Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

China the next superpower?

1356

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Kev_ps3 wrote: »
    Atrocious human rights record? Thats nonsense. At least they arnt invading country's left right and center.

    You mean its nonsense that China has an atrocious human rights record?

    Also maybe you've never heard of the ethnic cleansing of Tibet. I doubt anything the US has done comes close to the brutality of whats been done to the Tibetans.

    Also I expect the American voters are about to insist the US withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan but I seriously doubt the Chinese voters(!!) are about to demand their government pull out of Tibet.

    What do you think?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    If the US stops buying shyte from China they're screwed. Too much inequality in China for them to be considered a superpower. Plus they're running out of water with a population of over 1.3 billion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭MOC1972


    After watching this www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPILhiTJv7E I think they are in for a big bust:cool:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    :confused:

    What???

    Where do you get stuff like that? If they'd bombed a forest(???) how would that have avoided them having to fight their way through Japan to take over the country? Japanese people had started committing suicide en masse once they heard the Americans had landed in the south, there was no way there was going to be a peaceful invasion. The locals thought the americans were going to eat them alive.

    You're throwing out nonsense conspiracy ideas (doesn't warrant being a "theory"), without looking at the big picture.

    Why would the US have been more concerned with gathering data about the effects on nukes on humans but not on ending the bloody hard fought war in the pacific?

    Bombing a forest? :confused:

    Think about it for one second and the penny might drop. It's a very valid argument when talking about the Atomic bomb attacks.

    Also, why the fúck would they have had to invade an island nation that was already defeated militarily when the Allied fleets and air power could have blockaded them.

    If anyone is talking nonsense in the last 2 pages it's you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭aligator_am


    Yup, the IMF recently said that China's economy would overtake the USA by 2015.

    The Chinese have also recently developed a missile capable of sinking American air craft carriers and have developed stealth a fighter of their own.

    I think the Chinese are happy to play the waiting game as at this rate the Americans will have utterly bankrupted themselves, the Chinese will beat them without firing a shot, same way the Americans beat the USSR.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    karma_ wrote: »
    Think about it for one second and the penny might drop. It's a very valid argument when talking about the Atomic bomb attacks.

    You mean the dropping one as a deterrent first?

    First they warned the japanese what they were goign to do.

    No response.

    They bombed Hiroshima and then warned the japanese again.

    No response.

    So they bombed nagasaki.

    Then Japan surrendered.

    If your theory was correct they wouldnt they just have gone ahead and bombed tokyo in the first place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    karma_ wrote: »
    Also, why the fúck would they have had to invade an island nation that was already defeated militarily when the Allied fleets and air power could have blockaded them.

    The Japanese hadnt surrendered. So they werent defeated.

    And your idea is that the US navy and air force should have "blockaded" Japan? Has any country the size of Japan ever been "blockaded" before?

    You're thinking of cities that have been blockaded but not an Island similar in size to the UK. How would you even start to "blockade" it?

    Again, reading a history book, or maybe getting a dvd about the history of ww2 might really help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    karma_ wrote: »
    If anyone is talking nonsense in the last 2 pages it's you.

    Bombing a forest huh?

    :pac: :pac: :pac:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,797 ✭✭✭karma_


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Bombing a forest huh?

    :pac: :pac: :pac:

    Took you three posts and this was teh best you could come up with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    Among other things this video has some interesting info on China and India....




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Kev Ps3 wrote: »
    Atrocious human rights record? That's nonsense. At least they are invading country's left right and center.



    Yes they certainly would not annex there neighbours as in mongolia,tibet,and repeatedly threaten a small island of there coast, taiwan.They also certainly would not restrict tv/press/religious/web freedom,We wont even go into the tarmanan square day massacres that they said never happened... yep china is a great country least we forget.


    Usa has its problems but give me that country anyday over china.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭NTMK


    CommuterIE wrote: »
    That was necessary, to prevent hundreds of thousands of American troops being killed... I for one fully supported that action... maybe you are a troll?

    :eek::rolleyes:
    even the generals at the time disagree with that statement the war didnt end for 2 weeks after the A-Bombs. I was just a full demonstration of the results of the Manhattan project


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    I disagree with the use of nuclear weapons by the US, but do you have any idea how many allied troops would have died trying to conquer Japan? Take the stubborn refusal to surrender by the Nazis and multiply it tenfold, and factor in the mountainous forested landscape of Japan and you're talking about deaths in the millions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭NTMK


    I disagree with the use of nuclear weapons by the US, but do you have any idea how many allied troops would have died trying to conquer Japan? Take the stubborn refusal to surrender by the Nazis and multiply it tenfold, and factor in the mountainous forested landscape of Japan and you're talking about deaths in the millions.

    but the thing is the japanese military were on the brink collapse a month before the A-bombs they targeted civillians killing >120,000 not milltary installations
    Link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    NTMK wrote: »
    :eek::rolleyes:
    even the generals at the time disagree with that statement the war didnt end for 2 weeks after the A-Bombs. I was just a full demonstration of the results of the Manhattan project

    2 Weeks is no time at all, it would have taken two years for the usa to have fought its way through Japan.

    The bombs were certainly a warning. Thats they they didnt just go ahead and take out the Emperor in tokyo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    NTMK wrote: »
    but the thing is the japanese military were on the brink collapse a month before the A-bombs they targeted civillians killing >120,000 not milltary installations
    Link

    :confused:

    Lets not forget the japanese made the Germans look like school children in terms of brutality in China. They may not have massacred as many as the Germans but in terms of sheer inhmane brutality, there's few incidents in human history to equal the Rape Of Nanking. Bayoneting children int he street etc. They hand killed 300,000 civilians in nanking alone, and that was only one city.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

    They had also expressed their disdain for all the "rules of war" in their treatment of allied prisoners. The Bataan Death March was a famous one. Almost 10,000 dead, including almost a thousand americans.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Death_March

    So think back and put yourself in the mind of the allies.

    How great was their motivation to minimize Japanese casulties while continuining to risk their own lives at considerable expense?

    Seriously?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭NTMK


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    :confused:

    Lets not forget the japanese made the Germans look like school children in terms of brutality in China. They may not have massacred as many as the Germans but in terms of sheer inhmane brutality, there's few incidents in human history to equal the Rape Of Nanking. Bayoneting children int he street etc. They hand killed 300,000 civilians in nanking alone, and that was only one city.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

    They had also expressed their disdain for all the "rules of war" in their treatment of allied prisoners. The Bataan Death March was a famous one. Almost 10,000 dead, including almost a thousand americans.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Death_March

    So think back and put yourself in the mind of the allies.

    How great was their motivation to minimize Japanese casulties while continuining to risk their own lives at considerable expense?

    Seriously?

    the Japanese also attempted to end the war month before hand and the Americans refused, there is absolutely no justification for indiscriminately killing over a hundred thousand civilians and preparing to kill even more when even the generals were saying its unnecessary as an american citizen it makes me sick


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Rayna Fat Rebellion


    There was a report recently that the research papers their uni's are producing are basically 95% muck but apparently now they claim to be the second highest producer of them on earth, this says alot about them.

    Add to that the fact that they rarely think outside the box and are very conformal.
    All they do is copy other countries idea's and products, until they start creating things instead of copying them they will never sustainably hold higher economic powers than the U.S.

    I don't know the political system well but they will need to become a democracy before this will change imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭aligator_am


    I always found that one of the greatest ironies about the A-Bombs dropped on Japan was that the Americans stumbled across the missing materials on a German U-Boat destined for Japan!

    Once they got the inventory of the sub they had enough raw materials to complete their bombs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    NTMK wrote: »
    the Japanese also attempted to end the war month before hand and the Americans refused,

    Source?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    There was a report recently that the research papers their uni's are producing are basically 95% muck but apparently now they claim to be the second highest producer of them on earth, this says alot about them.

    Add to that the fact that they rarely think outside the box and are very conformal.
    All they do is copy other countries idea's and products, until they start creating things instead of copying them they will never sustainably hold higher economic powers than the U.S.

    I don't know the political system well but they will need to become a democracy before this will change imo.

    They like copying countries as well as their ideas:(


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/chinese-copy-of-austrian-village-stirs-emotions-2299516.html
    Chinese copy of Austrian village stirs emotions


    By George Jahn, Associated Press

    Saturday, 18 June 2011

    It's a scenic jewel, a hamlet of hill-hugging chalets, elegant church spires and ancient inns all reflected in the deep still waters of an Alpine lake. Hallstatt's beauty has earned it a listing as a UNESCO World Heritage Site but some villagers are less happy about a more recent distinction: plans to copy their hamlet in China.

    After taking photos and collecting other data on the village while mingling with the tourists, a Chinese firm has started to rebuild much of Hallstatt in faraway Guangdong province, a project that residents here see with mixed emotions.

    Publicly, Hallstatters say they are proud that their village has caught the eye of Minmetals Land Ltd. the real estate development arm of China Minmetals Corp., China's largest metals trader. With most of them dependent on the hundreds of thousands of tourists who overrun Hallstatt's 900 inhabitants each year, they see the project as good for business.

    "We're happy they find it beautiful enough to copy," says souvenir store owner Ingrid Janu. Hallstatt Mayor Alexander Scheutz describes the plan as "a compliment to our village," while hotel owner Monika Wenger thinks at least some Chinese who have seen the copycat version of Hallstatt will want to visit the original.

    But in a deeply traditional part of Austria shielded for centuries from much of the rest of the world by towering mountains and steep valleys, the apparent secrecy surrounding the project has also revived suspicions of outsiders, even though Hallstatt survives only because of the millions of tourist dollars spent here every year.

    Although the Chinese developers say construction started in April, Scheutz and Wenger say the village knew nothing about the plan to replicate Hallstatt until early this month. They say a Chinese guest involved in the project and staying at Wenger's hotel spilled the beans — apparently inadvertently — showing Wenger drawings and plans she should have kept to herself of the central marketplace, Wenger's 400-year old hotel and other landmarks that were mirror images of the originals.

    "I saw myself confronted with a fait accompli," says Scheutz of his first reaction when he saw the drawings, now collected in a thick folder on his desk containing documents that he says copy much of the town, down to the individual boards of scenic wooden balconies. While he disputes local media accounts citing him as furiously vowing to prevent the Chinese project, he acknowledges being "definitely a bit stunned."

    Wenger is more outspoken. She says most of the villagers she has talked to are "outraged — not about the fact but the approach."

    "I don't like the idea of knowing that a team was present here for years measuring, and photographing and studying us," she said Thursday, sitting at her hotel's terrace against the stunning backdrop of Lake Hallstatt, its surface mirroring nearby granite peaks. "I would have expected them to approach us directly — the whole thing reminds of a bit of Big Brother is watching.

    "This house is my personal work of art," she said of her 400-year-old hotel. "And then someone comes here and copies it — for me, it's as if a painter copies someone else's artwork."

    The Chinese developers are advertising the project as low-density, high-end residential development "surrounded by mountains with mountain and lake views," to be built "in a European architectural style, with a commercial street built with the characteristics of an Austrian-style town."

    But at the Chinese site, in the city of Huizhou about 100 miles north of the border with Hong Kong, there is little to indicate that the copycat version will ever approximate the beauty of the original.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    NTMK wrote: »
    when even the generals were saying its unnecessary

    What general?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    I always found that one of the greatest ironies about the A-Bombs dropped on Japan was that the Americans stumbled across the missing materials on a German U-Boat destined for Japan!

    Once they got the inventory of the sub they had enough raw materials to complete their bombs.

    That's absolute rubbish. The allies sunk a German sub which was sending jet engine designs (Already known to both Nazi's and the Allies) to Japan. It was the only time one submarine has sank another in battle. No Axis state ever got close to finishing a nuclear weapon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭dresden8


    How many countries has America invaded/bombed since WW2? How many has China?

    I reckon the US would win hands down, Tibet included.

    How many Democratically elected governments has China toppled versus the States?

    I'll start you off with Chile and Iran, neither by China by the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭aligator_am


    That's absolute rubbish. The allies sunk a German sub which was sending jet engine designs (Already known to both Nazi's and the Allies) to Japan. It was the only time one submarine has sank another in battle. No Axis state ever got close to finishing a nuclear weapon.

    You were saying?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_submarine_U-234
    German submarine U-234 was a Type XB U-boat of the German Kriegsmarine during World War II. Her first and only mission into enemy territory consisted of the attempted delivery of uranium and other German advanced weapons technology to the Empire of Japan. After learning of Germany's unconditional surrender, the submarine surrendered to the United States on 14 May 1945.

    [edit] Construction

    Originally constructed as a minelaying submarine, U-234 was damaged during construction at Kiel in 1942. Following the loss of U-233 in July 1944 it was decided not to use U-234 as a mine layer and she was instead completed as a long-range cargo submarine with Japan missions in mind.

    [edit] Wartime service

    U-234 returned to the Germaniawerft yard at Kiel on 5 September 1944, to be refitted as a transport, instead of a minelayer. Apart from minor work, she had a schnorchel added and 12 of her 30 mineshafts were fitted with special cargo containers the same diameter as the shafts and held in place by the mine release mechanisms. In addition, her keel was loaded with cargo, thought to be optical-grade glass and mercury, and her four upper-deck torpedo storage compartments (two on each side) were also occupied by cargo containers.[4]
    [edit] Cargo

    The cargo to be carried by U-234 was determined by a special commission, the Marine Sonder Dienst Auslands, established towards the end of 1944, at which time the submarine's officers were informed that they were to make a special voyage to Japan. When loading was completed, the submarine's officers estimated that they were carrying 240 tons of cargo plus sufficient diesel fuel and provisions for a six- to nine-month voyage.[4]

    The cargo included technical drawings, examples of the newest electric torpedoes, one crated Me 262 jet aircraft, a Henschel Hs 293 glide bomb, and what was listed on the US Unloading Manifest as 560 kg of uranium oxide. As evidenced by Hirschfeld and Brooks in the 1997 book Hirschfeld, Wolfgang Hirschfeld reportedly watched the loading into the boat's cylindrical mine shafts of about 50 lead cubes with 9 inches (230 mm) sides, and "U-235" painted on each: according to cables sent from the dockyard, these containers held "U-powder". However, according to author and historian Joseph M. Scalia, who discovered a formerly secret cable message at Portsmouth Navy Yard, the uranium oxide had been stored in gold-lined cylinders; this document is discussed in Hitler's Terror Weapons. The exact characteristics of the uranium remain unknown; it has been suggested by Scalia, and historians Carl Boyd and Akihiko Yoshida that it may not have been weapons-grade material and was instead intended for use as a catalyst in the production of synthetic methanol for aviation fuel.[5][6] When the cargo had been loaded, U-234 carried out additional trials near Kiel, then returned to Kiel where her passengers came aboard.
    [edit] Passengers

    U-234 was carrying twelve passengers, including a German general, four German naval officers, civilian engineers and scientists, and two Japanese naval officers. The German personnel included General Ulrich Kessler of the Luftwaffe, who was to take over Luftwaffe liaison duties in Tokyo; Kai Nieschling, a Naval Fleet Judge Advocate who was to rid the German diplomatic corps in Japan of the remnants of the Richard Sorge spy ring; Dr. Heinz Schlicke, a specialist in radar, infra-red, and countermeasures and director of the Naval Test Fields in Kiel (later recruited by the USA in Operation Paperclip); and August Bringewalde, who was in charge of Me 262 production at Messerschmitt.[6]

    The Japanese passengers were Lieutenant Commander Hideo Tomonaga of the Imperial Japanese Navy, a naval architect and submarine designer who had come to Germany in 1943 on Japanese submarine I-29, and Lieutenant Commander Shoji Genzo, an aircraft specialist and former naval attaché.[7]
    [edit] Final voyage

    U-234 sailed from Kiel for Kristiansand, Norway in the evening of 25 March 1945, accompanied by escort vessels and three Type XXIII coastal U-boats, arriving in Horten two days later. U-234 spent the next 8 days carrying out trials of her schnorchel, during which she accidentally collided with a Type VIIC U-boat performing similar trials. Damage to both submarines was minor, and despite a diving and fuel oil tank being holed, U-234 was able to complete her trials. U-234 then proceed to Kristiansand, arriving on about 5 April, where she underwent repairs and topped off her provisions and fuel.

    U-234 departed Kristiansand for Japan on 15 April 1945, running submerged at schnorchel depth for the first 16 days, and surfacing after that only because her commander Kapitänleutnant Johann-Heinrich Fehler considered he was safe from attack on the surface in the prevailing severe storm. From then on, she spent two hours running on the surface by night, and the remainder of the time submerged. The voyage proceeded without incident, and the first sign that world affairs were overtaking the voyage was when the German Navy's Goliath transmitter stopped transmitting, followed shortly after by the Nauen station; Fehler did not know it, but Germany's naval HQ had fallen into Allied hands.

    Then, on 4 May, U-234 received a fragment of a broadcast from British and American radio stations announcing that Admiral Karl Dönitz had become Germany's head of state following the death of Adolf Hitler. U-234 finally surfaced on 10 May in the interests of better radio reception and received Dönitz's last order to the submarine force, ordering all U-boats to surface, hoist black flags, and surrender to Allied forces. Fehler suspected a trick and managed to contact another U-boat (U-873), whose captain convinced him that the message was authentic.

    At this point, Fehler was practically equidistant from British, Canadian and American ports. He decided not to continue his journey, and instead headed for the east coast of the United States. Fehler thought it likely that if they surrendered to Canadian or British forces, they would be imprisoned and it could be years before they were returned to Germany, and believed that the US, on the other hand, would probably just send them home.

    Fehler consequently decided that he would surrender to US forces, but radioed on 12 May that he intended to sail to Halifax, Nova Scotia to surrender to ensure Canadian units would not reach him first. U-234 then set course for Newport News, Virginia, Fehler taking care to dispose of his Tunis radar detector, the new Kurier radio communication system, and all Enigma related documents and other classified papers. On learning that the U-boat was to surrender, the two Japanese passengers committed suicide by taking an overdose of Luminal (a barbiturate sleeping pill). They were buried at sea.[7]

    [edit] Capture

    The difference between Fehler's reported course to Halifax and his true course was soon realized by US authorities who dispatched two destroyers to intercept U-234. On 14 May 1945 she was encountered south of the Grand Banks by the USS Sutton. Members of the Sutton's crew took command of the U-boat and sailed her to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, where the U-805, U-873, and U-1228 had already surrendered.

    News of the U-234's surrender with her high-ranking German passengers made the event a major news event. Reporters swarmed over the Navy Yard and went to sea in a small boat for a look at the submarine. The fact that she had a half ton of uranium oxide on board was covered up and remained classified for the duration of the Cold War;[8] a classified US intelligence summary of 19 May merely listed U-234's cargo as including "a/c [aircraft], drawings, arms, medical supplies, instruments, lead, mercury, caffeine, steels, optical glass and brass."[9] The uranium subsequently disappeared, most likely finding its way to the Manhattan Project's Oak Ridge diffusion plant; it has been calculated that it would have yielded approximately 7.7 pounds (3.5 kg) of U-235 after processing, around 20% of what would have been required to arm a contemporary fission weapon.[10]
    A torpedo from USS Greenfish sinks U-234 off Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

    Dr. Velma Hunt, a retired Penn State University environmental health professor, has suggested the U-234 may have put into two ports between her surrender and her arrival at the Portsmouth Navy Yard: once in Newfoundland, to land an American sailor who had been accidentally shot in the buttocks, and again at Casco Bay, Maine.[11] The US Navy reportedly unloaded about 1,200 pounds (540 kg) of uranium oxide from U-234 at Portsmouth, but the two dismantled Me 262 jet fighters were not listed at Portsmouth, suggesting that they had previously been unloaded somewhere else. However, other accounts do mention the Me 262s at Portsmouth.
    [edit] Fate

    As she was unneeded by the US Navy, U-234 was sunk off Cape Cod as a torpedo target. She was destroyed by the USS Greenfish (SS-351) on 20 November 1947.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭ArphaRima


    Wars waged?

    US - too long a list for me to think off hand.

    China - Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Russia, India, Tibet, Burma, USA, and civil war. All since WW2. Not a short list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    The Allies still knew how to make atomic bombs without that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,369 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    fluffer wrote: »
    Wars waged?

    US - too long a list for me to think off hand.

    China - Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Russia, India, Tibet, Burma, and civil war. All since WW2. Not a short list.

    Not to mention the ongoing war with many of its own people to keep them under the thumb of the regime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    dresden8 wrote: »
    How many countries has America invaded/bombed since WW2? How many has China?

    I reckon the US would win hands down, Tibet included.

    How many Democratically elected governments has China toppled versus the States?

    I'll start you off with Chile and Iran, neither by China by the way.

    Ah c'mon don't be coy.

    Come right out and tell us how China has a far better record in 20th/21st century International Relations than the USA.

    Thats what you're trying to convince us of isnt it? Except when you actually say it then the full absurdity of the statement comes across.

    :cool:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭dresden8


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Ah c'mon don't be coy.

    Come right out and tell us how China has a far better record in 20th/21st century International Relations than the USA.

    Thats what you're trying to convince us of isnt it? Except when you actually say it then the full absurdity of the statement comes across.

    :cool:

    I asked questions and gave some hints to the answers. Why not try and answer the questions instead of being a smartarse?

    So, Chile and Iran, democratically elected governments overthrown by the protectors of democracy and replaced with despots.

    Explain that.


Advertisement
Advertisement