Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Clamped!

1171820222346

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    What ticket? Why would you stand there a few metres away watchign them go through the motions of clamping and say nothing:confused: Cos thats what I'm talkign about there.

    Walk over and tell them you just pulled in and are gettign a ticket. If they say though, get in the car and drive off.

    Good lord :rolleyes: There should be no need to have to watch your back while purchasing your ticket. I'm astounded you find the practice of clamping someone while watching them buy their ticket acceptable. An elderly person (who are often the targets of extortionists) just isn't going to be able to walk back, get in their car and drive off while trying to get past a thug who's bigger than them quickly enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    What ticket? Why would you stand there a few metres away watchign them go through the motions of clamping and say nothing:confused: Cos thats what I'm talkign about there.

    Walk over and tell them you just pulled in and are gettign a ticket. If they say though, get in the car and drive off.

    That's not always possible. And the pay machine is not always in sight of the car.

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    Anan1 wrote: »
    Look, we all know that some clampers are unscrupulous - what does that have to do with this case?

    Clamping. And the lack of law backing it up. Charging 90 EUR unclamping fee is extortion and hence unscrupulous. Not having an independant appeals process is even more unscrupulous.

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Stark wrote: »
    Good lord :rolleyes: There should be no need to have to watch your back while purchasing your ticket. I'm astounded you find the practice of clamping someone while watching them buy their ticket acceptable. An elderly person (who are often the targets of extortionists) just isn't going to be able to walk back, get in their car and drive off while trying to get past a thug who's bigger than them quickly enough.

    Good lord indeed , I was responding to your posts that the machines are somehow hidden away a days camel ride from the parking spots.
    Stark wrote: »


    And if the guys clamping the car are physically stronger than me? .

    Is there many cases where people have gone to get in their cars and been wrestled away?



    Anyway, are we discussing the op and similar cases or extreme ones where the clampers arrive as you step out of the car? I havnt seen anyone defending that. No one denied you should be able to go get a ticket. Takign 20 minutes is takign the piss.

    Is there many cases where the machine is more than a minute (2 mins walking is actuslly a fair distance) away?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    Is there many cases where people have gone to get in their cars and been wrestled away?

    There's been a few examples mentioned in this very thread.

    /M


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Stark wrote: »
    Which would not have happened if they were given a reasonable grace period.
    There's a 15 minute grace period in Dún Laoghaire, which is many times longer than you need to get a ticket and actually covers most errands. The grace period should be enough to ensure that you can comfortably get a ticket, and it should be clearly signposted. What it does not need to cover is somebody arriving without coins and then wandering around for 20 minutes trying to find change.
    Marlow wrote: »
    Clamping. And the lack of law backing it up. Charging 90 EUR unclamping fee is a extortion and hence unscrupulous. Not having an independant appeals process is even more unscrupulous.

    /M
    Yeah yeah, we should have regulation. In the meantime, if you don't like the rules then don't park there. Especially not for 20 minutes without paying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    Anan1 wrote: »
    In the meantime, if you don't like the rules then don't park there. Especially not for 20 minutes without paying.

    Or unclamp yourself until regulation is in place.

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Is there many cases where people have gone to get in their cars and been wrestled away?

    If someone is in the process of clamping the car, I would need to be as strong or stronger than them to pull them away from the clamp. I'm still astounded that you consider it acceptable that they should continue doing so after you've shown them your ticket. Not even Anan1 is trying to justify that.
    Anan1 wrote:
    There's a 15 minute grace period in Dún Laoghaire, which is many times longer than you need to get a ticket and actually covers most errands. The grace period should be enough to ensure that you can comfortably get a ticket, and it should be clearly signposted.

    As it should be.
    Anan1 wrote:
    What it does not need to cover is somebody arriving without coins and then wandering around for 20 minutes trying to find change.

    Well without any grace period signed, how is the OP meant to know if it's 15 mins or 20 mins. If it was signed as 15 mins, he would have known to return to his car when he found himself running short on time. Since there are no rules covering how private clampers display and enforce this, it's impossible to respect them. Even if it was 5 minutes clearly signed, then the person parking would be able to obtain their ticket in that time safe in the knowledge that they weren't going to return ticket in hand to find a yellow boot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Stark wrote: »
    If someone is in the process of clamping the car, I would need to be as strong or stronger than them to pull them away from the clamp. I'm still astounded that you consider it acceptable that they should continue doing so after you've shown them your ticket. Not even Anan1 is trying to justify that.
    I think the point here is that the landowner has a right to set whatever rules they please, but that they have a duty to make any potential customers aware of these in advance. That way, you can make an informed decision on whether or not you want to do business with them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    https://maps.google.ie/maps?q=dublin+road,+naas&hl=en&ll=53.22099,-6.658459&spn=0.001457,0.003731&sll=53.344104,-6.267494&sspn=0.371809,0.955124&t=h&hnear=Dublin+Rd,+Naas,+County+Kildare&z=19&layer=c&cbll=53.22099,-6.658459&panoid=5dFZPb4QHl3xe1oa_IQe_g&cbp=12,132.44,,0,-4.3

    Is that where we're talking about btw?
    Stark wrote: »


    Well without any grace period signed, how is the OP meant to know if it's 15 mins or 20 mins. If it was signed as 15 mins, he would have known to return to his car when he found himself running short on time.

    If its not signed then there isnt one. Why would you just pick a time and assume it to be true?

    I doubt theres a case that 5 mins wouldnt cover.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Marlow wrote: »
    Or unclamp yourself until regulation is in place.

    /M
    If you have no respect for the property rights of others.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,455 ✭✭✭RUCKING FETARD


    7+ pages of extra Bull**** today (thanks Anan1) to add to the 10 or so before it that ruined the best Thread in over 6 months site wide.

    Wonder would a Mod delete everything back to post 238 on pg16 except for post 337 and 338 on pg23 and lock the Thread?

    And get one of the AH mods to add it to the Legendary Thread.

    Well done Kildare, Gary, Yawns and brummy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Marlow wrote: »
    There's been a few examples mentioned in this very thread.

    /M

    Well then an assault charge should have been handy to secure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    7+ pages of extra Bull**** today (thanks Anan1) to add to the 10 or so before it that ruined the best Thread in over 6 months site wide.

    Wonder would a Mod delete everything back to post 238 on pg16 except for post 337 and 338 on pg23 and lock the Thread?

    And get one of the AH mods to add it to the Legendary Thread.

    Delete it why? Because people dont like clampers and just want a free rant? Why not just have all threads one sided and ban reasoned debate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Well then an assault charge should have been handy to secure.

    And someone parking their car should be forced to deal with this why?
    Anan1 wrote:
    If you have no respect for the property rights of others.

    A car is property too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    Anan1 wrote: »
    I think the point here is that the landowner has a right to set whatever rules they please, but that they have a duty to make any potential customers aware of these in advance. That way, you can make an informed decision on whether or not you want to do business with them.
    Stark wrote: »
    Well without any grace period signed, how is the OP meant to know if it's 15 mins or 20 mins. If it was signed as 15 mins, he would have known to return to his car when he found himself running short on time.

    But you can only do that, if there is enough information. Like a clearly stated grace period, where the machines are, what payment methods they take etc. With lack of information the grace period needs to be extend.
    Anan1 wrote: »
    If you have no respect for the property rights of others.

    If we go by your assumption, that the landowner gets no money from the clamping, then it makes no difference to the landowner if you declamp yourself or you pay the declamp fee. The op stated, he paid the ticket, so he's paid the landowner for the privilege to park there.

    No disrespect to the landowner in that case.

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Marlow wrote: »
    Or unclamp yourself until regulation is in place.

    /M

    and yet again, why bother paying for parking in the first place then? PArk where you want.

    Dont worm out of it with talk of the OP, your being general now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭Paparazzo


    Anan1 wrote: »
    If you have no respect for the property rights of others.

    Jesus, you're using that line to support clamping! We've turned full circle. It's the ones stopping someone from using their own car cos they're a few minutes late paying a couple of euro are the ones getting the rights abused!
    I've heard the lot now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Stark wrote: »
    And someone parking their car should be forced to deal with this why?

    .

    Who said they should? But apparently they already have so I'm assumeing they won their case and the clampers now have convictions for assault?


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 23,307 ✭✭✭✭beertons


    Great result lads, well done.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Who said they should? But apparently they already have so I'm assumeing they won their case and the clampers now have convictions for assault?

    It would be difficult to obtain a successful conviction for assault for someone simply standing between you and your car. Pretty much every nightclub bouncer in the country would be done for assault if that was the case. In any case, the clampers are relying on people's fear and ignorance of the law in order to go about their business. If everyone was using the law to their successful advantage, the clampers wouldn't be able to operate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Marlow wrote: »
    But you can only do that, if there is enough information. Like a clearly stated grace period, where the machines are, what payment methods they take etc. With lack of information the grace period needs to be extend.
    Agreed, but common-sense will tell anyone that it's not 20 minutes.

    Marlow wrote: »
    If we go by your assumption, that the landowner gets no money from the clamping, then it makes no difference to the landowner if you declamp yourself or you pay the declamp fee. The op stated, he paid the ticket, so he's paid the landowner for the privilege to park there.

    No disrespect to the landowner in that case.

    /M
    If the OP did pay then it made no difference to the landowner, the clampers were down the amount of time it took them to attach the clamp, and the boardsies were down the time it took them to get there, crawl under the OP's van, pull apart the suspension, remove the clamp, reassemble, go home and clean up. This is why I find the idea that the boardsies somehow won to be a bit ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Stark wrote: »
    It would be difficult to obtain a successful conviction for assault for someone simply standing between you and your car. Pretty much every nightclub bouncer in the country would be done for assault if that was the case. In any case, the clampers are relying on people's fear and ignorance of the law in order to go about their business. If everyone was using the law to their successful advantage, the clampers wouldn't be able to operate.

    I asked if people were wrestled away from their cars when tryign to get in and Marlow said yes they were. Yours is the first mention of the clampers standing in front of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Anan1 wrote:
    Agreed, but common-sense will tell anyone that it's not 20 minutes.

    Telling someone they should figure out the rules using common sense just isn't good enough. Not when you're preparing to stick your hand in their pocket and take out €120 for not understanding them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Paparazzo wrote: »
    Jesus, you're using that line to support clamping! We've turned full circle. It's the ones stopping someone from using their own car cos they're a few minutes late paying a couple of euro are the ones getting the rights abused!
    I've heard the lot now
    They don't put the car park under your car while you're away, you choose to park there. If you don't like the rules then park elsewhere.
    Stark wrote: »
    Telling someone they should figure out the rules using common sense just isn't good enough. Not when you're preparing to stick your hand in their pocket and take out €120 for not understanding them.
    In principle I agree with you, and I do think that grace periods should be clearly signposted, but, seriously - 20 minutes? The biggest halfwit in Ireland would know that that's not going to fly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,194 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I asked if people were wrestled away from their cars when tryign to get in and Marlow said yes they were. Yours is the first mention of the clampers standing in front of them.

    It's quite easy to use bully tactics on a vulnerable person and get away with it. We're quite good at it in this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,555 ✭✭✭✭Marlow


    Anan1 wrote: »
    If the OP did pay then it made no difference to the landowner, the clampers were down the amount of time it took them to attach the clamp, and the boardsies were down the time it took them to get there, crawl under the OP's van, pull apart the suspension, remove the clamp, reassemble, go home and clean up. This is why I find the idea that the boardsies somehow won to be a bit ridiculous.

    That's because you don't find it worthwhile. They however did. And so do the majority of the posters here.

    /M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Stark wrote: »
    Telling someone they should figure out the rules using common sense just isn't good enough. .

    No one said figure out the rules themselves. If the sign doesnt say you have a 20 min grace period, then dont just go ahead and assume you do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,801 ✭✭✭✭Gary ITR


    Anan1 wrote: »
    Agreed, but common-sense will tell anyone that it's not 20 minutes.


    If the OP did pay then it made no difference to the landowner, the clampers were down the amount of time it took them to attach the clamp, and the boardsies were down the time it took them to get there, crawl under the OP's van, pull apart the suspension, remove the clamp, reassemble, go home and clean up. This is why I find the idea that the boardsies somehow won to be a bit ridiculous.

    Just on your final point, it was one bolt there was no crawling. Plus i needed to go to the shop anyway plus i got to meet and have a chat with some cool lads, all in all it was a goodevening


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Marlow wrote: »
    That's because you don't find it worthwhile. They however did. And so do the majority of the posters here.

    /M

    Thats because the majority are int he "rabble rabble, ****ing clampers " camp. How many car park owners are agreeing?

    Sure people have been on giving out about clamping in their aparments or estates when they are the ones employing them through a management company. Ah ignorance, eh?


    Anyway, just in case you missed it:


    Marlow wrote: »
    Or unclamp yourself until regulation is in place.

    /M

    and yet again, why bother paying for parking in the first place then? PArk where you want.

    Dont worm out of it with talk of the OP, your being general now.


Advertisement