Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Michael D Higgins

  • 17-03-2012 11:24AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3 Mark from poland


    Did he really deserve over one million votes ? What has he done since he got elected ? At least sean gallagher was going to visit every secondary school in the country, Michael D is going to spend the next 7 years sitting around up in the aras. Before anybody starts talking about sean gallagher and FF Michael D higgins was in the dail during the "boom" years not once did him or his party point out that bertie and co were spending too much money on welfare and everything else, infact in 2007 the labour party accused FF of not spending enough money.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,948 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    I am going to presume you are from Poland and give you the benefit of ignorance in Irish politics. The President is a largely ceremonial role. Our President has been quite visible and vocal since he took office, more then I expected actually so far, and he has been quite positive in his language.

    Visit every secondary school? Is that really the best you can muster up?

    I don't know if this will remain open very long as it is a pretty terrible argument.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭Ellis Dee


    Did he really deserve over one million votes ?

    I suppose you'd have to ask the over one million voters who voted for him. :rolleyes:
    What has he done since he got elected ?

    His job as far as I can see. I haven't heard of him doing something he shouldn't have or not doing something he should have. Things like that tend to get pointed out in the media here in Ireland. Don't know what the practice is in Poland.:)
    At least sean gallagher was going to visit every secondary school in the country,

    And that would have achieved exactly what? :confused:

    Michael D is going to spend the next 7 years sitting around up in the aras.

    How do you know that? Have you seen his schedules?:confused:
    Before anybody starts talking about sean gallagher and FF Michael D higgins was in the dail during the "boom" years not once did him or his party point out that bertie and co were spending too much money on welfare and everything else, infact in 2007 the labour party accused FF of not spending enough money.

    Meh.:rolleyes:

    By the way, do you know the three things you need for a really good evening in Poland?

    Answer: A litre of Vyborova vodka, a kilo of Cracow salami and a big dog.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,847 ✭✭✭bleg


    I like his focus on intellectualism. We shouldn't fear it. It's something to be embraced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,421 ✭✭✭V_Moth


    What has he done since he got elected ?

    Not embarrassing Ireland unlike that baldy fella.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Did he really deserve over one million votes ?
    Well of course nobody 'deserves' a vote.

    If you're asking why he earned over a million votes, the answer has as much to do with the quality of the alternative candidates as it has with Higgins's own Presidential capital.

    There was an interesting discussion in this forum recently about Irish people having a reputation for boldness and defiance. I think the Presidency is yet another example of the evidence that such liberalism exists only when it is utterly meaningless.

    We are quite prepared to bewstow upon reformative, liberal, even Socialist! candidates like Robinson and Higgins the impotent seal of Presidency, almost as some sort of crotch grabbing demonstration of our bold, lefty credentials.

    But when it comes to electing Teedees with strategic, policymaking influence, we're much happier with the Conservative schoolteacher type thank-you-very-much.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,771 ✭✭✭raymon


    Did he really deserve over one million votes ? What has he done since he got elected ? At least sean gallagher was going to visit every secondary school in the country, Michael D is going to spend the next 7 years sitting around up in the aras. Before anybody starts talking about sean gallagher and FF Michael D higgins was in the dail during the "boom" years not once did him or his party point out that bertie and co were spending too much money on welfare and everything else, infact in 2007 the labour party accused FF of not spending enough money.

    Hello Mark , welcome to boards.

    Looks like you are a Gallagher supporter... well good for you.

    To answer your question ... yes Higgins did deserve all the votes he got. Everyone who democratically voted for him would probably agree with me .

    I know a lot of Gallagher supporters were disappointed that he didn't get elected.

    However having a liar in the highest office in the land would not have been a good idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭bonzos


    Is he drawing a political pension on top of his current wage?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Dob74


    bonzos wrote: »
    Is he drawing a political pension on top of his current wage?


    I dont think he is, but didnt the law just change so sitting politicians dont get pay and pension.

    Anyway I dont think Michael D is in politics for money


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    bonzos wrote: »
    Is he drawing a political pension on top of his current wage?

    No.
    I really respect him on the wages front as when he was speaking in NUIG he got asked by members of the SF branch would he take the average-industrial-wage and he refused to comment saying he didn't think the presidency was something to be auctioned off to the lowest bidder.
    Then he got elected and voluntarily took a paycut of around 25%.
    Granted he is still earning around €250k but voluntarily deciding to take home tends of thousands less is pretty cool.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Dob74 wrote: »
    Anyway I dont think Michael D is in politics for money

    I agree.

    But it should be pointed out that if politicians were expected to be self financing, Michael D would probably still be working for ESB.

    And what a loss that would have been to the state.

    We can't just overlook the undesirability of making politics financially unattractive for perfectly well intentioned individuals, who quite rightly are fearful of losing their place in the private sector. We just have to make sure that we're making it attractive to the right sort: that's where voting comes in.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    I am going to presume you are from Poland and give you the benefit of ignorance in Irish politics. The President is a largely ceremonial role. Our President has been quite visible and vocal since he took office, more then I expected actually so far, and he has been quite positive in his language.

    Visit every secondary school? Is that really the best you can muster up?

    I don't know if this will remain open very long as it is a pretty terrible argument.

    Am getting married to a Polish girl and have spent a lot of time around Poles, Czechs, Slovaks and other Slavic races, and I cannot trace as much as one hint of the most common slavic linguistic mistakes that even fluent English speakers make in "Mark from poland"'s post. Also Mark is a very uncommon name for a Pole. The closest would be Marek. I also dont see a real Pole, capitalising Mark and not capitalising Poland.
    Michael D is going to spend the next 7 years sitting around up in the aras

    "Up in the Aras" sounds very Irish to me.

    My point being, that by having a username of "Mark from Poland" it seems he is mis-representing himself if he is not in fact from Poland. I set my location as the Czech Republic so as to give context to some of my posts, even though I am Irish.

    I therefore question the rest of the post.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,849 ✭✭✭Valmont


    later12 wrote: »
    And what a loss that would have been to the state.
    That implies Michael D Higgins actually adds something of value to the state. Apart from his dubious socialist rhetoric, I can't think of much else he brings to the table.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    He is full on Frankfurt school. So it is a good thing the role is ceremonial.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    syklops wrote: »
    Am getting married to a Polish girl and have spent a lot of time around Poles, Czechs, Slovaks and other Slavic races, and I cannot trace as much as one hint of the most common slavic linguistic mistakes that even fluent English speakers make in "Mark from poland"'s post. Also Mark is a very uncommon name for a Pole. The closest would be Marek. I also dont see a real Pole, capitalising Mark and not capitalising Poland.


    Yes, and there are clear Irishisms in there too.
    Before anybody starts talking about sean gallagher and FF Michael D higgins was in the dail during the "boom" years not once did him

    Still, he might be living there, as you say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,849 ✭✭✭Valmont


    Lockstep wrote: »
    Then he got elected and voluntarily took a paycut of around 25%.
    Granted he is still earning around €250k but voluntarily deciding to take home tends of thousands less is pretty cool.
    Considering he's being paid very handsomely in bailout money just to make speeches and shake hands, I can't really believe you're actually impressed by this empty gesture. Surely the plight of the country puts its vacuousness in perspective?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,302 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Valmont wrote: »
    That implies Michael D Higgins actually adds something of value to the state. Apart from his dubious socialist rhetoric, I can't think of much else he brings to the table.

    Patron of the Arts and all that, it isn't really about left or right politics which was a point his critics missed in the campaign. I wouldn't put him up as some major figure in the history state but when people looked at the alternatives and their pasts, he was seen as the safe bet.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,453 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Valmont wrote: »
    Considering he's being paid very handsomely in bailout money just to make speeches and shake hands, I can't really believe you're actually impressed by this empty gesture. Surely the plight of the country puts its vacuousness in perspective?

    Also I thought that the presidential salary was set to €250k before the elections which would make it a mandatory cut.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    He is full on Frankfurt school. So it is a good thing the role is ceremonial.

    He's on the left of the Labour party, but let's recall that he was part of the Rainbow cabinet, the same govt which introduced the 12.5% corporation tax rate...he's hardly Theodor Adorno.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    Heavily influenced by The Frankfurt School of theoreticians, such as Thomas Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, who integrated mass society critique into the analysis of monopoly capitalism, Michael D. Higgins sees "culture" as the set of customs, rituals and products that make up the way of life of every section of the community. As such, art is central to the democratic process and accessible to all.


    http://www.hotpress.com/archive/443615.html


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    Heavily influenced by The Frankfurt School of theoreticians, such as Thomas Adorno and Herbert Marcuse, who integrated mass society critique into the analysis of monopoly capitalism, Michael D. Higgins sees "culture" as the set of customs, rituals and products that make up the way of life of every section of the community. As such, art is central to the democratic process and accessible to all.

    A rigorously researched article, by the look of things...:pac:

    Whatever about Michael D's intellectual influences, the point is that he sat in govt with FG, and it's difficult to imagine an Adorno pulling up a chair with the likes of John Bruton. Thank God he has no power because he's "full-on Frankfurt School"? He was in power, as part of a centrist coalition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    Its not an article, its an interview asking MD about his influences. He hardly denied anything - it presumably wasn't political poison to be influenced by the Frankfurt school back in the day. This was 1993.
    Thank God he has no power because he's "full-on Frankfurt School"? He was in power, as part of a centrist coalition.

    Indeed, as part of a coalition. Adorno, were he given power would share it with anybody it took to get his ideology across. In any case Micky D is influenced by the Frankfurt school, as he is by other stuff, no doubt - like Irish culture, music etc. I was slightly tongue in cheek, but he is, nevertheless, influenced by Frankfurt, as are much of the 1968 generation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭Kinski


    Adorno, were he given power would share it with anybody it took to get his ideology across. In any case Micky D is influenced by the Frankfurt school, as he is by other stuff, no doubt - like Irish culture, music etc. I was slightly tongue in cheek, but he is, nevertheless, influenced by Frankfurt, as are much of the 1968 generation.

    Are we talking about Thomas or Theodor?

    So far as I'm aware, Adorno never sought any sort of power, but you only have to look at his contemptuous dismissal of 60s student radicalism to see that he wasn't interested in forging opportunistic alliances to advance his political ideas.

    I actually quite like the fact that we have a president who is interested in areas like political theory and sociology, rather than the anti-intellectual types we usually have in high office in Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    Yes, well it depends on the intellectual discipline. I would prefer a physicist.I personally think that the entire Frankfurt School of critical theory, Bloch, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse etc. and their antecedents Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx and G.W.F. Hegel are, to a man, charlatans. Also charlatans with blood stained hands.

    Hegel is probably the odd man out there, as a non-leftist - but its all bad philosophy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    Valmont wrote: »
    Considering he's being paid very handsomely in bailout money just to make speeches and shake hands, I can't really believe you're actually impressed by this empty gesture. Surely the plight of the country puts its vacuousness in perspective?

    Yes, I was waiting for this.
    If you can find me many more Irish people who would willingly take a paycut of a quarter of their salary I'd be very impressed. Especially as he's also refusing to take out the multiple pensions that he could be taking out.

    Neither do I agree with this notion that our politicians should be paid the AIW or even worse, the minimum wage. It's a job and should be paid as such, not auctioned off.

    The presidency is an important role, we've already seen how well Robinson and McAleese did the job. Merely as the role isn't policymaking doesn't make it pointless or worthless.

    Give him time in the role before casting judgement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    Quazzie wrote: »
    Also I thought that the presidential salary was set to €250k before the elections which would make it a mandatory cut.
    Untrue.
    It's set at €250k for the next president. Michael D took it voluntarily.
    Source -


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,453 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    Lockstep wrote: »
    Untrue.
    It's set at €250k for the next president. Michael D took it voluntarily.
    Source -

    I wasn't sure when that came into effect. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38,989 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    Indeed, many would do it for €250k, but how many would voluntarily choose to take €250k when they are entitled to €325k and this cannot be taken away by anyone? Factor in the pensions he is forgoing and it's a verysignificant amount of money that he is well able to claim but refuses to do so.
    Auctioning off public office ("I'll do it for less money than he will") I'm sure you'd agree isn't a good idea.
    Granted we could have gotten McGuinness who'd take the AIW but he made this a campaign point. Higgins, who refused to comment on it during the campaign and then voluntarily took paycuts and pension waivers once he got is far more admirable. IMHO


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    So, Mark from Poland...what does Bronisław Komorowski achieve that Higgins should emulate - congratulating Putin on victory perhaps???

    At least Vaclav Havel fought tooth and nail against Putin's abuses. Is it too much to expect Bronisław Komorowski to carry the torch? It sickens me to see a former eastern bloc President with dissident history lap-dogging through gritted teeth to Putin.

    “Lying can never save us from another lie.”
    Vaclav Havel


Advertisement
Advertisement