embittered and disenfranchisment is now generational as a result. The free market policy she created (and which has had to be fed and fed by successive governments) has seen all of Europes economies lying in tatters.
    She sold out every political and moral principle to expediency (the Unionists, being a prime example, but also would have sold the Falklanders if things had been more advantageous to her aims) and we should always remember that. Fair play to those who will not let her legacy be revised or forgotten, just because she has died.

    So you're now blaming Thatcher for the ruin of all European economies?? do you want to blame her for the bubonic plague or extinction of the dinosaurs while you are at it?

    Thatcher didn't create capitalism or the free market. She applied it to the UK. She left power in 1990 and the whole financial collapse started 17 years later. Successive governements in the UK and across many countries had 2 decades to regulate the financial services sector globally. They failed.

    Go ahead though blame the "witch" for everything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    To be fair, Galloway does bring a bit of unintentional comedy to the table.

    "shall I be the cat?"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    AEDIC wrote: »
    I see what you are saying, however there is a little bit of the evolution of embitterment at work here.

    If you actually look at how divided the UK was at the end of her spell as PM and compared it to now I would wager the divide is bigger now. Simply because children (and sometimes sadly granchildren) of those that lived through the Thatcher era have just grown up with 'we hate Thatcher' on their t-shirts without really knowing why.

    Dont get me wrong, she wasnt popular even with her own party towards the end, but the number of people that I have heard spewing absolute hatred over the past 24 hours that could have only been toddlers (or werent even born) is staggering.

    That's what I mean about the generational disenfranchisement she engendered unlike any other leader ever.
    I think those trapped in the great swathes of community she laid bare know very well who to blame and why.
    I think a lot of her Irish sycophants (that she has owned for a long time) need to ask themselves why she engenders such bitterment and hate as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 663 ✭✭✭space_man


    As for those who reckon she helped women advance, I think it's now ever more unlikely that a woman will become PM given the division and destruction she helped create.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    So you're now blaming Thatcher for the ruin of all European economies?? do you want to blame her for the bubonic plague or extinction of the dinosaurs while you are at it?

    Thatcher didn't create capitalism or the free market. She applied it to the UK. She left power in 1990 and the whole financial collapse started 17 years later. Successive governements in the UK and across many countries had 2 decades to regulate the financial services sector globally. They failed.

    Go ahead though blame the "witch" for everything.

    Thatchers model of deregulation of the financial services industry has not been tamed yet. It is an all devouring greed fueled monster, as we have seen to our cost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Thatchers model of deregulation of the financial services industry has not been tamed yet. It is an all devouring greed fueled monster, as we have seen to our cost.

    There was plenty of opportunity for those who came after to reverse it before things went t*ts up. But those that came afterwards created the scale of the problem by stoking the flames of capitalism even more. It really is a hell of a reach to blame her for something that happened a decade and a half later. What about Blair, Brown, Bush, Clinton etc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    grenache wrote: »
    These socialists will be the same people firing missiles at police at the next G8 Summit.
    because the police will have deliberately provoked them first to cause trouble so they can beat them down to satisfy their brutal tendantsies

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭jprboy


    But she was sexy..........

    Well, according to Kevin Myers on Newstalk earlier. Said she was the greatest British PM ever and am also sure he said that she was hugely sexually charismatic.......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    There was plenty of opportunity for those who came after to reverse it before things went t*ts up. But those that came afterwards created the scale of the problem by stoking the flames of capitalism even more. It really is a hell of a reach to blame her for something that happened a decade and a half later. What about Blair, Brown, Bush, Clinton etc?

    It still hasn't been controlled and might never be, until it brings the whole thing down. That is why responsible leaders don't unleash that kind of deregulation. As we can see it was for very short term gain for relatively few.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    true wrote: »
    And Adams described her Irish policy "as ‘a failure’, causing ‘great suffering’ by a hardline stance against the Irish republican cause.".
    it was a failure, and it caused people to suffer
    true wrote: »
    It was Adams and his comrades who caused the "great suffering" against the people of these islands, and all for what
    she caused it via her policies meaning the IRA kept bombing
    true wrote: »
    his terrorist policies were a failure.
    not at all, yes he didn't get a re-unification of north and south, but his policies regretable as they were in the case of sivilians did eventually bring northern ireland into a state where the unionists no longer could treat our nationalist brothers and sisters like trash, yes things could be much better but at least its a lot better then it was in the 1960s 70s and 80s, the whole thing was regretable but had it not happened the north could still be a place where non-unionists are treated like and live like animals in squaller

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    getz wrote: »
    sinking the belgrano was right,britain was at war with argentina over the falklands,the ship was not on a holiday cruise it was there for a reason,
    not at all, the ship was moving away, she was wrong to sink it, it was an evil terrorist war crime, hopefully those on the sub who sunk her who are still alive will hear the screams of those poor souls as they pop off to hell.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    not at all, the ship was moving away, she was wrong to sink it, it was an evil terrorist war crime, hopefully those on the sub who sunk her who are still alive will hear the screams of those poor souls as they pop off to hell.

    It was moving away? No it wasn't, it was part of a pincer movement moving in on the taskforce, the Argentinian navy have said as much as well. It was zigzagging and was currently facing away from the islands, bit it wasn't sailing away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    You'd also have to argue if the incident occured under Callaghan, Blair, Heath, Major (basically any of them either side of her), i doubt any of them would have chosen the path Maggie did
    yes they would have made the right decisian and handed them to the argentines, it would have saved many more lives and lots and lots of money, the people of the falklands don't care about the british, they get everything for nothing from britain so of course their happy to remain british
    Context is everything here. This was at a period where the British empire was crumbling, China not budging on the lease for Hong Kong, territories such as Ireland and many others exiting the empire in the previous half century. The Argies probably felt the British wouldn't care about the Malvinos, given the rest of the empire was effectively dissipating. They sorely misjudged the resolve of the woman
    she did it to get re-elected, and it worked, she wanted to keep as much of the remenants of the empire as possible

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    yes they would have made the right decisian and handed them to the argentines, it would have saved many more lives and lots and lots of money, the people of the falklands don't care about the british, they get everything for nothing from britain so of course their happy to remain british

    she did it to get re-elected, and it worked, she wanted to keep as much of the remenants of the empire as possible

    Please stop, I hate to see you make a fool of yourself again.

    The Falkland's has negative unemployment, it receives nothing from the UK other than defence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭AnarchistKen


    Just seen a response from Ken Loach regarding her death and he is quoted as saying "Lets privatize her funeral and put it out to competitive tender and accept the cheapest bid. It's what she would have wanted."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 444 ✭✭AEDIC


    not at all, the ship was moving away, she was wrong to sink it, it was an evil terrorist war crime, hopefully those on the sub who sunk her who are still alive will hear the screams of those poor souls as they pop off to hell.

    The Belgrano wasn't moving away at all. It WAS outside of the exclusion zone but it was repositioning to the south of the Island on the orders of Admiral Juan Lombardo on the 1st May in preparation for what was described in orders as a 'massive attack' the following day on the 2nd May.

    It was therefore positioning for an attack and not turning away or retreating, the main issue and therefore controversy is that it was outside of the UK's own exclusion zone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭Rascasse


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    It still hasn't been controlled and might never be, until it brings the whole thing down. That is why responsible leaders don't unleash that kind of deregulation. As we can see it was for very short term gain for relatively few.

    Let us not forget that it was Labour that deregulated the banks in 1997, and look at the trouble that has caused. Not everything can be blamed on MT.

    Regarding the "short term gain for the very few", actually many average Joes did very well out of the deregulation of the stock market and privatisation. Many of those who worked for privatised companies got share awards and options along with annual share bonus schemes and many other listed companies also created share incentive schemes for their workers. They also created PEP's to allow small investors, such as those receiving shares from a company scheme, to benefit from them without paying tax or CGT.

    Also the Right to Buy scheme and breaking of the stranglehold of the building societies on the mortgage market created an awful lot of opportunity for those in the lower classes to improve their situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    not at all, the ship was moving away, she was wrong to sink it, it was an evil terrorist war crime, hopefully those on the sub who sunk her who are still alive will hear the screams of those poor souls as they pop off to hell.

    Sorry, that is nonsense. You just made it up, added some screams for effect, and presented it as fact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,288 ✭✭✭TheUsual


    I wonder if the BBC could be a bit more critical and honest in their coverage of her rotten legacy if the Tories were not in Government.
    I never look to the BBC for any fair coverage of Ireland and Irish history, that's not their job, and I would be suspicious if they suddenly did. But the biased revisionism they show at the moment is ridiculous.
    Fine have your dewy-eyed montage of a hard working woman and all the former advisers that worked for her and some snippets from her cabinet colleagues.
    But this must be balanced by other programs bringing up the history brought up by people who did not like her, hate her even.

    Either David Cameron has been interfering with a free press and balance of viewpoints on her death, or maybe a behind the scenes order has come from their royalty to present her as one of their own. After all, they will be attending Thatcher's funeral.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭jprboy


    Rascasse wrote: »
    Let us not forget that it was Labour that deregulated the banks in 1997, and look at the trouble that has caused. Not everything can be blamed on MT.

    .

    True, ultimately the weather will do what it wants to.

    Oh, wait .......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    TheUsual wrote: »
    I wonder if the BBC could be a bit more critical and honest in their coverage of her rotten legacy if the Tories were not in Government.
    I never look to the BBC for any fair coverage of Ireland and Irish history, that's not their job, and I would be suspicious if they suddenly did. But the biased revisionism they show at the moment is ridiculous.
    Fine have your dewy-eyed montage of a hard working woman and all the formers Tories that worked for her and some snippets from her colleagues.
    But this must be balanced by other programs bringing up the history brought up by people who did not like her, hate her even.

    Either David Cameron has been interfering with a free press and balance of viewpoints on her death, or maybe a behind the scenes order has come from their royalty to present her as one of their own. After all, they will be attending Thatcher's funeral.

    Seriously?

    The BBC is renowned for being anti Tory.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    TheUsual wrote: »
    I wonder if the BBC could be a bit more critical and honest in their coverage of her rotten legacy if the Tories were not in Government.
    I never look to the BBC for any fair coverage of Ireland and Irish history, that's not their job, and I would be suspicious if they suddenly did. But the biased revisionism they show at the moment is ridiculous.
    Fine have your dewy-eyed montage of a hard working woman and all the former advisers that worked for her and some snippets from her cabinet colleagues.
    But this must be balanced by other programs bringing up the history brought up by people who did not like her, hate her even.

    Either David Cameron has been interfering with a free press and balance of viewpoints on her death, or maybe a behind the scenes order has come from their royalty to present her as one of their own. After all, they will be attending Thatcher's funeral.
    Seriously?

    The BBC is renowned for being anti Tory.



    Have to agree with Theusual on this I found ITN much better and balanced in there reports.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    freddiek wrote: »
    the fawning Anglophile lackeys are very busy on this thread. I'm with Galloway on this one.

    http://redmolucca.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/tramp-the-dirt-down/
    Galloway is a great man and a great politician, decent and with a good heart, he has given many years of loyal service to his people and may he give many many more

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



Advertisement
Advertisement