Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

We haven't had a good Public Sector bashing thread in ages

11617181921

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    You gave me an example of a cartel that was partially state sponsored, it has an edge when it comes to competition over a cartel that does not receive state sponsorship. Your example aren't good enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Pedant wrote: »
    You gave me an example of a cartel that was partially state sponsored. That's not good enough.

    to you its not, but for you

    Oh, that article if you read it was 2 swiss banks

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_Suisse

    Did Credit Suisse receive any state money - I dont think so

    I'll take that as a point proven again

    read the article

    Motor trade does not get state funding - really come on your losing it

    as you said yourself

    . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
    . . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
    . . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
    . . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
    . . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
    . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
    . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
    . . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
    . . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
    . . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
    . . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
    . . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
    . . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
    . . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
    . . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
    . . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
    ,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
    . .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
    . . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    The handbags are flying tonight :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,651 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    Less of the childish name-calling please.

    /mod


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    to you its not, but for you

    Oh, that article if you read it was 2 swiss banks

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_Suisse

    Did Credit Suisse receive any state money - I dont think so

    I'll take that as a point proven again

    read the article

    Motor trade does not get state funding - really come on your losing it

    as you said yourself

    The two swiss bank (UBS and Credit Suisse) actually did receive state money, see here. Those banks were part of a greater international cartel of banks, some of whom also received state support. Please do a little bit more research.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Pedant wrote: »
    The two swiss bank (UBS and Credit Suisse) actually did receive state money, see here. Those banks were part of a greater international cartel of banks, some of whom also received state support. Please do a little bit more research.

    Your avoiding the motor trade example

    In any case back to bank cartel, if swiss government supported cartel by financing bank, then how come they were the ones to remove it.

    The criminal 'The General' was on the dole while carring out major crime, did the Irish government support his crime by financially supporting him with dole money -> no. In fact they took dole payments off him and the public servant who signed off on it was seriously injured for doing it. A public servant on an average wage doing his job.

    cartels should be illegal, even calls that OPEC should be illegal. Just one of those things private sector trying to maximise profits and its down to police etc to stop them. Just cause a government may give a grant or loan etc does not in any way signify that they support cartels. The reason for grants, loans etc is to stimulate the economy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    Your avoiding the motor trade example

    I've already tackled it. That cartel (being private) wouldn't have last too long, like most other private non-government sponsored/funded cartels. I don't see what the issue is here.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    In any case back to bank cartel, if swiss government supported cartel by financing bank, then how come they were the ones to remove it.

    Why do you think? Because the mess they started was getting out of control, maybe. Go ask them.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    The criminal 'The General' was on the dole while carring out major crime, did the Irish government support his crime by financially supporting him with dole money -> no.

    In fact they took dole payments off him and the public servant who signed off on it was seriously injured for doing it. A public servant on an average wage doing his job.

    Well, if I gave money (no matter what form) to a criminal, technically I am supporting him, regardless of whether I knew he was actively committing crime or not. Technically, the Irish government were unintentionally supporting his crimes, but I'm sure that concept is beyond you. They may have cut dole payments off him, but they didn't ask for the money they gave him earlier back.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    cartels should be illegal, even calls that OPEC should be illegal. Just one of those things private sector trying to maximise profits and its down to police etc to stop them. Just cause a government may give a grant or loan etc does not in any way signify that they support cartels. The reason for grants, loans etc is to stimulate the economy.

    I believe that any state sponsored cartel should be illegal. Not private cartels. I seriously don't believe that the government should hinder two companies who voluntary enter into an agreement together, be it price fixing, etc... You haven't yet falsified my claim, however, that private non-state supported/funded cartels will ultimately fail due to competition.

    I honestly feel as though we're going around in circles here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Pedant wrote: »
    I've already tackled it. That cartel (being private) wouldn't have last too long, like most other private non-government sponsored/funded cartels. I don't see what the issue is here.




    Well, if I gave money (no matter what form) to a criminal, technically I am supporting him, regardless of whether I knew he was actively committing crime or not. Technically, the Irish government were unintentionally supporting his crimes, but I'm sure that concept is beyond you. They may have cut dole payments off him, but they didn't ask for the money they gave him earlier back.



    I believe that any state sponsored cartel should be illegal. Not private cartels. I seriously don't believe that the government should hinder two companies who voluntary enter into an agreement together, be it price fixing, etc... You haven't yet falsified my claim, however, that private non-state supported/funded cartels will ultimately fail due to competition.

    I honestly feel as though we're going around in circles here.
    I can see why you have issues with public sector

    Best of Luck in leaving Cert, better change your views for economics or you'll end up loosing a grade of two as you views are off the wall with nothing to back them up except your own opinion. How can you say a private cartel wont last, cause it says so in a book ?

    The dole did not supports the general, he had so much money it did not count, drop in the ocean

    Irish government support criminals and criminal activity is off the wall

    why would people set up a cartel if it was going to fail, it takes legal action to get rid of them. How long to you would it take a private cartel to fail, how long is a short time ? how long is a piece of string more like


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Quiet obvius that people with anti-public sector views have anti-government views and as far as they are concerned private sector can possibly do no wrong.

    When they finish leaving cert and get out into the big bad world reality will strike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    I can see why you have issues with public sector

    Best of Luck in leaving Cert, better change your views for economics or you'll end up loosing a grade of two as you views are off the wall with nothing to back them up except your own opinion. How can you say a private cartel wont last, cause it says so in a book ?

    No, because it's proven by history.

    If you want remain tied in ignorance to the system, continue, be my guessed.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    The dole did not supports the general, he had so much money it did not count, drop in the ocean

    Every little helps. It doesn't matter how much his dole payments were in comparison to his real earning, it's still a contribution, no matter what way you look at it.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    Irish government support criminals and criminal activity is off the wall

    They didn't intend to support criminality but they did. It doesn't matter how much they paid him via the dole, that money was still going to something.

    Anyway, I'm curious as to why you are so surprised at the suggestion that the Irish government supported (or supports) criminality.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    why would people set up a cartel if it was going to fail, it takes legal action to get rid of them.

    Because they're chancing their arm without an understanding of economics. That and they think like you do.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    How long to you would it take a private cartel to fail, how long is a short time ? how long is a piece of string more like

    That depends on the size of the cartel combined, the size of the market they're in and the demand for the product they are producing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    Quiet obvius that people with anti-public sector views have anti-government views and as far as they are concerned private sector can possibly do no wrong.

    When they finish leaving cert and get out into the big bad world reality will strike.

    From what you've posted on this thread so far, I'm convinced that the education I've received thus far is greater than yours.

    However, you are correct, I am anti-government. I don't believe that the private sector can do no wrong, no system is perfect, there are bad people in the world - we have to accept that. Though I think it'd be very naïve of you to suggest that the public sector or government is capable of any greater good. In fact it's quite the opposite.

    The incentive to do wrong is not brought about by freedom, but by power over others. An old phrase, "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" - I've already mentioned that on this thread so far, I think. It only takes one malevolent peron to get into a seat of power (such as that provided by the government) for everything to be fucked up. That power is not easily attained outside government, unless supplied by the government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Pedant wrote: »
    From what you've posted on this thread so far, I'm convinced that the education I've received thus far is greater than yours.

    However, you are correct, I am anti-government. I don't believe that the private sector can do no wrong, no system is perfect, there are bad people in the world - we have to accept that. Though I think it'd be very naïve of you to suggest that the public sector or government is capable of any greater good. In fact it's quite the opposite.

    The incentive to do wrong is not brought about by freedom, but by power over others. An old phrase, "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" - I've already mentioned that on this thread so far, I think. It only takes one malevolent people to get into a seat of power (such as that provided by the government) for everything to be fucked up. That power is not easily attained outside government, unless supplied by the government.

    No, people need to stand up to what is right and people do. Read up on easy eddie in the windy city, what he did for his son and why O'hare airport got its name. You will undertand he went against absolute power in Chicago and his son was a war hero

    Oh what would James Connolly say of you views, men like him that fought for our freedom and gave their lives. So sad that this is the way the youth now think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    No, people need to stand up to what is right and people do. Read up on easy eddie in the windy city, what he did for his son and why O'hare airport got its name. You will undertand he went against absolute power in Chicago and his son was a war hero

    O'Hare helped catch Al Capone for tax evasion. Personally, I don't see tax evasion as unethical (that's another discussion entirely), but Al Capone needed to be stopped nonetheless.

    Al Capone was a criminal gangster who got powerful during the Prohibition era. He profited from the black market sale of alcohol (much the same way as modern gangland criminals profit from the sale of illegal drugs).

    If the state had not done the stupid thing of making alcohol illegal (enshrining alcohol prohibition in the US Constitution), you wouldn't have the likes of Al Capone growing a mass criminal industry. Again, his rise can be blamed on blow-back from government policy. The state was to blame for the likes of Al Capone.

    Indeed, many gangland thugs nowadays would not have so much power if the possession and sale of drugs wasn't illegal.
    mbiking123 wrote: »
    Oh what would James Connolly say of you views, men like him that fought for our freedom and gave their lives. So sad that this is the way the youth now think.

    Connolly was a socialist trade-union swine. If his like weren't kept down we'd be living in a soviet satellite state. Not much freedom there. I'd rather imperialism was fought based on ideals of true liberty, like the Enlightenment ideas brought into being during the American Revolution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭mbiking123


    Pedant wrote: »
    O'Hare helped catch Al Capone for tax evasion. Personally, I don't see tax evasion as unethical (that's another discussion entirely), but Al Capone needed to be stopped nonetheless.

    Al Capone was a criminal gangster who got powerful during the Prohibition era. He profited from the black market sale of alcohol (much the same way as modern gangland criminals profit from the sale of illegal drugs).

    If the state had not done the stupid thing of making alcohol illegal (enshrining alcohol prohibition in the US Constitution), you wouldn't have the likes of Al Capone growing a mass criminal industry. Again, his rise can be blamed on blow-back from government policy. The state was to blame for the likes of Al Capone.

    Indeed, many gangland thugs nowadays would not have so much power if the possession and sale of drugs wasn't illegal.



    Connolly was a socialist trade-union swine. If his like weren't kept down we'd be living in a soviet satellite state. Not much freedom there. I'd rather imperialism was fought based on ideals of true liberty, like the Enlightenment ideas brought into being during the American Revolution.

    I would ask all public servants to read this, with views like this how could you ever be appreciated


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,305 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    No, people need to stand up to what is right and people do. Read up on easy eddie in the windy city, what he did for his son and why O'hare airport got its name. You will undertand he went against absolute power in Chicago and his son was a war hero

    Oh what would James Connolly say of you views, men like him that fought for our freedom and gave their lives. So sad that this is the way the youth now think.

    Libertarianism is the new Communism.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    mbiking123 wrote: »
    I would ask all public servants to read this, with views like this how could you ever be appreciated

    Oh of course. Because the trade unions haven't destroyed the public service enough. Why should I appreciate a particular public service if it doesn't live up to the mark? Why should I appreciate anything that doesn't like up to the mark? Are all public servants entitled to be appreciated? All private sector workers certainly aren't.

    Truth hurts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    K-9 wrote: »
    Libertarianism is the new Communism.

    How? What? Where? Why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,305 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Pedant wrote: »
    How? What? Where? Why?

    Puzzlement doesn't suit you darling. Not your style, it isn't "in" this year.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    K-9 wrote: »
    Puzzlement doesn't suit you darling. Not your style, it isn't "in" this year.

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Pedant wrote: »
    Connolly was a socialist trade-union swine.

    Please explain to me why you consider James Connolly a swine?

    What exactly about him gave you this opinion?

    True he was a socialist and trade unionist but why is that a bad thing?

    When he was working for unions one third of Dublin's population lived in slums. Prior to the advent of trade unionism in Ireland, unskilled workers lacked any form of representation. Furthermore, there were many more unskilled labourers in Dublin than there were jobs for them. Thus unskilled workers often had to compete with one another for work on a daily basis, the job generally going to whoever agreed to work for the lowest wages. Unskilled workers in Dublin were very much at the mercy of their employers. Employers who suspected workers of trying to organize could "blacklist" them, practically destroying any chance of future employment. He helped form a worker's militia named the Irish Citizen Army to protect workers' demonstrations after the first Bloody Sunday and the frequent brutality of the Dublin Metropolitan Police.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    Elaborate on the employers connections and what gave them so much power during that time.

    Anyway, let's not let Connolly and my use of one word "swine" let this thread go off topic. I just regard all socialists/communists as "swines" because of the inherent hypocrisies of their ideologies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,364 ✭✭✭golden lane


    when ireland sorts out it's public services problems..........their will be a basis for a great recovery......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    We need as small a government and public service as possible - a minarchy. Only the jails, police, courts and a legislature. Police chiefs should be elected on a local level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,364 ✭✭✭golden lane


    Pedant wrote: »
    We need as small a government and public service as possible - a minarchy. Only the jails, police, courts and a legislature. Police chiefs should be elected on a local level.


    i think the number one priority is a national health service.......paid for by central taxes......maybe a dispensing charge for prescriptions......

    there are too many differrent rules to the present system.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Pedant wrote: »
    Elaborate on the employers connections and what gave them so much power during that time.

    Anyway, let's not let Connolly and my use of one word "swine" let this thread go off topic. I just regard all socialists/communists as "swines" because of the inherent hypocrisies of their ideologies.

    Read a book if you want further elaboration on the employers connections I want to know why you called him a Swine. If you are going to call a man who is considered a national hero like Connolly a swine because of your modern day view of communism and socialism then you should expect someone to call you up on it or you should keep your opinions to yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Pedant wrote: »
    We need as small a government and public service as possible - a minarchy. Only the jails, police, courts and a legislature. Police chiefs should be elected on a local level.

    So what no Schools, hospitals, roads, fire brigade and so on? Or should they be run by Coca Cola or someone similar?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    Doc wrote: »
    Pedant wrote: »
    We need as small a government and public service as possible - a minarchy. Only the jails, police, courts and a legislature. Police chiefs should be elected on a local level.

    So what no Schools, hospitals, roads, fire brigade and so on? Or should they be run by Coca Cola or someone similar?
    Education can be private.
    healthcare can be private.
    Fire brigade can be private, etc..

    Just like any other business.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    Doc wrote: »
    Pedant wrote: »
    Elaborate on the employers connections and what gave them so much power during that time.

    Anyway, let's not let Connolly and my use of one word "swine" let this thread go off topic. I just regard all socialists/communists as "swines" because of the inherent hypocrisies of their ideologies.

    Read a book if you want further elaboration on the employers connections I want to know why you called him a Swine. If you are going to call a man who is considered a national hero like Connolly a swine because of your modern day view of communism and socialism then you should expect someone to call you up on it or you should keep your opinions to yourself.
    Well, if you don't know the answer yourself (as in, why did employers back then have so much power), there's really no point in me arguing with you further on that point. Maybe I'll see if you answer and see what rewritten history you come up with.

    I couldn't care less if Connolly is regarded as a national hero. If the socialists got their way, there'd probably be a law stated that you had to have a picture of Connolly in you living room - a bit like Kim Il-Sung in North Korea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Pedant wrote: »
    Well, if you don't know the answer yourself (as in, why did employers back then have so much power), there's really no point in me arguing with you further on that point. Maybe I'll see if you answer and see what rewritten history you come up with.

    I couldn't care less if Connolly is regarded as a national hero. If the socialists got their way, there'd probably be a law stated that you had to have a picture of Connolly in you living room - a bit like Kim Il-Sung in North Korea.

    I do know about it but I'm not the one who called him a Swine you are, and without backing that up at all. I have not rewritten history in any way. You are the one making statements and not backing them up.

    So you are basing your opinion on Connolly on what might of happened not what did? What if he created a pure communist state where everyone was equal and shared in the work and profits of the country equally? There is no reason why your imaginary outcome is anymore valid than mine.
    Pedant wrote: »
    Education can be private.
    healthcare can be private.
    Fire brigade can be private, etc..

    Just like any other business.

    So if you are born poor you have no way to become educated? If there is a fire in a poor persons home who can not afford to pay for the fire brigade they should burn to death? If you are hit by a car and could be saved they should not do so unless your credit card can cover it?

    Think what a miserable world it would be if you had your way. Explain to me how a world where you would die in the street because you couldn't afford healthcare or in a fire because you could afford to pay a fireman or never receive any education would be better than living in a communist country today?

    Your arguments are poorly thought out and irrational.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Pedant


    Doc wrote: »
    I do know about it but I'm not the one who called him a Swine you are, and without backing that up at all. I have not rewritten history in any way. You are the one making statements and not backing them up.

    So you are basing your opinion on Connolly on what might of happened not what did? What if he created a pure communist state where everyone was equal and shared in the work and profits of the country equally? There is no reason why your imaginary outcome is anymore valid than mine.

    Forget what I said about Connolly being a "swine". Was kinda off topic anyway and not what this whole discussion was about. It was mbiking123 who brought him into the discussion only a few posts ago.

    Communism wouldn't work because the well observed laws of supply and demand utterly break down. State-run economies have always been terribly inefficient.
    Doc wrote: »
    So if you are born poor you have no way to become educated? If there is a fire in a poor persons home who can not afford to pay for the fire brigade they should burn to death? If you are hit by a car and could be saved they should not do so unless your credit card can cover it?

    Think what a miserable world it would be if you had your way. Explain to me how a world where you would die in the street because you couldn't afford healthcare or in a fire because you could afford to pay a fireman or never receive any education would be better than living in a communist country today?

    To answer that, I think you first need to look at the source of poverty and why private education is so expensive. Also, when it comes to education, you don't necessarily need access to teachers and a school building to get an education. Afterall, most of the world's knowledge is at your finger tips. Didn't Connolly educate himself? Those who are willing will get on.

    In relation to the fire-brigade, I honestly don't think you'd pay before they came to your house to quench the fire. They'd come and then you'd have to pay them the sum of their services from your insurance. The same thing would happen with healthcare. Say you got a heart attack in the middle of the street, do you honestly think an ambulance driver would ask for your credit card when you're unconscious? No, the cost of the ambulance would be written off by your health insurance.
    Doc wrote: »
    Your arguments are poorly thought out and irrational.

    Oh really? Have you read everything I've written on this thread so far? Please tell me what you regard as "irrational" and "poorly thought out". Clearly, if you compare what I wrote to the tripe mbiking123 has made up so far in my conversations with him, you can clearly see that I have the upper hand.


Advertisement
Advertisement