Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

If Hitler Won the War

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    D-day landing meant nothing.

    Germany was finished at that stage.
    There's more at play usually than pure numbers. An exceptionally decisive victory for Germany on that day could have been the morale boost that they needed to hold Europe against the Soviets. Not least because they may have been able to reduce the resources they needed to hold the west.

    The defeats in the East certainly were a massive loss to the Germans and an indication that they would really struggle to hold the eastern front. D-Day was smaller by comparison but dealt the crushing blow to Nazi morale - they were now flanked on both sides by enemies who were winning. It was then the German forces started collapsing and breaking ranks.

    Would the Soviets have destroyed Germany without D-Day? Possibly, but probably not in less than a year (as happened after D-Day), and certainly not without much larger casualities. Would the D-Day landings have been as decisive without the Soviets wins? Probably not.

    Like I mention though, a scenario in which the Germans "won" would require that the Germans won in the east (or lost less badly) and won on D-Day. It would also have required that Hitler didn't become a raving loony towards the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭Davidth88


    An interesting one.

    If Germany won World War 2 , I imagine they would have occupied the British Isles ( as in the geographic area ..... to stop any nonsense ) .

    You would have seen the continuation of the persecutions of the racial minorities , so in Ireland you could expect any Jews , travellers etc wiped out.

    Ireland would be used to supply the German 3rd Reich , so any exports would go there , you could expect a lot of men to be deported for slave labour etc

    Really not a nice idea TBH.

    If you look how they treated the Channel Isles for example , all radios banned lots of people deported .

    Think of North Korea really .

    Can't think of many up sides TBH


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 657 ✭✭✭exiledelbows


    mconigol wrote: »
    Edit: Also all have traffic lights would be like this: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2305/2533922845_fb0601f8e4.jpg

    Not true, they're an East German post-WW2 variation

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampelmännchen


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭wendell borton


    Germany would have been a far stronger position if their policies had not forced some of the greatest scientest of that time out of the country, while at the same time constraining the remaining ones with their ideology.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    How come nobody has posted this:




    Thats what would happen? :pac: :P


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Stillweak wrote: »
    Probably my last post on boards as I want to close account anyway. Going to get a lot of stick for this, but .........

    I wonder about it all the time.

    No Israeli land grabbing and imposing their own slightly more subtle holocaust.
    Well hitler and some of his cronies were initially quite supportive of a Jewish homeland/Israel as one "solution" to the "Jewish problem", so Israel may well have come to be anyway.
    No 9/11
    No doubt other 911's would have happened.
    Probably a united Ireland speaking German
    (revenge to Britain and reward to our non involvement in war)
    Hardly. Hitler wasn't particularly interested in Ireland. Chances are with the UK out of the war, he wouldn't have bothered with engaging with Ireland beyond low level diplomacy. Now at the wannasee conference when they were deciding what to do about Jews in Europe they reckoned Ireland had 4000 living here so that might have interested them, though they were wrong on the numbers.
    guerrilla warfare in most counties under German rule, which would be ruthlessly put down
    Maybe not. If hostilites had died down officially, guerrilla war may have also died down quickly enough, especially if the reich economy benefited locals. Where they really fooked up was with their daft racial purity guff. If they had said to the Russians "do you wanna be part of the reich?" they would have found many, if not millions of Russians who wanted shot of Stalin and his bully boys. I read one account by a russian pilot stationed outside a village in Russia who noticed the locals started breaking out their religious stuff and going to church services again and the same locals were suprised the germans allowed that. The locals even handed u the local party spy(apparently these were usually schoolteachers) There was a lot of hostility to Stalin and the party. A hostility the germans daftly didn't take advantage of.

    One notion I'd have, odd though it may seem, is that if Hitler had won adnd had won early enough(UK sues for uneasy peace/non involvement in Europe in 1940 and Russia had been taken) then the holocaust may not have happened to nearly the degree it did. They had most certainly been persecuting Jews from early on, but the wholesale mechanised final solution came later after the Brits had held out and they were bogged down in Russia. The aforementioned Wannasee conference definitely has the feeling of "we need to do this as fast as possible before the jig is up" about it.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wow, Godwin's Law was proved in the very first post :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,269 ✭✭✭GalwayGuy2


    The aforementioned Wannasee conference definitely has the feeling of "we need to do this as fast as possible before the jig is up" about it.

    That's even worse. They were driven by hate that they were prepared to die for their ideology?:S


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    GalwayGuy2 wrote: »
    That's even worse. They were driven by hate that they were prepared to die for their ideology?:S
    Pretty much yea. They diverted vast resources to it too. Resources they could have aimed elsewhere in winning the war. Mad.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    We'd have wound up being ruled by Germany. That of course is not happening presently.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    seamus wrote: »
    There's more at play usually than pure numbers. An exceptionally decisive victory for Germany on that day could have been the morale boost that they needed to hold Europe against the Soviets. Not least because they may have been able to reduce the resources they needed to hold the west.

    It wasn't gonna happen.

    The German air force had been destroyed by the USSR. Germans defending Occupied France had no aerial cover. D-Day was a battle for the invading forces to lose. Britain and the US waited until Germany was on her knees so as to minimise losses of their own troops and to allow Germany and the USSR to destroy each other.
    Wibbs wrote: »
    Well hitler and some of his cronies were initially quite supportive of a Jewish homeland/Israel as one "solution" to the "Jewish problem", so Israel may well have come to be anyway.

    Yeah, something that is "conveniently" written out of history was the collaboration between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement in getting jews to Palestine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Yeah, something that is "conveniently" written out of history was the collaboration between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement in getting jews to Palestine.

    Eichmann was sent to Palestine and promptly got deported investigating this possibility. Another madcap idea was resettling the Jewish people in Madagascar. These were all shelved. The extermination of the Jewish race in Europe is clearly outlined in Mein Kampf by one A. Hitler.
    He had a pathological hatred of the Jewish people and would never have settled for anything less that their extinction. Any resettlement would only have delayed the Holocaust not prevented it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,226 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    chops018 wrote: »
    http://headrambles.com/2011/11/15/if-hitler-won-the-war/

    Do you ever wonder what the world would be like if Hitler had won the last war?

    Yes and then I thank God a lot of people died to stop him.
    chops018 wrote: »
    It’s impossible to say precisely of course, but we can take a rough guess.

    First of all, Hitler may have had some fairly weird ideas but he was no fool.

    Should I bother ? :rolleyes:
    chops018 wrote: »
    Hitler, amongst other things was a health fanatic. He believed in total abstinence from alcohol, was a vegetarian and had a hatred of smoking.

    Why oh fooking why do people persist with this sh** that he was a vegetarian.
    He wasn't and there is proof to the contrary he liked suasages, game pies, stuffed pidgeon, amongst other things.

    I would bet it was mostly because people thought vegetarians are a bit precious and odd, but in your case you seem to think it shows him in a good light.
    Either way you are wrong.

    Oh and he didn't believe in total abstinence from alcohol, the SS commander of his personal guard was a big drinker and there is no evidence he stopped people in his company from totally drinking.
    And there is even evidence that Hitler took the odd sip of wine or beer,
    but he never allowed himself be drunk supposeldy because he was found past out as a young guy and also his father was an alcoholic.

    So you were wrong in most of your asertions about hitler, just like you are wrong in your rosey outlook of what the Third Reich would mean for us and everyone else conquered.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭bluecode


    I know there are plenty of people who wish Hitler won the war. No doubt these same people would happily be poncing around in black uniforms terrorising the rest of us!

    In fact it was almost impossible for Hitler and Germany to win the war. He completely underestimated the Soviets for a start and he had no regard for the Americans. If he had he would never have gone to war with either of them. Plus he was a crap general who ignored all professional military advice.

    But if he had won the war, the holocaust that happened would have paled into insignificance compared to what was planned. He intended to wipe out most of the Poles and most of the Slavs. The rest of Europe would be vassal states including us.

    But there is one thing many people don't consider. Hitler was a sick man by 1945, not helped by his quack of a Doctor. He would not have survived much longer anyway even if there wasn't another attempt to kill him.

    The thing to remember is that the German military took an oath of loyalty directly to Hitler. When he died so did the oath. Hitler was very careful to keep his cronies at each others throats. So there was no natural successor. There could easily have been a something of a civil war between the SS and the German army led by different factions. Himmler fancied the job. So did Goering and the military generally despised the Nazis. Once released from their oath they would happily have rounded up all the Nazi leadership and shot the lot.

    It could have been very messy indeed.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Hitler used a divide and conquer policy to gain
    - The Ruhr
    - Austria
    - Bits of and later half of Czechoslovakia (only democracy in Eastern Europe 1.2m in their army, supplied 1/4 of the tanks used in invasion of France, most of the arms for the Atlantic wall )
    - Bits of the Latvia?


    - Half of Poland ( only happened because Poles / France / UK didn't do deal with Russia ) , Even without the Czech's or Russia and the small size of the BEF , France could still have invaded.

    - Denmark was over before anyone could react
    - Norway like Poland (and Czechoslovakia) showed that France / UK weren't really interested in a real war


    Like a gambler on a lucky streak he hoped to deliver a knock out blow to the Russians , let's not forget that just a generation before the Russians had surrendered the Ukraine to Germany. Had Germany tried for peace , offering to defeat the Russian revolution at the start of 1918 the map of Europe might have been very different.

    The big mistake was invading Russia at that time (Russia by then had gobbled up the Baltic States and bits of just about everyone else on their border.)

    Another big mistakes were allying with Italy (though this was necessary to also ally with all the Eastern European countries like Finland, Romania, Slovakia etc. )




    Hitler would have not continued to win. He should have quit while ahead.


    Allying with Japan was a disaster. The Japanese didn't even bother to attack the shipping from USA to Russia's far eastern ports !!

    Perhaps if he'd gotten Japan on-side for an attack on Russia he could have kept the US out of the war. (The US would still make money selling arms) But allying with Japan meant that peace with the colonial powers was off the table. An this was the same Japan that a generation previously had taken some of Germany's Pacific colonies.


    Hitler could have tried to keep the peace with Russia.
    A peace deal with the UK/ Russia against Japan could have resulted in a very different world. Plenty of living space in the Fench / Dutch Colonies.

    Same for Japan. The US would have been far happier if Japan had gone north in to Siberia and just kept Manchukoko, allowing China to defeat the communists there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    It wasn't gonna happen.
    Thankfully this is a "what if" thread, so we can ponder over theoretical scenarios no matter how unlikely :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,157 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Hardly. Hitler wasn't particularly interested in Ireland. Chances are with the UK out of the war, he wouldn't have bothered with engaging with Ireland beyond low level diplomacy. Now at the wannasee conference when they were deciding what to do about Jews in Europe they reckoned Ireland had 4000 living here so that might have interested them, though they were wrong on the numbers.

    They just made up loads of 'he said she said' stories :)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Green_%28Ireland%29
    Operation Green (German: Unternehmen Grün) often also referred to as Case Green (Fall Grün) or Plan Green (Plan Grün), was a full scale operations plan for a German invasion of Ireland in support of Operation Sea Lion (Unternehmen Seelöwe).[1][2] Despite its detailed nature, Green is thought to have been designed only as a credible threat, a feint, not an actual operation. Plan W, a planned occupation of all of the Irish Free State by British forces, was drafted by the British military in secret liaison with the Irish government to counteract any German invasion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    I remember reading about his obsession with healthy living, It's interesting to ponder would he have implemented widespread control over alcohol and tobacco products if he had won. He introduced a smoking ban in public places in Germany as well as an extensive anti smoking campaign in the print media. He also discouraged the practice in his military but of course it was still widely practiced, Goring for instance was a chain smoker. Eva Braun also smoked.

    Hitler seemed to reach this conclusion about tobacco in his early 30s up until then he himself had been a heavy smoker and drinker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Stillweak


    donvito99 wrote: »

    As you said yourself, I'm surprised no one has brought you up on this.

    That's an abysmally obnoxious thing to say, how dare you compare the two.

    I will quite happily compare the two.
    What happened to the Jews at the hands of hitler was appalling murder of innocents.
    What is happening to the Muslims in the middle east at the hands of Israel is appalling murder and dehumanisation of innocents.
    The difference is Israel is just going about it in a slower less oblivious way. They will evidentially get to the 6 million mark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭Beaulieu


    Len Deighton wrote a great book on this very topic back 30 yrs ago -SSGB.
    Well worth a read and with a nice sting in the tail if I remember too;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    If hitler won the war I'd have been alright, blond hair and blue eyes. Actually I could have been part of the master race now, or even the only race at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Stillweak


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Well hitler and some of his cronies were initially quite supportive of a Jewish homeland/Israel as one "solution" to the "Jewish problem", so Israel may well have come to be anyway

    Maybe initially but by 1945, You are suggesting Hitler might have stopped what he was doing in the camps and told the Jews he hadn't killed that not only would he not be killing them but he was giving them land to go to live on. Ok


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭dd972


    this would have been interesting, I wish they'd won now :p

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welthauptstadt_Germania


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭bluecode


    Stillweak wrote: »
    I will quite happily compare the two.
    What happened to the Jews at the hands of hitler was appalling murder of innocents.
    What is happening to the Muslims in the middle east at the hands of Israel is appalling murder and dehumanisation of innocents.
    The difference is Israel is just going about it in a slower less oblivious way. They will evidentially get to the 6 million mark.
    Complete nonsense. You are merely exposing your prejudice. There is absolutely no comparison. Plus this is completely irrelevant to the subject of this thread. It's people like you and Hitler who made Jews seek to get away from persecution and set up their own country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    dd972 wrote: »
    this would have been interesting, I wish they'd won now :p

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welthauptstadt_Germania

    It was just an exaggerated Paris. Speer was an adequate architect and Hitler a failed artist. Making everything bigger doesn't make it better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 113 ✭✭Rebelkell


    We all would have got a nasty surprise as the nazi's viewed us a step above the Jews on par with the slavs. Still at least there would be no itinerant gangs driving around the country beating up old people.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I remember reading about his obsession with healthy living, It's interesting to ponder would he have implemented widespread control over alcohol and tobacco products if he had won. He introduced a smoking ban in public places in Germany as well as an extensive anti smoking campaign in the print media. He also discouraged the practice in his military but of course it was still widely practiced, Goring for instance was a chain smoker. Eva Braun also smoked.

    Hitler seemed to reach this conclusion about tobacco in his early 30s up until then he himself had been a heavy smoker and drinker.
    True but contrary to popular he wasn't a vegetarian, nor was he a teetotaler. He still ate sausages and lamb and liked the odd schnapps.
    Stillweak wrote: »
    Maybe initially but by 1945, You are suggesting Hitler might have stopped what he was doing in the camps and told the Jews he hadn't killed that not only would he not be killing them but he was giving them land to go to live on. Ok
    That was my entire point, initially is the important part. The final solution was more a psychotic rush job. If success had come early enough expulsion of Jews to another area might have been more attractive/cheaper(after nicking all their assets of course). Have an oul perusal of this. Some Zionist groups actively sought support from some among Hitlers staff. He himself was variable on the idea, but mostly pro.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Rebelkell wrote: »
    We all would have got a nasty surprise as the nazi's viewed us a step above the Jews on par with the slavs. Still at least there would be no itinerant gangs driving around the country beating up old people.
    Not me pal, I'd have learned some german and passed off as one, just like in escape to victory.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    [QUOTE=Davidth88;82633398If Germany won World War 2 , I imagine they would have occupied the British Isles ( as in the geographic area ..... to stop any nonsense )[/quote]They didn't occupy Vichy France or many of the Eastern European countries until later on.

    If you get a chance have a read of Fatherland.

    Germany is the top dog in a sort of EU with the UK (and Ireland) in a similar sort of relationship that Finland (and to a lesser extent Austria) had to Russia during the Cold War.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 138 ✭✭Difference Engine


    If Hitler won the war AH wouldn't have a PC brigade to complain about. There'd be no threads about Islam, gay marriage wouldn't be an issue and certainly no immigrants to worry about.

    Welfare threads would be a thing of the past (as would most welfare recipients). Mods would actually be the Gestapo instead of just being compared to them.

    Cats and beards would be the only topics of the day.

    It would be a mods dream really, just there'd be no one left to moderate as all you bleeding heart liberals would have been sent east. :p


Advertisement
Advertisement