Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Is It Illogical To Buy Saorview In the Border Regions?

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    JonathonS wrote: »
    Sony have been advertising the HX803 models, which are Saorview approved and have T2 tuner and Digital tick. As are the EX553, EX653, HX753 and HX923 ranges, and the EX723 models as you point out, although the latter are not listed on the Sony Irl site.

    EX524 and NX723 models are no longer listed on Sony UK or Sony Ireland sites.

    The HX803 range are not Saorview certified. My list a few pages back is only those that have both Saorview and Freeview HD certification.

    By the way the list for Sony's Saorview certification for their 2011 and 2012 models is here
    JonathonS wrote: »
    All TV models on the Sony Ireland site have a T2 tuner.

    You cannot assume that because they have a t2 tuner module that the software has been configured and indeed certified for both Saorview and Freeview HD. Only those that pass Teracom and DTG's individual bench tests get certified and approved to use the respective logos.


  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,190 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    It's the 3 at the end that signifies a T2 tuner. Eg. an EX440 has MPEG4 tuner, an EX443 is identical but for having MPEG4 T2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭sesswhat


    STB wrote: »
    Only the ones I have originally listed have certification for both.

    Yes. What I'm saying however is that the Freeview site listing is very limited and also out-of-date. It seems to represent more of a sample of what is available (or rather was available 18 months ago) than a resource to check certification. In fact I don't even think the Samsung LE40D550 they feature has got DVB-T2?

    As a result, if you are looking for a recent model Freeview HD TV, attempting to check certification against the official Freeview website is futile.

    If there is a publicly available, official, up-to-date and exhaustive list of certified Freeview HD TVs anywhere then I'm damned if I can find it.

    Freeview seem to be happy to let the consumer be guided by the claims of the manufacturers in identifying the correct equipment in the first instance. On the other hand, Saorview have a more proactive approach by listing everything as it is certified, for now at least.

    The sites I linked to are just two examples of places where you can throw the net a bit wider. If you find something you are interested in, you can check Saorview certification, and then you should at least download the manual to check for DVB-T2. If you are in a shop, at least you can check if the packaging has the Freeview HD logo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Andy454


    eirman wrote: »
    I have come to the conclusion that it just doesn't make sense to purchase any kind of Saorview equipment, if you have a decent signal from the North (which I have).

    I bought a Saorview TV recently and I regret it. It's DVB-T only, so I won't be able to view HD from the north. (DVB-T2 required). I'd rather have 11 or 12 HD channels compared the present 1 (max 4).

    I don't care where the Irish channels first appear in my EPG .... I can sort them and/or use favourites.

    My next TV or PVR will be purchased in the north and will be DVB-T2 compliant.

    Any flaws in my logic?


    omg this is brilliant!!! RTE really have gone betamax now, I thought there signals were supposed to be the most modern form of transmission! DVB-T instead of DVB-T2! excellant stuff - well done montrose, soon it will only be their own clique watching their own rubbish...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭Delboy5


    At the weekend i bought the below FreeviewHD box from Argos in the north.

    http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/5323218/c_1/1%7Ccategory_root%7CTechnology%7C33006169/c_2/2%7C33006169%7CSet+top+boxes%2C+recorders+and+satelite%7C33008689/c_3/3%7Ccat_33008689%7CSet+top+boxes%7C33015958.htm



    It gives me all the Freeview & Saorview stations in one EPG with the option to move the channels to where i want them. Next week i will also get the 4 Uk HD stations....

    The box also comes with a USB port which gives you PVR functionality, you can pause live tv or schedule recordings.
    You can schedule a recording, leave the box in standby, it will wake up at the designated time, record the program and then go back to standby. I did a test recording last night using a small 16Gb pen drive, 30mins took approx 1Gb. One downside is when recording you cant change channel away from the "recorded" channel. I have to say the EPG isnt the best looking either........

    The USB port also functions as a Media player, havent tested out what formats it takes yet........


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    omg this is brilliant!!! RTE really have gone betamax now, I thought there signals were supposed to be the most modern form of transmission! DVB-T instead of DVB-T2! excellant stuff - well done montrose, soon it will only be their own clique watching their own rubbish...

    Andy454, have you a bit of a chip on the shoulder about RTÉ?
    You'll be pleased to know that DVB-T2 in in the revised Saorview standard.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭STB


    Andy454 wrote: »
    omg this is brilliant!!! RTE really have gone betamax now, I thought there signals were supposed to be the most modern form of transmission! DVB-T instead of DVB-T2! excellant stuff - well done montrose, soon it will only be their own clique watching their own rubbish...

    If you knew what the diffrence was you wouldnt be throwing the word betmax around. Both DVB-T and DVB-T2 support HD. The reason the UK use it is that they can squeeze more into a mux as DVB-T2 is more efficient as a platform for the multitude of stations they broadcast. In Ireland we do not have the luxury of having lots of stations so its not an issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭eirman


    Thanks all the replies to this thread. I have concluded that my original assumption is correct ..... it would be illogical to buy sub-standard DVB-T saorview equipment when NI HD signals are receivable.

    If you are in an overspill area, be sure to buy Saorview v2013* equipment (with DBV-T2) or you may, like me, regret it.

    * My unofficial terminology


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,461 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Andy454 wrote: »
    omg this is brilliant!!! RTE really have gone betamax now, I thought there signals were supposed to be the most modern form of transmission! DVB-T instead of DVB-T2! excellant stuff - well done montrose, soon it will only be their own clique watching their own rubbish...

    You realise that DVB-T2 didn't actually exist when RTENL was rolling out? If it hadn't been for our Government and BAI we might have had ASO in 2010!

    DVB-T2 is mandatory part of standard from Jan 2013 and current DVB-T Saorview and post-2012 Saorview boxes / TVs will work in Ireland for very many years.

    You know a that apart from DVB-T and DVB-T2 there is MPEG2 and MPEG4 for SD and UK DVB-T is MPEG2 only ("obsolete").

    Also as well as DVB flavours (used in Africa, Russia, Australia, NZ, all of Europe, Middle East) there is also FOUR other incompatible Digital Terrestrial Systems?
    North America, A lot of South America, China and Japan.

    It's not comparable to Betamax/VHS.

    Also Satellite uses three systems: DVB-S, DVB-S2 and a US one (though US uses DVB too)

    Cable has DVB-c and DVB-c2

    These are all different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Andy454


    watty wrote: »
    You realise that DVB-T2 didn't actually exist when RTENL was rolling out? If it hadn't been for our Government and BAI we might have had ASO in 2010!


    It's not comparable to Betamax/VHS.

    QUOTE]

    I stand by my analogy, DVB-T2 was concieved as early as 2008, there where even prototype recievers at mediacast even earlier... long before saorview was launched.......- i do recall rte was transmitting a trial dvb-t mpeg 2 service at the time....

    Quote from above states that one should be buying a " Saorview v2013* - brilliant - hats off to the saorview people they really do deserve that 130k salary!"

    If I recall Watty, this was also discussed at length by yourself in various arguements over why we should adopt mpeg 4 over mpeg 2 - I thought saorview was DVB-T2 - considering the power savings (someone mentioned) could be achieved versus DVB-T!- weren't you the main proponent of going dvb-t2 with mpeg 4 in some long since closed thread.... maybe the good people at saorvew /rtenl should have been paying closer attention to your posts watty....


    DVB-T + MPEG4 = Betamax
    DVB-T2 + MPEG4 = VHS

    Viewers with DVB-T2 receivers will get more channels, better quality recievers, more likely to get better software development with upgrades with new features.... like the people who bought vhs recorders in the 1980's - more movies in VHS, more recording time on a tape, more features (IR remotes!!)

    Viewers with DVB-T receivers will be like the people that bought the betamax equipment, limited choice of channels, no future support - for saorview rev 2013!

    Brilliant - I'll ring Joe tomorrow!!!!

    What should I buy joe, a dvb-t with mpeg 2, a dvb-t with mpeg 4, a dvb-t2 with mpeg 4 or something with mheg9?? saorsat or saorview or freesat and freeview someone help me please joe.... I don't want the telly to go dark on october 24th, mheg5 over...

    Come budget day we might have episodes of the shining all over ireland as people cant afford boose and have no tv...


    ...no tv and no beer make homer go something something....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    Problem kinda related to all this that I hope someone can shed some light. TV has a built in DVB-T tunner. At some point in the past it has picked up all the freeview channels at one point or another but never together afaik. It used to pick up all the ITV, Channel 4 freesat without the BBC ones. Currently it is picking up all the BBC channels without the ITV, Channel 4 ones? Anyone tell me what's going on with that?

    Opr


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Andy454


    Almost 4 years ago now... before saorview... Boxer debacle...

    ******************************************************
    28-11-2008, 10:11

    watty

    Unfortunately DVB-T2 is likely to be the HD standard....

    **********************************************************

    so in the 4 years we've know about DVB-T2, "industry experts" here have told the public to go out and buy dvb-t recievers with mpeg4 capability aka saorview boxes...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭sesswhat


    opr wrote: »
    Problem kinda related to all this that I hope someone can shed some light. TV has a built in DVB-T tunner. At some point in the past it has picked up all the freeview channels at one point or another but never together afaik. It used to pick up all the ITV, Channel 4 freesat without the BBC ones. Currently it is picking up all the BBC channels without the ITV, Channel 4 ones? Anyone tell me what's going on with that?

    Opr

    If you are getting your channels from Freeview in NI, try again next week after 24th, when UTV and CH4 join the BBC channels on higher power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    sesswhat wrote: »
    If you are getting your channels from Freeview in NI, try again next week after 24th, when UTV and CH4 join the BBC channels on higher power.

    Cool, thanks. I am getting it from NI so I presumed it was something like that. The telly is only Mpeg2 compatible so I need to get something to also pick up the Soarview channels. What's my best option? Soarview box or should I just buy something which will pick up freesat HD and is Mpeg4 compatible?

    Opr


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Andy454


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Andy454, have you a bit of a chip on the shoulder about RTÉ?
    You'll be pleased to know that DVB-T2 in in the revised Saorview standard.

    Are people aware that they should purchase a revised Saorview standard box?

    pardon me, many people on here shouted people down when they suggested that rte should have continued the mpeg2 service available at the trial that was compatible with 100% of the lcd and plasma tv's sold in the state at that time.

    They said DVB-T mpeg 4 was the future of all broadcasting in europe and we should adopt this new standard and get on with it, saorview issued a spec to box manufacturers and sold receivers to DVB-T mpeg4 to beat the band.

    Now it turns out the new standard that will actually be DVB-T2 + mpeg4 and people should be buying a saorview box with DVB-T2 compatibility if they want to future proof their set top box - or wish to currently receive hd broadcasts from our nearest neighbour... what a joke.

    I can't believe there are "saorview" approved boxes that are not DVB-T2 compatible - will joe soap be entitled to a refund if he discovers his saorview box is not compatible with future saorview broadcasts? considering he demanded a refund from his electrical retailer for the tv he bought in 2008 that he was told worked with the DTT service available at the time?

    Electronic recyclers will have fun smushing all these boxes into paste...

    We really do live in a banana republic, our nearest neighbour has a tried and trusted broadcasting system, which 100's of thousands of citizens in the state have been recieving for the past 10+ years (wicklow/wexford ondigital subscribers you know who you are!) and our own incumbent broadcaster who is supposed to report to US, the licence fee payer, goes and adopts an obscure version of standards incompatible with the majority of existing equipment - it is a complete farce.

    They had mpeg 2 broadcasting during the trial, why the hell couldn't they have kept this standard and then moved to DVB-T2 when standards were finalised inline with the UK - they knew DVB-T2 was coming down the line since 2008! UK have been broadcasting DVB-T2 since 2009!

    Good luck to them finding a commercial partner now, the majority of these saorview boxes don't even have CI slots, commercial partners will be limited now in what they can offer based on DVB-T capacity, which means if they do go down the route DVB-T2, which they will, they will once again have to convice customers to upgrade their saorview boxes - really are they having a laugh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Change the record. RTE adopted an actual standard, whereas the UK is doing its own thing as usual. MPEG2 is obsolete and using it would have required parallel MPEG4 HD channels, which would be a complete waste. In the UK there will be a further "changeover" when they shut down at least some of the SD stuff in a few years to free up bandwidth for HD.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭lawhec


    When the initial Saorview specification laid down mandating the use of MPEG-4 AVC video of SD & HD over DVB-T in 2008 and with the roll out of the network commencing, DVB-T2 was still at the draft stage. The final standard to be adopted was only settled on in September 2009. By the time there was a "soft launch" of Saorview in October 2010 only the UK and Italy had any public DVB-T2 transmissions, with Sweden and Finland about to launch one, with the SADC declaring it as its preferred option later in the year. It is only within the last 12 months that the ball for international adoption of DVB-T2 has visibly started rolling. It also needs to be remembered that even the DVB organisation initially discouraged countries to adopted DVB-T2 straight from analogue broadcasts instead of DVB-T for whatever reason.

    The initial decision for the adoption of DVB-T/MPEG-4 for SD & HD in Ireland was the correct decision then and it still is in hindsight - only if the roll out of the Saorview transmission network was beginning in the summer of 2010 rather than the summer of 2008 would any sense to adopt DVB-T2 be feasible. MPEG-2 was a non-runner in 2008 and it still is; most countries that were launching DVB-T networks around that time were using MPEG-4. Using MPEG4 on a multiplex for both SD and HD services eliminates the need for SD simulcast and the corresponding waste of multiplex space that comes with it, and problem that the UK is currently having to handle.

    Many countries to this day including France, Spain, Italy, Norway and New Zealand are using MPEG-4 over DVB-T for HD broadcasts. Ireland is most certainly not alone in the basic points of its DTT standards.

    It is not the fault of RTÉ that unscrupulous retailers - particularly those based in the UK - were offloading televisions in the Irish market that couldn't decode MPEG-4 video. There was no need for RTÉ to have its technical hands tied behind its back - the UK D-Book specifications on its own, which continues today with Freeview HD receivers, acts strangely for non-UK originated transmissions. If RTÉNL were to have broadcast with DVB-T MPEG2 there would have been plenty of questions as to why channels could only be accessed from 800 onwards and the time being one hour behind in the summer! The Saorview NorDig specification OTOH is more sympathetic to receiving UK originated transmissions. It's also worth remembering that only a minority of people in the RoI will be able to receive a reliable Freeview signal from N. Ireland or Wales.

    The decision for Saorview to adopt an updated set of technical standards from the start of 2013 which includes mandatory DVB-T2 is a can't-lose one for RTÉ's detractors - if it was left until later to add it to a future specification update people would be howling about Ireland failing to catch up and leaving even more receivers 'potentially' redundant. The problem is that what is a minimum specification set for reception can have a lower specification set for transmission.

    There is no urgency for the RoI to adopt DVB-T2 at least for Free-To-Air broadcasts as it isn't pressed for spectrum space any more that what it has already chosen. RRC-06 seen plenty of allocations go to Ireland, some have been lost with the decision to clear E61-68 for mobile telephone use but an additional two-three multiplexes could be launched without any problem from most current transmitter sites. Compare this to the UK who are now strapped for spectrum space in the UHF band - they've been able to get away with their DSO into fitting the content of six pre-DSO DVB-T multiplexes into five by having the the 16QAM multiplexes turned into 64QAM with higher transmission powers and gaining one spare multiplex in the process to broadcast using DVB-T2 for HD services. They couldn't have launched HD without T2 on Freeview otherwise. But they have future problems stored up - while in Northern Ireland it's in many people's interests to have Freeview HD equipment to view either cross-border broadcasts or the planned NIMM, the only incentive in most of Britain is to view four HD channels - three of whom are simulcast with existing SD channels and another which part-simulcasts with no exclusive content of its own. The planned launch of 'local TV' multiplexes hasn't technical parameters set in stone, but Ofcom are recommending DVB-T with MPEG2 video and QPSK modulation. Freeview HD has been slow to take off there. The majority of televisions sold in Britain, especially smaller screen (less than 32 inch) ones are still Freeview only, incapable of either DVB-T2 reception or decoding MPEG4 video. It's a price of the UK being an early adopter and there is no way even the commercial multiplex operators can consider converting to DVB-T2 MPEG4 for SD or HD channels for several years yet, especially with limited spectrum now available since they still have no bloody clue about how to allocate channels E31-38 yet! (Why the UK government thought that would be useful for mobile comms in a non-international standard band is puzzling, then again they reallocated the VHF Bands I & III away from broadcasting into trunk radio until DAB came to town - no lessons learned.) At least Saorview doesn't have to worry about the above. Maybe DVB-T2 will be used when 4K or 8K video is being tested, though by that stage terrestrial TV broadcasting could be threatened with redundancy.

    There are some elements within RTÉ that have valid criticism to be attached to them - the insistence on continuing with DAB in particular - but the technical standard of Saorview is most certainly not one of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,203 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Andy454 wrote: »
    DVB-T2 was concieved as early as 2008, there where even prototype recievers at mediacast even earlier... long before saorview was launched.......- i do recall rte was transmitting a trial dvb-t mpeg 2 service at the time....

    The technical conditions for DTT in Ireland were consulted on and published by Comreg in 2007 which set the standard as DVB-T MPEG2 and MPEG4 (In Dec2006 Estonia rolled out the world's first DVB-T/MPEG-4 only DTT network followed by Norway in 2007).

    Following the publication of the DTT standard by Comreg the Dept published the min. receiver spec. for DTT in Ireland in Feb2008.

    The Depts 2006/08 DTT trial, which tested both MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video decoding, ended in Jul 2008 with the Dept announcing at the end of the trial that only MPEG-4 video decoding would be used.

    RTÉNL started DVB-T/MPEG-4 pre-launch engineering test transmissions a few days later on Aug 5th.

    By the time DVB-T2 became an official standard in late 2009 13 sites (including all main transmitters) were transmitting DTT to 85-90% of the population


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    rte did the right thing rolling out dvb-t/mpeg4 and had the first licence worked out over 10 years back they would have done the right thing rolling out mpeg2

    most of the performance gains in dvb-t2 come from it being mpeg4 and fewer from the better qam


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    most of the performance gains in dvb-t2 come from it being mpeg4 and fewer from the better qam

    Fewer what from the 'better' QAM? Also, MPEG & DVB-anything are completely separate entities, not inherently linked in any way.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mpeg4 compression gets you more space than the qam enhancements in the t2 standard do. Lars or Watty would inevitably explain it better.

    I can see the UK turning off Dvb-t mpeg2 by 2018 and going mpeg4 dvb-T2 only by then.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭Peter Rhea


    I get your meaning now, but the carrier is separate from the payload. If the transmitter operators want to find improvements, they need to use a better modulation scheme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭BarneyMc


    Delboy5 wrote: »
    At the weekend i bought the below FreeviewHD box from Argos in the north.

    http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/5323218/c_1/1%7Ccategory_root%7CTechnology%7C33006169/c_2/2%7C33006169%7CSet+top+boxes%2C+recorders+and+satelite%7C33008689/c_3/3%7Ccat_33008689%7CSet+top+boxes%7C33015958.htm



    It gives me all the Freeview & Saorview stations in one EPG with the option to move the channels to where i want them. Next week i will also get the 4 Uk HD stations....

    The box also comes with a USB port which gives you PVR functionality, you can pause live tv or schedule recordings.
    You can schedule a recording, leave the box in standby, it will wake up at the designated time, record the program and then go back to standby. I did a test recording last night using a small 16Gb pen drive, 30mins took approx 1Gb. One downside is when recording you cant change channel away from the "recorded" channel. I have to say the EPG isnt the best looking either........

    The USB port also functions as a Media player, havent tested out what formats it takes yet........

    This sounds good Delboy5. I've just reserved a new telly on Argos but if this box does the trick then maybe I'll stick it out with my old telly instead. I live in Monaghan and pick up the UK Freeview channels. Can you let us know how the UK HD channels look next week and what video formats the USB supports when you get a chance to test? Thanks a mil!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭mrdtv2010


    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    I get your meaning now, but the carrier is separate from the payload. If the transmitter operators want to find improvements, they need to use a better modulation scheme.

    The mode used by NIMM is , in fact, QPSK, FEC 2/3, GI 1/32. Just stick in UTV's postcode in the DUK postcode checker.

    A full exposition of DVB-T2 and the reasons for its use is here:

    http://tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3348.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭reslfj


    The Cush wrote: »
    The technical conditions for DTT in Ireland were consulted on and published by Comreg in 2007 which set the standard as DVB-T MPEG2 and MPEG4 (In Dec2006 Estonia rolled out the world's first DVB-T/MPEG-4 only DTT network followed by Norway in 2007).
    Estonia used MP2 audio, Norway was the first country to use HE-AAC audio with DTT. Not 100% sure, but I think Norway was the first country to mandate MPEG-4 High Profile Level 4.0 (720p50/1080i), too.

    I know the first STBs were delivered by air to shops in Oslo - literally hours before the first digital broadcasts in early September 2007. IDTV's with support for the Nordig (Norwegian) spec's were not available until early 2008.
    The Cush wrote: »
    ...
    The Depts 2006/08 DTT trial, which tested both MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video decoding, ended in Jul 2008 with the Dept announcing at the end of the trial that only MPEG-4 video decoding would be used.

    I remember much confusion about which SI information and which audio standards was just for tests and which would be used after the tests. This lasted for a very long time, but can't put exact dates on just now.

    Much focus in this forum was on a fast start for pay-TV and on 'Neotion' cards saving existing MPEG-2 only TV sets. Both of course never happened.

    I know the marketing departments of the TV manufactures in the UK, - including the DTG until April/May 2008 - did not want DVB-T2.
    The technical departments of the same companies (Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, ...), the BBC and the technical group within the DVB.org and within the DTG - were however working flat out to create the DVB-T2 standard.
    The Cush wrote: »
    By the time DVB-T2 became an official standard in late 2009 13 sites (including all main transmitters) were transmitting DTT to 85-90% of the population
    The DVB-T2 standard was essential fixed by March 2008* (chip design could begin)

    vZnd5cg
    Nick Wells, BBC - Chairman DVB-T2-TM (technical group) October 2008

    The standard was published June 30, 2008 - only text changes and clarifications but no technical changes were added between the DVB.org version and the final ETSI standard EN-302755 v1.1.1 from September 9., 2009.

    The BBC did much testing during 2008 Q3,Q4 and 2009 Q1,Q2 and based on these better than expected test results, the FEC coderate was increased in the UK from 3/5 to 2/3 and the resulting bitrate from 36.14 to 40.21 Mbps.
    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/spectrum/spectrum-policy-area/projects/dtv/BBC_submission_on_UK_transm1.pdf

    Finland started DVB-T2 pay-TV during the Vancouver Winter Olympics in March 2010. Well they used DVB-T transmission during the Olympics duo to lack of DVB-T2 receivers but changed the transmission standard to DVB-T2 shortly after the Olympics (in early April - AFAIR). The DVB-T2 coverage in Finland was 40% by year end 2010 with two muxes in operation.

    Sweden started with two DVB-T2 muxes in November 2010 with around 80% coverage before year end 2010.(now ~98.5%)
    Peter Rhea wrote: »
    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    ...
    most of the performance gains in dvb-t2 come from it being mpeg4 and fewer from the better qam

    Fewer what from the 'better' QAM? Also, MPEG & DVB-anything are completely separate entities, not inherently linked in any way.

    ..., the operators need to use a better modulation scheme.

    If you think in channel capacity - you can compare the effect of using DVB-T2 alone or using MPEG-4 alone - I guess.

    MPEG-4 requires more like 2/3 the bitrate when compared with modern MPEG-2 encoders. The signaling, EPG plus other overhead require about the same bitrate - T or T2.

    DVB-T2/DVB-T bitrates = 40.2/24.1 = 1.668 ~+67%

    When you add the effect of better stat-muxing possible with the more channel in a DVB-T2 mux - it is at best a draw - most likely DVB-T2 will give the larger improvement in capacity.

    Moving from DVB-T/MPEG-2 to DVB-T2/MPEG-4 is about a 2.5 times increase in channel capacity which means only 40% of the price/channel.


    The very smart thing Ofcom did in the UK - smart for the DTT viewers money - was making it clear to all, that they (Ofcom) would enforce a shift to both MPEG-4 and DVB-T2 at the same time - i.e.
    • no DVB-T/MPEG-4 DTT licenses ever to be issued in the UK.
    • release of the BBC B mux post DSO to be used for DVB-T2 from a known date - DSO-Granada (Manchester) November 2009.
    Ofcom did not allow the 'picnic' project (DVB-T/MPEG-4 SD only) and its firm plan for the HD mux created a market for DVB-T2 equipment.
    The UK with its large number of DTT viewers turned out to be large enough to ensure private DVB-T2 receiver development.

    I think, it was not well understood and maybe still isn't, that DVB-T2 - in addition to more capacity - provides large added benefits under difficult RF-channel conditions, e.g. is much more robust with impulse noise, non LOS conditions, 0dB Echo etc.

    The operators needed the better LDPC/BCH FEC (error correction) scheme much more than higher order modulation - e.g. DVB-T2 64-QAM CR=4/5 has a 36 Mbps bitrate.


    Lars :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,461 ✭✭✭✭watty


    The east coast Dept trials were political window dressing to try and drum up Pay TV. BT actually ran them, not RTENL.

    In reality it was probably Autumn 2007 that MPEG4 only was decided on and first RTENL non-Dept transmission I think in Dec 2007 with the spec agreed with Dept PUBLISHED in March 2008
    The [DVB-T2] standard was published June 30, 2008
    So six months too late for Ireland and in terms of Production Setbox / TV Hardware DVB-T2 not available till nearly 2 years after Irish Spec published and almost 21/2 years after RTENL decision to use MPEG4 DVB-T and start transmission separate from the almost "fake" DCENR trial managed by BT.

    I tested Neotion cards during DCENR trial and it was evident that it was a rubbish solution and wouldn't work with many TVs or Setboxes unless you "lied" and claimed it was an MPEG2 codec in ID on the Transmission stream, which would badly affect some real MPEG4 decoders. It also ran far too hot.

    The "Picnic" MPEG4 on DVB-T in UK would have purely been of advantage to Sky and no-one else.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Thanks Lars and Watty. Out of interest how much of the global T2 box market is in the UK right now?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    If I recall correctly, the BBC began T2 broadcasts before any pieces of equipment were on the market. Dec 9th 2009, I think, with equipment being launched the following spring.

    It would make more sense fot the UK to adopt Nordig at this stage, with a timetable for migration towards it. They will either have to have a big bang approach or alternatively go mux by mux, migrating channels from one mux to another as they do with satellites.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭mrdtv2010


    If I recall correctly, the BBC began T2 broadcasts before any pieces of equipment were on the market. Dec 9th 2009, I think, with equipment being launched the following spring.

    It would make more sense fot the UK to adopt Nordig at this stage, with a timetable for migration towards it. They will either have to have a big bang approach or alternatively go mux by mux, migrating channels from one mux to another as they do with satellites.

    Why? The addressable UK DTT market is far larger than the actual Nordig market. The economics are now in favour of T2: from £179 to £32 for a T2 adapter in two years. The arguments have been nicely advanced by resflj and the EBU report which I linked earlier. If the 600Mhz channels are used for TV they will be for T2 TV.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    mrdtv2010 wrote: »
    Why? The addressable UK DTT market is far larger than the actual Nordig market. The economics are now in favour of T2: from £179 to £32 for a T2 adapter in two years. The arguments have been nicely advanced by resflj and the EBU report which I linked earlier. If the 600Mhz channels are used for TV they will be for T2 TV.

    If they join Nordig, they can drive it and the result will be a better standard. At the moment, they have a private standard, with its own idiocies.


Advertisement