HAARP-Chemtrails WMD: Exposing a Spiritual, Mass Mind-Control & Planetary Assault wit

nuub · 24-09-2012 03:24PM

But you have to probe, saying there is no scientific proof in itself means nothing. There was no proof for gravity,relativity and you would be burned for saying the Earth was round. Look at the Kennedy assassination although no goverment office has accepted responsibility the general consensus is that they played a part in it? If politicians came forth like this women although her views maybe wrong at least, like in this forum, they could be debated and dispelled in the public eye thus saving everyone the hassle of going to and fro on a "dead" issue and maybe the space wasted and the gigs of data on the internet could be put to better use.

endacl · 24-09-2012 03:40PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

surya wrote: »

1. Chemtrails, as opposed to contrails, take three or more hours to dissipate. Regular contrails disappear in about 20 minutes.

2. Chemtrails tend to look flat.

3. Another feature different from ordinary contrails is that mature chemtrails display a vertical curtain of fall-off.

4. Intense chemtrail spraying is done in tic-tac-toe, "X" and grids patterns.

Also, where are these 'chemtrails' coming from?

Aliens. Governments. Sometimes both. They're easily spotted. They're the ones wearing respirators during sprayings, and are thus unaffected. Unlike the rest of us 'sheeple' who are reduced to the level of mindless automatons.

Do try to keep up!

;-)

endacl · 24-09-2012 03:50PM

nuub wrote: »

But you have to probe, saying there is no scientific proof in itself means nothing. There was no proof for gravity,relativity and you would be burned for saying the Earth was round. Look at the Kennedy assassination although no goverment office has accepted responsibility the general consensus is that they played a part in it? If politicians came forth like this women although her views maybe wrong at least, like in this forum, they could be debated and dispelled in the public eye thus saving everyone the hassle of going to and fro on a "dead" issue and maybe the space wasted and the gigs of data on the internet could be put to better use.

There was evidence for both gravity an relativity. They both had to wait for maths an physics to reach a certain level of sophistication before they could be described though.

Immolation for claiming a round earth and a heliocentric solar system had a lot more to do with an adherence to blind dogma on the part of a superstitious church that feared losing power in society and authority over populations. The evidence was there. It just wasn't considered.

The consensus around the Kennedy assassination is arguably the official story. The vast majority of people see no need to question it.

hooradiation · 24-09-2012 03:54PM

nuub wrote: »

But you have to probe, saying there is no scientific proof in itself means nothing.

I think you'll find that you're wrong on that one, champ.

nuub · 24-09-2012 07:07PM

hooradiation wrote: »

I think you'll find that you're wrong on that one, champ.

If taken literally then yes but before proof you have theories like darwins theory was just theory until he managed to establish proof and that's why i said that.

24-09-2012 07:50PM

nuub wrote: »

If taken literally then yes but before proof you have theories like darwins theory was just theory until he managed to establish proof and that's why i said that.

Darwin himself never proved evolution.
He was able to support his theories with some evidence and good reasonable explanations at the time but the proof did not come until much later.

Chemtrails on the other had have no evidence supporting them whatsoever.
Not only is there no reason to believe they exist but there is rational or plausible reasoning behind why they might exist.

Yet despite this some people have no problem making all manner of claims about chemtrails based entirely on their own imagination.

endacl · 24-09-2012 09:20PM

nuub wrote: »

If taken literally then yes but before proof you have theories like darwins theory was just theory until he managed to establish proof and that's why i said that.

On man, don't fall back on that one...

'Scientific theory' v 'well that's just a theory' should be stickied.

Even Wikipedia knows that...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

Monty Burnz · 24-09-2012 09:52PM

nuub wrote: »

If taken literally then yes but before proof you have theories like darwins theory was just theory until he managed to establish proof and that's why i said that.

Darwin's theory is still 'just a theory'. Same as gravity is still 'just a theory'.

endacl · 24-09-2012 10:59PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Darwin's theory is still 'just a theory'. Same as gravity is still 'just a theory'.

Here's a proposition for the 'just a theory' brigade...

Gravity. Just a theory. Test it. Find a high window......

--Kaiser-- · 25-09-2012 08:27AM

Even if people are spraying chemicals on us from up high (which is preposterous in the first place) do the proponents of this theory not think of the inefficiency of this supposed method of dispersal? If you spray chemicals at thousands of feet in the air (the height at which contrails form) you have zero control over the massively wide area where they would land.

Surely if they wanted to drug people then they would pump chemcals into the water supply?

hooradiation · 25-09-2012 09:46AM

nuub wrote: »

If taken literally then yes but before proof you have theories

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWyVKoMOh_Y

Monty Burnz · 25-09-2012 04:57PM

nuub wrote: »

But you have to probe, saying there is no scientific proof in itself means nothing. There was no proof for gravity,relativity and you would be burned for saying the Earth was round.

There always was and is rather a lot of proof for gravity. And the earth has been known to be round since at least the time of the ancient Greeks.

Monty Burnz · 25-09-2012 04:57PM

endacl wrote: »

Here's a proposition for the 'just a theory' brigade...

Gravity. Just a theory. Test it. Find a high window......

I think this demonstrates that you don't know what a scientific theory is...

endacl · 25-09-2012 07:02PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

endacl wrote: »

Here's a proposition for the 'just a theory' brigade...

Gravity. Just a theory. Test it. Find a high window......

I think this demonstrates that you don't know what a scientific theory is...

Tongue was planted firmly in cheek!

endacl · 25-09-2012 11:48PM

I was testing the old 'if the wind changes, it'll stay like that' theory.

Theory is busted. Wind changed. Tongue fully mobile.

Feck! Cheek won't move!

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:41AM

Double bust this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iaVdAUhsrE

endacl · 27-09-2012 02:44AM

parrai wrote: »

Double bust this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iaVdAUhsrE

Bedtime. I'll get to it tomorrow. They do look serious though. It must make sense.

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:47AM

endacl wrote: »

Bedtime. I'll get to it tomorrow. They do look serious though. It must make sense.

It makes alot of sense.

--Kaiser-- · 27-09-2012 08:07AM

parrai wrote: »

It makes alot of sense.

I doubt it very much. Why are all these conspiracies in the form of long Youtube videos? How about a short dissertation that can be skimmed through, rather than two deluded individuals having an hysterical conversation?

endacl · 27-09-2012 01:09PM

--Kaiser-- wrote: »

parrai wrote: »

It makes alot of sense.

I doubt it very much. Why are all these conspiracies in the form of long Youtube videos? How about a short dissertation that can be skimmed through, rather than two deluded individuals having an hysterical conversation?

Yep. Watched as much as I could manage with a straight face. Got to nearly 30 minutes before I had the realization that I'd never get that 30 minutes back. Life is too short to spend watching that tripe.

parrai · 27-09-2012 01:12PM

Sorry for the wasted moments of your life that you have missed out on. To me is made perfect sense having watched the entire documentary.

--Kaiser-- · 27-09-2012 01:44PM

parrai wrote: »

Sorry for the wasted moments of your life that you have missed out on. To me is made perfect sense having watched the entire documentary.

Right. Any proof? Or is it just hearsay and conjecture? Because I'm not interested in the latter

endacl · 27-09-2012 01:45PM

parrai wrote: »

Sorry for the wasted moments of your life that you have missed out on. To me is made perfect sense having watched the entire documentary.

No apology necessary! T'was my choice to watch.

At what point did it start to make sense? I might give it another try if you narrow down the search a bit.

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:06PM

endacl wrote: »

No apology necessary! T'was my choice to watch.

At what point did it start to make sense? I might give it another try if you narrow down the search a bit.

The evidence they collected from samples taken from several parts of the states. Aluminum 61 times the permitted level, ie 61000 part per million. Strontium and barium at extremely high levels.

Trees, caked in the stuff, clouds formations that were not clouds...

The politicans reactions when geoengineering was put to them, all in the documentary. I don't think this is a ct.

Edit: regarding the title of the thread, I am only talking about chemtrails (geoengineering)

Monty Burnz · 27-09-2012 02:16PM

parrai wrote: »

The evidence they collected from samples taken from several parts of the states. Aluminum 61 times the permitted level, ie 61000 part per million. Strontium and barium at extremely high levels.

How do they know this is coming from aircraft? If it is coming from aircraft, how do they know it is deliberate?

Proof?

parrai wrote: »

Trees, caked in the stuff, clouds formations that were not clouds...

How come nobody else has noticed these tree cakes? Any chance of seeing these cloud formations that 'are not clouds' without sitting through 90 minutes of ropey claims?

parrai wrote: »

The politicans reactions when geoengineering was put to them, all in the documentary. I don't think this is a ct.

So the politicians know about it and nobody else does?

What level of politician? In which countries?

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:18PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

How do they know this is coming from aircraft? If it is coming from aircraft, how do they know it is deliberate?

Proof?

How come nobody else has noticed these tree cakes? Any chance of seeing these cloud formations that 'are not clouds' without sitting through 90 minutes of ropey claims?

So the politicians know about it and nobody else does? What level of politician? In which countries?

All in the documentary

Monty Burnz · 27-09-2012 02:21PM

parrai wrote: »

All in the documentary

Right, but 'chemtrails' have been debunked completely - all in the science books. Also common sense.

endacl · 27-09-2012 02:22PM

parrai wrote: »

All in the documentary

If meself and Monty were to sit down and ramble on for an hour and a half on the topic of, oh I don't know, ..... blue cars cause herpes, then post the video to YouTube, would this constitute evidence of the insidious link between blue cars and herpes?

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:23PM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Right, but 'chemtrails' have been debunked completely - all in the science books. Also common sense.

Maybe, the evidence presented in the documentary would seem to suggest otherwise, to me anyway. Who knows, eh? Only time will tell.

parrai · 27-09-2012 02:25PM

endacl wrote: »

If meself and Monty were to sit down and ramble on for an hour and a half on the topic of, oh I don't know, ..... blue cars cause herpes, then post the video to YouTube, would this constitute evidence of the insidious link between blue cars and herpes?

Yeah, but you're not comparing like with like, as a matter of fact, yer just typing whatever comes into your head, which is very strange indeed. Crash, maybe?

HAARP-Chemtrails WMD: Exposing a Spiritual, Mass Mind-Control & Planetary Assault wit

Comments