Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Maggie Thatcher death discussion thread - Mod rules in first post

1356759

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭harry Bailey esq


    i will admit i dont know much about thatcher but she is hardly the pinnacle of all evil in our history is she, as others said she did do her country a bit of good, while also inflicting suffering on others, the same could be said of many a party in ireland

    she set the peace process in Ireland back twenty years,evil?i dunno,probably.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭Madam


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Majority of seats.

    Nowhere near a majority of votes.

    Almost none in Scotland or Wales - the Scots will never forgive her for the Poll Tax!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    awec wrote: »
    The fact remains though that her influence on the UK as a whole was overwhelmingly positive and you only have to look at where she took it from to where she took it to to see that.

    She allowed terrorists murder citizens with assistance from the army in her own country.

    She supported evil regimes in Iraq, Cambodia, Chile, and South Africa.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Tweet at 4:11pm http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0408/380324-live-former-british-pm-margaret-thatcher-dies/
    RTE wrote:
    The death of Margaret Thatcher was a "great day" for coal miners, David Hopper, general secretary of the Durham Miners' Association said today.

    The ex-miner, who turned 70 today, spent all of his working life at Wearmouth Colliery.

    He said: "It looks like one of the best birthdays I have ever had.

    "There's no sympathy from me for what she did to our community. She destroyed our community, our villages and our people.

    "For the union this could not come soon enough and I'm pleased that I have outlived her."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭irish bloke


    i dont hate people i know nothing of

    Your just coming across as uneducated then.

    If you know nothing about her (by your own admission) then you are not really entitled to an opinion on her


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    awec wrote: »
    Her economic policies proved to be correct.

    It's far too early to say. Neoliberalism has led to some horribly indebted western nations and stratification of society not seen since the Victorian era.


  • Administrators Posts: 56,569 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The mining issue is usually trotted out but that industry was on it's knees and had to go. Alternative, cheaper fuels combined with union demands put an end to that industry, all Thatcher did was turn off the life support.

    An unpopular decision but 100% the correct one.

    As has been said, no subsequent government has tried to put life back into Britain's mining industry and there is a reason for that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭sfwcork


    I heard she has relation who is a partner with kpmg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    awec wrote: »
    The mining issue is usually trotted out but that industry was on it's knees and had to go. Alternative, cheaper fuels combined with union demands put an end to that industry, all Thatcher did was turn off the life support.

    An unpopular decision but 100% the correct one.

    As has been said, no subsequent government has tried to put life back into Britain's mining industry and there is a reason for that.

    And what did she do to help those areas get back on their feet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,731 ✭✭✭✭coolhull


    I would imagine a lot of the people here on this thread weren't even born, or were very young when she was Prime Minister.
    Does anyone even remember who succeeded Margaret Thatcher when she resigned, or who was PM before her?
    The fact that everyone knows her name is testament to the fact that she made a major contribution to history, for either good or bad,depending on your opinion.
    And leaving a legacy is what any politician aspires to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    she set the peace process in Ireland back twenty years,evil?i dunno,probably.

    plenty of idiots up north didnt help it either tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,450 ✭✭✭Morag


    She was a Fascist not a feminist.
    I am old enough to remember the effects of her governments policies and it's scarey how they are being replicated here now.
    Thatcher maybe dead but unfortunately Thatcherism isn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,845 ✭✭✭Hidalgo


    Your just coming across as uneducated then.

    If you know nothing about her (by your own admission) then you are not really entitled to an opinion on her

    Plenty others giving opinions on the woman that know very little about her. At least this poster isn't jumping on the bandwagon trotting out comments for the sake of it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    No sanctions, Nelson Mandela is a terrorist

    -Thatcher


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    We need someone with the balls Thatcher had to take on the unions in this country.

    I'm not on about picking fights with Argentina or letting hunger strikers starve to death.

    We need someone to stand up and crush the power of the unions like she did in the 80s.

    Our spineless government are bringing this country to its knees by bending over backwards for the public service trade unions.

    We need someone with Thatcher's clout to rip up the Croke Park Agreement and run the public services like a private industry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,450 ✭✭✭Morag


    coolhull wrote: »
    I would imagine a lot of the people here on this thread weren't even born, or were very young when she was Prime Minister.
    Does anyone even remember who succeeded Margaret Thatcher when she resigned, or who was PM before her?
    The fact that everyone knows her name is testament to the fact that she made a major contribution to history, for either good or bad,depending on your opinion.
    And leaving a legacy is what any politician aspires to.

    James Callaghan Labour preceded her and John Major Tory/Conservative party succeed her.

    Some of us remember.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭Seedy Arling


    It would be nice if people put forward solid arguments pro/contra her policies, and not expressing delight over the death of a feeble old woman whose mind apparently had gone due to dementia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭trickymicky


    what i cant understand is if she was so hated by the british people, how did she get three terms in office and basically ran britain for 21 years.

    now im no fan of thatcher and wont lose any sleep with her being dead, but can anyone answer this for me because i wouldnt be too educated in her policies but there must of been something that kept her in power for that long.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Lapin wrote: »
    We need someone with the balls Thatcher had to take on the unions in this country.

    I'm not on about picking fights with Argentina or letting hunger strikers starve to death.

    We need someone to stand up and crush the power of the unions like she did in the 80s.

    Our spineless government are bringing this country to its knees by bending over backwards for the public service trade unions.

    We need someone with Thatcher's clout to rip up the Croke Park Agreement and run the public services like a private industry.

    The road to economic hell is paved with consensus. After 25 years of national agreements the political class does not know how to govern without help. It needs to get everyone on board to thrash out a plan that doesn't work but which everyone can say they adhere to and are seeking to fulfil. In Britain of the 70s it was Beer and Sandwiches, that was a stitch up. Things under Croke Park are no better.
    what i cant understand is if she was so hated by the british people, how did she get three terms in office and basically ran britain for 21 years.

    She wasn't hated by the British she was hated by some in Britain. As I mentioned in a previous post. If you were a working class person with ambition and drive (a barrow boy) or wanted to own your own home you voted Tory in 1979 and at least once, probably twice thereafter. If you were a coal/steel worker you might have voted the first time so angry were people with Labour in 79 but not thereafter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭rusheen


    We remember all the innocent victims of "British Justice" imposed by Cromwell , Thatcher


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,569 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    what i cant understand is if she was so hated by the british people, how did she get three terms in office and basically ran britain for 21 years.

    now im no fan of thatcher and wont lose any sleep with her being dead, but can anyone answer this for me because i wouldnt be too educated in her policies but there must of been something that kept her in power for that long.
    Because she wasn't.

    There were groups opposed to her, and they were incredibly outspoken, but that should not be translated as widespread hate.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    i will admit i dont know much about thatcher but she is hardly the pinnacle of all evil in our history is she, as others said she did do her country a bit of good, while also inflicting suffering on others, the same could be said of many a party in ireland

    She didn't care about people - simples! God just listening to/reading some of the stuff she advocated and participated in makes my stomach churn:

    Advocating the Cromwell approach to catholics up North
    Implications of assisting the Khmer Rouge
    Standing by Pinochet
    Eugh - getting an ulcer thinking of everything: blocking sanctions on the Apartheid regime, sinking of the General Belgrano, blocking sanctions on the Pinochet regime, the list goes on!
    It would be nice if people put forward solid arguments pro/contra her policies, and not expressing delight over the death of a feeble old woman whose mind apparently had gone due to dementia.

    Have a google - even if you watch the RTE reel on her you can pick up on some pointers as to why people hated her.
    I really don't care that she is dead. What boils my blood is people defending her policies, especially when they don't even know what they were.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,450 ✭✭✭Morag


    Let me see, she wanted homosexuality outlawed, the mentioning of homosexuality in any forum outlawed, she wanted to put all the AIDS/HIV patients in a concentration camp.

    Poll Tax, ie household tax and if you didn't play it you lost your right to vote.
    Privatisation of everything, rail roads, untility companies ect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Morag wrote: »
    Let me see, she wanted homosexuality outlawed, the mentioning of homosexuality in any forum outlawed, she wanted to put all the AIDS/HIV patients in a concentration camp.

    Poll Tax, ie household tax and if you didn't play it you lost your right to vote.

    You better find that article for us all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,293 ✭✭✭1ZRed


    The one thing I'll say is that people my age are commenting on this saying "thank fuk the old bitch is dead", yet never lived through her reign, and many dont know anything about her but are just piggy backing off of what other people are saying. It's so stupid.

    I'll admit I know feck all about her, bar some things, but you won't see me saying anything for or against about her either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,845 ✭✭✭Hidalgo


    Lapin wrote: »
    We need someone with the balls Thatcher had to take on the unions in this country.

    I'm not on about picking fights with Argentina or letting hunger strikers starve to death.

    We need someone to stand up and crush the power of the unions like she did in the 80s.

    Our spineless government are bringing this country to its knees by bending over backwards for the public service trade unions.

    We need someone with Thatcher's clout to rip up the Croke Park Agreement and run the public services like a private industry.

    If we had someone like her in charge of Ireland, people would be even more p*ssed off with the government than they currently are due to the type of policy she would enact. Even if these policies were for the long term good of the state, people would be up in arms as they would suffer in the short to medium term (and long term for some)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭AK333


    what i cant understand is if she was so hated by the british people, how did she get three terms in office and basically ran britain for 21 years.

    now im no fan of thatcher and wont lose any sleep with her being dead, but can anyone answer this for me because i wouldnt be too educated in her policies but there must of been something that kept her in power for that long.

    Thats because she was PM for 13 years, not 21! From 79 to 92 and in the last 2 to 3 years her own party tried to get her out but she 'wasn't for moving'.

    Bertie Ahern was voted in three times, that doesn't mean that he was that popular either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,746 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    mike65 wrote: »
    You better find that article for us all.

    I think the poster is referring to Section 28 which was a law that said that local councils couldn't "promote homosexuality". It came into force in 1988 under Thatcher.

    Cameron has since said that Section 28 was a mistake.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,924 ✭✭✭wonderfullife


    Morag wrote: »
    Let me see, she wanted homosexuality outlawed, the mentioning of homosexuality in any forum outlawed, she wanted to put all the AIDS/HIV patients in a concentration camp.

    Poll Tax, ie household tax and if you didn't play it you lost your right to vote.
    Privatisation of everything, rail roads, untility companies ect.

    You're aware you can't just make up stuff and claim it to be fact?

    For a start, she appointed an openly gay MP to her cabinet (Earl of Avon).

    She was a conservative politician and like many conservatives felt the idea of homosexuality did not square up to the traditional view of marriage of that between man and woman.

    Of course that's something most of us will disagree with but that's far from wanting it "outlawed" and the HIV concentration camp thing is pure nonsense.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    I think the poster is referring to Section 28 which was a law that said that local councils couldn't "promote homosexuality". It came into force in 1988 under Thatcher.

    Cameron has since said that Section 28 was a mistake.

    Quite, a very different matter to concentration camps. Still, there is room for idiots and fools on the internet.


Advertisement
Advertisement