HAARP-Chemtrails WMD: Exposing a Spiritual, Mass Mind-Control & Planetary Assault wit

Monty Burnz

parrai wrote: »

Maybe, the evidence presented in the documentary would seem to suggest otherwise, to me anyway. Who knows, eh? Only time will tell.

But I've looked at a large part of this documentary (not all of it) a while back, and I thought the 'evidence' presented was beyond thin. Thin to the point where you could see right through it. Just more fodder for people who want to believe in secret knowledge.

Let me put it like this: if there was a genuine, widespread, well evidenced and widely known programme to create 'chemtrails', these people would be out there putting together documentaries about how it was not true at all.

Edit: Here's the guy behind the video - he looks like a proper loon to me. He clearly believes in all the HAARP, NWO, Georgia Guidestones nonsense - he has swallowed the whole package.

As another person notes on this clip on another forum:

He goes through the usual litany of debunked claims about the chemtrail theory. But one thing caught my attention, at 9:44 in the video:

MJM: Contrails do still occur, however contrails usually dissipate in a couple of seconds. It's exactly what, er, how the wording is, a "condensation trail". Aerosol trails are much different, they linger in the sky, as we discussed, for several hours, even several days

So it seems that Murphy thinks that because something forms by "condensation" then it cannot last more than a few seconds. He seems to be saying that airplane exhaust must be exactly like the only other form of condensation he's aware of, your breath on a cold day.

endacl

parrai wrote: »

Yeah, but you're not comparing like with like, as a matter of fact, yer just typing whatever comes into your head, which is very strange indeed. Crash, maybe?

Red cars then...

parrai

endacl wrote: »

Red cars then...

Now you're onto something!

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

But I've looked at a large part of this documentary (not all of it) a while back, and I thought the 'evidence' presented was beyond thin. Thin to the point where you could see right through it. Just more fodder for people who want to believe in secret knowledge.

Let me put it like this: if there was a genuine, widespread, well evidenced and widely known programme to create 'chemtrails', these people would be out there putting together documentaries about how it was not true at all.

I don't think the levels of the toxins presented in tests, which tested positive, is 'thin' at all. Also the ph testing of the land and water, against previous recorded ph values, did not add up.

Alot of disinformation out there, it's difficult spotting the liars, but eventually they leave slime in their tracks. So, I suppose we'll see eventually.

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

But I've looked at a large part of this documentary (not all of it) a while back, and I thought the 'evidence' presented was beyond thin. Thin to the point where you could see right through it. Just more fodder for people who want to believe in secret knowledge.

Let me put it like this: if there was a genuine, widespread, well evidenced and widely known programme to create 'chemtrails', these people would be out there putting together documentaries about how it was not true at all.

Edit: Here's the guy behind the video - he looks like a proper loon to me. He clearly believes in all the HAARP, NWO, Georgia Guidestones nonsense - he has swallowed the whole package.

As another person notes on this clip on another forum:

Yeah, I noticed in the documentary a few times, he gets confused on points... like for instance 'the few seconds' thing. But others in the documentary, actually say that these condensation trails from normal flights, last about 20 minutes, not a few secs.

Whilst the 'chemtrails' last all day long.

Monty Burnz

parrai wrote: »

I don't think the levels of the toxins presented in tests, which tested positive, is 'thin' at all. Also the ph testing of the land and water, against previous recorded ph values, did not add up.

How come state agencies haven't noticed these high levels of toxins? Are they all in on it too? Exactly how big is this conspiracy?

parrai wrote: »

Alot of disinformation out there, it's difficult spotting the liars, but eventually they leave slime in their tracks. So, I suppose we'll see eventually.

I don't know about slime tracks, but perhaps a trail of foam from the mouth might show up.

Do you agree with this guy that this conspiracy is a part of the whole NWO/HAARP/Bill Gates Eugenics/Illuminati/Federal Reserve is a private bank super conspiracy?

If not, don't you think his judgement might be a little bit dodgy?

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

How come state agencies haven't noticed these high levels of toxins? Are they all in on it too? Exactly how big is this conspiracy?

I don't know about slime tracks, but perhaps a trail of foam from the mouth might show up.

Do you agree with this guy that this conspiracy is a part of the whole NWO/HAARP/Bill Gates Eugenics/Illuminati/Federal Reserve is a private bank super conspiracy?

If not, don't you think his judgement might be a little bit dodgy?

Laziness, carelessness. Don't know...

People are waking up though.

Regarding the loaded question... again who knows. I know one thing I wouldn't put any of it past them.

Regarding the documentary makers judgement, I think, in this instance, he is onto something.

Monty Burnz

parrai wrote: »

Yeah, I noticed in the documentary a few times, he gets confused on points... like for instance 'the few seconds' thing. But others in the documentary, actually say that these condensation trails from normal flights, last about 20 minutes, not a few secs.

Of course, the others in the documentary are talking out of their arses with their 20 minutes - contrails can last for many hours, and have been known to do so since at least the 1940s.

Further information on it here.

Monty Burnz

parrai wrote: »

Laziness, carelessness. Don't know...

People are waking up though.

Regarding the loaded question... again who knows. I know one thing I wouldn't put any of it past them.

Regarding the documentary makers judgement, I think, in this instance, he is onto something.

Ok - if you are inclined to believe in the mega-conspiracy, there is nothing factual at all I can say that will convince you. It is just the way you are made.

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Of course, the others in the documentary are talking out of their arses with their 20 minutes - contrails can last for many hours, and have been known to do so since at least the 1940s.

Further information on it here.

I dunno, imho, there's something not quite right about this. My minds made up monty.

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Ok - if you are inclined to believe in the mega-conspiracy, there is nothing factual at all I can say that will convince you. It is just the way you are made.

Ah monty dunno what you're bangin on about here...

Monty Burnz

parrai wrote: »

Ah monty dunno what you're bangin on about here...

If you are inclined to believe in the whole NWO package, there is nothing factual or logical that will persuade you that chemtrails are a myth. I've wasted a lot of time trying to persuade believers in that nonsense: now I am content just to show those who might be on the fence just how ridiculous the claims are, and let the true believers carry on in their fantasy world.

parrai

Monty Burnz wrote: »

If you are inclined to believe in the whole NWO package, there is nothing factual or logical that will persuade you that chemtrails are a myth. I've wasted a lot of time trying to persuade believers in that nonsense: now I am content just to show those who might be on the fence just how ridiculous the claims are, and let the true believers carry on in their fantasy world.

Don't know where you got the bit in bold from.

Don't waste your time! Why would you do such a thing... Surely people can do their own homework.

--Kaiser--

parrai wrote: »

I don't think the levels of the toxins presented in tests, which tested positive, is 'thin' at all. Also the ph testing of the land and water, against previous recorded ph values, did not add up.

Alot of disinformation out there, it's difficult spotting the liars, but eventually they leave slime in their tracks. So, I suppose we'll see eventually.

If this is true that there are higher levels of toxins detected, how do you prove they are from chemtrails? Because if you can't prove it we're back in hearsay and conjecture land