Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Crisp wrapper blockage killed family

«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    is this the one about the carbon monoxide?

    edit: my sympathy left when I saw it was the huge bag the 10+ packets of crisps come in. what numpty puts one of those on a fire :confused:

    asking for it :rolleyes:

    Mod: Poster banned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,475 ✭✭✭bitemybanger


    You couldn't do that if you tried.
    Have you ever tried lighting a fire from a lit cigarette? It dosnt work but DON'T fall asleep holding one or else!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,084 ✭✭✭dubtom


    Saila wrote: »
    is this the one about the carbon monoxide?
    yes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    dubtom wrote: »

    This is shocking, how something so simple as a crisp packet could kill those poor people. I'm constantly telling my Wife,who is a compulsive fire messer,to stay away from it.

    Bit more than an empty pack of crisps....
    It has been learned that a large plastic wrapper from a crisp multi-pack caused a blockage and sent the deadly fumes into the living room where the family was watching television.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭44leto


    I am shocked at the simplicity of the cause of this tragedy.

    All smoke alarms should be routinely fitted with carbon monoxide detectors. It would not be that expensive to impose this extra standard on the manufactures, besides people would be willing to pay the extra cost.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,084 ✭✭✭dubtom


    Nodin wrote: »
    Bit more than an empty pack of crisps....
    What difference does it make if the wrapper was big or small,3 people died as a result of it FFS.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭ItsAWindUp


    Saila wrote: »
    is this the one about the carbon monoxide?

    edit: my sympathy left when I saw it was the huge bag the 10+ packets of crisps come in. what numpty puts one of those on a fire :confused:

    asking for it :rolleyes:

    Charming


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    dubtom wrote: »
    What difference does it make if the wrapper was big or small,3 people died as a result of it FFS.

    one of them is just a dumb thing to do, the other wins a darwin award with 2 other defenceless child victims

    Mod: Poster banned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 631 ✭✭✭sligono1


    Saila wrote: »
    is this the one about the carbon monoxide?

    edit: my sympathy left when I saw it was the huge bag the 10+ packets of crisps come in. what numpty puts one of those on a fire :confused:

    asking for it :rolleyes:


    here now what sort of comment is that three people are dead and a family that will never be the same.

    isnt it easy for you to hide behind your keyboard and sling such pathetic comments,no your the numpty saila


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    ItsAWindUp wrote: »
    Charming

    doesnt change the fact he was asking for it though

    Mod: Poster banned.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭ItsAWindUp


    Saila wrote: »
    doesnt change the fact he was asking for it though

    What a pathetic insensitive comment to make


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    dubtom wrote: »
    What difference does it make if the wrapper was big or small,3 people died as a result of it FFS.

    ...because the idea that a small piece of plastic can block a chimney and kill a family (a) causes needless panic and (b) isn't what happened.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭msg11


    How did it block it ? Would it not have melted in the fire, I don't really understand to be honest?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭ItsAWindUp


    msg11 wrote: »
    How did it block it ? Would it not have melted in the fire, I don't really understand to be honest?

    Maybe the chimney was already partially blocked? It's a strange one all right


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 631 ✭✭✭sligono1


    Saila wrote: »
    doesnt change the fact he was asking for it though


    sad sad person.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭44leto


    Saila wrote: »
    is this the one about the carbon monoxide?

    edit: my sympathy left when I saw it was the huge bag the 10+ packets of crisps come in. what numpty puts one of those on a fire :confused:

    asking for it :rolleyes:

    Who put the wrapper on the fire was it one of the children??

    And most don't even know the dangers of CO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    44leto wrote: »
    All smoke alarms should be routinely fitted with carbon monoxide detectors. It would not be that expensive to impose this extra standard on the manufactures, besides people would be willing to pay the extra cost.

    Bit tricky, that one.
    Carbon monoxide is heavy (-er than normal air) and usually builds up in a pool on the floor, rising slowly ...whereas smoke detectors usually are on the ceiling because smoke rises.

    EDIT
    I've since learned that I was wrong.
    Carbon monoxide is lighter than air ...it's CO2 that I was thinking of


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    msg11 wrote: »
    How did it block it ? Would it not have melted in the fire, I don't really understand to be honest?

    If you put a piece of paper on the fire that isn't crumpled up, the heated air can catch it and blow it up the chimney. Presumably thats what happened here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    msg11 wrote: »
    How did it block it ? Would it not have melted in the fire, I don't really understand to be honest?

    with the wind lately it could easily have been suked up the chimney when they threw it on the fire and not had a chance to burn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,037 ✭✭✭Plazaman


    Saila wrote: »
    one of them is just a dumb thing to do, the other wins a darwin award with 2 other defenceless child victims

    What am I missing here. Nowhere in the article does it say Mr Wallwork put the package into the fire.

    Regardless of if he did or not, 3 people have died and so a keyboard warrior ups and decides they deserved it ???


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭jcf


    How the hell did this manage to block the fumes and redirect them to the living room ??

    surely it would shrivel up and burn ?

    or was it the fumes from the plastic itself that killed them ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 239 ✭✭meemeep


    taken from www.carbonmonoxide.ie:
    The incomplete combustion of organic fossil fuels such as oil, gas or coal is a common environmental source of CO and is responsible for many cases of non-fatal unintentional CO poisoning.

    In normal conditions the combustion process (the addition of oxygen) will result in carbon in the fossil fuel, combining with oxygen, in the air, to produce Carbon Dioxide (CO2), the same substance we exhale when we breathe.

    However, if there is a lack of air for the combustion process or the heating appliance is faulty, Carbon Monoxide can be produced.

    So if the chimney was blocked and no air was getting through - I guess it could happen. Freaky and very sad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭sunflower27


    There's always going to be someone that needs to get in with the crass comment.

    I think all of us have done stupid things in our pasts that could have gone horribly wrong and thankfully didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭henryporter


    Judging by some of the dumb questions so far, it's surprising tragedies like this aren't more prevalent. Fireplaces are for burning fuel, not rubbish. Regardless I have nothing but the utmost sympathy for the poor mother of the two children, nobody deserves to go through such pain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    jcf wrote: »
    How the hell did this manage to block the fumes and redirect them to the living room ??

    surely it would shrivel up and burn ?

    or was it the fumes from the plastic itself that killed them ?

    A semi-melted sheet of big plastic being sucked up the chimney and blocking the flue (which usually is rather small in diameter) seems possible.

    The other problem then is the remains of the fire. The article talks about glowing embers. While these don't usually produce smoke anymore, they still burn a huge amount of oxygen (and produce huge amounts of CO and CO2) ...but due to the lack of smoke you wouldn't notice that the chimney is blocked as CO and CO2 are odourless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭M cebee


    Saila wrote: »
    dubtom wrote: »
    What difference does it make if the wrapper was big or small,3 people died as a result of it FFS.

    one of them is just a dumb thing to do, the other wins a darwin award with 2 other defenceless child victims

    you deserve a darwin award for pathetic,insensitive comments if not trolling

    prob one of kids threw it in fire anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    Plazaman wrote: »
    What am I missing here. Nowhere in the article does it say Mr Wallwork put the package into the fire.

    Regardless of if he did or not, 3 people have died and so a keyboard warrior ups and decides they deserved it ???

    eh no, I said or at least meant if a huge crisp packet gets put on a fire it is a dumb thing to do. period. if a child does it there are supervision issues. we will never know, all we can take from what has happened is it was a tragic accident and Im sorry to hear it like most.

    the facts according to the article are this big crisp packet was put on after it was on its way out [this is what embers are] and blocked the chimney causing the build up of carbon monoxide gas which caused their suffocation and death.

    RIP either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Tragic but people do ridiculous things. I've lost people close to me who are gone more to their own mistakes than anyone else, as much as you'd like to blame others who were at fault in the second degree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭M cebee


    Saila wrote: »
    Plazaman wrote: »
    What am I missing here. Nowhere in the article does it say Mr Wallwork put the package into the fire.

    Regardless of if he did or not, 3 people have died and so a keyboard warrior ups and decides they deserved it ???

    eh no, I said or at least meant if a huge crisp packet gets put on a fire it is a dumb thing to do. period. if a child does it there are supervision issues. we will never know, all we can take from what has happened is it was a tragic accident and Im sorry to hear it like most.

    the facts according to the article are this big crisp packet was put on after it was on its way out [this is what embers are] and blocked the chimney causing the build up of carbon monoxide gas which caused their suffocation and death.

    RIP either way.

    you cant determine there are supervision issues here

    leave it alone


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    Wow - that is bizarre.
    I saw this on the news when it happened and assumed another murder, murder, suicide by the Dad.

    I am truly shocked about this, not being bad but surely it has to be on the TV Show - 100 weirdest ways to die.

    Was the crisp packet thrown on the fire and the fumes from the packet killed them or was the chimney blocked by the crisp packet and the smoke from the "normal" fire got them ??


Advertisement
Advertisement