Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Paedophiles - do you sympathise with them?

13»

Comments

  • #62
    softmee
    Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    alcomoholic wrote: »
    obviously what they do is pretty low brow and whatnot, but surely it's just a sexual orientation like any other? whilst we feel sorry for their victims, surely we must also feel sympathy for they themselves who live in a society that deems their sexual preferences to be deviant.

    It is not "sexual orientation like any other" ... and it is 100% deviant, just sometimes it's hard to judge who should be blamed :

    http://trailerx.info/2011/08/05/is-10-too-young-for-a-sexy-spread-in-vogue/

    (or if you see some clothes "for children" in shops like penneys) :

    http://www.styleite.com/retail/padded-bikinis-kids/


  • #63
    needadvi
    Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭needadvi


    All problems start in the heart. You can have a terrible urge inside yourself to slap people that annoy you, rape women etc etc etc. Once you know you have those urges, be ashamed, cast the thought aside and hope it never enters your mind again.

    Or you could have the urge, feed the urge by fantasizing about it, then eventually you might actually go out and do the bad deed.

    So best thing is to not feed those desires. :D

    If you fed the desire and it led to the act, then it's your fault if it happens for real!


  • #64
    Shane St.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    eh. no.
    castrate them. problem solved


  • #65
    cowzerp
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    Skunkle wrote: »
    Them be wronguns your hanging around with. Normal people would fancy 15 year old but wouldnt do anything for moral reasons.

    Moral, legal whatever i'll ask them which next time!!
    Quite common actually.

    Point been they don't act upon it by choice..

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • #66
    Shane St.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    alcomoholic wrote: »
    no

    do u know any1 who is. seems a very random topic to bring up here.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Show Time
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Sick freaks who should get a bullet to the head.


  • #68
    fedor.2.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭fedor.2.


    Ive seen it all now, a thread sympathising with paedos, lovely. Pathetic.


  • #69
    fedor.2.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭fedor.2.


    alcomoholic wrote: »
    obviously what they do is pretty low brow and whatnot, but surely it's just a sexual orientation like any other? whilst we feel sorry for their victims, surely we must also feel sympathy for they themselves who live in a society that deems their sexual preferences to be deviant.


    Im going to keep an eye on you


  • #70
    bnt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,244 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    By "paedophile" I'm assuming the OP means someone who has acted on his/her paedophilia and molested a child. No, I have no sympathy for them. We judge people by their actions and such actions are illegal, unethical, and unacceptable.

    Without action, we simply don't know what a person is thinking, and trying to control thoughts is getting in to "thought police" territory. I have no trouble believing there have been paedophiles who went through their whole lives successfully resisting temptation, and we'll never know.

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • #71
    wolf moon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 644 ✭✭✭wolf moon


    Otis Driftwood wrote: »
    Pedophiles are animals,end of story.
    We love and protect animals so much, don't we? :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    softmee
    Closed Accounts Posts: 845 ✭✭✭softmee


    needadvi wrote: »
    So best thing is to not feed those desires. :D

    It's scary to think what your desires might be... :rolleyes:


  • #73
    Shane St.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    Looters - do you sympathise with them?
    obviously what they do is pretty low brow and whatnot, but surely it's just a occupation like any other? whilst we feel sorry for their victims, surely we must also feel sympathy for they themselves who live in a society that deems their occupation to be deviant.
    SARCASM


  • #74
    MungBean
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    cowzerp wrote: »
    Moral, legal whatever i'll ask them which next time!!
    Quite common actually.

    Point been they don't act upon it by choice..

    But if they only chose not to act on it out of fear of the consequences then when in a position where there is a chance you can avoid those consequences then you are more likely to offend. Meaning even though they chose not to act they are still sexually attracted to kids and thus paedophiles.

    I'm not talking about your friends here I'm talking about someone who is attracted to say a 10 year old.

    You dont have to touch a child to be a paedophile, someone might sit at home and pull themselves off 10 times a day thinking of raping children. He might never touch a child for fear of being caught but it doesnt change the fact that he's a paedophile.


  • #75
    Snacker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 168 ✭✭Snacker


    seriously gtfo.

    Mods, are ye drunk?they're clearly looking for attention/trolling making this site a laughing stock

    there are plenty threads like this around to post in already.


  • #76
    Sunnyisland
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    No I have no sympathy what so ever for them they prey on children,
    Children are particularly vulnerable and defenceless, and the damage caused to them often leads to a lifetime of pain. It steals their life from them. When the starting line for that life of pain is when you're a child, that's a Hell of a long time to have to live with it.


  • #77
    Shane St.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    im actuaally disgusted ppl are debating with this guy. i mean wtf. i was abused as a kid. and this just angers me!!! :mad::mad:


  • #78
    allym
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭allym


    I understand what you mean about it being a sexual orientation to an extent, however you can't ignore the fact that this orientation involves having sex with children without their consent(as they are too young to give it, not understanding the concept etc.).

    Whether someone acts on their urges or not, they still have the urge to rape a child.

    If someone regularly has urges to rape a grown adult, but never acts on it, you can't deny that it is a disgusting thought and very, very wrong.

    It's the same deal with pedophilia, yes it's obviously hard to have those urges but not acting on them does not mean that those urges are not sick.


  • #79
    Super-Rush
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    jive wrote: »
    Made a thread about this in after hours before but Mickey Dolenz doesn't like me because I'm awesomer than him so it was locked.

    Posted it in Humanities instead, it got really long though but still one of the more interesting threads if I do say so myself! http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056249576
    jive wrote: »
    double post

    strong admin consistency
    jive wrote: »
    Meh, banning me would mean I'd just have to register an email and sign up on here again. Just goes to show that you locked my thread due to having a personal gripe, otherwise you would have locked this one too.

    Anyway if you're genuinely interested in the subject OP the thread in humanities sho am gooood. You'll get a lot of tabloidesque headline posts in this thread
    jive wrote: »
    It's cool I'm done posting in this thread didn't come in to derail the thread anyway.

    Probably will get a ban (probably another one from micky dolenz no less) but what can you do, it's a mild inconvenience at worst. A simple log out would mean I could view the forum again anyway. Anyway the thread on humanities is good if anyone wants to read it, some knowledgeable people weighed in on the subject big tiiiime

    If you derail another thread with your petty gripes about being banned etc, you will be permanently banned from After Hours. Last warning.


    There are certain things that should never ever be discussed in After Hours and this is definitely one of them.

    Thread closed.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement