Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What would happen if a Unionist ran for the Irish Presidency?

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭whubee


    a kick in the balls/flaps is what would happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Here's a clue, Douglas Hyde and Erskine Childers were both Protestants.

    Protestent =/= unionist though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭NSNO


    I suppose it would depend on the type of Unionist. A Union Flag-waving Orangeman would be laughed out of whatever room he first broached the idea in.

    However, if David Norris' letter to the Israeli judge had never come to light then he would've stood a very good chance of being elected. As someone in favour of at the very least looking at the issue of Commonwealth membership, combined with his accent and his Anglicanism, he might be the closest thing to a 'unionist' that would stand a chance at becoming President.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    wolfpawnat wrote: »
    Indeed many of Irelands greatest republicans were, hell Sam MaGuire got a cup named after him and he was Protestant!

    Protestant does not always suggest Unionist, nor does Catholic always suggest Nationalist :)

    Indeed particularly in the south of ireland were we lack the degree of sectarianism.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 686 ✭✭✭headmaster


    A protestant has already held the office, or am I mistaken? Oops, i've gone back over the posts and had my query answered. Anyway, it would be great to see it happen as they would be under OUR RULE AND WOULD DO OUR BIDDING. Now, that would be worth it, hell yeah.;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    headmaster wrote: »
    A prodestant has already held the office, or am I mistaken?

    True but as I say were lucky that unlike some places in the north we dont assign political terms to people of a certain religion.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    mike65 wrote: »
    Obviously they are, if a gay can....it would be interesting to see who was subject to greater bigotry ;)
    A Gay ? There was more than one on the cards. Actually if you think about it the possible candidates include all kinds of everything.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Hyde was our first president back in 1938. Ireland back then wasn't quite as liberal as it is today. So I reckon it's a fair comparison.


    Anyways all anyone has to do to get on the ballot sheet is
    http://www.president.ie/index.php?section=15
    To be a candidate a citizen must be over 35 years of age and must be nominated either by:

    Not less than 20 members of Dáil or Seanad Éireann, or
    Not less than 4 administrative counties (including County Boroughs)

    Former or retiring Presidents may become candidates on their own nomination.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    Hyde was our first president back in 1938. Ireland back then wasn't quite as liberal as it is today. So I reckon it's a fair comparison.


    Anyways all anyone has to do to get on the ballot sheet is
    http://www.president.ie/index.php?section=15

    all people in the north are entitled to irish citizenship


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    paky wrote: »
    funny enough, there are many protestants in cork even around clonalkilty of all places! still, just because they are protestants does not mean they would vote unionist.

    The Munster Plantations were quite large too. From 1590 on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    mike65 wrote: »
    Obviously they are, if a gay can....it would be interesting to see who was subject to greater bigotry ;)

    I haven't seen any bigotry towards any gay person......I have however seen rightful contempt for someone who acted inappropriately.

    As for a unionist candidate - that aspect of their preferences would mean nothing to me - it would depend on their decency and capability and what they condoned just like any other candidate - which is precisely why a unionist would have a chance of a vote.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    A nice gesture to our neighbours if a suitable candidate were found.I don't know who that would be though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    paddyandy wrote: »
    I don't know who that would be though.

    How about old "Never Never Never" himself for the craic.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    peter robinson or sammy wilson?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    The shower of crap that are running at the moment would have some competition.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭Celly Smunt


    if a unionist was clearly the best person for the job and could take a load of hardship off Ireland,Irish people would still be too stubborn to vote the right person in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,017 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    I wouldnt totally rule out the possibility of a Unionist ever being elected the presidency. For example the Late Gordon Wilson IIRC was a Unionist and was generally well regarded as an Irish senator.Had the opportunity presented itself its not too far out to imagine him being serious contender for the presidency.
    paky wrote: »
    all people in the north are entitled to irish citizenship

    Not quite.

    In fact there are even people in the "South" who are not entitled to Irish citizenship.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    I wouldnt totally rule out the possibility of a Unionist ever being elected the presidency. For example the Late Gordon Wilson IIRC was a Unionist and was generally well regarded as an Irish senator.Had the opportunity presented itself its not too far out to imagine him being serious contender for the presidency.



    Not quite.

    In fact there are even people in the "South" who are not entitled to Irish citizenship

    even so, shouldnt unionists be encouraged to run candidates in the general election?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭Celly Smunt


    paky wrote: »
    even so, shouldnt unionists be encouraged to run candidates in the general election?

    they don't get much encouragment though do they?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    I haven't seen any bigotry towards any gay person......I have however seen rightful contempt for someone who acted inappropriately.

    As for a unionist candidate - that aspect of their preferences would mean nothing to me - it would depend on their decency and capability and what they condoned just like any other candidate - which is precisely why a unionist would have a chance of a vote.
    A unionist who would desire the abolition of the state they are running to be head of? Wouldn't have thought you would be a fan of that.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    pmcmahon wrote: »
    they don't get much encouragment though do they?

    obviously not but its up to the unionists at the end of the day to decide.

    i think since the foundation of this state there has been some sort of denial in irish society of our past british heritage. its no wonder the unionists dont want anything to do with the south


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    This thread is baffling. Unionists are anti Republican. Why would they look to be head of state of that country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭laoch na mona


    pmcmahon wrote: »
    if a unionist was clearly the best person for the job and could take a load of hardship off Ireland,Irish people would still be too stubborn to vote the right person in.

    a unionist fundamentally could never be the best person as they oppose the irish state they would set about dismantling our independce


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,017 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    paky wrote: »
    even so, shouldnt unionists be encouraged to run candidates in the general election?

    Of course.

    Unionist candidates have run in various constituencies in the Republic right up to the late 1980's although as far as Im aware there havent been any Unionist TD's since the late 1920's.
    KeithAFC wrote: »
    This thread is baffling. Unionists are anti Republican. Why would they look to be head of state of that country.
    For the same reason that Nationalist and/or Republican candidates contest elections in the United Kingdom perhaps ? And its not beyond the realms of possibility that a Unionist could also be a Republican.

    Its also possible that a moderate Unionist could stand for election on issues totally unrelated to Unionism/Nationalism.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭Celly Smunt


    a unionist fundamentally could never be the best person as they oppose the irish state they would set about dismantling our independce

    the president protects the Irish constitution,it would take a referendum for the abolishment of the state.

    A unionist in charge though is totally contradictory i'll grant you that,but plausible on character and policy.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    A unionist who would desire the abolition of the state they are running to be head of? Wouldn't have thought you would be a fan of that.

    well in keeping with the spirit of republicanism shouldnt every person have the right to determine their political aspirations?
    lets face it, alot of things in the south would have to change if we are to move forward to a united ireland.
    encouraging unionists to run in the south could provide us with a template of how a united ireland may look?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭Celly Smunt


    paky wrote: »
    obviously not but its up to the unionists at the end of the day to decide.

    i think since the foundation of this state there has been some sort of denial in irish society of our past british heritage. its no wonder the unionists dont want anything to do with the south

    I agree,i think ever since the declaration people seem to forget that modern Ireland stemed from Britain whether they like it or not


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    paky wrote: »
    peter robinson or sammy wilson?

    Big Ian Paisley :D


    @ Keith its only a laugh. Nobody seriously would vote a Unionist as President.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    paky wrote: »
    well in keeping with the spirit of republicanism shouldnt every person have the right to determine their political aspirations?
    lets face it, alot of things in the south would have to change if we are to move forward to a united ireland.
    encouraging unionists to run in the south could provide us with a template of how a united ireland may look?
    How would you encourage them? Sure they can run if they want, I certainly wont be voting for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    As its a non job with no power the proposition is quite hypothetical in any event as regards the national question.


Advertisement
Advertisement