Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Dark Knight Rises - seen thread *SPOILERS WITHIN* See Mod Warning in first post

1343537394097

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭Oscorp


    Who cares what his motives are, at the end of the day, some kids who witnessed a horrific event got cheered the fcuk up by a surprise visit from the hero of the movie they all paid to see. That can only be a positive thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Maybe I am cynical...

    But arent we talking about the same guy who came off as quite the ass 3 years ago on the set of terminator salvation. Tearing into the guy but then stating he was a nice guy. That they were done professional.
    Oscorp wrote: »
    Who cares what his motives are, at the end of the day, some kids who witnessed a horrific event got cheered the fcuk up by a surprise visit from the hero of the movie they all paid to see. That can only be a positive thing.


    I agree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭jpm4


    It is a bit stupid alright.

    Blake explains that when Bruce turned up to his orphanage one day. he had that same "look" in his eyes that Blake has. Both having lost his parents too. So he knew there was more. He must of been Batman. Thats what the movie tells us.

    But by saying that.... doesnt it sound a little stupid? lol. Like ok Blake copped onto he was batman. But Gordon, harvey dent, even selina kyle (etc) having both known bruce wayne and batman didnt twig it? :pac:

    THAT is the actual explanation? Seriously? I was so baffled by this I assumed there was a scene from one of the previous films that set this up, but I guess not.

    I am genuinely exhausted from watching this film....the amount of exposition, plot, characters, action....there's enough for about 2 and 1/2 films in there. I only had a very general sense of what was going on at any given time, ask me for specific details on characters/plot devices and I could not have supplied them. I suspect many couldn't.

    Genuinely dissapointed in the Bane vrs Bat fight scenes - could there not have been a bit more than slugging it out fisticuffs? Enjoyed Cillian Murphy's cameo a great deal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 460 ✭✭Ape X


    Did Bale absail down from the window above?

    Nice gesture though irrespective of motive.

    Anyway, having digested the second viewing a little more, my main gripe is the same as nix - Blake knowing Wayne is Batman based on the head of him :pac: Not a major gripe at all, and as I said earlier, it didn't take away from my enjoyment of it. However, would have been nice if Blake had figured it out with detective work!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭rossc007


    The prison isnt the same as it was when Bane was there & Talia were there. The League of Shadows dealt "justice" in there. And its known as hell because escape is always visible and an inch within reach with the climb and jump. Theres nothing to stop you but most just cant make it. Having freedom constantly that close would be torture. And the doctor was paid by bane to keep him alive.

    Theres been a strange amount of things people are claiming as plot holes that really were explained or easily interpreted. It really is a film people need to watch more then once. A massive amount happened in it and a lot of it seems to have been missed by people.

    Way to condescend... The prison was far from hell, which was pretty pivotal to the plot. While we're on the subject, are we supposed to believe in all that time no one could fashion a grappling hook to bridge the gap? They didnt seem short on rope, made from pubes no doubt, perhaps that's why it was described as hell, having to climb out on a pube rope?

    Seeing as you watched the film more closely than me, any idea why none of the cops could escape from a sewer system in 4-5 months. And was that washing powder Bane was dropping down to them in the supplies?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,529 ✭✭✭✭Dempsey


    Was Blake's 'vibe' about Bruce Wayne/Batman not confirmed to himself by the 8 year absence of both? Hence, why he never said anything to anyone? And the chat in Wayne Manor was just an attempt to get Wayne to trust him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    jpm4 wrote: »
    Genuinely dissapointed in the Bane vrs Bat fight scenes - could there not have been a bit more than slugging it out fisticuffs? Enjoyed Cillian Murphy's cameo a great deal.

    Cillian Murphy cameo was good :P

    I thought the bane vs batman fight in the sewers was awesome (my favourite scene) Really showed batman was no match for him.

    On the subject. I think the one problem with bane was the miranda tate thing. Like bane is built up as this bad ass. For over two hours. But then, last 20 minutes its revealed he aint top-dog. She is. Then he just gets killed easily by catwoman.

    I knew going into the film Bane was breathing gas. To help with pain. I thought that was going to be the weakness Batman used to defeat Bane. But it wasnt. In fact, it never really explained alot about the mask.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭Boo Radley


    rossc007 wrote: »
    They didnt seem short on rope, made from pubes no doubt, perhaps that's why it was described as hell, having to climb out on a pube rope?

    Not interested in getting involved in this spat but that was pretty funny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,054 ✭✭✭✭Professey Chin


    rossc007 wrote: »
    Way to condescend... The prison was far from hell, which was pretty pivotal to the plot. While we're on the subject, are we supposed to believe in all that time no one could fashion a grappling hook to bridge the gap? They didnt seem short on rope, made from pubes no doubt, perhaps that's why it was described as hell, having to climb out on a pube rope?

    Seeing as you watched the film more closely than me, any idea why none of the cops could escape from a sewer system in 4-5 months. And was that washing powder Bane was dropping down to them in the supplies?

    What would make it a hell then? Fire? Brimstone? Lads with horns sticking pitchforks up everyones arse? What exactly is this grappling hook going to hook onto? They cant see anything to hook at the top and everything on the climb is small grips and flat ledges?

    And who said no cops escaped? You saw a couple escape but get caught and a grenade get thrown down the hole. A couple making their way out and large numbers managing the same are different things. You seem a little obsessed with the dirty clothes too. Do you work for Daz by any chance?

    And I wasnt intending to be condesending but there really was a massive amount that happened. It was constant references and activities for 150 minutes. Things are going to be missed and if you look through this thread a lot of what people werent sure about has been easily explained.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭rossc007


    What would make it a hell then? Fire? Brimstone? Lads with horns sticking pitchforks up everyones arse? What exactly is this grappling hook going to hook onto? They cant see anything to hook at the top and everything on the climb is small grips and flat ledges?

    And who said no cops escaped? You saw a couple escape but get caught and a grenade get thrown down the hole. A couple making their way out and large numbers managing the same are different things. You seem a little obsessed with the dirty clothes too. Do you work for Daz by any chance?

    And I wasnt intending to be condesending but there really was a massive amount that happened. It was constant references and activities for 150 minutes. Things are going to be missed and if you look through this thread a lot of what people werent sure about has been easily explained.

    I'm sure Bane wasn't being literal when he used the word hell, if he was then I am even more disappointed with where Bruce ended up. But I expected at least worse then mountjoy, you know heroine, rape, nothing to eat but rice crispies.

    When the cops who are free meet up there are only 12 of them, I think, hence the mickey fit Gordon takes when Foley goes missing. So I think its safe to assume no one escaped, its not eluded to anyway.

    Good joke about the Daz, its practically the same thing I said in my last post, but when you say it its funnier for some reason.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭seraphimvc


    jpm4 wrote: »
    THAT is the actual explanation? Seriously? I was so baffled by this I assumed there was a scene from one of the previous films that set this up, but I guess not.

    I am genuinely exhausted from watching this film....the amount of exposition, plot, characters, action....there's enough for about 2 and 1/2 films in there. I only had a very general sense of what was going on at any given time, ask me for specific details on characters/plot devices and I could not have supplied them. I suspect many couldn't.

    Genuinely dissapointed in the Bane vrs Bat fight scenes - could there not have been a bit more than slugging it out fisticuffs? Enjoyed Cillian Murphy's cameo a great deal.
    guys, ill just take it from imbd: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1345836/faq a good read there if you have any other 'common' questions.

    John Blake discovered as a child when Bruce came for a charity donation to the orphanage Blake resided in. Upon seeing Bruce, Blake worked out he had severe suppressed emotions that would give him a motive to become The Batman who appeared years later. He challenges Bruce with his suspicions of his alter ego when visiting. Though Bruce does not confirm his theory, he doesn't deny it either giving Blake the evidence that Bruce really is The Batman.

    In short, He wasn't 100% sure when he first visited him.


    Regarding some hate posts earlier in the thread, I found it funny about the 'plot holes' people are talking about. A lot of things are just there and even explained very quickly and precisely. Sometimes i understand why movies nowadays spoon feed the viewers everything. every fcking thing.

    This is a super hero movie and is loosely based on the KnightSaga and Nolan is a very practical director that did some amazing job for everything in the film. If people wanna whine about it please do it in smart way eg. starting from the physics in the film, or lets say specific medical knowledge of getting recover from that spine injury in such a short period of time and in such condition is closing to 0.00000000001%. Batman's strong body+ mind of steel made everything happens, a superhero, alot comical relief, fighting = pow pow pow, cheesey scenes/ending, bam, done. How can anyone not enjoy this film is beyond me.

    gonna cook up my review tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭Smartly Dressed


    rossc007 wrote: »

    When the cops who are free meet up there are only 12 of them, I think, hence the mickey fit Gordon takes when Foley goes missing. So I think its safe to assume no one escaped, its not eluded to anyway.

    Nobody showed up because they were too afraid. That's implied in the scene, with Foley being used as an ''every cop'', who is initially afraid then regains hope and courage when he sees Batman has returned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Nobody showed up because they were too afraid. That's implied in the scene, with Foley being used as an ''every cop'', who is initially afraid then regains hope and courage when he sees Batman has returned.


    He should of stayed at home :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    One continuity problem I had. They are breaking into the stock exchange place and they need 9 minutes until the program is finished. When the program is finished, it is night time :confused: Seriously long 9 minutes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,257 ✭✭✭✭Rabies


    Its just PR work guys.

    Thats not to say bale isnt a good guy (you'd have to know him personally to make that judgement) But this is all PR.

    Doesn't matter if its a PR stunt or if he did it himself, either way it is a nice touch. Those people went through hell, give them a break and enjoy it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,418 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Grimebox wrote: »
    One continuity problem I had. They are breaking into the stock exchange place and they need 9 minutes until the program is finished. When the program is finished, it is night time :confused: Seriously long 9 minutes
    Yes I spotted that too ,a serious error allright.
    Stock Exchange would close at 5pm and seeing as it was probably August in the film (snow didnt come for another 3 months) it wouldnt be dark for at least another 3 hours.
    Also I'm sure if the Stock exchange was hacked like that or even broken into any trades would be null and void and Wayne Industries wouldnt lose all its money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭LovelySpuds


    Saw it earlier and I have to say it was a great film and ties a lot of loose ends


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,291 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Rabies wrote: »
    Doesn't matter if its a PR stunt or if he did it himself, either way it is a nice touch. Those people went through hell, give them a break and enjoy it.

    I agree its a nice touch :)

    It should be noted however some of the victims families are trying to sue warner brothers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,257 ✭✭✭✭Rabies


    It should be noted however some of the victims families are trying to sue warner brothers.

    Really?
    Thats sad to be honest. How is WB to blame? Let them take on the NRA instead.

    Anyway, this thread is for discussion of the movie and apparently its plot holes :D


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Andy!!


    humanji wrote: »
    Actually, in his defence, I'd say no studio would allow him to do that. There's too much money to be made from the franchise, even with the mantle being handed on, to kill him off.

    So, just have Alfred nodding, then cut to credits. Also, the trilogy is finished; that has no implications on the franchise. They killed Bruce Wayne in the comics years ago; how dead is he now? :pac: Did they stop making Batman comics? Your post makes no sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I have a question:

    Did Jim Gordon have a friendship with Bruce Wayne at all? The only 2 times I remember them meeting is when he's a kid and when he crashes the Lamborghini into the Swat car during TDK and they didnt act like they were on friends terms when they met then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,054 ✭✭✭✭Professey Chin


    Andy!! wrote: »
    So, just have Alfred nodding, then cut to credits. Also, the trilogy is finished; that has no implications on the franchise. They killed Bruce Wayne in the comics years ago; how dead is he now? :pac: Did they stop making Batman comics? Your post makes no sense.
    He came back in the comic so there was 2 batmans. Now though theyve just restarted everything.
    Overheal wrote: »
    I have a question:

    Did Jim Gordon have a friendship with Bruce Wayne at all? The only 2 times I remember them meeting is when he's a kid and when he crashes the Lamborghini into the Swat car during TDK and they didnt act like they were on friends terms when they met then.
    Nope no friendship. Theyd be a couple of their very few interactions


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Scanlas The 2nd


    Its just PR work guys.

    Thats not to say bale isnt a good guy (you'd have to know him personally to make that judgement) But this is all PR.

    Fact.

    How could you possibly know what Christian Bale's motivations are, you don't know the man. Is it impossible that he might just want to visit the victims for his own reasons unrelated to WB?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭LH Pathe


    Bale has probably been reflecting and is genuinely deeply affected by the madness Nolans' iteration has wreaked. Like batman, would be

    it's probably just the cult of ledger, and the intensity of his portrayal didn't mix with prone holmes. He frankly has an impressionable stupidity, in those derpy eyes and I'm not impressed with his act nor actions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭caspa307


    I think the problem is that ADR much like theatre requires the actor to use his imagination more so then if he was on set of a multi million dollar film and thus there is a tendency to go over the top. I'd love to have heard Hardy's original line delivery sans mask , I doubt if would have been half as fruity and theatrical as his studio redub . As I said before I can't help but feel the cure was worse then the disease in this regard.

    ill try find the link later but i red an interview where hardy said that in a prank while filming the prologue he tried to do a yoda voice, but to his surprise it was never edited out


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Overheal wrote: »
    I have a question:

    Did Jim Gordon have a friendship with Bruce Wayne at all? The only 2 times I remember them meeting is when he's a kid and when he crashes the Lamborghini into the Swat car during TDK and they didnt act like they were on friends terms when they met then.

    I forgot they weren't friends because of that scene in TDK, its like Gordon is only asking him why he ran the light to cover up what he actually did, totally forgot Gordon doesn't know he's Batman


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭folan


    saw this last night, was very very disappointed.

    Plot wasnt strong. Im not sure of plot holes etc, but when it comes down to it, the first 2 films in the franchise were much stronger in that i believed them. this one just caught me as not quite. it felt more like a comic book movie than the first 2, if you get me.

    and the score was terrible, imo. I can remember cringing in places when it got as steryotypical and predictable as possible.

    JGL was brilliant, the high point of the film for me. An ever improving actor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭jpm4


    seraphimvc wrote: »
    guys, ill just take it from imbd: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1345836/faq a good read there if you have any other 'common' questions.

    John Blake discovered as a child when Bruce came for a charity donation to the orphanage Blake resided in. Upon seeing Bruce, Blake worked out he had severe suppressed emotions that would give him a motive to become The Batman who appeared years later. He challenges Bruce with his suspicions of his alter ego when visiting. Though Bruce does not confirm his theory, he doesn't deny it either giving Blake the evidence that Bruce really is The Batman.

    In short, He wasn't 100% sure when he first visited him.


    Regarding some hate posts earlier in the thread, I found it funny about the 'plot holes' people are talking about. A lot of things are just there and even explained very quickly and precisely. Sometimes i understand why movies nowadays spoon feed the viewers everything. every fcking thing.

    This is a super hero movie and is loosely based on the KnightSaga and Nolan is a very practical director that did some amazing job for everything in the film. If people wanna whine about it please do it in smart way eg. starting from the physics in the film, or lets say specific medical knowledge of getting recover from that spine injury in such a short period of time and in such condition is closing to 0.00000000001%. Batman's strong body+ mind of steel made everything happens, a superhero, alot comical relief, fighting = pow pow pow, cheesey scenes/ending, bam, done. How can anyone not enjoy this film is beyond me.

    gonna cook up my review tomorrow.

    Re: The explanation of Blake knowing - fair enough. It's a clunkly, exposition heavy explanation that sounds stupid to me but considering the amount of stuff that they had to get through in the film I guess that all the time they could give it. It would have been cool if we could have seen scenes of Blake actually deducing Batman's identity though, rather than just being told about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    jpm4 wrote: »
    Re: The explanation of Blake knowing - fair enough. It's a clunkly, exposition heavy explanation that sounds stupid to me but considering the amount of stuff that they had to get through in the film I guess that all the time they could give it. It would have been cool if we could have seen scenes of Blake actually deducing Batman's identity though, rather than just being told about it.

    Personally I thought it worked. It showed 1. Blake was an orphan like Bruce, 2. it told the story of his parent's deaths and how it affected him and 3. it showed he is intelligent enough to work out something that, as has been mentioned, people like Gordon could not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 Noobjockey


    nix wrote: »
    Seen it twice now and only plot hole i cant fill is how does Blake know Bruce is Batman?

    Well he said he figured it out as a kid. I can see why it's annoying that that's all there was to it but I've seen and heard worse excuses! When I saw Blake, it was fairly obvious that he was going to be "Robin" and be the next one to take over the mantle. I didn't think of him as Dick Grayson, though, I assumed he was more of the Tim Drake character from the comics (especially with the whole Blake rhyming with Drake thing.. world's greatest detective right here, folks tongue.gif). Also, Tim Drake is the only Robin from the comics who figured it out on his own and was always thought to be a better detective than Dick or Jason. Again, there is a bit of a nod toward this when Comissioner Gordon makes him detective in the movie.

    Anyway, getting back to the actual movie, I'm extremely happy. I knew this movie would never reach the heights of TDK but I think given that Nolan never intended on making a third movie and was forced to come up with as engaging a villain as Heath Ledger's joker, he didn't do half bad. Bane (IMO) was terrifying. The first fight scene, no music, just the sound of Batman's destruction, was chilling. Really fantastic. I think they captured elements of Knightfall, No Man's Land and The Dark Knight Returns perfectly. Yeah there were plot holes and some cheesy dialogue. But as realistic as Nolan has tried to make these movies, you're still watching a film about a man who trained as a ninja, dresses up as a bat and fights people who have half their face blown off or wear a special mask that aleviates pain and apparently gives him super strength!

    The only things I could complain about in this movie were, firstly, the fact that at times (I stress "at times", I was very happy for the majority of the movie) I didn't feel like I was really on the edge of my seat, biting my nails etc. When it first turned to winter, I felt that the movie was turning a bit hollow and starting to lack in intensity. Maybe that was the point, though? All hope is lost and Gotham is a shell of the great city it was. Just an opinion.. Secondly, I wasn't happy with Bane's downfall. Fair enough, having Catwoman intervene at an appropriate time to help Batman, but giving her the final shot? I thought that was disappointing. That was Batman's fight and should have been Batman's victory. Overall, though, not complaining. This movie was an excellent end to a phenomenal trilogy.

    Sorry for the long, rambling post!


Advertisement
Advertisement