Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bridge from Ireland to America

  • 17-06-2011 02:31AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,400 ✭✭✭✭


    Well there ever be a bridge going from Ireland too the U.S. Is it even possible too have a long bridge like that.


«134

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    Ha, Thats priceless, There wont be a bridge built but eventually maybe a submerged tube with high speed trains connecting the E.U. and U.S.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    cena wrote: »
    Well there ever be a bridge going from Ireland too the U.S. Is it even possible too have a long bridge like that.
    Would you like a water?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,801 ✭✭✭✭Kojak


    Why is the title too when it should be to?

    Are both countries getting a bridge of their own?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    Sure, anythings possible. Tho not at the moment anyway. I'd imagine it'd be a tunnel or pipeline if they ever did construct such a thing tho rather than a bridge.

    They're talking about building an elevator up to a geostationary orbital position in space (basically making things like rockets and shuttles obsolete) so digging a long hole in the ground would be relatively unimpressive by comparison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭jc84


    A bridge to the uk and Europe would be more realistic and I can't see that ever happening


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,408 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    How long would it take to drive it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,724 ✭✭✭The Scientician


    J. Marston wrote: »
    How long would it take to drive it?

    Well it's about 3000 miles to the US from Ireland, so depending on your speed 40 hrs should do it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    J. Marston wrote: »
    How long would it take to drive it?

    If you went on the fastest trains available today you could get from Galway to Boston in about 8-10 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,692 ✭✭✭✭OPENROAD




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,400 ✭✭✭✭cena


    J. Marston wrote: »
    How long would it take to drive it?

    Good point. A tunnel does sound better with a high speed train


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭chucken1


    Too it?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    I doubt a bridge, but I'd say there will be a time (in the very distant future) when lack of fossil fuels means flying can't happen cheaply anymore, that there will be a tunnel from US to Mainland Europe, Via Ireland and the UK. So you could get a train from New York to Paris, stopping in Dublin and London.

    I think it'd be pretty cool, but as I said, I doubt it'll happen for quite some time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,801 ✭✭✭✭Kojak


    cena wrote: »
    Good point. A tunnel does sound better with a high speed train

    The Dart or the Luas??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 250 ✭✭blockedPaT


    I wonder how long it would take to make a bridge like that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,943 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    get the chinese to do it. they're building high speed rail links all over asia to cement superpower status.

    http://c1.gas2.org/files/2011/06/transrailchina.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    blockedPaT wrote: »
    I wonder how long it would take to make a bridge like that

    Channel Tunnel took 6 years to tunnel 30 miles. The atlantic is about 100 times longer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    A tunnel with a maglev is the way to go



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭johnmcdnl


    the longest bridge in the world right now is 164km long over in china... that's not even the distance from dublin to galway...

    it's be some big ass bridge to span the entire Atlantic ocean and be able to withstand storms and all....

    as for a tunnel... the longest rail tunnel is 154km long in japan.. once again - think of the scale of the Atlantic ocean...

    how long would it take to build this tunnel or bridge as well... look how long it took to build the port tunnel.. and how much that cost as well...

    this tunnel would be the new great wall of china


    would be ****ing cool though :cool:


    oh yeah - you'd need service stations and all underneath the ocean...

    it'd be amazing to see if it ever happened :cool::cool::cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,692 ✭✭✭✭OPENROAD


    I doubt a bridge, but I'd say there will be a time (in the very distant future) when lack of fossil fuels means flying can't happen cheaply anymore, that there will be a tunnel from US to Mainland Europe, Via Ireland and the UK. So you could get a train from New York to Paris, stopping in Dublin and London.

    I think it'd be pretty cool, but as I said, I doubt it'll happen for quite some time.

    They might just skip Ireland though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,860 ✭✭✭✭retalivity




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,801 ✭✭✭✭Kojak


    red menace wrote: »
    A tunnel with a maglev is the way to go


    Would that be like the Springfield monorail, becuase that didn't work out too well if I remember correctly....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    Kojak wrote: »
    Would that be like the Springfield monorail, becuase that didn't work out too well if I remember correctly....

    Yep it was supposed to glide as gently as a cloud


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭Spread


    Extend the Red Line from Tallagh to Chatam, Cape Cod and then Route 6 to join the Highway. Deadly!;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    Kojak wrote: »
    Would that be like the Springfield monorail, becuase that didn't work out too well if I remember correctly....

    They've got maglev rails in Emsland, Daejeon, and Southwest Jiaotong, and by gum, it put them on the map!

    (thanks wiki)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,369 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    charlemont wrote: »
    Ha, Thats priceless, There wont be a bridge built but eventually maybe a submerged tube with high speed trains connecting the E.U. and U.S.

    This is correct. The highspeed transportation of the future will be supersonic trains inside vacuum sealed tubes. Vastly superior to air travel or something as primitive as a bridge.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 644 ✭✭✭filthymcnasty


    Zillah wrote: »
    This is correct. The highspeed transportation of the future will be supersonic trains inside vacuum sealed tubes. Vastly superior to air travel or something as primitive as a bridge.

    As we cannot connect two short tram lines and are incapable of building a 10k metro, then no


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    I watched that supersonic underwater tunnel train programme on Discovery and I thought to myslef. LOL. No.

    Now I consider myself an optomistic person and am usually very receptive to new stuff but the underwater supersonic train in a vacuum tunnel?

    Niggapleeze.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭ardinn


    What: Submerged OCEANIC tunnel and supersonic train

    WHERE: New York – London

    Cost: $88 billion – $175 billion

    Crux: Neutrally buoyant vacuum tunnel submerged 150 to 300 feet beneath the Atlantic's surface and anchored to the seafloor, through which zips a magnetically levitated train at up to 4,000 mph.

    The idea is as wondrous as it is audacious: Get on a train at New York City's Penn Station and hit Paris, London or Brussels just an hour later. "From an engineering point of view there are no serious stumbling blocks," says Ernst Frankel, retired professor of ocean engineering at MIT.


    As envisioned by Frankel and Frank Davidson, a former MIT researcher and early member of the first formal English Channel Tunnel study group, sections of neutrally buoyant tunnel submerged 150 to 300 feet beneath the surface of the Atlantic, then anchored to the seafloor–thereby avoiding the high pressures of the deep ocean. Then air would be pumped out, creating a vacuum, and alternating magnetic pulses would propel a magnetically levitated train capable of speeds up to 4,000 mph across the pond in an hour. As Frankel and Davidson say, it's doable. "We lay pipes and cables across the ocean every day," says Frankel. "The Norwegians recently investigated submerged, floating tunnels for crossing their deep fjords, and were only held back by the costs."

    Ah, the costs: Estimates range from $25 million to $50 million per mile. Another hurdle: safety. But Davidson believes a test case might mitigate concerns. "Maybe a tunnel across Lake Ontario would show how it reacts to dynamic conditions and give us a better understanding of the costs," he muses. "A transatlantic tunnel will be done. We just have to be as interested in it as we are in getting to the Moon."

    An hour?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Is it possible that it could be built? Yes

    Will it ever be built? No


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,816 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    We're finding it impossible to build a bridge to cross the Corrib for a Galway by pass, and with the continental shift, America is drifting away from us by a few mm every year, it'll never happen.


Advertisement
Advertisement