Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 11/12 - Mod Note 4153

1182183185187188334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Because they want to sell, and nobody else will pay that



    Same situation with Villa and Bent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    We can't really offer him the money. I can't see the club smashing it's transfer wage cap for Tevez. It would be double of what the next best paid player is and then the floodgates would be opened.

    I don't think they will either, but I think paying Tevez £250k/wk makes more sense then paying Carroll and Bent a combined £160-180k/wk


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    doc_17 wrote: »
    Dalglish/Rush partnership was about 25 years ago. The game has changed. I just don't believe a real top team can carry a player like Bent who adds very little to geneal play.


    Rush tracked back and worked very hard outside the 18 yard box when the team did not have the ball. Rush and Bent are like chalk and cheese in terms of general play.


    Someone like Gary Lineker would have been a better comparison to Bent.


    But to touch on your point about a player who adds little to general play not being able for a top 4 team slot. It did not hurt United much when they had to "carry" van Nistelrooy. If the rest of the team is good enough as a unit, then a genuine finisher can be fit into the starting XI. Hell look at Torres for us, his general play was nothing special and he could go missing for large chunks of games yet still manage to find the net a few times in the same games.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,867 ✭✭✭✭5starpool




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    Same situation with Villa and Bent.

    Do Villa want to sell, or is that just hearsay?

    I doubt Villa are as anxious to see Bent go as City are to see Tevez go


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 845 ✭✭✭skydish79


    Would prefer us to target some quality in midfield before looking at the strikers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    Damn, I wanted Wilson for leeds


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Rush tracked back and worked very hard outside the 18 yard box when the team did not have the ball. Rush and Bent are like chalk and cheese in terms of general play.


    Someone like Gary Lineker would have been a better comparison to Bent.


    But to touch on your point about a player who adds little to general play not being able for a top 4 team slot. It did not hurt United much when they had to "carry" van Nistelrooy. If the rest of the team is good enough as a unit, then a genuine finisher can be fit into the starting XI. Hell look at Torres for us, his general play was nothing special and he could go missing for large chunks of games yet still manage to find the net a few times in the same games.

    It was someone else who made the Rush comparison not me! Wouldn't hear a bad word about him:D

    Van Nistlerooys time at United saw him score 30 plus a season. Every season. You can carry that. Not someone like Bent who'll get around 15 goals. Likewise torres, who had a favourbale goals to games ratio (during his time at Liverpool) and made an impact in the big games.

    But listen, if people want Darren Bent at Liverpool good luck to you. It's all about opinions...I don't rate Bent. Torres and Van Nistlerooy were class though and I think a cut above Darren Bent.

    We do need who is a better finisher yes but why can't they be useful in other departments as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Do Villa want to sell, or is that just hearsay?

    I doubt Villa are as anxious to see Bent go as City are to see Tevez go


    I think they want to sell because Bent doesn't want to be there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    skydish79 wrote: »
    Would prefer us to target some quality in midfield before looking at the strikers


    Would be my preference as well to strengthen there first. Get some genuine quality and steel.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Would be my preference as well to strengthen there first. Get some genuine quality and steel.

    When you have scored less goals than the bottom team in the league, your £35 million striker is not contributing and your main striker is banned for 8 games, I think a striker is a priority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,438 ✭✭✭livinginkorea


    We need a right poacher of a striker...loads of balls being knocked pass the goal with nobody on the end of them. Carroll sits back too far and doesn't know what to do. Hopefully we will get a decent one in the transfer window.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 34,985 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    I guess a point at home to Blackburn look like a better result today!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭jesus_thats_gre


    5starpool wrote: »

    This is ****..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    Bent would be such a short sighted signing, and he would cost a shed load. Terrible signing if it happened. Saying that I would not be one bit surprised if we ended up with him.

    As a previous poster said, Comolli's role needs looking at if the best we can come up with is Darren Bent, for all his contacts around the globe.

    He was not given an automatic start at Spurs however I do worry about his ability to cut it at a big club where he is under the microscope game in game out.

    Love to see us make a move for Higuain, although it would probably be more likely in the Summer. Terrific player, who is by no means a regular for Real.

    Huntelaar is another good shout, although the best time to sign him was when he was at Real aswell, he would cost a fortune now.

    I just feel that there has got to be an unknown out there that we can sign for a smaller fee. to coin the phrase, a fox in the box. I personally believe it has never been easier to be a striker in this Liverpool side, the amount of balls whipped across the 6 yard box has never been more plentiful. Fowler would have an absolute field day :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    Bent would be such a short sighted signing, and he would cost a shed load. Terrible signing if it happened. Saying that I would not be one bit surprised if we ended up with him.

    As a previous poster said, Comolli's role needs looking at if the best we can come up with is Darren Bent, for all his contacts around the globe.

    He was not given an automatic start at Spurs however I do worry about his ability to cut it at a big club where he is under the microscope game in game out.

    Love to see us make a move for Higuain, although it would probably be more likely in the Summer. Terrific player, who is by no means a regular for Real.

    Huntelaar is another good shout, although the best time to sign him was when he was at Real aswell, he would cost a fortune now.

    I just feel that there has got to be an unknown out there that we can sign for a smaller fee. to coin the phrase, a fox in the box. I personally believe it has never been easier to be a striker in this Liverpool side, the amount of balls whipped across the 6 yard box has never been more plentiful. Fowler would have an absolute field day :p

    Luuk De Jong has been watched numerous times by Liverool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Grayditch


    A certain result today makes me feels whole lot better about Stephens' Day where I took some amount of abuse from people who are about to get a text right about now... ;)


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 7,944 Mod ✭✭✭✭Yakult


    When you have scored less goals than the bottom team in the league, your £35 million striker is not contributing and your main striker is banned for 8 games, I think a striker is a priority.

    Tbf Andy deserves a run, especially with Gerrard coming back I think he could net a few along with other players. A new striker might not settle in either and if its between Bent and no one, I would rather no one and have faith with who we have already.

    If nothing by the end of January, then we should move for a striker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Grayditch wrote: »
    A certain result today makes me feels whole lot better about Stephens' Day where I took some amount of abuse from people who are about to get a text right about now... ;)

    Good man...don't go easy on them now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    Yakult wrote: »
    Tbf Andy deserves a run, especially with Gerrard coming back I think he could net a few along with other players. A new striker might not settle in either and if its between Bent and no one, I would rather no one and have faith with who we have already.

    If nothing by the end of January, then we should move for a striker.

    I think we need a better striker than Carroll if we are to finish in the top 4. He's simply not good enough for Liverpool. And showing no signs of improving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,692 ✭✭✭Dublin_Gunner


    skydish79 wrote: »
    Would prefer us to target some quality in midfield before looking at the strikers


    Definitely do not agree.

    Gerrard, Adam, Henderson, Shelvey & Spearing all for CM positions.

    Our problem don't lie in the centre of midfield, its with finishing.

    A consistent finisher is what we need. In fact, as someone mentioned him, a Gary Lineker would be perfect :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    doc_17 wrote: »
    It was someone else who made the Rush comparison not me! Wouldn't hear a bad word about him:D

    Van Nistlerooys time at United saw him score 30 plus a season. Every season. You can carry that. Not someone like Bent who'll get around 15 goals. Likewise torres, who had a favourbale goals to games ratio (during his time at Liverpool) and made an impact in the big games.

    But listen, if people want Darren Bent at Liverpool good luck to you. It's all about opinions...I don't rate Bent. Torres and Van Nistlerooy were class though and I think a cut above Darren Bent.

    We do need who is a better finisher yes but why can't they be useful in other departments as well.


    Sorry mate, I read your post as making the Rush comparison.

    As for Bent, well as already said I would not be keen on getting him as I don't think he would cost as much or even more than a better player, but I do think he would get more goals than what we have at the moment in the team, and I certainly think he would outscore Carroll.

    As for a 30 league goals a season man being easier for a team to carry than a 15 goal man, yeah he is. But a 15 goal man is easier to carry than a 5 to 7 goal man.

    If I was looking for a striker for the team right now, I would be trying to get the man that I thought would get the most goals and how he is in other departments would be a bonus but not essential as long as he can finish on a regular basis.

    Huntelaar would be my choice of target based on the above, and based on not making myself miserable dreaming of much more expensive players.
    Welliton I think would cost more than Huntelaar, but I think has way more potential and offers a bit more variety in attack thanks to his pace and skills.


    If the club wanted to spend big money again there is no shortage of names out there. Leanardo and Leandro Damiao just to throw two more brazilians into the mix.

    Cavani, Falcao, and Llorente to throw three more that would cost big money.


    Or we could go down the route of gambling on the likes of De jong, or Moestafa El Kabir as cheaper back up strikers that might have the potential to get better.


    Midfield is where I would want the club to bring in real quality first, but if a quality finisher was available and the club had the money to spare without it causing other transfers to be cancelled, then they would be mad not to at least try to bring someone in. Imho of course


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,224 ✭✭✭barone


    higuain from real madrid would be an awesome buy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Definitely do not agree.

    Gerrard, Adam, Henderson, Shelvey & Spearing all for CM positions.

    Our problem don't lie in the centre of midfield, its with finishing.

    A consistent finisher is what we need. In fact, as someone mentioned him, a Gary Lineker would be perfect :D




    Not one of the midfielders you named is good enough to add steel to the team or play in a DM role to a high level when we are under the cosh. Spearing is the only one that is a natural fit and he is simply not good enough. The other four are all better at the offensive side of things.

    I agree we have a major problem with finishing, but a steadier more solid platform behind the offensive players only makes us stronger as a unit.

    In an ideal world/window we would be trying to bring in quality for the CM position and a quality finisher.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Sorry mate, I read your post as making the Rush comparison.

    As for Bent, well as already said I would not be keen on getting him as I don't think he would cost as much or even more than a better player, but I do think he would get more goals than what we have at the moment in the team, and I certainly think he would outscore Carroll.

    As for a 30 league goals a season man being easier for a team to carry than a 15 goal man, yeah he is. But a 15 goal man is easier to carry than a 5 to 7 goal man.

    If I was looking for a striker for the team right now, I would be trying to get the man that I thought would get the most goals and how he is in other departments would be a bonus but not essential as long as he can finish on a regular basis.

    Huntelaar would be my choice of target based on the above, and based on not making myself miserable dreaming of much more expensive players.
    Welliton I think would cost more than Huntelaar, but I think has way more potential and offers a bit more variety in attack thanks to his pace and skills.


    If the club wanted to spend big money again there is no shortage of names out there. Leanardo and Leandro Damiao just to throw two more brazilians into the mix.

    Cavani, Falcao, and Llorente to throw three more that would cost big money.


    Or we could go down the route of gambling on the likes of De jong, or Moestafa El Kabir as cheaper back up strikers that might have the potential to get better.


    Midfield is where I would want the club to bring in real quality first, but if a quality finisher was available and the club had the money to spare without it causing other transfers to be cancelled, then they would be mad not to at least try to bring someone in. Imho of course

    We have created more chances than any other team in the League and have one of the best defensive records. I'd say our midfield is functioning adequately. I do think we'll add a defensive midfielder for a moderate fee. I think the club have recognised the Carroll will not push the team into a top 4 position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    barone wrote: »
    higuain from real madrid would be an awesome buy



    Quality finisher alright and young.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,867 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    On a positive note, we now have the joint best defence in the league again thanks to Blackburn.

    Also, Higuain is unattainable, but would obviously be an immense signing. Not going to happen though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Grayditch wrote: »
    A certain result today makes me feels whole lot better about Stephens' Day where I took some amount of abuse from people who are about to get a text right about now... ;)

    Wait until after they play Newcastle.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    Bent is a good finisher but surely a purchase like that would go against everything we have been hearing about the long term plan.

    I wouldn't be jizzing my pants if we bought him :o


    In other news ...
    Wilson is gone to Blackpool on loan .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    We have created more chances than any other team in the League and have one of the best defensive records. I'd say our midfield is functioning adequately. I do think we'll add a defensive midfielder for a moderate fee. I think the club have recognised the Carroll will not push the team into a top 4 position.


    Our midfield is doing alright, but nothing great either. I think genuine quality in the centre could see the midfield actually start to chip in with more by way of goals and assists, something that it has not been great at this season. I think a player that can bring some steel to the centre, along with genuine ball winning abilities would give more freedom to the attackers. I'm not talking about a CM that can only do the DM role though, I would be thinking of a very good allrounder who would be a step up on what we have.

    I do agree that a quality finisher is something we need, and that Carroll does not look like he will be that man anytime soon.

    I also think we need a proper right sided attacker that is good enough to force the other team into leaving gaps elsewhere in order to try and stop him.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement