Skip to content
  • Register
    • Advertisement
    If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
    Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

    Week 15

    1…910121415…25

    Comments

    • #332
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Least its points on the board, important to have given the D a break


    • #333
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Arawn wrote: »
      Jesus give welker a bloody pass!!

      He was covered up


    • #334
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Hazys wrote: »
      Could there be more blatant holding on Lloyd on that 3rd down? ffs refs

      Completely missed it alright


    • #335
      Arawn
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,158 Arawn
      ✭✭✭


      kryogen wrote: »
      He was covered up

      I mean at all! Dont think it's been thrown his way all game


    • #336
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      A PI call on the Pats...fcuk u refs


    • Advertisement
    • #337
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Hazys wrote: »
      A PI call on the Pats...fcuk u refs

      Least it was a right call


    • #338
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Arawn wrote: »
      I mean at all! Dont think it's been thrown his way all game

      The interception was thrown to him wasnt it


    • #339
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Far too easy, this is what a good solid team can do to us


    • #340
      eagle eye
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,545 eagle eye
      ✭✭✭✭


      Ugh this looks like its going to be a bad night. Still don't get that interference call, didn't look to me like Talib did anything wrong there.


    • #341
      Arawn
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,158 Arawn
      ✭✭✭


      oh aye it was! good memory


    • Advertisement
    • #342
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      eagle eye wrote: »
      Ugh this looks like its going to be a bad night. Still don't get that interference call, didn't look to me like Talib did anything wrong there.

      He never looked back for the ball iirc, the receiver was coming back to the ball, after looking and Talib just went straight through him, sucky, but its PI


    • #343
      poldebruin
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 poldebruin
      ✭✭✭


      eagle eye wrote: »
      Ugh this looks like its going to be a bad night. Still don't get that interference call, didn't look to me like Talib did anything wrong there.

      if he had just turned his head to the ball I think he would have been ok, even the minimal contact without the head turned meant it was PI.

      Strange game, I really thought the Patriots would be too strong for SF, not showing it yet. Plenty time to go though.


    • #344
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      kryogen wrote: »
      Least it was a right call

      Right or not, they are not consistent and so far their inconsistency is hurting the Pats.


      Also, i thought the call (possibly the rule) is BS. Talib is looking back to see the pass is thrown, at the last second he takes his eye off the ball, throws his hands up and im not 100% sure he even made any contact with Crabtree till after the ball was swatted.


    • #345
      eagle eye
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,545 eagle eye
      ✭✭✭✭


      kryogen wrote: »
      He never looked back for the ball iirc, the receiver was coming back to the ball, after looking and Talib just went straight through him, sucky, but its PI
      Yeah but its not PI because the ball hit him on the back is how I see it.


    • #346
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      Blown coverage on the 49ers second TD.

      Dennard was left on an island covering two receivers with no safety help


    • #347
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      It doesnt look like it touched him...damn


    • #348
      Pudsy33
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,879 Pudsy33
      ✭✭✭✭


      Don't think he touched it....


    • #349
      poldebruin
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 poldebruin
      ✭✭✭


      What a disaster of a punt return - whichever way it goes, he shouldn't have been anywhere near it.


    • #350
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      Bring back the replacement refs


    • #351
      poldebruin
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 poldebruin
      ✭✭✭


      what a mess


    • Advertisement
    • #352
      PerrinV2
      Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 6,340 PerrinV2
      Mod ✭✭✭✭


      ya i dont think it was touched either


    • #353
      kmart6
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,174 kmart6
      ✭✭✭✭


      Going by his body language I'd say Ginn touched glanced it!


    • #354
      poldebruin
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 poldebruin
      ✭✭✭


      it'll be hard to overturn that if it's ruled on the field that he didn't touch it.


    • #355
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      WTF is going on?

      Was there a holding call? if so, on who? if so, does it affect the possible turnover?

      Is Bill challenging that the 49ers did not touch the ball to avoid the illegal touching call?


    • #356
      ScrubsfanChris
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ScrubsfanChris
      ✭✭✭


      Whats this Illegal touch? He was miles from the ball when someone made contact...


    • #357
      kryogen
      Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 kryogen
      ✭✭✭✭


      Can't see how it can be overturned if it was ruled not touched, but I do think he grazed it


    • #358
      padraig_f
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,332 padraig_f
      ✭✭✭


      Still not sure looking at the replays, doesn't look conclusive, so I'd say not enough to overturn it.


    • #359
      poldebruin
      Closed Accounts Posts: 2,052 poldebruin
      ✭✭✭


      Mike Peirera is hammering the refs on twitter, and he's normally very conservative with any critisism of crews.


    • #360
      Hazys
      Closed Accounts Posts: 7,510 Hazys
      ✭✭✭


      Whats the illegal touch?

      Aren't the Pats entitled to pick up the ball after it was punted? or is it because the dived on the fumble and knocked it on and then picked it up?


    • Advertisement
    • #361
      ScrubsfanChris
      Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ScrubsfanChris
      ✭✭✭


      Its like NFL panto out there :D


    Welcome!

    It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
    Sign In
    Register
    Advertisement