Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 11/12 - Mod Note 4153

1181182184186187334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    Being attainable is completely different to stating "wouldn't go to Liverpool".

    Availability is the name of the game. Once you've the cash, most players will move these days.

    So name one world class player who would go to Liverpool at the moment, that would be in and around the price of Tevez


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    I wouldn't describe him as world class. I don't watch Villarreal every week though, and I'm not saying he hasn't the potential to be, but I wouldn't put him in the same bracket as Tevez

    Perhaps not in Tevez class but he's a good player. 27 caps for Italy too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Bent would be roughly the same price, and on half the money. That would work out at about £13m cheaper over two years for an average player, who's sell on value would probably be similar to Tevez's. I would hate to see Bent signed



    Bent was signed for £18m with the potential to rise to £24m depending on add-ons achieved. Supposedly Villa have said they aren't willing to accept to big of a lose on him to it seems they will obviously take a lose on him. I think £15m with add-ons to £18m could get it done. He won't be on half on what Tevez in either which would be £125k, he would be on about 80k. Bent is a proven goal-scorer, wouldn't any issues with him being signed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    Why would Tevez sign for us ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    World class needs to be defined properly, but regardless saying because we can't sign a world class striker we have to waste all our money on a known headcase is still stupid.

    There's new players every year that are going to be very good to great, let's find them.

    And if after all Comolli's scouting we end up with Darren Bent, I'm going to wonder just wtf he does.

    This is what I'm getting at. If there's an alternative to Tevez who could really add to the side, then great. But I genuinely think its going to be someone like Bent, overpriced and overrated


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    Bent was signed for £18m with the potential to rise to £24m depending on add-ons achieved. Supposedly Villa have said they aren't willing to accept to big of a lose on him to it seems they will obviously take a lose on him. I think £15m with add-ons to £18m could get it done. He won't be on half on what Tevez in either which would be £125k, he would be on about 80k. Bent is a proven goal-scorer, wouldn't any issues with him being signed.

    Everyone knows Liverpool are mugs in the transfer market, it would be £18m at the very least, if that's what Villa paid
    Why would Tevez sign for us ?

    Money. He'd obviously prefer Milan, but if they aren't willing to buy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    This is what I'm getting at. If there's an alternative to Tevez who could really add to the side, then great. But I genuinely think its going to be someone like Bent, overpriced and overrated

    I think it'll be Luuk De Jong from Twente for about £12 Million or so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,436 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    since when did tevez become world class, guy can't even start for argentina


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    since when did tevez become world class, guy can't even start for argentina

    Is that not because him and the Manager don't get on? An unusual situation for Tevez


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Is that not because him and the Manager don't get on? An unusual situation for Tevez

    Its because he can't play with Messi. He gets in Messi's way. Aguero, Lavezzi, Higuain to compete with also.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    This is what I'm getting at. If there's an alternative to Tevez who could really add to the side, then great. But I genuinely think its going to be someone like Bent, overpriced and overrated

    There's plenty of players all around the word that could add to this side. Just because the British and Irish media doesn't report about them doesn't mean they don't exist.

    Nobody over here knew much about Soldado or Cavani two years ago when they signed for their respective clubs, did that stop them becoming two of the best goalscorers in Europe ?

    There are always players. We don't need to limit ourselves to Carlos Tevez.

    And if Tevez would sign for the money what makes you think someone esle won't ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Everyone knows Liverpool are mugs in the transfer market, it would be £18m at the very least, if that's what Villa paid


    So why would City accept £25m from us if we are mugs? Probably end up costing closer to £35m then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Has anyone said he had a great game?!


    Pretty sure that at least one person said he was excellent in the second half and average in the first.

    How anyone saw him being excellent even for one half last night is beyond me. He improved after Gerrard came on, but was nowhere near good let alone excellent in the second half. Pretty average at best for the second half and worse in the first half.

    Part of me actually dreads the reaction to when he gets a goal tbh, as I think it will lead to a run of comments saying he had just proven how good he is, rather then it being seen as hopefully the fist of many and a step in the right direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    darren Bent signing for Liverpoo would be a major mistake.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    doc_17 wrote: »
    darren Bent signing for Liverpoo would be a major mistake.

    Would it? He would definitely score goals for Liverpool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    Name one world class striker who right now would be attainable?


    Why does it have to be a world class striker? A good to very good finisher would have a field day with the chances Liverpool creates.


    Welliton
    Huntelaar
    Bent

    Would be three that spring to mind in the 25 to 28yo bracket of good finishers that have good track records in terms of goals to games that I think would stand a very good chance of having an immediate impact.

    Welliton I think would be amazing in the EPL, as he has so much to his game.

    Huntelaar is just a proven finisher over close to a decade of play and would be the kind of 18 yard predator that could excel at Liverpool.

    Bent I don't actually want as I think he could cost silly money due to being English but I do think that he would get a fair few goals in the current Liverpoool side.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    Ayala starts for Norwich


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    The main stiker for top teams should be more than a goalscorer....look at Rooney, Van P, Adebayor, Drogba, Aguero. They are all prolific but their all round general contribution is important as well and they create as well. It's this type of player we should be looking for. Not someone who lies up front and sticks it in from 2 yards and does little else.

    I understand pople saying we need more goals but we can be a little bit more ambitious in our targets as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭stumpypeeps


    doc_17 wrote: »
    The main stiker for top teams should be more than a goalscorer....look at Rooney, Van P, Adebayor, Drogba, Aguero. They are all prolific but their all round general contribution is important as well and they create as well. It's this type of player we should be looking for. Not someone who lies up front and sticks it in from 2 yards and does little else.

    I understand pople saying we need more goals but we can be a little bit more ambitious in our targets as well.

    Dalglish had Rush. Suarez needs a Rush.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭Sappy404


    Can't understand this Tevez talk. He'd be just as unhappy at Liverpool as he is at City. This talk about him being the only striker of his class who is available is strictly speaking true, but there's a very good reason why he's available, and ignoring that and just looking at his abilities on the pitch is incredibly naive.

    If we can get him on loan on a pay-as-you-play deal, then maybe. Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal would all be looking for him too though, and London is a much more suitable destination for him given his propensity for fooking off back to South America whenever he feels like it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    There's plenty of players all around the word that could add to this side. Just because the British and Irish media doesn't report about them doesn't mean they don't exist.

    Nobody over here knew much about Soldado or Cavani two years ago when they signed for their respective clubs, did that stop them becoming two of the best goalscorers in Europe ?

    There are always players. We don't need to limit ourselves to Carlos Tevez.

    And if Tevez would sign for the money what makes you think someone esle won't ?

    I'm not disputing your first part of your post, but I've seen nothing to suggest the club look beyond the realms of the UK

    The reasoning I'm advocating signing Tevez is that I think the alternative would be someone along the lines of Darren Bent. If they are looking beyond that, then great, but otherwise I'd take Tevez

    I think Tevez would sign because he doesn't have many alternatives who could offer him the money. Any other player with his ability would have a number of clubs after him, many of whom could offer more money, and CL football


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    doc_17 wrote: »
    The main stiker for top teams should be more than a goalscorer....look at Rooney, Van P, Adebayor, Drogba, Aguero. They are all prolific but their all round general contribution is important as well and they create as well. It's this type of player we should be looking for. Not someone who lies up front and sticks it in from 2 yards and does little else.

    I understand pople saying we need more goals but we can be a little bit more ambitious in our targets as well.

    Suarez? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Dalglish/Rush partnership was about 25 years ago. The game has changed. I just don't believe a real top team can carry a player like Bent who adds very little to geneal play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    doc_17 wrote: »
    The main stiker for top teams should be more than a goalscorer....look at Rooney, Van P, Adebayor, Drogba, Aguero. They are all prolific but their all round general contribution is important as well and they create as well. It's this type of player we should be looking for. Not someone who lies up front and sticks it in from 2 yards and does little else.

    I understand pople saying we need more goals but we can be a little bit more ambitious in our targets as well.


    Put a quality finisher in the same team as Suarez and I think that you would see Suarez improve a lot in terms of his goals to games. I think with a good finisher in the team he would be more like the player he was for Ajax (expecially that period when he had Huntelaar as the Ajax striker) and more like the player he is for his country.

    A quality finisher in the team would cause more space in and around the box for Suarez (and for the rest of our attackers) and create more time for them as a result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,093 ✭✭✭✭Tusky


    I think we need to consider where we are and what we have when buying a striker.

    We currently have:

    Suarez
    Carroll
    Bellamy
    Kuyt

    What will it mean for Carroll if we sign another striker? He will just fall further down the pecking order. I think we need to make a decision. Either stick with him and hope he improves, or sell him, cutting our losses and invest big in someone else.

    A lot of the names being suggested on here aren't good enough to be our main striker, but are merely being suggested because they are better than Carroll. But in that scenario we would have paid £35m+whatever for two players, neither of which are really the quality we are after.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭ynwa_17


    Danny Wilson has signed for Blackpool on loan:
    Liverpool defender Danny Wilson has joined Blackpool on loan until the end of the season.

    The 20-year-old Scotland international has found opportunities at Anfield hard to come by since his £2million move from Rangers in July 2010.

    Wilson has featured just once for Liverpool this term and will join Ian Holloway's side in their push for promotion back to the Premier League.

    Wilson is the second Liverpool player to join the Tangerines this season after Jonjo Shelvy enjoyed two successful months with the Championship side before he was recalled at the end of November.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2080684/Danny-Wilson-joins-Blackpool-loan.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

    Very decent deal for us. Blackpool play some good football as was seen when Shelvey was there so it'll be good for him to ge first team action.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Suarez? :confused:

    I'd like to see him score more goals to be honest. He is a top player though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,325 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Put a quality finisher in the same team as Suarez and I think that you would see Suarez improve a lot in terms of his goals to games. I think with a good finisher in the team he would be more like the player he was for Ajax (expecially that period when he had Huntelaar as the Ajax striker) and more like the player he is for his country.

    A quality finisher in the team would cause more space in and around the box for Suarez (and for the rest of our attackers) and create more time for them as a result.

    I don't disagree with any of that but all I'm saying is that Darren Bent shouldn't be that man...for the money we'd have to fork out and his age i think there would be better options


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    tommyhaas wrote: »
    I'm not disputing your first part of your post, but I've seen nothing to suggest the club look beyond the realms of the UK

    The reasoning I'm advocating signing Tevez is that I think the alternative would be someone along the lines of Darren Bent. If they are looking beyond that, then great, but otherwise I'd take Tevez

    I think Tevez would sign because he doesn't have many alternatives who could offer him the money. Any other player with his ability would have a number of clubs after him, many of whom could offer more money, and CL football


    We can't really offer him the money. I can't see the club smashing it's transfer wage cap for Tevez. It would be double of what the next best paid player is and then the floodgates would be opened.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭tommyhaas


    So why would City accept £25m from us if we are mugs? Probably end up costing closer to £35m then.

    Because they want to sell, and nobody else will pay that
    Kess73 wrote: »
    Why does it have to be a world class striker? A good to very good finisher would have a field day with the chances Liverpool creates.


    Welliton
    Huntelaar
    Bent

    Would be three that spring to mind in the 25 to 28yo bracket of good finishers that have good track records in terms of goals to games that I think would stand a very good chance of having an immediate impact.

    Welliton I think would be amazing in the EPL, as he has so much to his game.

    Huntelaar is just a proven finisher over close to a decade of play and would be the kind of 18 yard predator that could excel at Liverpool.

    Bent I don't actually want as I think he could cost silly money due to being English but I do think that he would get a fair few goals in the current Liverpoool side.

    I didn't say he had to be world class, I was just responding to another poster implying that Liverpool can at the minute attract world class players. Of the above, I'd love to see Huntelaar sign, Welliton I don't know much about, and Bent as I said I think is overrated and overpriced, which probably makes him the most likely


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement