Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland won't be united so let loyalists fly flag – Seamus Heaney

245678

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭bbam


    As a catholic from just south of the border I could care less if they fly the Queens knickers or our presidents boxers 24/7/365.

    Why the **** don't they decide on a new neutral flag and fly that!

    The truth is that there are huge segments on both sides of the divide in the north who just want to fight about anything they can. Flags is just the most recent thing they latched onto, if all flage were banned they'd fight about their right to keep flag poles anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    It's a piece of cloth.

    This is a very immature, reductionist understanding of symbolism.

    Flags represent things - they have meaning and engender emotions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    Soups123 wrote: »
    Can they not just fly both flags every fcukung day and then everyones happy

    They will find something to argue about. Location of flags, which one is higher, etc, etc. We aren't dealing with rational people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    bbam wrote: »
    As a catholic from just south of the border I could care less if they fly the Queens knickers or our presidents boxers 24/7/365.

    Why the **** don't they decide on a new neutral flag and fly that!

    The truth is that there are huge segments on both sides of the divide in the north who just want to fight about anything they can. Flags is just the most recent thing they latched onto, if all flage were banned they'd fight about their right to keep flag poles anyway.

    This "one side is as bad as the other" argument is idiotic and wrong. That flag flew over what was supposed to be a public building for 90 years and nationalists werent outside it every day protesting. The flag was eventually reduced to designated days to create a shared environment for everybody. Loyalists/Unionists couldnt accept this small move towards equality. Loyalists/Unionists blocked roads. Loyalists/Unionists protested. Loyalists/Unionists rioted. Loyalists/Unionists attacked cops and tried to burn a cop alive.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    This is a very immature, reductionist understanding of symbolism.

    Flags represent things - they have meaning and engender emotions.

    They are silly objects when you think about it, though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    IMO he's right. There win't be a United Ireland so long as they're all so bat schit crazy up there. And TBH I wouldn't want to share a country with those lunatics.

    So untill they all calm the fcuk down up there Mr Cameron and Mrs Windsor are welcome to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Lapin wrote: »
    I didn't imply that.



    I agree the decision taken was democratic.

    But I question the motives behind the move to table such a motion in the first place. The flag over City Hall was hardly a pressing priority for Belfast City Council. It smacks of truimphalism on the part of nationalists.

    I'm all for sticking with democracy but it sickens me to see it being abused.

    You seemed to disagree that Belfast was somehow different when another poster argued that Belfast is a 50/50 city. For some reason you stated (accurately) that its a UK city! But to me, the way you said it you were implying that its position in the UK over rules the fact that its a shared city! I apologise if I read you wrong, it's just the way I picked you up by saying the original posters comment was silly. Where in my opinion he was 100% correct.

    I don't know what the motives were, except that the political parties that got the most votes in Belfast city council had a policy of removing the flag from the building. The alliance went against this and proposed a policy of designated days. Democracy!

    Toys flying out of prams throughout the streets of east Belfast won't change that fact. Perhaps if the unionist forum gets its ducks in a row they will get enough voters out to get back a majority in BCC. Then the flag can go back up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Lapin wrote: »
    It smacks of truimphalism on the part of nationalists.

    Upside down and back to front shite tbh. The decision to fly the Union fleg on designated days was a democratic compromise. If you have any understanding of the history of Loyalism (which you clearly don't) you'll note that it is deeply rooted in anti-Irishness, anti-Catholicism, triumphalism and dominance.
    old hippy wrote: »
    They are silly objects when you think about it, though.

    It's a pointless observation. Watch me - I can do it too.

    The Pyramids are just a big bunch of stone blocks.

    Newgrange is just a man-made cave.

    The Mona Lisa is just paint on fabric.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    So flying a contentious flag 365 days a year doesnt smack of triumphalism, but wanting it to be taken down so as to create a neutral, shared space and then even compromising on that reasonable demand and allowing the contentious flag to be flown on designated days is somehow triumphalism. Seems you have an odd view of what constitutes triumphalism.

    Look at all those nationalist bastards. Walking around like they have equal rights. Bloody being alive and living in their home city. Triumphalist bastards


    It is the national flag of the United Kingdom. Who is contending that ?

    There was nothing contentious about the flag being flown over city hall for over 100 years prior to the vote being taken.

    I for one have never heard anyone complain about it before all this crap blew up.

    It only became contentious when a nationalist majority decided to remove it for no explanitory reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭kingtiger


    I don't give a toss what flag they fly. It's a piece of cloth


    would you fly a Swastika flag?

    after all its just a piece of cloth


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Lapin wrote: »
    It is the national flag of the United Kingdom. Who is contending that ?

    There was nothing contentious about the flag being flown over city hall for over 100 years prior to the vote being taken.

    I for one have never heard anyone complain about it before all this crap blew up.

    No one is contending the union flag is the flag of the united kingdom. You seem to want someone to contend it though?

    Ya plenty of nationalist requested on lobbied to have it removed. And then there was a conflict during the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s to remove it... Most loyalists probably hadn't heard about any proposals to remove it either until the ol letter campaign by the DUP... That calmed the entire situation down nicely!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭Lome


    The thing i dont understand about the whole flag issue is that its the exact same as london or any other city... Its just bringing it in line with other cities. So if they were so "British" surely they'd want to be more like london... They're a dying breed anyway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    Deedsie wrote: »
    No one is contending the union flag is the flag of the united kingdom. You seem to want someone to contend it though?


    Why do you consistantly refer to it as the 'contentious flag' then?

    There is nothing contentious about the flag.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Lapin wrote: »
    Why do you consistantly refer to it as the 'contentious flag' then?

    There is nothing contentious about the flag.

    Not only do I not constantly, I have never called it contentious... But then I don't live in nor have I ever lived in Belfast! I'm sure I'd object and vote for a party who support it's removal if I did live there! To much blood spilled in the name of both flags!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 428 ✭✭OCorcrainn


    If Seamas Heaney said that it must be true. :pac:

    On a related note his poetry is completely overrated .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,541 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    iDave wrote: »
    Protestant state for Protestant people etc.

    People are actually religious these days, or using religion as an excuse?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    Deedsie wrote: »
    Not only do I not constantly, I have never called it contentious... But then I don't live in nor have I ever lived in Belfast! I'm sure I'd object and vote for a party who support it's removal if I did live there! To much blood spilled in the name of both flags!

    Apologies, I got you mixed up with the comments of another poster her over this -
    Deedsie wrote: »
    No one is contending the union flag is the flag of the united kingdom.
    So flying a contentious flag 365 days a year doesnt smack of triumphalism, but wanting it to be taken down so as to create a neutral, shared space and then even compromising on that reasonable demand and allowing the contentious flag to be flown on designated days is somehow triumphalism.

    It seems Crooked Jack has the problem with the Union Jack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Lapin wrote: »
    Apologies, I got you mixed up with the comments of another poster her over this

    Fair enough, it happens to us all!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    This is just their idea of applying for a grant application for the local community,they are not educated enough to fill out the forms.
    They can then go out and spend the money on new top of the range flutes and lambeg drums for the wee ones so they can parade around in circles outside the local Catholic church on their march just like Daddy does instead of educating them and then the cycle continues.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭gallag


    tipptom wrote: »
    This is just their idea of applying for a grant application for the local community,they are not educated enough to fill out the forms.
    They can then go out and spend the money on new top of the range flutes and lambeg drums for the wee ones so they can parade around in circles outside the local Catholic church on their march just like Daddy does instead of educating them and then the cycle continues.
    You sound just as bigoted as the people you stereotype.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭bluecode


    The whole flag issue just proves what I and many other people think. If you thought the troubles were bad. Wait until the demographics swing against the loyalists. As is happening in Belfast right now. If the day ever arrives where a majority favour a united Ireland or even a less British Northern Ireland. The real troubles will start and it will be vicious. We got a taste of it in 1969 when a serious attempt at a pogrom on Catholics was attempted. It took the British army to put a stop to it.

    These so called loyalists cared a great deal about democracy when it worked in their favour. After all Northern Ireland was deliberately created to ensure an artificial majority. But things are gradually going against them and they know it.

    Now I'm not talking about all Protestants/Unionists in the North. But there is a strong element of bitter sectarianism particularly among Orangemen and the poorer, increasingly disaffected protestants. This is nothing new. It goes back hundreds of years and is the single biggest cause of problems on this island. In reality their Britishness is nothing more than a shield against being called Irish. Remember the North is a place where people can write on a wall, with no hint of irony: 'Irish go home'. Many are descendants of the people who arrived here many years ago into what was enemy territory. It still is it seems.

    When the time comes that their Britishness is threatened. They will organise themselves and attempt a coup. At that point even the moderate Unionists will have to choose sides. It will be like Kosovo and just as nasty.

    I speak as someone who isn't particularly republican in views and in fact don't see why Northern Ireland can't work as an entity if both sides respect each other's rights. But I fear that cannot happen as long the sectarian bigots reinforce their siege mentality on the loyalist side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Anyone who thinks that the troubles are over better think. Sure it's all lovey covey with Martin and Peter but talk to anyone who lives in the old flashpoint areas like West Belfast or Portadown and they will tell you that the mutual hatred is worse than ever. What other city in Europe or the world for that matter has to have a wall to keep people apart. It's only a matter of time until full scale fighting breaks out again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    Soups123 wrote: »
    Can they not just fly both flags every fcukung day and then everyones happy

    You think Loyalists would be happy if the Tricolour was flying on City Hall, even if it was beside the Union Flag?

    Ha.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    An Coilean wrote: »
    You think Loyalists would be happy if the Tricolour was flying on City Hall, even if it was beside the Union Flag?

    Ha.
    I'm pretty sure there'd be some law against it anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Lapin wrote: »
    It is the national flag of the United Kingdom. Who is contending that ?

    Nobody is contending what it is. The problem is that it doesnt belong over any building here. Half the population of the north dont want it and more importantly the majority of people in Belfast dont want it (this is after all a belfast city council issue.) The north is disputed territory, flags are obviously going to be contentious, hence Sinn Fein's very reasonable approach of both or no flags, a policy that they were willing to compromise on for the sake of peace.
    Lapin wrote: »
    There was nothing contentious about the flag being flown over city hall for over 100 years prior to the vote being taken.

    Yes there was. You think nationalists jsut woke up one morning in December and decided they didnt like it?
    Lapin wrote: »
    I for one have never heard anyone complain about it before all this crap blew up.

    I'm sure there is a lot of stuff from the north you have never heard. Nationalists have never liked it but they never felt the need to block roads and piss off the whole city over it.
    Lapin wrote: »
    only became contentious when a nationalist majority decided to remove it for no explanitory reason.

    What absolute shite. So because nationalists havent been blocking roads for 90 years it wasnt contentious? Cop yourself on


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭An Coilean


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure there'd be some law against it anyway.

    I doubt it, the usual procedure is that the flag of the state must either be on the highest poll of if there is no poll higher than the rest, on the right hand poll. Thats how it is here anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Lapin wrote: »
    It seems Crooked Jack has the problem with the Union Jack.

    The majority of Belfast has the problem with it. Hence the majority of their elected officials voted to take it down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    An Coilean wrote: »
    I doubt it, the usual procedure is that the flag of the state must either be on the highest poll of if there is no poll higher than the rest, on the right hand poll. Thats how it is here anyway.
    I can't see Sinn Fein being happy with the tricolour in a subordinate position to the union flag.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭bbam


    This "one side is as bad as the other" argument is idiotic and wrong. That flag flew over what was supposed to be a public building for 90 years and nationalists werent outside it every day protesting. The flag was eventually reduced to designated days to create a shared environment for everybody. Loyalists/Unionists couldnt accept this small move towards equality. Loyalists/Unionists blocked roads. Loyalists/Unionists protested. Loyalists/Unionists rioted. Loyalists/Unionists attacked cops and tried to burn a cop alive.

    Yes, yes this time it was loyalists/unionists.
    But there have been plenty of nationalist protests over similarly trivial issues.
    So the each are as bad as each other in general is actually very true.
    Both sides protest over poxy trivial issues.
    Both sides have rioted
    Both sides have killed each other
    Both sides have killed innocents to further their cause and prove points.

    Both sides are suffering because any saine person will avoid the north as a place to spend money.

    So don't tell me that the both sides are as bad as each other argument is wrong, when in fact that is the truth.
    Both are continually looking for an opportunity to create "equality" by getting one up on the other. Well do e to all involves, feckin crettins keeping the thing wound up, bringing new generations into the hatred and violence rather than turning their backs on a dark period in their history.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭Buzz84


    Well Heaney doesnt think there will ever be a United Ireland.

    FFS how long has he been keeping this to himself? If only he had told us sooner, it would of saved us so much bother.

    You swear his opinion was a statement of fact.


Advertisement
Advertisement