Should women value the relationship more?

Sindri · 18-01-2012 03:16PM

Look we all know women just go with men because they need someone to do manual labour.

Otherwise they'd all be lezzys.

Abi · 18-01-2012 03:19PM

K-9 wrote: »

That 1% makes all the difference.

I've already sent the "It's over" text :pac:

Abi · 18-01-2012 03:22PM

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

No wiki articles today I'm afraid. My opinion.

And out of curiosity, where was this derived from? Is it a personal experience of yours?

18-01-2012 03:30PM

I've no idea why, but this thread has actually boiled my blood a little.
Oh dear. Cup of tea required I think.

charlietheminxx · 18-01-2012 03:30PM

I don't think anybody really likes a needy partner. Male or female.

If a guy was more clingy in a relationship than me, I wouldn't like it, but similarly I wouldn't waste my time on someone who wasn't as interested in me as I was in them.

50/50 is where it's at.

nozzferrahhtoo · 18-01-2012 03:32PM

Deleted User wrote: »

I've no idea why, but this thread has actually boiled my blood a little.

Clearly because you care about the thread more than it cares about you and so the relationship was always doomed to failure. Also it doesnt want to have sex with your ugly ass either.... oh no wait thats the OPs GF. Got mixed up

kfallon · 18-01-2012 03:33PM

My head hurts

I prefer the more lighthearted threads in AH tbh!

Abi · 18-01-2012 03:33PM

Deleted User wrote: »

I've no idea why, but this thread has actually boiled my blood a little.
Oh dear. Cup of tea required I think.

It's based on a theory the OP has, shouldn't let it bother you.

Two sugars, drop of milk, stir to the left. Thanks doll :cool:

nozzferrahhtoo · 18-01-2012 03:36PM

Ok I will bite.... why left?

Beruthiel · 18-01-2012 03:37PM

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

IMO in order for a relationship between a man and woman to work well in all aspects the woman must value the relationship at least slightly more than the man.

Too bad for you Scanlas, you were born a century too late.

18-01-2012 03:39PM

nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »

Ok I will bite.... why left?

Because if you stir to the right, your cup will value you more and your cup-tea relationship will fail

18-01-2012 03:41PM

Abi wrote: »

It's based on a theory the OP has, shouldn't let it bother you.

Ah see I know that logically which was why I was all conflustered as to my annoyance :pac:

here you are dear

kfallon · 18-01-2012 03:41PM

nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »

Ok I will bite.... why left?

Everybody stirs to the left (as you are looking at the cup) don't they?

strobe · 18-01-2012 03:44PM

kfallon wrote: »

Everybody stirs to the left (as you are looking at the cup) don't they?

I stir in a figure of 8, like a boss.

Abi · 18-01-2012 03:44PM

nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »

Ok I will bite.... why left?

I'm a bit of a trickster see. All whoopie cushions and squirting flowers. It's a well known fact that if you stir anti-clockwise it creates a temporary black hole which sucks in the stirrer then closes up.

charlietheminxx · 18-01-2012 03:46PM

If you stirred anti-clockwise in the olden days they branded you a witch :pac:

nozzferrahhtoo · 18-01-2012 03:52PM

kfallon wrote: »

Everybody stirs to the left (as you are looking at the cup) don't they?

No idea I am not a tea or coffee drinker, or any drink in fact that requires one to stir anything into anything else. The only exception being the very occasional lemsip which I stir in both directions on the assumption that the sudden change of direction causes a sudden deceleration and acceleration in the opposite direction and so will increase the distribution of the particles.

It probably doesn’t but in my head it works. Someone a little more versed in the area of physics regarding the distributions of particles in a liquid needs to step in here and explain it… likely using words like Avogadro and Brownian and strange diagrams with spheres suspended in a beaker.

One thing I can safely say is that even if said person gets bogged down in details, analogies, diagrams and equations it will still be more engaging than what the thread WAS about.

dr.bollocko · 18-01-2012 04:02PM

Apparently I am supposed to give a reason for locking threads.

Surely it's so obvious I don't need to? Right?

You'd think that. But you'd be wrong.

So I am just going to leave my name as the last poster to indicate that I closed this thread.

That way, in the extremely unlikely (touch wood) event that somebody can not fathom why a thread of this calibre was closed, they can bother me with their questions because I really don't have anything better to do with my time anyway.

Should women value the relationship more?

Comments