Next Big False Flag Event: London Olympics?

Bradidup

cristoir wrote: »

Impressive back-peddling by the CTers all over the net. I suppose this is the warm-run for the bull they'll have to spin on the 22nd of December.

This is their plan. they want to ridicule and make fools of the truth movement. Cry wolf scenario, get it? Then they will strike with their real plan of destruction when least expected, like crashing the financial markets, attacking Iran and starting WW3

namloc1980

The back peddling over on abovetopsecret is hilarious. From the paralympics are the real target, to Obama called it off because of the election to the closing ceremony was actually the launch of the NWO plan (yup I missed it too). Its actually quite sad really. And remember this is only a preview of the back peddling that will happen on the 22nd December.

gibraltar

Bradidup wrote: »

This is their plan. they want to ridicule and make fools of the truth movement. Cry wolf scenario, get it? Then they will strike with their real plan of destruction when least expected, like crashing the financial markets, attacking Iran and starting WW3

So why did nobody in "the truth movement" work out that they were being conned?

If this entire "truth movement" can be conned so easily I think the safest course of action is to ignore everything they say, after all as you have pointed out they are just stooges for the NWO/Elite/Antichrist or whoever.

Bradidup

gibraltar wrote: »

So why did nobody in "the truth movement" work out that they were being conned?

If this entire "truth movement" can be conned so easily I think the safest course of action is to ignore everything they say, after all as you have pointed out they are just stooges for the NWO/Elite/Antichrist or whoever.

I actually believe that there was going to be false flag plan. They put it off because of the amount of attention it got with alternative media and social networking and feared it could have back fired

The latest Batman movie was a big give away, stadium collapse under explosives was deliberate to spin more CT

Once I saw that I knew nothing was going to happen as it was too obvious. They know now that people will not fall so much for predictive programming in future, clever.

Bradidup

Bradidup wrote: »

II actually believe that there was going to be false flag plan. They put it off because of the amount of attention it got with alternative media and social networking and feared it could have back fireed

The latest Batman movie was a big give away, stadium collapse under explosives was deliberate to spin more CT

Once I saw that I knew nothing was going to happen as it was too obvious. They know now that people will not fall so much for predictive programming in future, clever.

So if they knew this magic predictive programming didn't work (and we'd love you to explain how it works and demonstrate it does.) why did they go to the bother of doing all that insidious playing to plant all of their symbols everywhere?

And if they would call it off because "too many people would know about it", why then did they put out all these clues that were so easy to spot?

Have you considered the possibility that the doomsayers were just wrong and seeing stuff that wasn't actually there?

The barber of chewbacca

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

To the sceptics, what do you mean nothing happened?

A satanic orgy of symbols is "nothing happened"? What did you expect? An open confession on the internet stating the names and adresses of everybody on the hit-list? It ain`t over till its over and the worst hasn`t even started.

The UK, and London especially, was mobilised to an inch of its life and my gut feeling is that the military will remain a part of the furniture long after the 2012 Olympic dust has settled.

The fools that think this is over have only themselves to blame when the real elite agenda kicks in.

1) Mass depopulation of the planet.
2) Microchipping the survivors
3) Creation of a new "God".

There's been a few comments so far that lead me to believe that people will now let their guard down. The irony here being `the games` are NOT even over until the 9th September when the paralympics end, but even after that we are living in a very precarious period of time. Understandably therefore why we were forewarned :

While people are saying, "Peace and safety" destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. 1 Thessalonians 5:3

Hi RTDH,

First time poster, long time lurker.

I love conspiracy theories but I have noticed that any prediction made regarding CTs tend not to come to fruition. They're a lot of fun to read and make for some great movies/novels.

I also read other conspiracy sites for a bit of fun. I was on Icke's this morning and saw 3 posts that seemed very familiar

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=214858&page=189

Please read posts 3764, 3765 3766. They are basically what you have posted above.

Do you think for yourself or do you just copy posts (and ideas?) from other conspiracy forums?

Regards

Eggonyerface

Oh dear, someone seems to have egg on their face!!

Owryan

Bradidup wrote: »

I actually believe that there was going to be false flag plan. They put it off because of the amount of attention it got with alternative media and social networking and feared it could have back fired

The latest Batman movie was a big give away, stadium collapse under explosives was deliberate to spin more CT What/where was this ??

Once I saw that I knew nothing was going to happen as it was too obvious. They know now that people will not fall so much for predictive programming in future, clever.

You believed something would happen and you also believed nothing would happen so its not hard to see why so many cast scorn on CT's and their supporters.

Personally i believed nothing would happen, not because the NWO backed off but because the of the security surrounding the event, the problem is that same security fuels the theorys of certain CT'ers

RMD

Could it potentially be RtdH is just a very clever troll who copies the opinions of those on other conspiracy theory forums? Word for word copies of what was said on that forum in essence.

Owryan

Eggonyerface wrote: »

Oh dear, someone seems to have egg on their face!!

Ah now, we know RTDH doesnt answer questions, he just links to stuff. Would love to see him reply to my post #89 tho.

Owryan

RMD wrote: »

Could it potentially be RtdH is just a very clever troll who copies the opinions of those on other conspiracy theory forums? Word for word copies of what was said on that forum in essence.

FYP

gibraltar

Bradidup wrote: »

I actually believe that there was going to be false flag plan. They put it off because of the amount of attention it got with alternative media and social networking and feared it could have back fired

You honestly believe that people who would be able to plan and execute a false attack and kill who knows how many people and cause total panic called it off because of the dozens of different theories that were posted online?

Bradidup wrote: »

The latest Batman movie was a big give away, stadium collapse under explosives was deliberate to spin more CT

So why was that scene put in the movie? to warn people about the plan that they did not want people to know about?

really why would anyone put a scene in what would be the biggest movies of the year giving away their plan?

Bradidup wrote: »

Once I saw that I knew nothing was going to happen as it was too obvious. They know now that people will not fall so much for predictive programming in future, clever.

Clever? if this plan was real it would be the most stupid plan ever - "they" destroyed their own weapon and derailed their own scheme by putting huge hints and clues in the most popular forms of media they could find and then letting everyone know about it.

hooradiation

The barber of chewbacca wrote: »

Hi RTDH,

First time poster, long time lurker.

I love conspiracy theories but I have noticed that any prediction made regarding CTs tend not to come to fruition. They're a lot of fun to read and make for some great movies/novels.

I also read other conspiracy sites for a bit of fun. I was on Icke's this morning and saw 3 posts that seemed very familiar

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=214858&page=189

Please read posts 3764, 3765 3766. They are basically what you have posted above.

Do you think for yourself or do you just copy posts (and ideas?) from other conspiracy forums?

Regards

..damn

Monty Burnz

Bradidup wrote: »

This is their plan. they want to ridicule and make fools of the truth movement.

To be honest, the falshood movement are doing a good job of that themselves with no help from anybody.

ArmaniJeanss

Interesting choice of verse from The Tempest to have in the background during the OFAH Batman scene.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187466/London-2012-closing-ceremony-Del-Boy-Rodney-stage-escape-iconic-Reliant-Robin.html

The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind: We are such stuff
As dreams are made on, and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.

Monty Burnz

Bradidup wrote: »

I actually believe that there was going to be false flag plan. They put it off because of the amount of attention it got with alternative media and social networking and feared it could have back fired

The funny thing is that on other threads here we are told that the NWO/Illuminati deliberately give clues to what they are going to do to

1) show how all-powerful they are or
2) to make it seem more likely to happen so that the public accepts whatever it is.

Now we have people claiming that their clues were too effective...these all-powerful Illuminati clearly couldn't find their ass with both hands.

hooradiation

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

Interesting choice of verse from The Tempest to have in the background during the OFAH Batman scene.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187466/London-2012-closing-ceremony-Del-Boy-Rodney-stage-escape-iconic-Reliant-Robin.html

The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind: We are such stuff
As dreams are made on, and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.

Not really - there's a bunch of famous literary works, Shakespeare, Oscar Wilde, Anthony Burgess and Elizabeth Barrett Browning are the ones i can spot myself - on the newspaper that's decorating the set.

Besides, why go for a speech on the illusions created by a play and their transience (Prospero himself is widely regarded to be a author insert in this scene) when we have "A Clockwork orange" in big bloody letters , albeit slightly obscured in the pictures linked.

y'know, seeing as it's an actual book about a Dystopian future?

ArmaniJeanss

hooradiation wrote: »

Not really - there's a bunch of famous literary works, Shakespeare, Oscar Wilde, Anthony Burgess and Elizabeth Barrett Browning are the ones i can spot myself - on the newspaper that's decorating the set.

Besides, why go for a speech on the illusions created by a play and their transience (Prospero himself is widely regarded to be a author insert in this scene) when we have "A Clockwork orange" in big bloody letters , albeit slightly obscured in the pictures linked.

y'know, seeing as it's an actual book about a Dystopian future?

Fair point. I guess I just thought it was a rather obscure verse to pick. Like if only one Shakespeare play/verse is going to be used in the sequence then The Tempest is of itself a strange choice, and a verse about towers temples and palaces disappearing to nothingness is, if nothing else, a fun choice.
(Obviously the original verse doesnt refer to actual palaces etc).


I'd have thought something inspirational from Henry IV/V might have been better, though I suppose some pre-battle speech by Hal would be as open to misinterpretation.

Run_to_da_hills

The barber of chewbacca wrote: »

Hi RTDH,

First time poster, long time lurker.

I love conspiracy theories but I have noticed that any prediction made regarding CTs tend not to come to fruition. They're a lot of fun to read and make for some great movies/novels.

I also read other conspiracy sites for a bit of fun. I was on Icke's this morning and saw 3 posts that seemed very familiar

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=214858&page=189

Please read posts 3764, 3765 3766. They are basically what you have posted above.

Do you think for yourself or do you just copy posts (and ideas?) from other conspiracy forums?

Regards

So what?

There was probably very little in that content that has not already being addressed in detail on previous RTTH threads in this forum.

Sonics2k

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

So what?

There was probably very little in that content that has not already being addressed in detail on previous RTTH threads in this forum.

The point is, not only do you not come up with your own CT's (you simply copy paste them), but now it seems you also simply copy+paste other peoples comments.

For someone who likes to go on about sheeple, you seems to be doing a good job yourself.

gibraltar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

So what?

There was probably very little in that content that has not already being addressed in detail on previous RTTH threads in this forum.

is there any chance of a real reply? i.e. one you have not copy & pasted and that answers a question.

gibraltar

Sonics2k wrote: »

The point is, not only do you not come up with your own CT's (you simply copy paste them), but now it seems you also simply copy+paste other peoples comments.

For someone who likes to go on about sheeple, you seems to be doing a good job yourself.

Ironically one of the posters that RTDH plagiarised is called sheepy.

hooradiation

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

Fair point. I guess I just thought it was a rather obscure verse to pick. Like if only one Shakespeare play/verse is going to be used in the sequence then The Tempest is of itself a strange choice, and a verse about towers temples and palaces disappearing to nothingness is, if nothing else, a fun choice.
(Obviously the original verse doesnt refer to actual palaces etc).


I'd have thought something inspirational from Henry IV/V might have been better, though I suppose some pre-battle speech by Hal would be as open to misinterpretation.

I think the tempest is quite liked by a lot of people, it's not my favourite that'd probably be MacBeth - but the quoted verse while not the best known one from the Tempest, that's Prospero's final soliloquy, it's still pretty famous.
Maybe they just wanted to go with the not obvious choice?
Personally I have a soft spot for Shylocks "Hath not a Jew eyes" soliloquy from merchant of Venice, and I'd actually have loved for them to include it, if only for the accompanying shitstorm that'd have followed from the alternative news sources.

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

(Obviously the original verse doesnt refer to actual palaces etc).

Well, interestingly enough a popular theory is that the "globe" referenced in that is a direct reference to the globe theatre, where Shakespeare's plays were performed.

RoboClam

RMD wrote: »

Could it potentially be RtdH is just a very clever troll who copies the opinions of those on other conspiracy theory forums? Word for word copies of what was said on that forum in essence.

These are the kinds of posts I was referring to on the feedback thread. Someone insults a member and then it snowballs with everyone else making fun of that member. Calling someone a troll is seen as a form of personal abuse and will not be tolerated.

EDIT: I guess it could also be considered back seat moderating too, so don't do it! If you genuinely think someone is a troll, report it citing your reasons and the mods will discuss it. Mentioning it in a post just drags the thread off topic.

ResearchWill

The barber of chewbacca wrote: »

Hi RTDH,

First time poster, long time lurker.

I love conspiracy theories but I have noticed that any prediction made regarding CTs tend not to come to fruition. They're a lot of fun to read and make for some great movies/novels.

I also read other conspiracy sites for a bit of fun. I was on Icke's this morning and saw 3 posts that seemed very familiar

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=214858&page=189

Please read posts 3764, 3765 3766. They are basically what you have posted above.

Do you think for yourself or do you just copy posts (and ideas?) from other conspiracy forums?

Regards

I met David Icke once, had the pleasure of having dinner with him, he very nicely gave me a signed copy of his book "The Robots Rebellion" lovely guy but let's just say I don't agree with a thing he said but really nice all the same.

SIR PEADO BAILOUT

ResearchWill wrote: »

I met David Icke once, had the pleasure of having dinner with him, he very nicely gave me a signed copy of his book "The Robots Rebellion" lovely guy but let's just say I don't agree with a thing he said but really nice all the same.

I met FILL IN once,had nothing to do with the topic :rolleyes: still Danny 28 Days Later Boyle looks the part of an insider type, from nowhere and has a nice run of blockbusters to his name not bad eh for a little gob****e gombeen from Tuam of all da places.And sure he`ll be having da last laugh we`ll be seeing soon enough now

ResearchWill

SIR PEADO BAILOUT wrote: »

I met FILL IN once,had nothing to do with the topic :rolleyes: still Danny 28 Days Later Boyle looks the part of an insider type, from nowhere and has a nice run of blockbusters to his name not bad eh for a little gob****e gombeen from Tuam of all da places.And sure he`ll be having da last laugh we`ll be seeing soon enough now

Know Fill In very well bit like you though.

seannash

So would the 7 people who voted yes like to maybe admit they got it wrong

Its only fair seeing as sceptics are called sheep all the time

Brown Bomber

A good article on the Olympics/terrorism hype and the possible reason for it by Stephen M Walt in Foriegn Policy.

Remember how the London Olympics were supposedly left vulnerable to terrorists after the security firm hired for the games admitted that it couldn't supply enough manpower? This "humiliating shambles" forced the British government to call in 3,500 security personnel of its own, and led GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney to utter some tactless remarks about Britain's alleged mismanagement during his official "Foot-in-Mouth" foreign tour last month.

Well, surprise, surprise. Not only was there no terrorist attack, the Games themselves came off rather well. There were the inevitable minor glitches, of course, but no disasters and some quite impressive organizational achievements. And of course, athletes from around the world delivered inspiring, impressive, heroic, and sometimes disappointing performances, which is what the Games are all about.
...
The second lesson is that we continue to over-react to the "terrorist threat." Here I recommend you read John Mueller and Mark G. Stewart's The Terrorism Delusion: America's Overwrought Response to September 11, in the latest issue of International Security. Mueller and Stewart analyze 50 cases of supposed "Islamic terrorist plots" against the United States, and show how virtually all of the perpetrators were (in their words) "incompetent, ineffective, unintelligent, idiotic, ignorant, unorganized, misguided, muddled, amateurish, dopey, unrealistic, moronic, irrational and foolish." They quote former Glenn Carle, former deputy national intelligence officer for transnational threats saying "we must see jihadists for the small, lethal, disjointed and miserable opponents that they are," noting further that al Qaeda's "capabilities are far inferior to its desires."


Further, Mueller and Stewart estimate that expenditures on domestic homeland security (i.e., not counting the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan) have increased by more than $1 trillion since 9/11, even though the annual risk of dying in a domestic terrorist attack is about 1 in 3.5 million.
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/blog/2072

Monty Burnz

Brown Bomber wrote: »

A good article on the Olympics/terrorism hype and the possible reason for it by Stephen M Walt in Foriegn Policy.

Interesting article. The 'war on terror' can't - by definition - defeat terror of course, but it can certainly line a few pockets and advance a few foreign policy goals under the good old-fashioned guise of 'patriotism'.