Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Waco Seige

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Wattle wrote: »
    According to some the A.T.F. started the fire.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege
    The government maintains the fires were deliberately started by Davidians. Davidian survivors maintain the fires were accidentally or deliberately started by the tank assault.

    It was the FBI and not the ATF at that stage though, AFAIK.

    From the same source:
    FBI surveillance tapes from devices planted in the wall of the building record a man inside the compound saying "Everybody wake up, let's start to pray", then, "Pablo have you poured it yet" ..."Huh" ... "Have you poured it yet"... "in the hallway"... "things are poured, right?" CEV1 receives orders to spray two bottles of tear gas into left corner of building
    FBI surveillance tapes record a male Davidian saying, "The fuel has to go all around to get started." Then a second male says, "Well, there are two cans here, if that's poured soon."
    FBI surveillance records a meeting starting at 7:30 AM between several unidentified males.

    UM: "They got two cans of Coleman fuel down there? Huh?"
    UM: "Empty"
    UM: "All of it?"
    According to the goverment, a series of remarks like "I want a fire (...)", "keep that fire going" and "do you think I could light this soon?" indicate the Davidians have started setting fire to the complex around 11:30. Surviving Davidians testified that Coleman fuel had been poured, and fire experts in Danfort's report agree "without question" that people inside the complex had started multiple accelerated fires.

    So from the above it seems the Davidians did pour fuel all over the complex and started the fire.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    When they were saying "fire" they could of been taking about shooting at the Feds who came to immolate them. As is "fire your guns".

    Another thing that always interested me about this event - is how many atheists seem to think they deserved it as they were "religious nuts".

    For what it is worth, I worked for a US TV station at the time and we had a crew there and they all stated the fire was started by the ATF and they had their tapes of the event confescated. The only news footage of the attack was from a CNN camera miles away.

    It is outright mass murder by a government on a group of people to make an example of them. Practice for Iraq.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    It is outright mass murder by a government on a group of people to make an example of them. Practice for Iraq.

    What do you think should have been done then?

    They were breaking the law by stockpiling illegal weapons, and there were allegations of sexual abuse. The authorities attempted to execute a search warrant based on this and were met with a gun battle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    It is outright mass murder by a government on a group of people to make an example of them. Practice for Iraq.

    I don't doubt that mistakess were made in the final hours of the siege, but that appears to me to be down to poor planning and a degree of incompetence. Why would it be in the interests of a government agency like the FBI to commit "mass murder", had they ended the siege bloodlessly they would have been held as heroes? As for practising for Iraq, they must have known that George W Bush was going to be president one day and that he'd invade Iraq?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭ClovenHoof


    The allegations of sexual abuse were fabricated. Most of the children had left by the time the buring began. Koresh (whom I am not defending) allowed anyone who wanted to leave to go. Many did.

    That does not sound like a crazy suicidal cult leader to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,538 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    Paully D wrote: »

    So the Davidians did pour fuel all over the complex and started the fire.

    the atfs actions caused the fire, its clear as day on video, the day in question was extremely windy, they punched giant holes all over the building which meant a small fire would burn rapidly out of control in minutes throughout the compound, which it did

    firing dozens of flash/bang and pyrotechnique canisters into a wooden structure was insane, never mind one with huge gaping holes in it on a windy day, the atf will never admit they were wrong of course


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,795 ✭✭✭enfant terrible


    M5 wrote: »
    Cant watch it here in the USA, land of the free :rolleyes:

    Ya the US government must be blocking it :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Da Shins Kelly


    The details seem to be up in the air, but it does seem as though the cops had good reason to investigate the premises since David Koresh was keeping illegal weapons and the allegations of sexual abuse. That said, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if the cops engaged in some misconduct themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    The allegations of sexual abuse were fabricated. Most of the children had left by the time the buring began. Koresh (whom I am not defending) allowed anyone who wanted to leave to go. Many did.

    That does not sound like a crazy suicidal cult leader to me.

    Fair point.

    Some reading about the child abuse allegations for those interested:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Koresh
    The child abuse and sexual abuse claims have been widely circulated in the press coverage though it is often difficult to separate the purported claims from the evidence.[11] Koresh's doctrine of the House of David[12] did lead to spiritual marriages with both married and single women in the group and with at least one underage girl. The underage girl was Michele Jones, the younger sister of Koresh's legal wife Rachel and the daughter of life-long Davidians Perry and Mary Belle Jones. Koresh took Michele as a spiritual wife when she was thirteen, evidently with the consent of the Joneses. This means Koresh was in violation of state law and could have been prosecuted for statutory rape in Texas. A six-month investigation of child abuse allegations by the Texas Child Protection Services in 1992 failed to turn up any evidence likely because the Davidians concealed the spiritual marriage of Koresh to Michele Jones, assigning a surrogate husband (David Thibodeau), to the girl for the sake of appearances. [13] A second allegation involved an underage girl, Kiri Jewell, who testified in the Congressional hearings on Waco in 1995. She claimed Koresh engaged in improper sexual touching and other behaviors that would have brought sexual assault charges against him. There is no independent confirmation of this incident, however, and Kiri's family was split over whether they believed her story.

    Regarding the allegations of child abuse, the evidence is less compelling. In one widely reported incident, ex-members claimed that Koresh became irritated with the cries of his son Cyrus and spanked the child severely for several minutes on three consecutive visits to the child's bedroom. In a second report, Koresh was said to have beaten the eight-month old daughter of another member for approximately forty minutes until the girl's bottom bled. In a third incident, a man involved in a custody battle visited Mt. Carmel and claimed to have seen the beating of a young boy with a stick. [14] Finally, the FBI's justification for forcing an end to the 51 day standoff was predicated on the charge that Koresh was abusing children inside Mount Carmel. In hours following the deadly conflagration, Attorney General Janet Reno told reporters that "We had specific information that babies were being beaten." [15] But FBI Director William Sessions publicly denied the charge and told reporters that they had no such information about child abuse inside the Mount Carmel. [16] A careful examination of the other child abuse charges found the evidence to be weak and ambiguous, casting doubt on the allegations. [17]

    The allegations of child abuse stem largely from detractors and ex-members. [18] The 1993 U.S. Department of Justice report cites allegations of child sexual and physical abuse. But despite the merits of the charges, legal scholars point out that the ATF had no legal jurisdiction in the matter of child protection and it appears that these accounts were inserted by the ATF to inflame the case against Koresh. For example, the account of former Branch Davidian Jeannine Bunds is reproduced in the affidavit. She claimed that Koresh had fathered at least fifteen children with various women and that she had personally delivered seven of these children. Bunds also claims that Koresh would annul all marriages of couples who joined the group, had exclusive sexual access to the women, and would also have regular sexual relations with young girls,[19] though some of these charges are clearly exaggerated. [20] There is no question that Koresh had multiple children by different women in the group. His House of David doctrine based on a purported revelation involved the reproduction of 24 children by chosen women in the community. These 24 children were to serve as the ruling elders over the millennium after the return of Christ. In his book, James Tabor states that Koresh acknowledged on a videotape sent out of the compound during the standoff that he had fathered more than 12 children by several "wives."[21] On March 3, 1993, during negotiations to secure the release of the remaining children, Koresh advised the Negotiation Team that: "My children are different than those others," referring to his direct lineage versus those children previously released.

    At the time, in Texas, the age of parental consent for a minor to marry was 14, as was the age for consent to engage in sexual relations. In the documentary film, Waco: The Rules of Engagement (long version), Jack Harwell, Sheriff of McLennan County, stated: "You have to have proof to go into court . . . Keep in mind, too, that most of the girls who were involved were at least 14 years old and 14 year olds get married with parental consent. So if their parents were there and letting things happen in the way of sexual activities and what have you with their 14 year old kids, you have common law husbands and wives. Uh, I don’t say that I agree with that and that I approve of it. But at the same time, if parents are there and they’re giving parental consent, we have a problem with that in making a case."


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    If I may throw a side topic out there arising from such incidents as Waco...

    At what point does it seem appropriate that law officials should come politely (hopefully) knocking on doors, asking about why Mr Joe Soap or "XXXXX" organisation has one gun or a further 52 handguns, 15 sub-machine guns and 20 rocket launchers?

    Should law officials, even as basic as a street cop (or higher) have the right to ask questions without clear justification but with just reason for concern or maybe just puzzlement?

    Myself, I think in the public interest, where large sums of weapons are concerned (as in Waco), certainly at some level, appropriate questions should always be asked.
    Such questions being asked, being deeper in investigation to a possible increasing number of rumoured or confirmed weaponry.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭as125634do


    Pigs really messed this up


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ClovenHoof wrote: »
    It is outright mass murder by a government on a group of people to make an example of them. Practice for Iraq.
    Please explain

    I don't remember the US military being involved in Waco, they were far too busy in Somalia and soon to be in Bosnia. By then the Persian Gulf War with Iraq was over. The invasion of Kuwait was far in the future and only after lots of stuff in the Balkans and sub saharan Africa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,378 ✭✭✭Krieg


    Would love to watch the documentary, damn youtube wont load it.

    I only read about the jonestown massacre a couple of months ago when it was part of BBC news features and analysis. I couldnt believe that I never heard of the incident before, really shocking story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    The details seem to be up in the air, but it does seem as though the cops had good reason to investigate the premises since David Koresh was keeping illegal weapons and the allegations of sexual abuse. That said, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if the cops engaged in some misconduct themselves.

    The paraphrase bill hicks, there was allegations of sexual abuse against the catholic church but nobody sent bradley tanks into St Patricks Cathedral.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Bambi wrote: »
    The paraphrase bill hicks, there was allegations of sexual abuse against the catholic church but nobody sent bradley tanks into St Patricks Cathedral.
    St Patricks Cathedral = National Cathedral of the Church of Ireland (a church of the Anglican communion)


    oh and eh , bradley = not a tank


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭LighterGuy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    Plazaman wrote: »
    I remember watching it on the telly in a pub, it was on in the background and no one was really paying any attention. It was only when it showed an FBI guy in full riot gear getting shot and falling off a roof that people started to go, wait this isn't a film and looks very serious.

    The shooting of the ATF officer on the roof, was one of the enduring and unpleasant images from that day. The ATF commander knew in advance that the Davidians had been tipped off about the raid, yet he still proceeded with the operation. With all surprise lost, four ATF officers died in the initial raid. The next enduring enduring image for me, was the raging inferno being whipped up by the high winds. It all had a fatal inevitability about it, especially with a nut job like Koresh and the private army he had amassed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭Da Shins Kelly


    Bambi wrote: »
    The paraphrase bill hicks, there was allegations of sexual abuse against the catholic church but nobody sent bradley tanks into St Patricks Cathedral.

    Well, they should have done something about it. Just because they didn't on that occasion, doesn't mean they shouldn't have. If there's sexual abuse going on anywhere it should be investigated. Of course what happened at Waco was a tragedy and probably could have been avoided, but I do not believe that David Koresh was a good person. Marrying a 14 year old (even if it's an isolated incident) is not something that should be excused. Like I said, the police are probably guilty of engaging in misconduct, but so is David Koresh. He's not a f*cking martyr.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    Jim Jones was a true sociopath - a hardline communist and atheist

    Communism and atheism, the calling cards of the sociopath.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I thought they used CEVs and M88s, not Bradleys. (Just got off my Brad about an hour ago, actually.)

    As a frequent user of flash bangs I am reluctant to think they are likely to start a fire. Smoke grenades could, though, if they were used. I don't think tear gas grenades would.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    Jim Jones was a true sociopath - a hardline communist and atheist

    Communism and atheism, the calling cards of the sociopath.

    I never said that - the calling card of a sociopathic are charisma, the ability to lie and no moral hangups. It's not Jones's specific beliefs that were the problem, rather his ability to convince people. So no offence to atheists or communists was intended!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    Communism and atheism, the calling cards of the sociopath.

    Let's not forget 'democracy'. Psycopaths/sociopaths have been using that blatent con job for years to take a sh1t on everyones head. If you can manipulate most of the people some of the time and all that jazz..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    St Patricks Cathedral = National Cathedral of the Church of Ireland (a church of the Anglican communion)


    oh and eh , bradley = not a tank

    St Patricks Catherdral..New York. In the USA. Where the waco siege happened. Where Bill Hicks hailed from. Which was, oh and eh, not in Ireland.

    Oh and eh, I know what a bradley is so, oh an eh, maybe pay more attention to the bit that read "to paraphrase bill hicks"

    Oh and eh 2 minutes in. Bill Hicks= Bradley Tank



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Bambi wrote: »
    Bradley Tank

    Technicality a Bradley is not a tank, it is an APC. In use against civilians it could be considered a 'tank'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Technicality a Bradley is not a tank, it is an APC. In use against civilians it could be considered a 'tank'.

    I'll take a deep breath and repeat:

    I know what a f**king bradley is. I was paraphrasing Bill Hicks. Bill Hicks repeatedly used the term "bradley tank" in his rants on Waco.

    Does this need further explanation or are you up to speed now or what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    I never said that - the calling card of a sociopathic are charisma, the ability to lie and no moral hangups. It's not Jones's specific beliefs that were the problem, rather his ability to convince people. So no offence to atheists or communists was intended!

    I know, lol. The tongue was firmly planted in the cheek.
    No offense was taken, sure I'm a sociopath myself.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Marrying a 14 year old (even if it's an isolated incident) is not something that should be excused.
    Was it a real state licensed marriage ?

    Otherwise it's not legal. Simple as.



    US states differ a lot. About half will allow you to marry your cousin.

    The marriage age is increasing , but it's starting from very low.
    http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=116474
    In Kansas, the impetus was a 14-year-old pregnant girl who married her 22-year-old boyfriend. In Georgia, it was a 37-year-old woman who married her son’s 15-year-old friend and then bore his child. Both times, the older newlyweds landed in jail for having sex with a minor.

    ...
    The state with the lowest marriage age is New Hampshire, which allows 13-year-old girls and 14-year-old boys to marry
    ...
    Balch took up the cause after his 13-year-old daughter presented a Georgia judge with a pregnancy test and won permission to marry her 14-year-old boyfriend.
    ...
    “But some legislators were adamant about the illegitimacy issue. … By preventing someone who’s 14 or 15 from marrying, you’re guaranteeing illegitimacy for the child.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Bambi wrote: »
    I'll take a deep breath and repeat:

    I know what a f**king bradley is. I was paraphrasing Bill Hicks. Bill Hicks repeatedly used the term "bradley tank" in his rants on Waco.

    Does this need further explanation or are you up to speed now or what?

    I wasn't talking to you. Go back to sleep.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Bambi wrote: »
    Bradley Tank

    Technicality a Bradley is not a tank, it is an APC. In use against civilians it could be considered a 'tank'.


    Mine's a CFV, not an APC. Infantry use IFV. An APC version does exist (well, I believe it's advertised as multi function but can do the role) but is not in service anywhere.

    NTM


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    I wasn't talking to you. Go back to sleep.

    Oh silly me, how could i have got the impression that you were talking to me just because you quoted my post and only my post. :rolleyes:


Advertisement
Advertisement