Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Next Big False Flag Event: London Olympics?

245

Comments

  • #32
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    Will you feel bad about discouraging people from going and seeing Katie Taylor et al if nothing happens? Will you admit that you got it wrong?

    No, the elite only have themselves to blame over all those CT's that have been spun.

    .


  • #33
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »
    I bet you dream of such an image occurring. Thousands dead, but you are correct. So it probably balances out, right?

    I bet you don't answer this yet again.

    Could you please point out by way of quotation anything that he has posted that supports your ugly assertion the he would "dream of such an image occurring".

    Failing that could you please keep your delusional conspiracy theories to yourself? I don't believe users of the forum are permitted to be the subject of them. Thanks.


  • #34
    Father Damo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Father Damo


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    No, the elite only have themselves to blame over all those CT's that have been spun.

    .


    The government are to blame for deluded people pulling plots out of hints they imagine they have seen hidden in various aspects of popular culture?

    It just gets better this does :pac:


  • #35
    Chazz Michael Michaels
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭Chazz Michael Michaels


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »
    I bet you dream of such an image occurring. Thousands dead, but you are correct. So it probably balances out, right?

    I bet you don't answer this yet again.

    Could you please point out by way of quotation anything that he has posted that supports your ugly assertion the he would "dream of such an image occurring".

    Failing that could you please keep your delusional conspiracy theories to yourself? I don't believe users of the forum are permitted to be the subject of them. Thanks.

    In the CT forum? Hahaha, you're a funny guy. Keep it up.


  • #36
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »
    In the CT forum? Hahaha, you're a funny guy. Keep it up.

    So you aren't going to back up what you say...again. I'm shocked.

    I don't understand why you making foolish comments and then not having the ability to support them when questioned is so entertaining to you, but different strokes.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Father Damo wrote: »
    The government are to blame for deluded people pulling plots out of hints they imagine they have seen hidden in various aspects of popular culture?

    It just gets better this does :pac:

    You are aware that you are putting words in his mouth, right? He never said: "for deluded people pulling plots out of hints they imagine they have seen hidden in various aspects of popular culture?" Did he? But never miss an opportunity to get a sly dig in.


  • #38
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Father Damo wrote: »
    The government are to blame for deluded people pulling plots out of hints they imagine they have seen hidden in various aspects of popular culture?

    It just gets better this does :pac:

    The corrupt governments of today are to blame for letting their agents spread widespread fear and doubt among the masses. 11.000 deaths or a nuclear attack is kind of scary and more son in the particular false flag climate that we are living in today


  • #39
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    The corrupt governments of today are to blame for letting their agents spread widespread fear and doubt among the masses.
    Not the masses it seems, just you and people who share your belief system. Perhaps you need to look closer to home? :)


  • #40
    Chazz Michael Michaels
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭Chazz Michael Michaels


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    So you aren't going to back up what you say...again. I'm shocked.

    I have valid reasons to not respond to your questions. I will leave it at that.


  • #41
    Jonny7
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    The corrupt governments of today are to blame for letting their agents spread widespread fear and doubt among the masses. 11.000 deaths or a nuclear attack is kind of scary and more son in the particular false flag climate that we are living in today

    Nope, this is a paranoid imaginary world you have created for yourself using real events.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    hooradiation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    If something major did happen I would have a clear conscience

    I don't know how you could. You'd have been sitting on information that could have saved lives, but all you did was make vague posts on a small corner of the internet.

    Thankfully, seeing as it's all complete bunk, you'll never have to wrestle with this kind of moral dilemma.


  • #43
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Nope, this is a paranoid imaginary world you have created for yourself using real events.
    You seem to be quite confused on this matter, it is not myself that has initially created these scenarios of possible mass onslaught.
    hooradiation wrote: »
    I don't know how you could. You'd have been sitting on information that could have saved lives, but all you did was make vague posts on a small corner of the internet.
    one person deciding not to go could be one life spared if something did occur.
    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Thankfully, seeing as it's all complete bunk, you'll never have to wrestle with this kind of moral dilemma
    It is not over yet.


  • #44
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    You seem to be quite confused on this matter, it is not myself that has initially created these scenarios of possible mass killings.
    So you have been the victim of a disinformation campaign?


  • #45
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    So you have been the victim of a disinformation campaign?

    I would be vigilant of their methods to put it in a better way.


  • #46
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    I would be vigilant of their methods to put it in a better way.
    It always makes sense to be vigilant about your government, but it seems to me that the greatest risk is letting them off the hook on the basics of running the show while screaming from the rooftops about vast conspiracies that they almost certainly know nothing about.


  • #47
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »
    I have valid reasons to not respond to your questions. I will leave it at that.

    Cognitive dissonance is not a "valid reason".


  • #48
    hooradiation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    one person deciding not to go could be one life spared if something did occur.

    A very weak balm for you conscience, then.
    I guess you ought to be thankful you're so wide of the mark.

    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    It is not over yet.

    It was over before it even started, as is the way with all things that don't exist.
    Now we just have the death rattles of this 'theory'.


  • #49
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    It always makes sense to be vigilant about your government, but it seems to me that the greatest risk is letting them off the hook on the basics of running the show while screaming from the rooftops about vast conspiracies that they almost certainly know nothing about.
    I am sure they were well aware of those "exercises" that were carried out just prior to that live 7/7 attack.


  • #50
    al28283
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭al28283


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    You are aware that you are putting words in his mouth, right?

    you've done a fair amount of that yourself in these threads tbh


  • #51
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    I am sure they were well aware of those "exercises" that were carried out just prior to that live 7/7 attack.
    I'm sure that various branches of the government were aware of them. That doesn't prove anything at all though, does it?

    It certainly doesn't prove the existence of a completely leak-proof giant conspiracy of astonishing scope, complexity and brutality. Or that the Abrahamic god exists, or any of the other elements of your belief system.


  • Advertisement
  • #52
    A Primal Nut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭A Primal Nut


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    The corrupt governments of today are to blame for letting their agents spread widespread fear and doubt among the masses. 11.000 deaths or a nuclear attack is kind of scary and more son in the particular false flag climate that we are living in today

    They didn't spread fear and doubt among the masses. They (whether inadvertently or purposefully) spread fear and doubt among a small number of conspiracy theorists such as yourself who will stay away from London anyhow.


  • #53
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Has the latest false flag event claim thingy happened yet?


  • #54
    DB21
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭DB21


    kryogen wrote: »
    Has the latest false flag event claim thingy happened yet?

    Nope. Thought it would have been today. Y'know, eyes of the world on the stadium, which was packed to the rafters. I guess the boogeymen had another reason to put it off :rolleyes:


  • #55
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    kryogen wrote: »
    Has the latest false flag event claim thingy happened yet?
    We are waiting for the fake UFO to land in London and for Prince William to be pronounced King of the NWO. I'll send you a PM when it happens.


  • #56
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    So just back after 3 great days in London for the Olympics. After reading this and other threads I was shocked to find very little signs of NWO activity in London. I mean after all the dire predictions from RTTH and his ct buddies I was expecting thousands of troops and tanks to be imposing marital law on the streets or chaos at the venues or to see the city as a virtual ghost town. Even getting into the Olympic park I expected to be body scanned and searched but none of it. Just alot of people from all corners of the world having fun and enjoying themselves with very little sight of NWO agents. So how could that be, surely RTTH wasn't just making stuff up??


  • #57
    Triangular
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭Triangular


    Those triangular illuminatic-esque lights that shine on the stadium are very conspiracy like, but this has been plain sailing thus far as far as false flags go.

    I thought today when I heard of a fire in New Yorks world trade centre that something big could be about to go, a curveball perhaps, but nothing. Sigh.

    Should these Olympics pass off trouble free then I think the supposed powers that be will have to look on it as a lost opportunity, and conspiracy theorists, that have been shyting on about the possibilites of this being a big part of the puzzle, will retreat, tail well and truly between legs. Or not. Who cares!


  • #58
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Triangular wrote: »
    Should these Olympics pass off trouble free then I think the supposed powers that be will have to look on it as a lost opportunity, and conspiracy theorists, that have been shyting on about the possibilites of this being a big part of the puzzle, will retreat, tail well and truly between legs.
    You don't believe that for a second, do you? The absence of attacks/UFO landings/crowning of William as emperor of the NWO will just be woven into the CT narrative as if it was exactly what they expected all along. Or ignored, like all the other thousands of false predictions.


  • #59
    ArmaniJeanss
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,183 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    The major terrorist/falseflag incident was always going to be at the Rio Olympics, not London.

    The antiChrist will be coming to the end of his second and final term as US president and will be desperate to hang onto power, giving the situation a level of urgency that London 2012 didn't have.

    The South American police/army/politicians will be more malleable and have poorer security making the operations much easier - this is almost certainly why the IOC/NWO picked Rio back in 2009, mere months after Obama came to power.

    I for one would be wary of travelling to Rio in 2016.


  • #60
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    ArmaniJeanss wrote: »
    The major terrorist/falseflag incident was always going to be at the Rio Olympics, not London.

    The antiChrist will be coming to the end of his second and final term as US president and will be desperate to hang onto power, giving the situation a level of urgency that London 2012 didn't have.

    The South American police/army/politicians will be more malleable and have poorer security making the operations much easier - this is almost certainly why the IOC/NWO picked Rio back in 2009, mere months after Obama came to power.

    I for one would be wary of travelling to Rio in 2016.
    I genuinely don't know whether this is brilliant satire or a serious post.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    ArmaniJeanss
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,183 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    I genuinely don't know whether this is brilliant satire or a serious post.

    Deadly serious.

    One of the scariest things about 2016 is the voting which saw Rio get awarded the Olympics in June 2009 in the Bella Centre Copenhagen (a building with an 'interesting' history if you care to do the research instead of being spoonfed). As said a vote taking place within 4 months of Obama's inaugaration, for an event taking place in the last few months of his second term.

    So Rio was in second place after Round 1, two votes behind Madrid. The city in fourth with 18 votes gets eliminated and suddenly after the second round of voting Rio is 20 ahead :eek:. And the city eliminated in fourth whose 18 voters all switched to Rio?, well click the link yourself and see if a few blocks start falling into place.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Summer_Olympics#Bidding


Advertisement
Advertisement