Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Gardai Harrasing Busker in Templebar

15681011

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 215 ✭✭Furious_George


    I am going by the drunken state of some of the crowd and guessing it was rather late at night. IF so then based on the second video posted the buskers are causing noise pollution both through use of amplified music but also through getting the crowd stirred up singing and shouting. Anyone living in the area should not have to put up with the noise or the general disturbance. This was enough cause for the Garda intervention to get the buskers and crowd to disperse.

    After that I dont know what was said by the first guy arrested to get himself arrested but I didnt see any brutality here. Looked pretty reseved of the Gardai given the group of people surrounding them shouting insults and trying to interfere with the arrest. I'm guessing the lads will be quicker to obey the directions of AGS in future so result. Just a pity a few more of the crowd werent taught a lesson, act like eegits shouting insults at the Gardai in the course of their duty and there are consequences.

    There are laws in this country which have to be obeyed. We cant pick and choose which ones we wish to obey and if we do we must accept the consequences. We want the Gardai to enforce laws but whenever we do we have drunken mobs like this interfering and the rabble rousers of boards.ie shouting that they shouldnt. We have the court system letting the criminals that AGS have arrested out with a slap on the wrist. Its no wonder that many of them stop caring. Why should they, they cant win with the public or the judiciary.

    Btw I know there are pricks in AGS just like there are in every part of this society. I just didnt see any evidence that the Gardai in the video did anything wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,763 ✭✭✭✭Crann na Beatha


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    You Garda are worse to be entertaining these gobsh**** with replies. They are not worth it and are arguing to attention seek. Do you honestly think that they would go up to a Garda on the street and say half of that stuff to them? Not a chance i'd say from mammy's little darlings.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 853 ✭✭✭Pappa Charlie


    It makes them feel important and thats good!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    It's legal to have sex when your girlfriend agrees to it, if she says "no", it's not longer legal. That would actually be rape.
    We all have rights to say "no" and people should respect that right.

    BULLSH!T!
    Absolute BULLSH!T analogy.

    Non-consensual sex is deemed to be rape and is illegal. It is codified in the law.

    Filming someone in public even if they express that they do not consent is NOT illegal.

    You have the right not to be fcuking laughed at. Try pressing charges against someone who laughs at you. You'll be laughed at even more.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    @Asharbassad Why do you keep going back to previous posts and only ignoring my most recent one?

    I have stated why he should have been arrested a number of times.

    If you think a beating took place in this video, you are very naive. The busker was not thrown to the ground but basically carried to it, for his own safety, and the other guy would have been told to stop resisting or they would use the baton, that's what it's there for, to hit people with. After you get hit with one you will comply or hit the ground as you will have a dead leg.

    Anyway, seeing as you fail to see the obvious in this video, and the fact you basically have an agenda against the gardai, I'm leaving this discussion, I'm sick of going around in circles.

    Have a nice day then. Off you go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 853 ✭✭✭Pappa Charlie


    BULLSH!T!
    Absolute BULLSH!T analogy.

    Non-consensual sex is deemed to be rape and is illegal. It is codified in the law.

    Filming someone in public even if they express that they do not consent is NOT illegal.

    You have the right not to be fcuking laughed at. Try pressing charges against someone who laughs at you. You'll be laughed at even more.

    LOL


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    Sitec wrote: »


    There they are singing into microphone, I'd imagine this was after being told to turn it off, and anyway that guy is just point blank ignoring the Gardai, delighted with his two minutes of fame in front of the crowd.

    Good enough for him getting arrested.

    I see the guards arrive and then leave. Why didn't they arrest the guy there who so many claim was wanted for an earlier incident? Were they waiting for the "right time to pounce"? Did they come over to determine that they had the right man and then withdraw to plane their next move? WTF is this alleged earlier incident nonsense about?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    MagicSean wrote: »
    He is committing an offence under section 6 of the Public Order Act. He is using abusive language with the intent of provoking a breach of the peace. It's not about disturbing the public. it's about preserving the peace. His actions are likely to stir up the crowd and cause a public order incident. That's why it's not allowed.

    As to the issue of recording. Do you think the person being arrested has a right to privacy at all?

    Have you a clue what "right to privacy" even means?
    Being filmed in a public place is not covered by privacy rights. Would you stop making sh!t up!

    As for the guy's intent. How do you know what his intent is? How the fcuk do you know that he is intending to cause a breach of the peace? Where do you get off spewing this rubbish?
    You'll throw out anything to try and back up your entrenched opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Well done the guards involved. Difficult situation surrounded by idiots. Great restraint.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    Phoenix wrote: »
    The claims of brutality are truly laughable,if anything the Gardai showed plenty of restraint in dealing with these people.
    the "commentator" is a very lucky man not to have been arrested too.

    Lucky to not have been arrested?
    Here we go again. Everyone says that so and so should have been arrested.

    On what charge?


  • Site Banned Posts: 33 yard_king


    Have you a clue what "right to privacy" even means?
    Being filmed in a public place is not covered by privacy rights. Would you stop making sh!t up!

    As for the guy's intent. How do you know what his intent is? How the fcuk do you know that he is intending to cause a breach of the peace? Where do you get off spewing this rubbish?
    You'll throw out anything to try and back up your entrenched opinion.


    speaking from experience i suspect

    the guy will be charged with a breach of the peace when he finds himself before a judge , guards have a host of ( insert here ) charges they can use against someone if stuck


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    The type of people that were running around following the incident and jeering, making the whole thing worse. THEY are whats wrong with the justice system.
    I hereby call for An Garda Siochana to be issued with 360 degree hat mount pepper sprayers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    You seem to be getting a bit upset. Maybe you should take a break.
    Have you a clue what "right to privacy" even means?
    Being filmed in a public place is not covered by privacy rights. Would you stop making sh!t up!

    The thing is, once he has been arrested he is no longer in control of where he is. So he is no longer choosing to be in a public place. What about a guy who is arrested indoors and walked out to a car. he is not choosing to be in a public place so should he not be entitled to the privacy he would have had?
    As for the guy's intent. How do you know what his intent is? How the fcuk do you know that he is intending to cause a breach of the peace? Where do you get off spewing this rubbish?
    You'll throw out anything to try and back up your entrenched opinion.

    What was his intent in hurling abuse if not to cause a breach of the peace? As a reasonable man do you not think riling a crowd up like that has the potential to result in trouble. In this particular case it resulted in a member of the crowd trying to physically interfere with an arrest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 215 ✭✭Furious_George



    I see the guards arrive and then leave. Why didn't they arrest the guy there who so many claim was wanted for an earlier incident? Were they waiting for the "right time to pounce"? Did they come over to determine that they had the right man and then withdraw to plane their next move? WTF is this alleged earlier incident nonsense about?

    Looked to me like he might be waiting for more backup. I wouldnt like to go into what might turn into a hostile crowd without significant backup. The second he tried to approach the busker the crowd started booing and jeering. He backed off and waited. Smart move.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    yard_king wrote: »
    speaking from experience i suspect

    the guy will be charged with a breach of the peace when he finds himself before a judge , guards have a host of ( insert here ) charges they can use against someone if stuck


    Speaking from experience you "suspect"?

    What's that infantile little dig supposed to mean?

    And just so you know, Atticus, a person is charged prior to appearing before a judge. Now go away.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    cursai wrote: »
    The type of people that were running around following the incident and jeering, making the whole thing worse. THEY are whats wrong with the justice system.
    I hereby call for An Garda Siochana to be issued with 360 degree hat mount pepper sprayers.

    Thanks for that gem of wisdom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭Paulzx




    As for deploying a taser. When did you become so comfortable with the use of tasers? Most of the times they are used against unarmed and non-threatening individuals.
    [/url]


    Let me guess..you've done a world wide research project on taser use and have discovered millions of innocent, non threatening people who have been tasered.

    There's a Nobel prize in it for ye:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,324 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Higher wrote: »
    The only embarassing thing for the guards in that clip is that they allowed themselves to be so disrespected in that clip. You would never see that in continental europe.

    Posters here are beyond ridiculous. On the one hand they deride the soft justice system and scumbags who have no respect for the law but then when the police DO get heavy handed they cry foul and abuse them.

    Heres the facts:
    Amps aren't allowed after 3.
    The buskers kept playing after warning
    One of them resisted arrest and was brought to the ground (quite gently I might add)
    Another interfered with the arrest and resisted, he received one baton hit to the leg and was arrested.

    So basically two guys resisted arrest, one was brought to the ground and the other got a baton to the leg. What on earth is the outcry here?

    The only shame is that that idiotic cameraman wasn't arrested. He was completely abusing the guards, obstructing arrest and riling up the crowd. Truly a pathetic character.

    Sometimes when I walk the city centre streets at night and see some of the ****E going on I truly do wish our police were like the Spanish or French. A slap to the guy pissing in front of tourists in the middle of grafton street, arresting those knackers who abuse the police, making scum think twice about getting involved in fights by baton charging any frays. etc.

    I think it would actually do our irresponsible nation some good. Weekends in Dublin City are disgraceful. You would never see the amount of fighting, pissing, drunkeness and vomiting in any other european city outside of Ireland and Britian. A true disgrace.

    Tougher police please.

    Similar carry on going on in Glasgow there a few months back.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    Paulzx wrote: »
    Let me guess..you've done a world wide research project on taser use and have discovered millions of innocent, non threatening people who have been tasered.

    There's a Nobel prize in it for ye:rolleyes:

    Tell "ye" what, Sparky, come back when you've got something meaningful to say.

    A taser is supposed to be used in place of a gun. Got that? A GUN! A gun is supposed to be used when it is justifiably believed that absent that use of gun, life is in danger.

    So...just to recap....it is not justifiable to shoot someone unless they are within their means of killing or seriously injuring you or another.
    Pumping multiple shells into someone with a knife who is twenty yards away from you is NOT justifiable.
    Tasering a teenager because he objects to you trying to fcuking cuff him because he was skateboarding is NOT justifiable.

    Now why don't you go off and do a bit of research of your own and come back with information as to when pepper spray, tasers, shot-gun bean-bags, etc are supposed to be used and then follow that up with examples of when these devices are used completely out of their recommended emploi.

    Nobel Boy!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭asherbassad


    MagicSean wrote: »
    You seem to be getting a bit upset. Maybe you should take a break.



    The thing is, once he has been arrested he is no longer in control of where he is. So he is no longer choosing to be in a public place. What about a guy who is arrested indoors and walked out to a car. he is not choosing to be in a public place so should he not be entitled to the privacy he would have had?



    What was his intent in hurling abuse if not to cause a breach of the peace? As a reasonable man do you not think riling a crowd up like that has the potential to result in trouble. In this particular case it resulted in a member of the crowd trying to physically interfere with an arrest.


    I don't know what his intent was and neither do you. You claim that he was intending to cause a breach of the peace. From where I'm standing he was expressing outrage at police heavy-handedness. Big bloody difference. I also saw in the video an old man with a hat remonstrating the guards as they had the lad on the ground. I also heard him ask (on the bridge) "Excuse me, Guard, did you just hit this man"?
    Now, should that old man have been arrested for "interfering" with the AGS doing their jobs? Was that old man, clearly disgusted by what he witnessed, questioning the police with the intent of causing a breach of the fcuking peace?
    Maybe the old boy should have been slapped in the mouth with a baton too, no?

    I'm not going to try and sugarcoat this whole debate by saying that criminals and street thugs need to be harshly dealt with. They do and that's beside the point. Everyone on here is just jumping to the defence of the gardai and they can't even back it up. They puke out irrelevant sh!t like "the cops do a tough job" (and quote anecdotal evidence of murders or vandalism). They allude to "noise late at night"-this or "skanger accents"-that. They gutlessly allude to "probably" or "could have happened"-blah blah.

    An old man was there and this old duffer displayed a hell of a lot more strength of character in expressing his outrage at what the police were doing than so many "look the other way" warriors on this thread.
    A man with a camera called out the police on what he felt was over the top treatment. Not only that but from the footage I can't see any reason why that lad should have been dragged up off what he was sitting on and then grabbed around the throat, manhandled to the ground and restrained.
    You can all say "well he should just comply and not resist cops pushing him around". Well you can do that if you want. You can just take it whether you're right or wrong. I guess your price is just lower than some people's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭DwightSchrute1


    I don't know what his intent was and neither do you. You claim that he was intending to cause a breach of the peace. From where I'm standing he was expressing outrage at police heavy-handedness. Big bloody difference. I also saw in the video an old man with a hat remonstrating the guards as they had the lad on the ground. I also heard him ask (on the bridge) "Excuse me, Guard, did you just hit this man"?
    Now, should that old man have been arrested for "interfering" with the AGS doing their jobs? Was that old man, clearly disgusted by what he witnessed, questioning the police with the intent of causing a breach of the fcuking peace?
    Maybe the old boy should have been slapped in the mouth with a baton too, no?

    I'm not going to try and sugarcoat this whole debate by saying that criminals and street thugs need to be harshly dealt with. They do and that's beside the point. Everyone on here is just jumping to the defence of the gardai and they can't even back it up. They puke out irrelevant sh!t like "the cops do a tough job" (and quote anecdotal evidence of murders or vandalism). They allude to "noise late at night"-this or "skanger accents"-that. They gutlessly allude to "probably" or "could have happened"-blah blah.

    An old man was there and this old duffer displayed a hell of a lot more strength of character in expressing his outrage at what the police were doing than so many "look the other way" warriors on this thread.
    A man with a camera called out the police on what he felt was over the top treatment. Not only that but from the footage I can't see any reason why that lad should have been dragged up off what he was sitting on and then grabbed around the throat, manhandled to the ground and restrained.
    You can all say "well he should just comply and not resist cops pushing him around". Well you can do that if you want. You can just take it whether you're right or wrong. I guess your price is just lower than some people's.

    It shall be an offence for any person in a public place to use or engage in any threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to provoke a breach of the peace or being reckless as to whether a breach of the peace may be occasioned.

    There does not need to be intent to provoke a breach of the peace, if his behaviour is reckless enough that it might provoke a beach of the peace then that is reason to arrest him. Also who got slapped in the mouth with a baton?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Míshásta wrote: »
    There was a lot we didn't see there. Why was he being arrested? Are the Guards just going to leave someone off because he resists arrest and runs away. The guy with the camera was not just filming and he was being provocative. Insulting the guards and using fowl language isn't going to calm the situation.

    That clip was just ****-stirring - somebody with a gripe with the guards.

    Seems to me there should have been at least one more arrest for interfering with police acting in the line of duty.

    The baying drunks in the background did nothing to ease the situation either.

    This is an unbelievably naive post. Clearly you're unaware that the Gardai enforce a curfew in Dublin which is not mandated by law anywhere. They literally expect the streets to be clear by a certain time and will make excuses to remove people if they're not.

    Most likely they were telling everyone to "go home" despite them breaking no laws whatsoever by staying where they were.

    And no, I'm not exaggerating, I've seen it often enough. Apparently hanging around on a public street perfectly civilly and nonviolently is "anti social behavior" these days if it's after 4AM.

    EDIT: Posting a clip exposing BS is not "sh!t stirring", and I highly doubt this was "in the line of duty", unless Dublin City Council have actually introduced a curfew to their bye-laws which I'm not aware of...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    unless Dublin City Council have actually introduced a curfew to their bye-laws which I'm not aware of...

    http://www.dublincity.ie/RecreationandCulture/Events/StreetPerformers/Documents/CodeOfPractice.pdf.pdf

    Amp Free Zones: The sites listed below will become amp free zones. This will be
    implemented for a trial period of 3 months (August – October 2012) and reviewed in
    conjunction with street performers at the end of the trial period:

    2. Temple Bar Square, Dublin 2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Atlantis50


    TheStook wrote: »


    What do ye make of this?

    I think its crazy to think that it still goes on in a Country such as Ireland, right in front of a crowd of 50 people.

    All the Gardai's numbers and stuff were recorded so I'm sure they'll get their punishment whatever that might be. But this is,in effect, police brutality?

    Also- 1:30- AH HEAARE LEAVE IT OUUU.

    1. An arrest was being made for reasons unknown and unexplained. Probably entirely legitimate.

    2. An idiot intervened and appeared to attack a Garda, two attempt to restrain him and a baton is drawn, he runs away and is caught.

    3. The cameraman continuously verbally abuses the Gardai and attempts to escalate the situation by getting other bystanders involved. He should have been arrested (he still can be - the video should be enough evidence).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    I don't know what his intent was and neither do you. You claim that he was intending to cause a breach of the peace. From where I'm standing he was expressing outrage at police heavy-handedness. Big bloody difference.

    He was shouting "filth" at them was he not? That is not criticism, that is simple abuse.
    I also saw in the video an old man with a hat remonstrating the guards as they had the lad on the ground. I also heard him ask (on the bridge) "Excuse me, Guard, did you just hit this man"?
    Now, should that old man have been arrested for "interfering" with the AGS doing their jobs? Was that old man, clearly disgusted by what he witnessed, questioning the police with the intent of causing a breach of the fcuking peace?

    But he didn't interfere. He didn't hurl abuse at them, he didn't try stop them. He expressed concern at a violent situation. Nothing wrong with that. He was probably quite surprised at the sudden spectacle before him.
    Maybe the old boy should have been slapped in the mouth with a baton too, no?

    Too? Who else was slapped in the mouth with a baton?
    I'm not going to try and sugarcoat this whole debate by saying that criminals and street thugs need to be harshly dealt with. They do and that's beside the point. Everyone on here is just jumping to the defence of the gardai and they can't even back it up. They puke out irrelevant sh!t like "the cops do a tough job" (and quote anecdotal evidence of murders or vandalism). They allude to "noise late at night"-this or "skanger accents"-that. They gutlessly allude to "probably" or "could have happened"-blah blah.

    I haven't alluded to any of those things. I've dealt with facts. One man was arrested under the public order act, for what we don't know. Possibly because he refused to move on when told to or possibly for something else he did previous. It's not clear. What is clear is that the Garda clearly told him he believed he was involved in a previous public order incident.
    An old man was there and this old duffer displayed a hell of a lot more strength of character in expressing his outrage at what the police were doing than so many "look the other way" warriors on this thread.

    You are really stuck on this old man. Do you know him? Or are you, as i suspect, just assuming that because he is old he knows best?
    A man with a camera called out the police on what he felt was over the top treatment.

    Shouting abuse is not calling someone out. If he had real concerns he could have gone to the Ombudsman.
    Not only that but from the footage I can't see any reason why that lad should have been dragged up off what he was sitting on and then grabbed around the throat, manhandled to the ground and restrained.

    That's easy. He refused to listen to the Garda, he was led away from the crowd, he refused to cooperate, he was restrained and put to the ground to be handcuffed. As I'm sure you probably know, it's easier to handcuff a resistant individual if he is on the ground.
    You can all say "well he should just comply and not resist cops pushing him around". Well you can do that if you want. You can just take it whether you're right or wrong. I guess your price is just lower than some people's.

    You should let Gardaí do their job. When you have no knowledge of the background of the incident or the individuals involved you have no right to interfere. By all means record it and follow up with the Ombudsman if you have concerns. That's what they are there for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    A knackbag who has the courage to question authority. A knackbag who has the moral fibre to express his outrage at violence directed at a fellow human being. A knackbag who most likely would do the same if it was you who was being punched up by cowboy cops.

    Would you tell him "get thee away, peasant! I only wish to have refined folk with polished D4 accents coming to my defence. Away with you, vile pleb!" ?

    Even though we can disagree about a number of things, I'm glad to see we both agree he's a knackbag.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 437 ✭✭tororosso


    MadsL wrote: »
    http://www.dublincity.ie/RecreationandCulture/Events/StreetPerformers/Documents/CodeOfPractice.pdf.pdf

    Amp Free Zones: The sites listed below will become amp free zones. This will be
    implemented for a trial period of 3 months (August – October 2012) and reviewed in
    conjunction with street performers at the end of the trial period:

    2. Temple Bar Square, Dublin 2

    This is a voluntary code that they asked buskers to sign up to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭Paulzx


    Tell "ye" what, Sparky, come back when you've got something meaningful to say.

    A taser is supposed to be used in place of a gun. Got that? A GUN! A gun is supposed to be used when it is justifiably believed that absent that use of gun, life is in danger.

    So...just to recap....it is not justifiable to shoot someone unless they are within their means of killing or seriously injuring you or another.
    Pumping multiple shells into someone with a knife who is twenty yards away from you is NOT justifiable.
    Tasering a teenager because he objects to you trying to fcuking cuff him because he was skateboarding is NOT justifiable.

    Now why don't you go off and do a bit of research of your own and come back with information as to when pepper spray, tasers, shot-gun bean-bags, etc are supposed to be used and then follow that up with examples of when these devices are used completely out of their recommended emploi.

    Nobel Boy!

    WTF has this got to do with the situation. Pumping multiple shells? Tasering skateboarders? You watching Die Hard at the moment?

    You're embarassing yourself. Take your own advice and come back when you've something meaningfull to say


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 BigSiyo85


    I am the person who made this video. I am 1 of a group of 3 buskers who have been operating mainly inside the arch of Temple bar but tend to move up towards Fitzsimons / Harry's Burger's area. We are well known and friendly with all the flyer girls and gent's who work that area on the weekend. From Club Havanna, Madonna's and others. We are friendly with the security in the Londis inside the arch, friendly to say we have been operating maybe a month and they have NEVER had a single issue with us.
    I not not a scumbag, a knack bag, a knacker nor am I filth.

    I'll quickly run thru how our relations with the Gardai has been......

    First memory was during afternoon on Henry St, a Guard asked us to move as we were using amp....he advised going towards Liffey St. So we set up on the corner there, he comes up an says he like's the music but if he gets a single call he has to shut us down. We agree, he never gets a call, we all live happy.

    Secondly, we were playing between 2 am and 2:30 am when a Guard approaches, mid tune, whilst there is a crowd of local's and tourists alike having a really good, harmless, fun time. He say's there was calls regarding noise and the hour and we have to wrap up. We agree and move up towards Central Bank. We set back up between Dame Street and Central Bank, whilst playing someone threw a coin that hit Paddy in the face, Paddy is a friend who was singing (Not a regular busker in this group of 3 but another busker who was singing at time). Amazingly and certainly not provoked by any of the busker's actions a spectator went and punched the culprit in the face. With that 4 or 5 Gardai and a squad car came in no time and pulled the hero spectator offside, they dealt with said culprit and proceeded to listen to us for over 20/30 minutes in Central Bank area. That leads us to believe the "call" or "calls" the earlier Guard speaks of was a lie. As if there were call's it would be known by all Guards in area that "calls have been made to shut buskers in Temple Bar down". Therefore them 4 or 5 would of shut us down straight away. What was earlier Guards motive to lie about calls ?

    Thirdly, Whilst setting up (as per usual, just inside the arch, Temple Bar) a Guard on a push bike see's us while passing by. He tells us not to set up, not to start playing and if we did he would take our amp and have us all arrested. Then he left and we set up and played for nearly 2 hours before moving on of our own accord. Why would that Guard, in that instant, be so determined that we don't play and we don't set up yet he couldn't be bothered coming back, as if it was pointless for the verbal tirade to begin with ? Why ?

    Fourthly, Were a group, 2 vocals and guitar. Imagine Sean at the back and Justin and I in front either side, to form a triangle. Im the rapper and Justin is the singer. It was during his particular bit of this particular tune so he was doing the singing at the time. I was drinking a can of red bull too. This short Guard comes barging in, intentionally hits my arm nearly knocking can out of my hand, very intentional, just to do it. He grabs Justin. Demanding that ALL music is turned off and that he wants his name and the rest. Another Guard grabs me by my am.
    As were not just idiots who obey whatever these particular Guards demand we speak up for ourselves. Funnily enough Justin recognized the Guard holding my arm but couldn't place the name. It was laughed off by both Guards until Justin DID remember the name, it was a beautiful moment when the short, aggressive Guard looks at the other Guard and other Guard realizes he is caught denying an honest claim. Within minutes they finish up after a word or 2 and end up leaving the scene, leaving us with everything, no intention to arrest or anything like it.

    The video is really Fifthly and there is a Sixth occasion which I will get too,
    But the annoying thing is, and from these accounts which are very truthful, there is no consistency to there treatment to us. Some allow the amp and like our music. Others don't allow the amp but allow unplugged. Others don't accept anything at all. Some threaten arrest others confiscation. Some lie about complaints coming thru on radio and others deny knowing you or deny knowing your name when there shown to do so.

    It is important to point out that all this happens whilst there is other acts using amp's within earshot.
    ***ALL WHILST THERE IS OTHER ACTS USING AMP'S WITHIN EARSHOT***

    Now regarding the video, (Fifthly)
    There is alot of "What happened before" "probably" "he could of".
    I am a busker in this group of 3, that's why the video is so close. The Guard at the very start asks us to switch off the amp after our current tune. In the "Pre Arrest Video" you can see 2 Gardai come up and whisper in Justin's ear, Justin flashes a thumbs up and they walk away satisfied. As they walk off in "Pre Arrest Video" they are satisfied. After said track we turn off our amp, there is a video on YouTube page of the crowd leading Colt 45 with a guitar and cajon (the cajon player, John, comes out once a bluemoon).

    ***Also this is in and around 2am, certainly not 3am***

    In my opinon, I feel the Guard was hoping by telling us to turn off the amp the buzz would cease, but when the whole crowd went on singing loudly, in spite if nothing else, said Gardai did not like that. Ego was at question at this point as we all bashed out this tune. So they quickly decided that the guitar and cajon were to be put away and muted. The crowd, some local...a lot were tourists couldn't understand why the reason for intervention. We knew from previous run-in's that they, for whatever reason, didn't want us dong what we do. But why we don't know. With that Justin takes a seat on the cajon whilst talking to another Guard looking for explanation as to why we have to stop. He keeps repeating to Justin that he has been told and he quotes a law or something. Not a reasonable explanation and certainly wouldn't be accepted from me to a Guard. While Justin is asking for a valid reason as to why we have to stop even tho we turned off our amp, the Guard found it fit to grab him by the scruff of the neck. He and other Guards think the answer to the initial situation was to grab Justin from his seat and push him towards the wall, and then towards me. I used my body to try stop them from running Justin back until he fell backwards. The crowd, having watched us peacefully, harmfully entertain strangers all evening, saw this ill-treatment and shouted in reaction to these Guards grabbing Justin initially for nothing.
    Baring in mind, we proved they cant keep us down by keeping the buzz very much alive without the amp, they had a chip and were a wee bit hurt over that, as we got that very minor 1 over them.

    *** THOSE WHO SAY HE RESISTED ARREST, THERE WAS NO GROUNDS FOR ARREST,
    HE WAS SCRUFFED BY A MAN IN A UNIFORM WHO HAD HIS EGO HURT BY 3 GUYS WHO HAD A GROUP OF PEOPLE JAMMING AND, IN THAT MOMENT IN TIME, WERE HELD IN MUCH HIGHER REGARD THEN THEM ROWDY GARDAI, JUSTIN WAS GRABBED WITHOUT REAL REASON AND NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS HAVE A DEFENSE MECHANISM, JUST BECAUSE YOUR ALMIGHTY GUARDS DOES NOT MEAN DEFENSE IS DISABLED IN THE HUMAN INSTINCT ***

    So with no grounds for arrest and what looks like assault, Justin tries free himself from this bully pulling out of him. Still not "under arrest", he did NOTHING to warrant the initial grab from that bully Guard. He tries to free himself, other Guards follow suit and then it's basically a done deal, with no good reason at all. So he is grounded, in that time a Guard reaches for my phone in an attempt to grab it. My property sir, thank you. Also, your there for our protection paid for by us, so (in this instant, with the previous) we will be filming you....just like you do us.
    In that time while attempting to record as many numbers I could with the madness going on around me a tussle ensues a few feet towards the arch, which I am almost certain was verbal and not physical (but was focusing elsewhere so could of missed something). Well my head turned due to the commotion before my hand did, GR B 929 had his baton drawn and administered 2 or 3 hits to the legs. The man with hat, glasses, moustache and scarf is furious in video. That's evidence something outlandish just happened. We don't know nor never met this man. His anger and shock is not out of no where and for nothing. He witnessed abuse from this Guard, who told him to stay back whilst brandishing the baton. This guy was hit at least 3 times for seemingly not a whole lot. The camera catches a definite 1. What happens next is weird and has more questions then answers.
    The guy, who is NOT a busker, is wrestled to the ground and held for a short time. Then GR B 929 gets up and other Guard gets up and then the guy is allowed to his feet.
    To this point, if a person is under arrest and needs a baton and pepper spray to apprehend he is NOT allowed to his feet of his own accord. That leads me to believe, to this point, he is NOT under arrest. So he is allowed to leave the scene. If he is allowed to get to his feet of own accord he is not under arrest well then he can leave the scene....to this point in the video. Then he starts to run, and the Guard seems to respond to the jeering of the crowd, "Run". So one Guard takes chase while the baton wielding reserve is in 2 minds as what to do.
    I believe the Guard failed to operate under pressure and only chased this guy because of the jeer's. Mainly because he was allowed get to his feet and find his breath all on his own, untouched. So the 2 Guards take chase up the Arch and onto Ha'Penny bridge. The lead Guard clips the guy's heels twice....succeeding in the second. And you see the chap is in an absolute ball.
    The man with the moustache, hat etc has also followed us up and his only concern is to confront GR B 929 regarding the use of his baton, which is evident in video. Which the Guard promptly denies but looks flustered when he see's that someone actually WAS on the ball with the video. Were moved away and told not to question authority,
    I in no way stopped them from doing there job. Not before the chase nor on the bridge. They created a hostile vibe with a bully, speak down to people attitude.

    ***THAT MAN WHO FOLLOWS US UP, HIS SHOCK AND ANGER IS NOT MISPLACED***

    Part 2
    By the end of this video maybe between 9 and 15 Gardai are taken off the streets to deal with this, a couple of squad cars and a van. All because that bully grabbed Justin for no proper reason. That was when it escalated. If these trained Guards only dealt with or moved on the crowd......assess the situation with common sense, prioritize and deal with it, like you were trained to do. Don't grab the guy who was singing all night for no proper grounds in front of a group of people who have been listening to him for the last hour. And then they can throw the resisting arrest when they feel like grabbing people, when the ego is hurt ???
    And they all have that ego. Before they even leave Maynooth. That attitude, smirk and ego is all in place. And your crazy if you think a busker, with a Dublin accent is going to make them look silly in front of a crowd. But again, if they had sense they could have prioritized and dealt with it all accordingly. But that simply is a bridge too far.

    Also in part 2 a group of 2 or 3 Gardai arrive....one grabbing my hand/phone wanting my property I'm in my rights to be using and another grabbing my other arm. Within seconds there is commotion by the back of the van and these Guards who have both arms, more or less, think that this commotion is more important. Then the video trails out with a girl complaining about he camera.

    At this time, I had my phone out for one reason. Protection. The Guards tend to lie under the safety of an oath or a uniform or the ignorance of the people there dealing with. They tend to act beyond duty when they feel no one is watching. Also, with prior inconsistent, aggressive, oppressive style dealings with the Guards whilst busking before I wanted this to be caught on tape. I certainly didn't think it would escalate to what it did. Maybe why my phone was nearly stolen twice by Gardai. Once resulting in me cursing and calling him filth.
    Those who say I shouldn't record or anyone should record Gardai on there duty is very naive or a Guard themselves. We, the public, are more or less recorded from when we enter the city centre to when we leave. I know CCTV isn't as far as housing estates etc but your filmed 24/7 whilst in town. All without your "permission".
    Also these guys are our servants, paid by tax paying people who are employed to uphold the law and serve the public. In a public place.

    ***WE CAN TAPE THEM FROM THE START OF THERE SHIFT TO THE END, THEY SERVE US, NOT RULE US***

    In this video I may have lost my cool by cursing and commenting. Or even getting too close, but due to prior I know how this gang of animals operate so it wasn't going unrecorded. I actually only call a Guard "filth" once and then on the bridge I refer to GR B 929's treatment and use of weapon "filth".
    All the Gardai commenting, all the misinformed opinions made from assumption, all the honest people missing the relevant points. These bully coppers know exactly whats going on as do we....We know about every moment we cross paths and who acts in what fashion.

    SATURDAY.........
    That video is from Friday.....PLEASE READ UPDATE at start of video for Saturday's proceedings, absolute thugs who acted far from outside the law. They used a tactical op to get us into the van in 30 seconds to 1 minute in order to save a 2nd video. They grabbed us with NO CAUTION, NO RIGHTS READ AND NO GROUNDS FOR CHARGE(S)

    They dumped all 3 of us cuffed into the reversing van with NO CAUTION, NO RIGHTS READ AND NO GROUNDS FOR CHARGE(S).
    I lost a runner in the melee and I am actually thankful a Guard grabbed it. That actually was appreciated (no sarcasm).
    But we were in that spot for up to 10 minutes pleading to grab our amp, micraphones, guitar, all our wires and jacks etc. Justin's bag's with certain belongings. We pleaded to either let us, or 1 grab it or please could they grab it. We were ignored and ALL of our equipment was left to a raging crowd, that the Gardai with there overkill, bully tactic's had enraged.

    ***ALL EQUIPMENT WAS STOLEN DUE TO US BEING KIDNAPPED BY GARDAI WITH NO RIGHTS READ OR NOW CAUTION -ALL OUR PROPERTY WAS STOLEN OR "LOST", 3 BUSKERS TREATED LIKE CRIMINALS, CHECK OUR VIDEO'S OUR FACEBOOK PAGE,THE PEOPLE IN THE VIDEOS, WE ARE HARMLESS, WE DON'T HARM BUT DO QUITE THE OPPOSITE - ALL EQUIPMENT WAS STOLEN, AND PART OF GUITAR THAT WAS SMASHED WAS FOUND IN SPOT WHEN WE RETURNED ON WAY HOME - THIS IS REFERING TO SATURDAY, NOT NIGHT OF VIDEO***

    Our Facebook page full of people who love what we do
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Undutchables/501013826582956

    Our YouTube page with said videos spoke of ( Colt 45 after asking to cut amp, and intimidation on the Saturday)
    http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGWvuVJ6L4J-uBzE5n2P9LA

    A link to an ever growing photo album of all our proceedings
    http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.3319799092577.111270.1796281652&type=3

    We are NOT SCUM nor are WE KNACKERS - We are PROVOKED AND BULLIED

    Cheers


Advertisement
Advertisement