Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Genocide in South Africa

245678

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭g5fd6ow0hseima


    For all it's imperfections the South Africa of today is a democratic state.

    with Black Economic Empowerment, you can hardly call it a democratic state.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,992 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    with Black Economic Empowerment, you can hardly call it a democratic state.

    Yes I can. They have free and fair elections. That is the basis of a democracy. If the majority of people vote for a Goverment with implements a particular policy, this is therefore also democratic.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭gerryandliza


    easychair wrote: »
    Which road is that? I've been to both SA and ZIM in the last year, and don't regognise any similarities. Can you explain what you mean that SA has gone down the same road as zim?


    Where do I start? ANC's open support for Mugabe's land grabs. Malema has openingly praised Mugabe and the ZANU PF and said they must follow the same route. The ever increasing attacks on farmers and foreigners.

    Only yesterday the ANC government have drafted new land reform bill which includes 'redistribution of land' without compensation and also this bill will seize foreign owned properties unless those properties are 'shared' with south african citizens.

    This means that anyone with a nice holiday home in sa will likely loose it unless they 'share' it.

    It might be true to say that SA is not at the same stage of land grabs and nationalisation as Zim but the government are openly following Mugabes methods.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭gerryandliza


    Yes I can. They have free and fair elections. That is the basis of a democracy. If the majority of people vote for a Goverment with implements a particular policy, this is therefore also democratic.


    The elections were so free and fair that when voting stations ran out of ballot papers, IEC officials ran across the road to get more from a private house!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    Im guessing he means paranoid leadership, autocratic tendencies, africanism, support of authoritarian dictators, racism, blaming its entire woes on western imperialism, plummeting life expectancies, incomprenehsible crime levels, corruption and croneyism on an endemic level....

    are you his spokesman?

    I've no idea what "africanism" means exactly, and woujld have thought many leaders develop autocratic tendencies. I don't see the same sort of racism in SA as I have seen in ZIM. Life expectancy in ZIM has plummeted dramatically for many reasons, and the same has not happened in SA. Crime levels in SA are high in places like Jozi, but can't be compared to the governtmemt supported lawlessness of ZIM, where the whole country has been brutalised and terrorised by lawless mobs which to army and police do nothing to prevent due top government diktat. Its true that SA is more corrupt that it has been at a government level, but again not on the scale of Mugabe in ZIM, whose personal corruption has brought a country which was once one of the richest in Africa to become one of the poorest,

    That has not happened yet in SA. SA is still a country with a free press, democratic elections (of sorts) and a thriving economy. Whatever the future holds for SA, it most certainly has not gone down the same road as ZIM.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭gerryandliza


    FTA69 wrote: »
    While we're on the subject of racial tension in South Africa, there has been one example of this which has gone largely unreported in my opinion and that is the case of immigrants from other African countries. In some of South Africa's many shanty towns immigrants from Zimbabwe and Mozambique etc have often come under sustained attack with scores of them being murdered or driven from their homes by racist mobs. In a context where South Africa is stricken with poverty, AIDS, crime and unemployment it's sad to see other misfortunate people being made a scapegoat for venting anger.


    Xenophobic attacks in SA are a reality. They blame foreigners for 'stealing' their jobs etc. Below is a link from the New York Times, the video is shocking to say the least. This is how foreigners are dealt with:eek:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/05/magazine/watching-the-murder-of-an-innocent-man.html?ref=southafrica


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭g5fd6ow0hseima


    Yes I can. They have free and fair elections. That is the basis of a democracy. If the majority of people vote for a Goverment with implements a particular policy, this is therefore also democratic.
    What you're saying is that apartheid would have been democratic if it had the backing of the majority. Electorally, yes, it reflected the wishes of the people, but in reality it wasn't democratic as equality and freedom were trampled on, just as the aspirations of many white south africans are trampled upon in today's SA due to BEE.

    Also, it was hardly democratic of Mbeki to do everything within his power to force the Inthaka Freedom Party into merging with the ANC, and also his obsession with floor-crossing in the SA parliament over the course of the last decade - bribing many opposition politicians into joining the ANC. He was so hell bent he even managed to capture the New National Party, who's predecessors were the chief proponents of Apartheid - ideology gone out the window there - anything for entrenchment of power.

    Maybe the ANC would have become another Zanu-PF if a meaningful opposition had existed in SA, but we'll never know. Given the ANC's unequivocal support of Zanu-PF - to the point that they were convinced that Zimbabwe was holding free and fair elections in 2005, there are grounds to believe this scenario.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭gerryandliza


    easychair wrote: »
    are you his spokesman?
    That has not happened yet in SA. SA is still a country with a free press, democratic elections (of sorts) and a thriving economy. Whatever the future holds for SA, it most certainly has not gone down the same road as ZIM.

    The media is not free. The economy is not thriving there is huge civil unrest at service delivery. SA is going through one of the most violent 'strike seasons' at the moment with many sectors engaging in violent demonstrations

    http://youtu.be/ryX6XqXNubA

    Would you like to be walking down a street anywhere in SA with this going on? These are council workers who are in full time employment and by south african standards reasonably well off.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    It might be true to say that SA is not at the same stage of land grabs and nationalisation as Zim but the government are openly following Mugabes methods.

    I'm afraid you and I must have visited differnt South Africa's and Zimbabwes.

    From memory Mugabe's methods were to send in gangs of what he called war veterans to terrorise and brutalise white farmers, to burn them out of their houses, kill injure and maim them, their wives and children, and steal their property, crops, livestock and to make sure the police and army would back up these "War`veterans" and brutalise the farmers some more.

    I don't recognise that in South Africa where the rule of law still prevails.

    Land redistribution has been an issue for many countries (even Ireland) where governemnts have stolen land from its legitimate owners.

    To equate what the SA government has done with Mugabe's brutalisation and murder or many people is ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭endabob1


    The problem has already kicked off in SA. Google farm attacks in south africa and see for yourself. It is really bad there! Malema who is part of the ruling party the ANC youth league is callin for nationalisation of mines bank land etc! He sings about killing whites and nothing much is really done to stop him! :eek: The average man on the street sleeps with one eye open in SA, what a pity that sa has gone downhill so fast.
    Tea_Bag wrote: »
    You really don't want to be in the country when Mandela dies.

    Malema is going to be the leader when Apartheid gets completely flipped on it's head. He's seriously dangerous and the ANC will back him up when the time comes. other songs he likes to sing at his speeches translate to "1 farmer, 1 bullet "
    anymore wrote: »
    And jsut where is Africs's most famous ' Human Rughts' campaigner Archbishop Tutu ? Winner of Tutu received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1984, the Albert Schweitzer Prize for Humanitarianism in 1986, the Pacem in Terris Award in 1987, the Sydney Peace Prize (1999) the Gandhi Peace Prize in 2005,[1] and the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009.

    This can hardly be happening in his own backyard, can it ? When he was on his retirement tour last year, should he not have been warning the world of this catastrophic state of affairs ?

    Oh Dear;

    Lets start with Malema; He is a piece of work no doubt but those calling him a member of the ruling party & suggesting him as the next president are off the mark, in real terms he's an irrelevance. He has a groundswell of support amongst the poorest and most uneducated because the ruling party have not done enough, to advance their cause, the same could have been said for his predecessor Fikile Mbalula and more so Winnie Mandela.
    When election time rolls around, the ANC get in with a large majority, and Malema will be a bit-part player like his predecessor is, he will have to toe the party line or be ostracised, and life outside the ANC means no life for the likes of him.

    To suggest that nothing is being done about his outbursts is also not true, the ANC have censored him in the past (in relation to the "kill the Boer" song, which was at a particularly sensitive time here with the death of Eugene Terblanche)
    http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Politics/ANCYL-confirms-charges-against-leaders-20110824
    and the Hawks (SA special police force) are investigating his "business activities
    http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Malema-Hawks-sifting-through-electronic-data-20110820

    There is a lot of rubbish that comes out of SA from all sides but the reality is 95% of violent crime happens in the townships because that's where the poorest people live, look at the riots in London if you want evidence that it's the same the world over. The farm crimes are a lot rarer than is being perceived, not denigrating it but in a country where 46 people are murdered daily, the numbers of farm killings are low compared to those killed in township violence.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=74016698

    Now to Bishop Tutu - He has been a consistent voice of reason amid the clatter of nonsense in South Africa in the last decade, He has been critical of SA's stance on Zim & Mugabe
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/3932806/Archbishop-Desmond-Tutu-criticises-South-Africa-for-failing-to-stand-up-to-Robert-Mugabe.html
    He has been critical of the government when he has felt it was appropriate
    http://www.timeslive.co.za/Politics/article958285.ece/Tutu-criticises-Zuma-and-government

    His so-called criticism of White South Africans is in fact correct, almost all my friends here are white and almost all of them have university educations, because they're parents prospered during apartheid, does this make them bad people? Not at all, it's a fact of life here, that's how things were and still are, change is slow and people living in the poorest townships have had 2 decades of being told things will get better, it's hard not to sympathise with their plight; That said the black on black xenophobia we have seen in the last few years here shows a different side of things.

    I've lived here for 4 years, I've travelled a lot in the world and in SA, I know a bloke who was killed on his farm in Zim, I know someone shot on the street here in Cape Town for his Cell Phone, I'm not immune to it but I can contextualise it. I have lived in big cities and been the victim of petty crtime, my mother has been burgled in small town rural Ireland, maybe I've been lucky in SA but I've had no bad experiences here, I know there is crime, I also know that 95% of it happens in areas I would never be. Maybe that makes me a selfish racist, who knows but I like living here and I'm intelligent enough to see through the bullsh!t to get the real story.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    The media is not free. The economy is not thriving there is huge civil unrest at service delivery. SA is going through one of the most violent 'strike seasons' at the moment with many sectors engaging in violent demonstrations

    http://youtu.be/ryX6XqXNubA

    Would you like to be walking down a street anywhere in SA with this going on? These are council workers who are in full time employment and by south african standards reasonably well off.

    I don't understand why you claim "civil unrest at service delivery" means that SA has gone down the same road as ZIM. To say the SA media is not free is simply untrue, and if you claim that the SA media is not free in the same way as the ZIM media, the you simply are living in a twilight world.

    What me walking down the street in the middle of a riot has to do with your claim that SA has gone down the same road as ZIM seems unclear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    One of the enduring memories of Spitting Image for me is the "I've never met a nice South African" song and it's apparent that there's at least a hint of this still about the place.

    That said,one of the major differences between SA and ZIm IS the malevolent presence of Uncle Bob himself.

    As other posters point out SA is still just about managing to cling to what we see as Democracy whilst ZIM rolls along with little more than Mugabbery.

    Mugabe's astute management of his PR has placed him in the lead role of the Black Man's defender against the White Oppressors and Uncle Bob continues to play that for all it's worth,whilst pillaging his country and its people in a manner which would make Gadaffi blush !!

    All things considered I'd suggest that SA's biggest threat comes from Uncle Bob himself, rather than from any suggested internal threat.?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    with Black Economic Empowerment, you can hardly call it a democratic state.

    And would you apply the same thought to America with its 'Affirmative action' policy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    What's happening now is completely different to what happened under the Apartheid regime in SA.

    What's happening now is generaly lawlessness leading to a very high crime rate.

    Under Apartheid a white minority imposed an unfair system upon a black minority, striping them of their basic human rights. To compare what's happening no to Zimbabwe is also misleading, there it was a state reappropriation of land from white farmers lead by a Tyrant. For all it's imperfections the South Africa of today is a democratic state.

    I have worked with many white South Africans, what they say about the current state of SA needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. If you believe some of them it's anarachy where a white man is more than likely going to be linched in the street. I have also worked with some black South Africans, can you guess what they say about the SA of today versus the Apartheid days?


    good post

    afrikanners have a lot in common with ulster unionists , they had the upper hand for so long , they hate having to be on equal terms with thier black fellow citizens , going from a situation where your taught to believe that blacks are inherently inferior to having to perhaps work for a black is as difficult for a protestant afrikanner as it is for a protestant unionist having to get a job where a catholic nationalist is in charge , both peoples have an inbuilt arrogance and superiority complex which makes coming to terms with equality a daunting task


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,220 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    If this was whites attacking blacks it would be racism and hate. There is no difference here. The attacks are both criminal and racist. Anyone denying that hasn't a clue. And, in a way, it's difficult to blame them. As pointed out, the whites who were in control were racist and oppressed the black people for so long. Similar to the racist Orangemen who oppressed Irish people in the North for so so long.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,227 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    ...
    To compare what's happening no to Zimbabwe is also misleading, there it was a state reappropriation of land from white farmers lead by a Tyrant.

    You almost make it sound ok with your reappropriation, but it is not reappropriation it is theft for the betterment of a few, where the land is not given to the black workers on the farm who actually can farm but it is given to high ranking members and supporters of the ruling party.
    Nodin wrote: »
    While there are legitamate concerns as regards the likes of Malema, hysterical claims don't help your case at all, at all.

    Legitimate concerns, give us a break.
    It is the scarest sh** possible scenario for white South Africans, where the leader of the youth wing of the ruling party, a guy even touted as future leader of the country is bascially espousing the forced removal of white and foreign owners of property and businesses.
    Even worse the guy is making light of the shooting of white South Africans.
    Nodin wrote: »
    Why are you asking?

    You apepar to think everything is rosey in the garden. :rolleyes:
    easychair wrote: »
    ...
    That has not happened yet in SA. SA is still a country with a free press, democratic elections (of sorts) and a thriving economy. Whatever the future holds for SA, it most certainly has not gone down the same road as ZIM.

    You know it is a long road.
    mugabe didn't start immediately removing white farmers in the early 80s when he took over.
    But over time he and his party did start terrorising the minorities within their country, both in order to appease their own disgruntled supporters whom they have never brought the promised benefits and in order to make themsevles even richer.

    I know I am going to be accused of all sorts with this statement, but I do think black African states are incapable of managing their own affairs.
    How many states are truly functioning multiparty democracies where the states natural resources are being used for the betterment of all the citizens.
    Apart from South Africa, Botswana is one of the only ones that comes to mind.
    And yes I do know that Western interference (both states and multinationals) over the decades has not helped at all as resources are exploited and war games are fought, but even when countries do have a chance they appear to firstly degenerate into a corruption riddled single party state, to be followed by a despot led autocracy which eventually leads to civil wars and ethnic clensing.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭endabob1


    The biggest difference between Zim & SA is that there was a revolution in Zim , a proper war for control and power, where the minority rule fought with guns and support from the west to retain control. In SA it was done democratically and that democracy has continued, 4 presidents in 16 years, as opposed to the Tinpot dictatorship over the border.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭caseyann


    I think they should all move out of there and back to their ancestral homes offered housing by their ancestral homes.And leave those countries to their own devices. Compensated by The government of Africa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,220 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    And, no amount of links, articles, sources or quotes will prove whether or not a black person attacking a white person, or vice versa, is racially motivated. Only the attacker him or her self can know this. It's in their minds and in their hearts. And, unless they come out and declare it then
    how can we truly know. Some things just need reading between the lines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭gerryandliza


    walshb wrote: »
    And, no amount of links, articles, sources or quotes will prove whether or not a black person attacking a white person, or vice versa, is racially motivated. Only the attacker him or her self can know this. It's in their minds and in their hearts. And, unless they come out and declare it then
    how can we truly know. Some things just need reading between the lines.


    With the greatest amount of respect, wake up and smell the coffee


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    jmayo wrote: »





    I know I am going to be accused of all sorts with this statement, but I do think black African states are incapable of managing their own affairs.

    Actually, the same could be said for Ireland and other countries around reh world. So it's not limited to some "black african states". I mean, the evidence is thst some African countries are poorly or badly led. I have worries about the future in SA myself. But I also look at Ireland and think your statement also applies, for example, and it's not just Africam states where we see evidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,220 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    With the greatest amount of respect, wake up and smell the coffee

    I'm confused?:confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    walshb wrote: »
    I'm confused?:confused:

    Me too. Posts where no actual argument is advanced seem to make little or no sense, and telling someone to "wake up and smell the coffee" is a slogan, and seems pointless.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,992 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    The elections were so free and fair that when voting stations ran out of ballot papers, IEC officials ran across the road to get more from a private house!

    Come on now, are you trying to say that the ANC aren't the democratically elected goverment of South Africa?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,992 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    What you're saying is that apartheid would have been democratic if it had the backing of the majority. Electorally, yes, it reflected the wishes of the people, but in reality it wasn't democratic as equality and freedom were trampled on, just as the aspirations of many white south africans are trampled upon in today's SA due to BEE.

    It wasn't democratic because the majority of people DID NOT get to vote. That's quite the strawman you built there.
    Also, it was hardly democratic of Mbeki to do everything within his power to force the Inthaka Freedom Party into merging with the ANC, and also his obsession with floor-crossing in the SA parliament over the course of the last decade - bribing many opposition politicians into joining the ANC. He was so hell bent he even managed to capture the New National Party, who's predecessors were the chief proponents of Apartheid - ideology gone out the window there - anything for entrenchment of power.

    Maybe the ANC would have become another Zanu-PF if a meaningful opposition had existed in SA, but we'll never know. Given the ANC's unequivocal support of Zanu-PF - to the point that they were convinced that Zimbabwe was holding free and fair elections in 2005, there are grounds to believe this scenario.

    I never said that the system in SA is perfect. All I said is that it was a democratic society. It has a huge amount of problems and they're problems that need to be solved. In historical terms, it's still a relativly new country, give that it only became a proper democratic state with the fall of Apartheid.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,992 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    jmayo wrote: »
    You almost make it sound ok with your reappropriation, but it is not reappropriation it is theft for the betterment of a few, where the land is not given to the black workers on the farm who actually can farm but it is given to high ranking members and supporters of the ruling party.

    You're twisting my words.

    I never said what happened in Zimbabwe was right. In fact my point was that it was without a doubt wrong. I was saying you can't compare what's happening in SA with what Mugabe did. The murder of South African farmers is wrong, but it is not state sponsered theft* which is what happened in Zimbabwe.

    *Yes I do believe it was theft. Reappropriation was not the right word.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭g5fd6ow0hseima


    It wasn't democratic because the majority of people DID NOT get to vote. That's quite the strawman you built there.

    I'm merely probing whether the poster felt that abuses of human rights of a minority are 'democratic' if carried out by an elected government. Of course I'm going to have to use some crazy scenario in this instance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8 sipuser


    endabob1 wrote: »
    Lets start with Malema; He is a piece of work no doubt but those calling him a member of the ruling party & suggesting him as the next president are off the mark, in real terms he's an irrelevance.

    To suggest that nothing is being done about his outbursts is also not true, the ANC have censored him in the past (in relation to the "kill the Boer" song, which was at a particularly sensitive time here with the death of Eugene Terblanche)

    There is a lot of rubbish that comes out of SA from all sides but the reality is 95% of violent crime happens in the townships because that's where the poorest people live, look at the riots in London if you want evidence that it's the same the world over. The farm crimes are a lot rarer than is being perceived, not denigrating it but in a country where 46 people are murdered daily, the numbers of farm killings are low compared to those killed in township violence.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=74016698

    Now to Bishop Tutu - He has been a consistent voice of reason amid the clatter of nonsense in South Africa in the last decade, He has been critical of SA's stance on Zim & Mugabe


    His so-called criticism of White South Africans is in fact correct, almost all my friends here are white and almost all of them have university educations, because they're parents prospered during apartheid, does this make them bad people? Not at all, it's a fact of life here, that's how things were and still are, change is slow and people living in the poorest townships have had 2 decades of being told things will get better, it's hard not to sympathise with their plight; That said the black on black xenophobia we have seen in the last few years here shows a different side of things.

    I've lived here for 4 years, I've travelled a lot in the world and in SA, I know a bloke who was killed on his farm in Zim, I know someone shot on the street here in Cape Town for his Cell Phone, I'm not immune to it but I can contextualise it. I have lived in big cities and been the victim of petty crtime, my mother has been burgled in small town rural Ireland, maybe I've been lucky in SA but I've had no bad experiences here, I know there is crime, I also know that 95% of it happens in areas I would never be. Maybe that makes me a selfish racist, who knows but I like living here and I'm intelligent enough to see through the bullsh!t to get the real story.

    Hi all,
    I have been following this thread and decided to give my 2 cent worth. sorry about not using the quotes properly not sure how to insert them properly. Anyway would like to pick up on points made above.
    I too lived in Cape Town for about 4 years up to last year and monitor events there very closely.
    Firstly Malema, "in real terms he's an irrelevance" - if only this was true, he is an extremely dangerous individual who is operating without control, the current PR stunt of the ANC to dicipline him is another in many over the past couple of years, he has defied High Court Orders and in his trial earlier this year been found guilty of Hate Speech and incitement- yet he continues to publicly sing "Shoot the Boer". I would like to add that to our national embarrassment Bono earlier this year was partying with this idiot malema and encouraging him to keep singing the song. So as far as I am concerned Bono is supporting Hate Speech and incitement to murder. Many of our freedom fighters stood with the Boer on the fields of the Transvaal during the Boer war against the british.
    Malema has the ear of the masses who have seen nothing from democracy, its easier to blame the whites and apartheid which ended 16 years ago than blame the corrupt ruling class of SA and specifically the ANC.

    I disagree with endabob when he says 95% of crime is in the townships- true it is bad but in the suburbs and cities it is also really bad. I lived in Kommetjie a small seaside town on the peninsula, in the last year I had at least one attempt a week to break into the house, our dog was poisoned and there were shoot-out between burglars and police regularly. I had 24hr armed response linked to the alarm which I did have to call on occasions. What I think people must realise is if your house is broken into in Ireland, and yes it happens, you will not get shot, stabbed, have your wife gang raped in front of you and then killed. You simply cannot compare being broken into in Ireland with South Africa. I dont doubt that your mother being burgled in Ireland was a very traumatic experience for her but I am sure you are glad it happened in Ireland and not in SA. I think you have been lucky, I too did only had my car broken into once there, but dammit they tried hard to get into the house. Cape Town is by SA standards relatively safe.


    Tutu's recent call for a "white tax" is racist and cannot be seen as anything else. Yes my white friends in Cape Town also were well educated but most were self employed, as a white professional or skilled worker you cannot get a job or promotion due to affirmative action where a person of colour HAS to be given priority regardless of qualifications or experience, this had led to the brain drain in recent years and the inevitable chaos caused by under qualified people running critical public services- eg the lack of maintenance at power plants leading to rolling power cuts all the time. The level of unemployment and increasing poverty within the white population is undeniable and largely due to reverse discrimination.

    In my business activities in SA I faced huge hurdles in getting business contracts not because of economic reasons but because of government policies towards the colour of my skin- Black Economic Empowerment Policy meant that for my business to prosper I would have to sign over 48% of Equity to a Black "Investor". In reality these elite of BEE non executive directors are the cronies of the ANC and the gateway to government and civil contracts, even to supply companies I would in effect have to give a 48% bribe- and that is policy. It is there to enrich the ruling ANC not create employment or provide advancement for the ordinary black kids who are trying their best at school and college.

    Ok in relation to farm attacks and genocide, anyone can argue one way or the other and get stuck on nitty details and individual points of view- from my perspective it is patently clear that the Xhosa Government of South Africa are engaged in an attempt to drive the whites out of SA, the notion of a Rainbow Nation is nonsense and a joke. Malema is the agent provocateur to stir up hatred amongst the poor masses and he IS succeeding.
    I do not agree that farm attacks are rarer than perceived, it is simply the case that the South African Police stopped recording many of these events in isolation to other crimes in 2007. The nature of these attacks and the level of prolonged torture of the victims clearly defines this as a hate crime and not an "ordinary robbery murder".
    One previous post disputed the comparison with ZIM saying Mugabe sent gangs of thugs to terrorise the white farmers, well if you look at the farm attacks it is exactly the same as the early days in ZIM. There are gangs of thugs ( and in fact a scary amount of police have been implicated) terrorising farms, killing off the occupants and driving survivors off the land because of fear.
    The fact that genocide watch has elevated SA to level 6 and named whites and women as the at risk group cannot be ignored and dismissed. It is all too easy for us from afar to blame it on apartheid and say" well whites should leave" if we ignore the fact that whites are been systematically targeted and forced out by direct violence and economic policies and add all the comments about land ceasures and "nationalising" of mines then we are ignoring the final preparations for a violent marxist revolution in which whites will be slaughtered. The Boer have as much right to be there as any other ethnic group in SA, they are the decendants of our european forefathers, just as the Americans and Australians are.
    We will see in time just what develops in SA but all the signs are bad for the future, I would love to have the optimism that I had a few years ago but the reality is somewhat different.
    This tread is trying to highlight the direction that SA is going in, I sadly must agree with what has been highlighted by this tread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,220 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    That is sickening to hear that Bonehead Bono would be encouraging that behaviour. Though, problems and isues in Africa, Bono and his meddling has caused many.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    caseyann wrote: »
    I think they should all move out of there and back to their ancestral homes offered housing by their ancestral homes.And leave those countries to their own devices. Compensated by The government of Africa.


    the netherland and england is full enough already although the conservative partys in each country would benefit


Advertisement