Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Water fluoridation should be scrapped!

145791020

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,311 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Worztron wrote: »

    Someone should tell this man that the high levels of fluoride that can cause his scary list of nasties, has nothing to do with the low levels of fluoride used in fluoridation schemes. Toxicity is dose-dependent.

    And that you really shouldn't turn J-Cloths into curtains.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    alastair wrote: »
    Someone should tell this man that the high levels of fluoride that can cause his scary list of nasties, has nothing to do with the low levels of fluoride used in fluoridation schemes. Toxicity is dose-dependent.

    But if he didn't lie how do you expect him to fill nearly four minutes of youtube worthy material?

    They don't let just anybody put videos up there, you know....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭Starfox


    Its simple really, We should have a choice about this, and i know most people would vote for no Fluoride.

    98% of Europe has banned water fluoridation.. Why? because its not safe!

    Everything you need to know about Fluoride, and its dangers, here.



    As part of the Cork Environmental Forum, Environmental Scientist Declan Waugh gave a presentation entitled 'Fluoride in Drinking Water, History of Water Fluoridation and Implications for Ireland'.
    This is a short interview with the man in question, covering some of the main issues he addresses in his presentation.
    It is an absolute scandal that such fantastic research has been met with a wall of silence from so many people of power in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    What's up with so many people using YouTube videos in place evidence backed arguments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭Starfox


    Ziphius wrote: »
    What's up with so many people using YouTube videos in place evidence backed arguments.

    So are you basically discrediting information because its on youtube?, thats clever ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Starfox wrote: »
    So are you basically discrediting information because its on youtube?, thats clever ;)

    Yes. Just because it's on YouTube doesn't make it true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Jimoslimos


    Starfox wrote: »
    It is an absolute scandal that such fantastic research has been met with a wall of silence from so many people of power in this country.
    Just no. It's not really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Starfox wrote: »
    So are you basically discrediting information because its on youtube?, thats clever ;)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,000 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy


    Ziphius wrote: »
    Yes. Just because it's on YouTube doesn't make it true.

    No but because youtube videos about stuff like this take up SOOOOOO much time it means I'm not watching them. Only people who watch these are the converted.


  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tooth decay is not generally life-threatening, though on occasion it can be. It is expensive to treat, and if left untreated it can impair the quality of life of those who have it. Tooth decay causes pain, can result in difficulty eating, causes bad breath, may cause facial disfigurement, and if sufficiently advanced has a significant effect on the self-confidence of sufferers.

    Tooth decay is also easily preventable by fluoridation. That can be achieved by the fluoridation of water supplies, or by topical fluoridation (e.g. of toothpastes). The problem with the latter is that poorer and less-educated people are less likely to follow basic dental hygiene guidelines.

    So there you have it - the main beneficiaries of fluoride in water are poor people.

    And who gives a crap about poor people? Certainly not tinfoil hat wearers bleating about first world problems. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,705 ✭✭✭Johro


    mikemac1 wrote: »
    Free drugs piped right to your home
    They promised us Lithium. Ah the recession..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭Tiddlypeeps


    Starfox wrote: »
    Its simple really, We should have a choice about this, and i know most people would vote for no Fluoride.

    98% of Europe has banned water fluoridation.. Why? because its not safe!

    Everything you need to know about Fluoride, and its dangers, here.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQArORf_Dcs

    As part of the Cork Environmental Forum, Environmental Scientist Declan Waugh gave a presentation entitled 'Fluoride in Drinking Water, History of Water Fluoridation and Implications for Ireland'.
    This is a short interview with the man in question, covering some of the main issues he addresses in his presentation.
    It is an absolute scandal that such fantastic research has been met with a wall of silence from so many people of power in this country.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70wuP5V8Pwg

    Got as far as "nature wouldn't have screwed up on something so fundamental as what a baby needed for healthy growth" in the first video and stopped watching.

    Water is naturally fluoridated in lots of places. In places where the fluoride concentration is higher than 1.5 parts per million the water even needs to be defluoridated.

    Here is a map showing the parts of the world that have such high levels of naturally occuring fluoride in the water that defluoridation is needed.

    Linking to a guy who claims to have read a scientific paper without backing up anything he says is not evidence.

    The only argument I've ever heard against fluoridating water that I feel is reasonable is the argument against medicating people without their consent. That argument can be countered by the fact that fluoride is naturally occurring in so many places, but it doesn't dismiss it completely. If somebody feels that water shouldn't be fluoridated on those ground then I won't disagree with them.

    Every other argument I've heard revolves around the fact that fluoride can be toxic if the does is high enough. That arguent is invalid when it comes to water fluoridation because the dose is so low. Dose is the most important factor with toxicity. Banana's are toxic if you eat enough of them, so is coffee and lots of other substances that are consumed by people every day. No legitimate study has ever concluded that fluoridating water between 0.5 and 1.0 parts per million is anything other than beneficial to human health. Here is a report published on the subject

    If you have any actual evidence that disproves that then I would love to see it. If not then stop trying to fill peoples heads with garbage until you have the evidence to support your claims.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Tooth decay is not generally life-threatening, though on occasion it can be. It is expensive to treat, and if left untreated it can impair the quality of life of those who have it. Tooth decay causes pain, can result in difficulty eating, causes bad breath, may cause facial disfigurement, and if sufficiently advanced has a significant effect on the self-confidence of sufferers.

    Tooth decay is also easily preventable by fluoridation. That can be achieved by the fluoridation of water supplies, or by topical fluoridation (e.g. of toothpastes). The problem with the latter is that poorer and less-educated people are less likely to follow basic dental hygiene guidelines.

    So there you have it - the main beneficiaries of fluoride in water are poor people.

    And who gives a crap about poor people? Certainly not tinfoil hat wearers bleating about first world problems. :rolleyes:

    Exactly. I mean how much does water fluoridation cost per person? A couple of cents? And how much will it save in dental bills.


  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ziphius wrote: »
    Exactly. I mean how much does water fluoridation cost per person? A couple of cents? And how much will it save in dental bills.

    I have no idea, to be honest, what Ireland spends on fluoridation of water supplies. What I do know is that having (mostly) grown up before fluoride was added to water or toothpaste, I have eight fillings, and at a rough estimate getting them and repairing them will end up costing me around €5-6,000 over the course of my lifetime.

    Poor people can't afford that kind of money, and given the state of Ireland's finances the taxpayer can't afford it either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    I have no idea, to be honest, what Ireland spends on fluoridation of water supplies. What I do know is that having (mostly) grown up before fluoride was added to water or toothpaste, I have eight fillings, and at a rough estimate getting them and repairing them will end up costing me around €5-6,000 over the course of my lifetime.

    Poor people can't afford that kind of money, and given the state of Ireland's finances the taxpayer can't afford it either.

    I think I underestimated a bit. According to this anti-fluoridation site (http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101469) it costs less than €4 million to fluoridate the water supply per year. Less than €1 per person per year!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭tiger55




  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tiger55 wrote: »

    Conspiracy theory video 1

    Conspiracy theory video 2

    What exactly do you have against poor people? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Again, any evidence other than YouTube videos?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭Tiddlypeeps


    Starfox wrote: »
    It is an absolute scandal that such fantastic research has been met with a wall of silence from so many people of power in this country.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70wuP5V8Pwg

    I decided it was unfair to dismiss the second video based on the idiotic claims made in the first so I went back and watched it.

    Wow! The entire video can be basically be summarised into "I read lots of stuff on the internet that told me fluoride was bad, I spent years doing it therefore you should believe me on those grounds".

    The technical term for the fluoride intolerance he mentions in the video is Salicylate sensitivity. Fluoride isn't the only substance that tigers it and it is incredibly difficult to maintain a salicylate free diet because the diet would be so restricted.

    Everything else he mentions in his video is a case of him assuming that correlation implies causation. It does not. He provides no evidience linking the various illnesses he mentions their being a high rate of in Ireland to water fluoridation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭Ando's Saggy Bottom


    About the only thing these threads are good for is bulking up the old ignore list.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    .....him assuming that correlation implies causation.

    What? You mean in the same way that the more you and I buy ice cream, the more people drown? :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭tiger55


    Ziphius wrote: »
    Again, any evidence other than YouTube videos?

    Maybe you think our governments have our best interests at heart?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    tiger55 wrote: »
    Maybe you think our governments have our best interests at heart?

    So... you don't trust the government ergo any wacky conspiracy theory you see on YouTube must be true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Everything else he mentions in his video is a case of him assuming that correlation implies causation. It does not. He provides no evidience linking the various illnesses he mentions their being a high rate of in Ireland to water fluoridation.

    They seem to do this a lot. The girl against fluoride, for example, likes to show how cancer rates are so much higher in the Republic (fluoridated) than in Northern Ireland (non-fluoridated) but then omits all the cancers which are more prevalent in Northern Ireland.

    The All Ireland Cancer Registry actually have actually addressed this misuse of data: http://www.qub.ac.uk/research-centres/nicr/nicr/MisinterpretationofAll-IrelandCancerAtlas1995-2007/


  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ziphius wrote: »
    So... you don't trust the government ergo any wacky conspiracy theory you see on YouTube must be true.

    Did you know, by the way, that it's the government who made laws to force free Irish men and women to drive on the left? Oh, and also not kill each other or rob stuff from each other.

    Bad government. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    Did you know, by the way, that it's the government who made laws to force free Irish men and women to drive on the left? Oh, and also not kill each other or rob stuff from each other.

    Bad government. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

    The fiends! I wouldn't be surprised if they are pay doctors' and nurses' salaries either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,795 ✭✭✭enfant terrible




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭Starfox


    What exactly do you have against poor people? :rolleyes:

    ok, why has 98% of Europe banned fluoride in drinking water... for a laugh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,880 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Starfox wrote: »
    ok, why has 98% of Europe banned fluoride in drinking water... for a laugh?

    Probably politicians, they rarely let science get in the way of potential votes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    OP, do you realise that water fluoridation does not necessarily mean adding fluoride, but can also mean removing it? Essentially the goal of fluoridation is to optimise the amount of fluoride in drinking water, since natural fresh water supplies (including bottled water) can contain higher than safe levels.

    The goal is to keep it between 0.5 and 1.3 parts per million. Sea water has, on average, between 1.2 and 1.5 parts per million and some natural fresh water has levels of up to 12 ppm. Anything above 4 ppm can have negative heath effects.

    Now, I can't find information on what Ireland's natural fresh water fluoride levels are, but it's safe to say that if you stop water fluoridation there will still be fluoride in your drinking water, the levels just won't be optimised.

    If you're that worried about it, buy yourself a water filter. They're not expensive and if you buy the right ones they will take the fluoride out of the water. Be prepared to have your teeth degrade dramatically over the next decade though.

    And no, brushing and flossing is not enough. Fluoridation improves dental health by up to 35%, even for those who brush twice daily.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement