What infuriates you about the opposite sex?

foxyboxer wrote: »

A random beautiful woman walks up to a man on the street.
"I think you're very attractive, would you like to have sex tonight?"

Majority of men would agree.

A random beautiful man walks up to a woman on the street.
"I think you're very attractive, would you like to have sex tonight?"

Majority of women would decline.

Why? For men sex has no consequence. For women it might result in getting pregnant so they are more selective instinctively.

foxyboxer wrote: »

It was a psychology experiment. Very interesting

The 16 women who were staying on the Florida State University campus in Tallahassee found themselves on the receiving end of a very direct chat-up line. A young man approached them and, without more ado, said, "I have been noticing you around campus. I find you to be very attractive. Would you go to bed with me tonight?" All the women declined, responding either by saying "You’ve got to be kidding", or "What is wrong with you? Leave me alone."

Out of the 16 men who were approached in the same way by a woman, 12 took up the offer. Their responses were "Why do we have to wait until tonight?" or "I can’t tonight, but tomorrow would be fine."

The psychologist Russell Clark, who carried out this experiment, wanted to find out how the sexes responded differently to sexual advances.

Clark was certain that the reason for this difference lay in the asymmetrical biology of the sexes: "In order to produce a child, men need only to invest a trivial amount of energy, a single man can conceivably father an almost unlimited number of children. Conversely, a woman can give birth to and raise only a limited number of children."
The different cost of sex for men and women was, then, a direct cause of the behaviour that Clark had noticed in his experiment. Women are selective, whereas men are basically prepared to go to bed with any woman. In contrast to the women, who all reacted with outrage to the offer of sex, the four men who didn’t accept were concerned to give the women an excuse, either by saying "I’m married" or "I’m going with someone".

http://www.madsciencebook.com/07bedwithme.htm

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

You wouldn't do it because your emotions force you not to do it; and your emotions are a type of mechanism to stop you getting pregnant with an unsuitable male, amongst many other reasons.

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

I'm not assuming no women would agree, of course some would. When a woman has sex with a man while not on the pill during ovulation I'd say her instincts deems him suitable genetically not necessarily a suitable Father.

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

To clarify my views:

When asked for sex like in the experiment vastly more men would say yes than women regardless of the time of the month.

This is because men are genetically programmed to spread their seed far and wide if possible whereas women must be more selective who they have sex with. Men and women don't think about it like this though they just respond to how their emotions are guiding them, but their emotions are guiding them with the above programming in built. During ovulation though women do go for more masculine men with better genetics when choosing a sex partner.

hightower1 wrote: »

Its called the law of averages, larger the test group the more accurate the result. Its how nearly all large scale testing is done in scientific groups regarding cross sections, also its what the inscurance industry metric is based upon and both science and the inscurance industry seem to be doing just fine for a long long time based on this proven method.