US, Britain planning to attack Iran

ejmaztec · 03-11-2011 07:05PM

baraca wrote: »

He's british.

Until the British finally get some sense and ditch NI.:pac:

Guy:Incognito · 03-11-2011 07:06PM

Meh, some lads over on the ct forum knew it was "definately" going to happen within days about 2 years ago.

V_Moth · 03-11-2011 07:07PM

So its 1953 again is it?

mfceiling · 03-11-2011 07:07PM

I support this war of terror...

ejmaztec · 03-11-2011 07:08PM

It'll be a longer haul than Iraq, because the Iranians haven't been stripped of all of their weapons.

V_Moth · 03-11-2011 07:12PM

Freddie59 wrote: »

Yeah, lets see. Hitler/Japan or the USA? You wouldn't be posting here only for the USA my friend.:rolleyes:

Yeah, let's give nuclear weapons to a tyrant whose declared aim is the annihilation of, firstly, Israel, and then the West. Great plan.

A nation which had pledged to fight to the last man, costing millions of Allied lives. A nation which was releasing bubonic plague-infected fleas, a nation which cut babies from pregnant women during the rape of Nanking.

Only mistake the USA has made is in not using nukes to quell these despots, instead of sacrificing thousands of young American lives.

Let's see, despotic totalitarian regimes like Iran or the USA?:rolleyes: I know who I'm choosing.

Troll Post.

mcmoustache · 03-11-2011 07:20PM

ejmaztec wrote: »

Until the British finally get some sense and ditch NI.:pac:

NI isn't a part of Britain. Both Britain and NI are parts of the UK.

*removes pedantic hat*

purplepanda · 03-11-2011 07:21PM

So Iran isn't allowed to have nukes but Israel is? I thought there was a treaty stopping the spread of these weapons, some states have given them up at least, Ukraine & South Africa for example

Will this conflict get the support of Russia & China, or will the west go it alone, what about the EU?

Doubt if the population of any of the nations involved will get any real say in all of this, what about the cost? Do people want their taxes spent on more wars & the aftermath?

Seems to me that governments take their orders from anyone but their own people!!!!!:mad:

mcmoustache · 03-11-2011 07:22PM

I wonder how the Russians and the Chinese will react...

suicide_circus · 03-11-2011 07:23PM

Isrealis gunning for preemptive strikes...well go ahead lads, you have the bomb and large well trained experienced armed forces, youre local, directly involved, well able for it...off yiz go.
Sure yiz didnt sent any troops to Iraq to help your allies, its only fair yous take this one.

alphanine · 03-11-2011 07:26PM

RobitTV wrote: »

The Middle east is in enough trouble, the last thing we need is a unpredictable country with a evil regime in control of highly dangerous Weapons.

If iran completes it's goal of having a Nuclear arsenal this will only create a middle east arms race spreading all over the middle east. Country after country having control of all sorts of Nuclear weapon's and other highly offensive weapons.

Fear and panic will then spread worldwide, countries near the middle east will also build up and other's will then join to make sure they can compete with their "next door neighbours".

It will all end with a worldwide mass build up of nuclear weapons and worldwide relations will then decrease to rock bottom.

Soon other corrupt countries will then sell nuke's to important members of the population, they will create their own group's to bring other countries to their knees.

There will then come a time where the world enter's the mother of all war's continent's will fight and fall. Then billions will die from nuclear fallout.

Then the world will become a uninhabitable place for human's and creatures and any other living thing in ever born on this planet. Who knows what happen's next? .......

Best post I've read in a long time

RobitTV · 03-11-2011 07:27PM

purplepanda wrote: »

So Iran isn't allowed to have nukes but Israel is? I thought there was a treaty stopping the spread of these weapons, some states have given them up at least, Ukraine & South Africa for example

Will this conflict get the support of Russia & China, or will the west go it alone, what about the EU?

Doubt if the population of any of the nations involved will get any real say in all of this, what about the cost? Do people want their taxes spent on more wars & the aftermath?

Seems to me that governments take their orders from anyone but their own people!!!!!:mad:

Israel does not have nuclear weapons

It has ballistic missiles which has a capability to CARRY nuclear bombs inside.

But israel does not contain actual Nuclear bombs

df1985 · 03-11-2011 07:28PM

as much as i wouldnt want Iran with nuclear weapons, are they not perfectly entitled to have them if they want them?

who sets the rules that the US,UK etc can have them but Iran cant?

Wheres this list of countries than can have them and those that cant?

cosmicfart · 03-11-2011 07:29PM

Freddie59 wrote: »

Yeah, lets see. Hitler/Japan or the USA? You wouldn't be posting here only for the USA my friend.:rolleyes:

Japan.

JONJO THE MISER · 03-11-2011 07:31PM

Ireland is to close its embassy in Iran, coincidence i think not.

latenia · 03-11-2011 07:33PM

Batsy wrote: »

The Daily Mail is a great newspaper. In fact, it's the best British newspaper there is.

From 0:11

cosmicfart · 03-11-2011 07:34PM

Freddie59 wrote: »

Yeah, let's give nuclear weapons to a tyrant whose declared aim is the annihilation of, firstly, Israel, and then the West. Great plan.

Who is giving them nuclear weapons they are making them themselves.

Freddie59 wrote: »

A nation which had pledged to fight to the last man, costing millions of Allied lives. A nation which was releasing bubonic plague-infected fleas, a nation which cut babies from pregnant women during the rape of Nanking.

If it were my nation I would fight to the last man, I guess you would not?
'bubonic plague-infected fleas' lol u watch to much discovery sci-fi

Freddie59 wrote: »

Only mistake the USA has made is in not using nukes to quell these despots, instead of sacrificing thousands of young American lives.

So you are approving of Nuclear holocaust then? u do realise dropping nuclear bombs does have an after effect?

Freddie59 wrote: »

Let's see, despotic totalitarian regimes like Iran or the USA?:rolleyes: I know who I'm choosing.

George W Bush???

suicide_circus · 03-11-2011 07:37PM

RobitTV wrote: »

israel does not contain actual Nuclear bombs

I dont believe that for a second.

RobitTV · 03-11-2011 07:40PM

suicide_circus wrote: »

I dont believe that for a second.

If they did, im pretty sure they would of threatened iran with them by now.

SafeSurfer · 03-11-2011 07:42PM

Freddie59 wrote: »

Yeah, lets see. Hitler/Japan or the USA? You wouldn't be posting here only for the USA my friend.:rolleyes:

The Russians defeated Nazi Germany in World War Two. They had 12 million military personel killed, the US had 407,000. The German military suffered over 75% of their losses on the Eastern front.

Yeah, let's give nuclear weapons to a tyrant whose declared aim is the annihilation of, firstly, Israel, and then the West. Great plan.

Sources? The annihalation of Israel quote has been accepted by all but the most hawkish as a deliberate mistranslation.

A nation which had pledged to fight to the last man, costing millions of Allied lives. A nation which was releasing bubonic plague-infected fleas, a nation which cut babies from pregnant women during the rape of Nanking.

Whats bubonic plague compared to a couple of atom bombs.

fedor.2. · 03-11-2011 07:48PM

JONJO THE MISER wrote: »

Ireland is to close its embassy in Iran, coincidence i think not.

They're also closing the one in the vatican. Its cost cutting.

suicide_circus · 03-11-2011 07:48PM

RobitTV wrote: »

If they did, im pretty sure they would of threatened iran with them by now.

You think they would, without direct provocation, openly threaten a neighbour with a nuclear strike?
Eh...no.

Ulysses Gaze · 03-11-2011 07:51PM

RobitTV wrote: »

The British Ministry of Defence is stepping up its contingency plans for a potential military strike against Iran as concerns grow over the Middle Eastern power’s nuclear programme, sources claim.

Reports last night that the UK was prepared to support the United States in any military action against Tehran came as Israel started testing ballistic missiles, raising fears of conflict within the region.

The US is believed to have told the MoD that it may decide to accelerate its plans for targeted missile strikes against key Iranian facilities.

British officials are thought to have told Washington that if it pushes ahead it will receive UK military help for any mission, despite some reservations within the coalition.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi promises 'brutal response' to any attack on Islamic Republic, tells US to 'think twice before putting themselves on collision course with Tehran.

Yesterday it was revealed that Tel Aviv had successfully test-fired a rocket capable of carrying a nuclear warhead which could strike Iran.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak are reportedly agitating for a pre-emptive attack against the Islamic state.

News 1
News 2
News 3
News 4
News 5

Israel has the largest airforce in the region.

Let them attack Iran.

The Internet Explorer · 03-11-2011 07:53PM

Laugh out loud with sheer and utter despair.

Rolling on floor laughing.

Rolling on floor laughing with confusion and anger.

SafeSurfer · 03-11-2011 07:56PM

df1985 wrote: »

as much as i wouldnt want Iran with nuclear weapons, are they not perfectly entitled to have them if they want them?

who sets the rules that the US,UK etc can have them but Iran cant?

Wheres this list of countries than can have them and those that cant?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty

RobitTV · 03-11-2011 07:57PM

suicide_circus wrote: »

You think they would, without direct provocation, openly threaten a neighbour with a nuclear strike?
Eh...no.

If israel does have nuclear weapons

The UN Nuclear watchdog would of found out a long time ago, Israel does not need nuke's it has the largest air force in the region.

There has been no confirmation israel contains Nuclear weapons, it's basically illegal not to tell the UN.

Anyway i'd trust israel any day over Iran.

tallaghtmick · 03-11-2011 07:59PM

I better get to play GTA 5 before we die from a nuclear winter :mad:

HovaBaby · 03-11-2011 08:00PM

If anything happens I hope the nuclear weapons are took down quick, Ireland is next to London after all.

Ruire · 03-11-2011 08:02PM

RobitTV wrote: »

Israel does not have nuclear weapons

It has ballistic missiles which has a capability to CARRY nuclear bombs inside.

But israel does not contain actual Nuclear bombs

"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/sep/21/israelandthepalestinians.bookextracts

Also, the story of the man who was arrested and jailed for revealing Israel's nuclear weapons plan back in 1986 - http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/21/international/middleeast/21CND-NUCL.html?scp=1&sq=Vanunu%20drugged&st=cse

TheMilkyPirate · 03-11-2011 08:02PM

losthorizon wrote: »

Its the British and the Israelis with their French developed Nuclear weapons (against the nuclear non proliferation treaty pact) that are stoking it up more than the Americans.

Odd, considering the terrible goings on in Syria (a regieme Israel is quite content to see continue on in power and in Bahrain (an ally of Britain and of the US)

http://www.euronews.net/2011/11/03/uk-prepares-for-conflict-with-iran/

http://www.euronews.net/2011/11/03/iran-warns-us-against-collision-course-over-nuclear-programme

I've no idea why you quoted me in this post, I was just pointing out to someone that KeithAFC considers himself British not Irish

US, Britain planning to attack Iran

Comments