Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Coral-Eclipse 2012.

  • 03-07-2012 09:37PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭


    I can't see past So You Think on form, but he's short enough for a race with such a big field.

    Nathaniel is a 12f horse, although Gosden is in top form and the horse has been well backed, I just don't fancy Nathaniel.

    Farhh could be anything but he doesn't greatly impress me, as a son of Pivotal out of a German mare who liked soft ground I think he needs cut in the ground and the ground is good to firm at the moment.

    The other Godolphin horse Monterosso at 20/1 is much more interesting. A surprise winner of the Dubai World Cup in march, his form at 10f reads 21341. He has the stamina to race at 12f which will help him see out Sandowns stiff uphill finish.

    Bonfire is probably worth a shot at 14/1 in places, 3y olds have a great chance at the weights and he'll be my bet if he runs.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Colonel Sanders


    Is the ground good to firm? There's been a lot of rain in London recently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭tryfix


    The racing post says it's good to firm, good in places.
    The going remained unchanged at Sandown at good to firm, good in places after 4mm of rain fell on Monday night but clerk of the course Andrew Cooper was expecting further rain on Tuesday night with up to 5mm forecast as an unsettled weather outlook remained.

    http://www.racingpost.com/news/live.sd?event_id=184359


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭Goldcupfav


    It will be interesting to see how Crackerjack King does on his first run for Marco Botti. Horse won his 7 starts in Italy and was only ever beaten once in the Prix du Jockey Club (French Derby) last year. Botti has booked Ryan Moore for the ride so id say a big performance is expected. Still id expect SYT to sign off his racing career with a win here.

    This is his last race in Italy beating Luca Cumani trained Afsare. 13/05/2012



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 713 ✭✭✭newuser89


    1st bonfire
    2nd nathaniel
    3rd so you think
    That's how I see it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    I can def see Farhh getting an awful lot closer to so you think.

    Read a piece where they are expecting big things from Nathaniel this year although as stated 10f is prob bit short but he will be of massive interest for me in the Arc later in the year.

    So you think is probably still the pick of the 3 and will win but it will be a close thing. Nathaniel and Farhh will be closing fast at the finish.

    1. So You Think
    2. Farhh
    3. Nathaniel


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭d-gal


    newuser89 wrote: »
    1st bonfire
    2nd nathaniel
    3rd so you think
    That's how I see it

    How you can see bonfire winning is beyond me. SYT could give him over a stone and still beat him. An extremely average 3yo


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 713 ✭✭✭newuser89


    All the weight he is getting
    And I don't think he ran his race in the derby
    I was impressed with him before that
    Syt is a very gd horse but still very beatable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭d-gal


    newuser89 wrote: »
    All the weight he is getting
    And I don't think he ran his race in the derby
    I was impressed with him before that
    Syt is a very gd horse but still very beatable

    The Dante has proven to be a poor race this year. The only 3yo I could see troubling SYT is Camelot and he obviously isnt there and if SYT puts in the same performance as last time he will win no problem. He will have to perform below his best for either Nathaniel or Farrh to beat him. Crackerjack might be worth an outside bet I'd imagine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 713 ✭✭✭newuser89


    Im pretty confident of nathaniel beating so you think anyway


  • Posts: 23,497 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's a very interesting race, So You Think has CD winning form which is a plus, last year beating Work Force by 1/2l on good ground in a 5 runner field.

    So You Think has won on good to soft and on soft in his earlier racing days and though no doubt stretched by 12f seems to be perfectly suited to 10f at Sandown.

    A few are rated up there with So You Think in this
    - Cityscape is rated 125 too, may well not find the 10f out of range, won well at Meydan over 9f on good ground, hard to discount in my opinion and on the official figures is in with a very definite chance if staying on, that's a significant if though. I really like that Meydan form and previous efforts over 8f in very decent races when not quite quick enough close home did suggest a step up in trip would suit. I would be very surprised if Cityscape is not making a very very promising looking attack 2 furlongs out in this, that attack may not be quite enough to take the race but if 3.5 tbp was knocking about on Betfair to accompany a little bit on the win market I think it would be valuesome.

    - Monterosso has nice pieces of form, beating So You Think over 10f on the artificial surface at Meydan but I reckon the rating of 127 flatters somewhat, I can't quite see Monterosso being good enough to win this, the market agrees so nothing profound there :pac:

    - The 4yo Nathaniel is rated 126 and having beaten Work Force over 12f on GS as a 3 year old has no stamina doubts over this 10f trip, has almost 3 1/2l to find on So You Think over 10f at Ascot though, again that was 2011 so going fresh here as a 4yo after a winter of doing whatever horses though may well be primed to close that gap. The guts of 10/1 seems quite decent all things considered.

    - Second fav is Farhh, rated 118 and like Nathanial a 4yo with potential to improve, race fit and beaten by almost 3l by So You Think 3 weeks ago when not getting the run of the race most people will be wondering how close he could have gotten. Aside from that race though there's not much other form to ponder and relying on the "one swallow doesn't make....." ole saying I'm reckoning Farhh is little value and not one to have huge hopes for.


    I give Cityscape and Nathaniel decent chances so anything about 5/4 ish on So You Think is poor value for me, I reckon 5/4 won't be hard to find on Saturday.

    I reckon the trip is ideal for Cityscape so that's the one for me at the likely odds :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭MyStubbleItches


    SYT out lame according to Sky Sports News just now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    That's opened up the race for punters a bit then (I'm assuming So You Think was very short).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 713 ✭✭✭newuser89


    Apparently so you think was lame
    But I wouldnt be surprised if ballydoyle were scared that a couple of horses would beat so you think in his last race


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭tryfix


    That certainly opens up the race a bit.

    The French filly Giofra looks more likely to place now, I'm not sure she's good enough to win but with SYT out it'll be much easier to finish in the first 3. She a lightly raced filly who finished 8l behind behind Cirrus Des Aigles in the Ganay after winning a French Gp2 on her 4 yo debut. She was 2L ahead of Reliable Man in the Ganay and 10L in front of Wigmore Hall. Reliable Man finished a nk behind Farhh in the POW with Wigmore Hall 4 1/2L further back.

    On form she's entitled to be in single figures in the betting, she was 25/1 in the betting before SYT was announced as a non runner.

    EDIT : She's out. The final 10 declarations are.

    Cityscape, City Style, Crackerjack King, Farhh, Monterosso, Nathaniel, Sri Putra, Twice Over, Bonfire and Cogito.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,340 ✭✭✭sting60


    I was wondering how long before SYT would be injured.Farhh will be hard to beat after his last run.


  • Posts: 23,497 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mike65 wrote: »
    That's opened up the race for punters a bit then (I'm assuming So You Think was very short).

    Was 2.1 to lay yesterday mike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    tryfix wrote: »
    EDIT : She's out. The final 10 declarations are.

    Cityscape, City Style, Crackerjack King, Farhh, Monterosso, Nathaniel, Sri Putra, Twice Over, Bonfire and Cogito.

    Nathaniel and Farhh look clear best to me now. What price Farhh now?

    Reverse forecast on the cards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    Farhh 9/4ish
    Nathaniel 3's


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,335 ✭✭✭✭UrbanSea


    Fargo must be the most under priced horse of all time. Crackerjack king at 12/1 would be my idea of a good each way bet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    So You Think missing has actually taken a lot of my interest out of it now.

    If the ground stays good to firm I'll probably give Cityscape a go.

    Nathaniel is a big lay for me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    UrbanSea wrote: »
    Fargo must be the most under priced horse of all time. Crackerjack king at 12/1 would be my idea of a good each way bet


    You mean Farhh??

    Why do you think he is so under-priced. He is clearly an improving 4yo. He took a jump from winning a 8f handicap to a somewhat unlucky 3rd in one of the premier 10f grp1's in this part of the world in only his 4th start.

    He has a very progressive looking profile and is deserved favourite with SYT not in the race.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,335 ✭✭✭✭UrbanSea


    Yeah that was my spell check. I'd still think 7/2 would be skinny enough in a wide open race but still think it'll prove to be a poor Eclipse looking back in terms of quality.


  • Posts: 23,497 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    HigginsJ wrote: »
    You mean Farhh??

    Why do you think he is so under-priced. He is clearly an improving 4yo. He took a jump from winning a 8f handicap to a somewhat unlucky 3rd in one of the premier 10f grp1's in this part of the world in only his 4th start.

    He has a very progressive looking profile and is deserved favourite with SYT not in the race.

    3.6 to back on Betfair.
    In my opinion Farhh is fav on the basis of ifs and buts due to the unlucky run last time out. Recent form is well known as having a more than fairly weighted effect on the price. I didn't reckon Farhh would be 2nd to SYT and without SYT in the race I wouldn't reckon anything less than 4/1 is appropriate.

    The market is taking full advantage of Farhh's bad luck lto imo :)
    Time will tell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    RoverJames wrote: »
    3.6 to back on Betfair.
    In my opinion Farhh is fav on the basis of ifs and buts due to the unlucky run last time out. Recent form is well known as having a more than fairly weighted effect on the price. I didn't reckon Farhh would be 2nd to SYT and without SYT in the race I wouldn't reckon anything less than 4/1 is appropriate.

    The market is taking full advantage of Farhh's bad luck lto imo :)
    Time will tell.

    Spot on.
    I'd say unlucky losers next time out are a bookies wet dream.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭aidan24326


    UrbanSea wrote: »
    Yeah that was my spell check. I'd still think 7/2 would be skinny enough in a wide open race but still think it'll prove to be a poor Eclipse looking back in terms of quality.

    Poor Grp1 races are becoming a feature of this season. The brilliance of Frankel and Camelot masks the mediocrity of the rest. The Epsom Derby was ordinary and the Irish version was shockingly poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭Nulty


    aidan24326 wrote: »
    Poor Grp1 races are becoming a feature of this season. The brilliance of Frankel and Camelot masks the mediocrity of the rest. The Epsom Derby was ordinary and the Irish version was shockingly poor.

    I'd have the opposite view....

    Camelot and Frankel have raised our expectations and thus perfectly good group 1 races are made to look ordinary by comparison. Anyway, Frankels races aren't 'races', they're a farce from a competition standpoint. He should be running against trains, planes and automobiles.

    And for the record, he'll win everything at 10f too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    aidan24326 wrote: »
    UrbanSea wrote: »
    Yeah that was my spell check. I'd still think 7/2 would be skinny enough in a wide open race but still think it'll prove to be a poor Eclipse looking back in terms of quality.

    Poor Grp1 races are becoming a feature of this season. The brilliance of Frankel and Camelot masks the mediocrity of the rest. The Epsom Derby was ordinary and the Irish version was shockingly poor.

    Spot on.
    The 3 year olds seems a particularly poor lot this year. Camelot aside obviously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Slattsy wrote: »
    Spot on.
    I'd say unlucky losers next time out are a bookies wet dream.


    You are correct that unlucky losers are great not for bookies but alot of the time its horses with bad temperment or have run like that before. Farhh and the french horse both looked to have had unlucky runs in that race.

    The question I would ask is that if Carlton house was running in this race without SYT what price would he be?


  • Posts: 23,497 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    HigginsJ wrote: »
    ....

    The question I would ask is that if Carlton house was running in this race without SYT what price would he be?

    CH would be 2nd fav, possibly joint 2nd fav despite a CD win off 119 in the form book imo, farhh would still be fav. What do you think?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    RoverJames wrote: »
    HigginsJ wrote: »
    ....

    The question I would ask is that if Carlton house was running in this race without SYT what price would he be?

    CH would be 2nd fav, possibly joint 2nd fav despite a CD win off 119 in the form book imo, farhh would still be fav. What do you think?

    Carlton House would win, and you'd probably get 3/1 ;)


Advertisement