Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Senator John Crown calls for ban on tobacco products by 2025

  • 28-06-2012 01:26AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,455 ✭✭✭


    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0627/senator-calls-for-ban-on-tobacco-products-by-2025.html
    The senator, who is also a consultant oncologist, said the measures should be adopted at a European level.
    He said placing a ban on the manufacturing and sale of cigarettes should be a long-term goal.


    Senator Crown said: "It will give the companies time to re-tool the machines to make something else.
    "This is a time when the world is short of food. Imagine all that agricultural land being used to produce cancer causing tobacco instead of being used to grow food.


    "It will allow the pension funds to reinvest and it will give the addicts due notice, if you're still alive in ten to 15 years, you won't be able to get cigarettes legally."


    Senator Crown, along with Jillian van Turnhout and Mark Daly, advocated a Bill that will see a ban on smoking in cars in Ireland when children are in the vehicle. The Bill was approved by the Cabinet yesterday.

    Good, could even shorten it to 2020.

    With it being a Tax staple though, will it ever happen?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    If they were to do this, they'd make up the loss of tax in other stuff. Oxygen tax anyone?


    Posted it in the other thread, but it bears repeating. Its the onion, but reality is being just as crazy. Or, people are advocating for it, I should say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,065 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    This guy is talking through his hoop, most non smokers will be jumping around with glee at this news, without realizing that the income tax rate will probably go up to 35/40% to cover the loss of tax from smoking.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    Look at what happened during the Prohibition era in the US. This will only fuel criminality and gangland violence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭Mickey H


    He can f*ck right off, the sandal wearing hippie twat.

    /Rolls up a smooth Old Holborn...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,955 ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    At least he's laid bare the aim of the health fascists - to criminalise smoking and smokers.

    Does anyone else see the irony in this? We replace religious moral intolerance with "healthy living" intolerance...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭The Radiator


    Nah, they should just tax the hell out of it even more. Be a bit silly banning when they could just make it a super luxury product and make a load o' money.
    People should be able to choose for themselves whether they smoke or not


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I'm a smoker and I'd love to see them made illegal. It will reduce the number of deaths caused by the habit. Of course some people will buy them illegally, but the numbers of people taking smoking up in the first place would be greatly reduced, and the onus would be on smokers to at least try harder to quit.

    I really hate the pussyfooting that goes on in relation to tobacco. Nobody denies that it's a lethal addiction but yet far more innocuous things are regularly banned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    I'm a smoker and I'd love to see them made illegal. It will reduce the number of deaths caused by the habit. Of course some people will buy them illegally, but the numbers of people taking smoking up in the first place would be greatly reduced, and the onus would be on smokers to at least try harder to quit.
    And then... http://arabia.msn.com/business/press/press/2012/april/cigarette_market_egypt/ministry-health-confirms.aspx
    Dr. Latif explained that, “illegal cigarettes are often manufactured and stored in highly polluted and infested areas. Based on other independent researches indicated that illicit cigarettes contain metals and toxic substances that are gravely harmful to the consumer’s health.”
    http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2012/04/27/children-sold-illegal-cigarettes-at-20p-a-pop-by-unscrupulous-midland-corner-shops-claims-former-scotland-yard-detective-97319-30848927/
    Children sold illegal cigarettes at 20p a pop by unscrupulous Midland corner shops, claims former Scotland Yard detective
    So, it would just expand the drug war. Not exactly doing anything for the greater good, IMO. It would be giving up on the money that was being made on tax, creating a vacuum in which criminal enterprise can make money... Not really seeing the gains.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How long til the "we all have to pay for your healthcare" argument comes along. **** it, I don't want anyone else paying for my healthcare if it impinges on my right to give myself cancer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    You won't around in 13 years Senator Crown, you and the rest of your talking shop will be abolished.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭Scioch


    Good to see someone is trying to make progress in relation to this. The tax should be moved onto unhealthy foods. Much wider base to draw from so wouldnt affect prices too much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,515 ✭✭✭✭admiralofthefleet


    he can shove it up his bollox

    /lights benson


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    If only stupid ideas caused cancer there'd be fewer people like him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,083 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    I'm no believer in making things illegal. I'm no believer that making smokes even more expensive than they are now would help in people smoking less or giving them up. That ain't gonna work.

    The only thing that will work is for culture to change into making smoking less socially acceptable and less cool for younger people to start doing. This has been going on for a good few years now and it is working. Slowly.

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    LordSmeg wrote: »
    Good to see someone is trying to make progress in relation to this. The tax should be moved onto unhealthy foods. Much wider base to draw from so wouldnt affect prices too much.
    This isn't a tax. It's a ban.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭Scioch


    Pushtrak wrote: »
    This isn't a tax. It's a ban.

    I know, the loss of tax which will result from the ban is what I'm talking about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Pushtrak wrote: »
    And then... http://arabia.msn.com/business/press/press/2012/april/cigarette_market_egypt/ministry-health-confirms.aspx

    http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2012/04/27/children-sold-illegal-cigarettes-at-20p-a-pop-by-unscrupulous-midland-corner-shops-claims-former-scotland-yard-detective-97319-30848927/

    So, it would just expand the drug war. Not exactly doing anything for the greater good, IMO. It would be giving up on the money that was being made on tax, creating a vacuum in which criminal enterprise can make money... Not really seeing the gains.

    If it was done over night then of course many problems would arise. I meant that it should be progressively outlawed, with proper help for smokers along the way, and carried out on a set timescale & with an encompassing legal framework to deal with any fallout. You could decriminalize possession while still targeting criminal groups.

    The ultimate goal being that people are left knowing that taking up the habit in the first place has no measurable benefits whatsoever. It's not a social or party drug, the only people that see any real upsides to using it are those already addicted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    LordSmeg wrote: »
    I know, the loss of tax which will result from the ban is what I'm talking about.
    Oh, right, I get you now. You'd probably have to tax the unhealthy food 300% for that plan to work though. So, it wouldn't work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,955 ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    If it becomes illegal to smoke or buy tobacco products perhaps we can enact the death penalty for selling cigarettes.

    Really great idea.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭Scioch


    Pushtrak wrote: »
    Oh, right, I get you now. You'd probably have to tax the unhealthy food 300% for that plan to work though. So, it wouldn't work.

    I dunno there is an awful lot of money being handed out for unhealthy foods. And much more people eat junk than smoke so you'd be taxing a much larger group over a huge number of products. Might not make up the entire shortfall but it would gather a sizable chunk if not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,499 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    Wouldn't a stupid ban like this also have a negative impact on the tourist industry. Smoking is as prevalent as ever on the continent, these people aren't going to holiday here anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Jester252


    Well if smoking banned then what becomes the goverment new bitch?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    If it was done over night then of course many problems would arise. I meant that it should be progressively outlawed, with proper help for smokers along the way, and carried out on a set timescale & with an encompassing legal framework to deal with any fallout. You could decriminalize possession while still targeting criminal groups.

    The ultimate goal being that people are left knowing that taking up the habit in the first place has no measurable benefits whatsoever. It's not a social or party drug, the only people that see any real upsides to using it are those already addicted.
    I'm really curious how people would react if you replaced this thread with alcohol and drinkers.
    JupiterKid wrote: »
    If it becomes illegal to smoke or buy tobacco products perhaps we can enact the death penalty for selling cigarettes.

    Really great idea.
    No, I'm sure people would be happy with heavy fines as some attempt to make up for the loss of money from smokers no longer paying tax*.
    Wouldn't a stupid ban like this also have a negative impact on the tourist industry. Smoking is as prevalent as ever on the continent, these people aren't going to holiday here anymore.
    Well, this trend of banning smoking is fairly large scale in global terms. Not entirely global, but it gets around, that's for sure. So, if it were to be in play here, it'd likely end up in play elsewhere as well.


    *Boards needs a shake-head smiley. Roll eyes wouldn't have been appropriate there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,059 ✭✭✭Sindri


    I'll just grow tobacco myself then. Maybe form an Amateur Tobacco Smoking and Cultivating Club where for a membership fee you get some organization merchandise which may include tobacco to "sample". The membership fee would be weekly of course. Then I can market it to the kiddies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭The Radiator


    Sindri wrote: »
    I'll just grow tobacco myself then. Maybe form an Amateur Tobacco Smoking and Cultivating Club where for a membership fee you get some organization merchandise which may include tobacco to "sample". The membership fee would be weekly of course. Then I can market it to the kiddies.

    But that's illegal, I'm telling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,915 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Completely agree with his motives in that smoking should be discouraged and stamped out. But when has telling people they can't do something actually resulted in them not doing it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭The Radiator


    ColHol wrote: »
    Completely agree with his motives in that smoking should be discouraged and stamped out. But when has telling people they can't do something actually resulted in them not doing it?

    Since never


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭MaxSteele


    Although I'm of the belief that prohibition doesn't work and aside from the criminality and black market that would take over tobacco ..... it would be a great long term goal if accomplished.

    I seriously can't understand people who smoke or support it's existence (basically the majority of my mates, father etc etc :rolleyes:). Nearly everyone I know complains about addiction to it, tries giving up but will probably lambast the idea of being rid of it.

    I'd almost rather see people on recreational drugs like Cannabis or cocaine instead increasing their smoke related disease chances of cancer, bronchitis or a tumor the size of a new born baby in their larynx.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    MaxSteele wrote: »
    I seriously can't understand people who smoke or support it's existence (basically the majority of my mates, father etc etc :rolleyes:).
    Would there be the same level of bafflement be raised if it were alcohol that was under discussion? Not directed at just you.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    meh


Advertisement
Advertisement