Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

London 2012 Megathread [Part 1]

1119120122124125333

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    A little off topic Sharon Davis is still a Ryide.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭donfers


    interesting that jameson is the new sensation of uk swimming after making dramatic improvements in his time at the olympics - if he was Chinese i wonder would the bbc be saying he is a new sensation or would they instead ask other types of questions about his dramatic sudden improvements in time, in Jamesons cases at the age of 23 which is more unusual than at 15 or 16


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭Samich


    Jamieson seems like a nice chap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Did the announcer just say something about Ryan Lochte while one of th ewomen was comign out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,251 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Great race. It took a WR to win it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭Samich


    donfers wrote: »
    interesting that jameson is the new sensation of uk swimming after making dramatic improvements in his time at the olympics - if he was Chinese i wonder would the bbc be saying he is a new sensation or would they instead ask other types of questions about his dramatic sudden improvements in time, in Jamesons cases at the age of 23 which is more unusual than at 15 or 16

    The Brits are tested at any time, I think Chinese athletes need 2/3 days notice of the test.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    donfers wrote: »
    interesting that jameson is the new sensation of uk swimming after making dramatic improvements in his time at the olympics - if he was Chinese i wonder would the bbc be saying he is a new sensation or would they instead ask other types of questions about his dramatic sudden improvements in time, in Jamesons cases at the age of 23 which is more unusual than at 15 or 16

    Maybe if he swept the boards and beat everyone by a good margin breaking world records they might.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭Sparks43


    Good race

    Reckon Gb will get a Bronze with Jemma Lowe in the 200 fly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    donfers wrote: »
    interesting that jameson is the new sensation of uk swimming after making dramatic improvements in his time at the olympics - if he was Chinese i wonder would the bbc be saying he is a new sensation or would they instead ask other types of questions about his dramatic sudden improvements in time, in Jamesons cases at the age of 23 which is more unusual than at 15 or 16

    Yup, same opinion as myself. He's broke his PB by 2.4 seconds in this Olympics, which is just as impressive as Ye imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Colmustard wrote: »
    A little off topic Sharon Davis is still a Ryide.

    Cant believe shes 50 this year :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭Sparks43


    Halsall will hack up in this

    1st by a mile and fastest overall


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    Cant believe shes 50 this year :eek:

    I know, it says a lot for healthy living, the girl that beat her in the swimming was an East German who later wrote a book about the way the coaches controlled her regimen of drugs with out her knowledge of what she was taking. She went on to have many problems because of them.

    I always thought after that book Davis should have had her medal up graded to a gold.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,213 ✭✭✭Sea Filly


    Colmustard wrote: »
    A little off topic Sharon Davis is still a Ryide.

    Yep, my BF is in agreement with you there! :)

    She does look great. Probably a mix of good lifestyle and good genes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Colmustard wrote: »
    A little off topic Sharon Davis is still a Ryide.

    Definatly on topic. Thread is all Olympic related.

    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭nice_very


    that girl that just won that semi, with the long surname, she is quite cute!

    also, watching the swimming I was just wondering why there are almost no black swimmers, (there was a Jamaican girl - cute too) I remember reading about Eric the eel and the argument was the different body shape or mass or something, cant be true surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Samich wrote: »
    The Brits are tested at any time, I think Chinese athletes need 2/3 days notice of the test.

    As is every medal winner. Straight after the event as well I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,213 ✭✭✭Sea Filly


    Colmustard wrote: »
    I know, it says a lot for healthy living, the girl that beat her in the swimming was an East German who later wrote a book about the way the coaches controlled her regimen of drugs with out her knowledge of what she was taking. She went on to have many problems because of them.

    Yes, that's whole affair is very sad to read about, it happened to many East German athletes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Womans 200m Butterfly coming up. Another Medal for Team GB?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,000 ✭✭✭✭opinion guy


    Sea Filly wrote: »
    Yep, my BF is in agreement with you there! :)

    She does look great. Probably a mix of good lifestyle and good genes.

    Yeah that boob job she had probably helped too:

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/woman/life/sharron-davies-im-almost-50-but-i-still-feel-like-a-winner-16171258.html
    (bottom of page)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,251 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    irish-stew wrote: »
    Womans 200m Butterfly coming up. Another Medal for Team GB?

    Unlikely from lane 8.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 FirePower


    Quick question, why are so many of you supporting Team GB with such gusto? It comes across as so small-time and bizarre.:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭Sparks43


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Unlikely from lane 8.

    I reckon she has a chance of Bronze

    But no more

    1st Hersey
    2nd Jiao
    3rd Lowe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭Corruptedmorals


    That's correct! I can go more into detail if you like, but it's kind of complicated and long.

    There are 2 scores given for each routine in gymnastics. The first is the difficulty score, which adds up the most difficult elements in the routine, plus any bonus the gymnast gets for doing those elements in combination (one right after the other). Skills are ranked in the Table of Elements in an alphabetical order with A skills being the least difficult and thus receiving the least amount of points (.1) and G being the most difficult. Most gymnasts have D and E skills in their routines, with F and G skills being done rarely. Certain parts of the routine have to be performed at a certain difficulty threshold, or else a technical deduction is incurred. For example, dismounts must be D skills or higher. Anything lower results in a .5 technical deduction.

    The difficultly score usually doesn't change unless a gymnast misses a combination, thus losing combination bonus; performs a skill so improperly the judges don't credit it, like missing a release skill on bars or not fully rotating a twist; or leaves out a skill altogether.

    The execution score is the second score. It starts at a 10.00 and judges deduct from there in increments of .1 (minor mistake), .3 (medium), .5 (major), and then a full point for a fall. Deductions include form (straight legs, pointed toes, correct positions in tuck, pike, prone), extra steps, and then each event has event-specific deductions (wobbles on beam, missed handstands on bars, etc.).

    The difficulty and execution scores are added together for the final score. So, if a gymnast has a difficulty score of 6.5 and an execution score of 8.8, their total score is 15.3.

    Apologies if none of that made any sense!


    Great job in explaining it! This is of course there was such a fuss over McKayla Maroney's vault, 9.733 is a record for WAG this quad and since the new code came in..probably goes further back than that too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    FirePower wrote: »
    Quick question, why are so many of you supporting Team GB with such gusto? It comes across as so small-time and bizarre.:confused:

    Why are so many anti British and complaining about them all the time, it comes across as small minded and bitter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    FirePower wrote: »
    Quick question, why are so many of you supporting Team GB with such gusto? It comes across as so small-time and bizarre.:confused:

    Well I'm from England orriginally. But I will support the Irish as well in any events that they are in.

    Plus factor into it there are so many more British competitors in these games, most of which barr a select few competing at a higher level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Gandhi


    Great job in explaining it! This is of course there was such a fuss over McKayla Maroney's vault, 9.733 is a record for WAG this quad and since the new code came in..probably goes further back than that too.

    One of the commentators over here (The States) was saying that Maroney gets about two feet (not inches, FEET) higher into the air on her vaults than any other gymnast.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard



    LOL

    Indeed it did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,251 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    FirePower wrote: »
    Quick question, why are so many of you supporting Team GB with such gusto? It comes across as so small-time and bizarre.:confused:

    Why not? There're no Irish in these events and they're the next nearest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭Colmustard


    FirePower wrote: »
    Quick question, why are so many of you supporting Team GB with such gusto? It comes across as so small-time and bizarre.:confused:

    They are our neighbours, I know most their athletes and I might as well be up for someone, they are putting on a great show and the war is over we are at peace,,thank gawd.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,256 ✭✭✭metaoblivia


    Great job in explaining it! This is of course there was such a fuss over McKayla Maroney's vault, 9.733 is a record for WAG this quad and since the new code came in..probably goes further back than that too.

    Yeah! The last time I can remember a 10 being awarded in international competition was some time in the 1990s. I've never seen a 10 execution score under the new code.

    But that vault was something else! There was a leg separation on the block, but you couldn't really see that in real time. And I think she probably should have held on to that stick a little bit longer. Her step out from it looked slightly uncontrolled, like what NCAA gymnastics fans might call a 'college stick,' where the gymnast throws up her hands and salutes really quickly before taking the step forward. And perhaps her knees could have been a little straighter, her body a little more extended in flight.

    But really, those are very nit picky deductions that are almost impossible to even see without slow motion. If they'd given it a 10, I would have been fine with that!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement