(N/D)igger the dog.

Sin_J · 15-06-2011 02:12PM

sensibleken wrote: »

I've never seen a film about a one eyed transvestite gorrilla whos lost a bag of his dads cum

I think you just haven't searched the internet hard enough

Dyr · 15-06-2011 02:20PM

They should rename the dog "dawg"

"yo dawg, we called yo dawg, "dawg" so yo dawg don't have to be hatin' on niggas dawg" etc etc

The King of Moo · 15-06-2011 02:30PM

Bambi wrote: »

They should rename the dog "dawg"

"yo dawg, we called yo dawg, "dawg" so yo dawg don't have to be hatin' on niggas dawg" etc etc

They should go the whole hog and rename the film "Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn!Busters" and change the dog's name to Biggy and have him be a wise-cracking, foul-mouthed CGI bulldog voiced by Ice-T who blows up the dams himself and then flies to Berlin and kills Hitler in the middle of a rally by bouncing a bone with a bomb in it along the street right at him.

Sin_J · 15-06-2011 02:51PM

The King of Moo wrote: »

They should go the whole hog and rename the film "Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn!Busters" and change the dog's name to Biggy and have him be a wise-cracking, foul-mouthed CGI bulldog voiced by Ice-T who blows up the dams himself and then flies to Berlin and kills Hitler in the middle of a rally by bouncing a bone with a bomb in it along the street right at him.

I want to see this movie! :pac:

southsiderosie · 15-06-2011 03:02PM

Irish Guitarist wrote: »

N*gger means black.

What language are you referring to?

Saying "n*gger" means black is like saying "Taig" means Irish.

mikemac · 15-06-2011 03:02PM

negro means black in Spanish and Portuguese, maybe that's what they meant

ascanbe · 15-06-2011 03:12PM

I suppose it's up to the film-makers if they wish to change it or not. They're making the thing, putting up the money; don't go and and see it if you don't want to.

Da Shins Kelly · 15-06-2011 03:15PM

It reminds me of when some people got their backs up about the fact that Quentin Tarantino uses the word 'n*gger' so much in his films cos he's a white guy. PC bull****. It's a movie, and it's supposed to be a reflection of real life. Believe it or not, some stupid f*cking people used to name their dogs 'N*gger' (some probably still do). Yes, it's offensive, but it's a fact. It's history, it's not as though the director is sticking it in there for the craic cos he's a massive racist. People need to get a grip. They should leave the name in, let people be offended like they should be, and move on. It's a piece of art, and the best art is supposed to be realistic. The reality is some people are racists - who'd have thunk it??!

Lando Griffin · 15-06-2011 03:20PM

One day as I sat reading my newspaper my 3 year old was watching a film.
I was aghast to hear one of the characters was called Tinker Bell.
To protect her against becoming a person who would alienate an ethnic group of people I switched off the film and banned her from watching it again.
Anyway, I doubt there is much resemblance between her character, a young female being dressed in luminous, scantly tight fitting attire, but to protect those on the fringes of society I decided my action was appropriate until such time they change her name.

Red Alert · 15-06-2011 03:25PM

This is political correctness gone mad. It really is.

mikemac · 15-06-2011 03:28PM

Anyone remember Golly Bars?
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/50314_152806536307_6955561_n.jpg

One of HB's finest icecreams
Now discontinued, haven't seen them in years

Irish Guitarist · 15-06-2011 03:28PM

southsiderosie wrote: »

What language are you referring to?

Saying "n*gger" means black is like saying "Taig" means Irish.

N*gger was used in Britain up until the 1950s to describe a fabric colour, although they usually said n*gger brown to describe a shade of brown.

http://www.milanoo.com/Vancl-Handsome-******-brown-100-Cotton-Mens-Jacket-p73458.html

hidinginthebush · 15-06-2011 03:37PM

wandatowell wrote: »

was the original film any good?

Yes

Android 666 · 15-06-2011 05:07PM

Red Alert wrote: »

This is political correctness gone mad. It really is.

It finally makes an appearance. Yay!!!

Wolfe Tone · 15-06-2011 05:08PM

The dog should be called ******, that was the dogs name!

Android 666 · 15-06-2011 05:23PM

Da Shins Kelly wrote: »

It reminds me of when some people got their backs up about the fact that Quentin Tarantino uses the word 'n*gger' so much in his films cos he's a white guy. PC bull****. It's a movie, and it's supposed to be a reflection of real life.

Quentin Tarantino's films are a reflection of real life? That's a new one on me…

Da Shins Kelly wrote: »

Believe it or not, some stupid f*cking people used to name their dogs 'N*gger' (some probably still do). Yes, it's offensive, but it's a fact. It's history, it's not as though the director is sticking it in there for the craic cos he's a massive racist. People need to get a grip. They should leave the name in, let people be offended like they should be, and move on. It's a piece of art, and the best art is supposed to be realistic. The reality is some people are racists - who'd have thunk it??!

The name of the dog is a side issue and not one that actually does anything to enhance the film. I would contend that someone calling a dog ****** back in the forties would be more a case of uninformed ignorance without any malicious intent or real racist motivation while somebody calling a dog that in 2011 would be doing so to cause offense knowing the feeling it provokes in the black community. The significance of words changes as time passes and in this case it has taken on a much more offensive meaning to people. All it would do in this film would be to act as a distraction and cause an unnecessary debate. I can understand the film makers desire to change a pretty insignificant detail like this when it is not going to have a major impact on what is going to happen in the rest of the film.

Manic Moran · 15-06-2011 05:30PM

The film should reflect the racism that was prevelant at the time, The dogs name should be Ni*ger as it originaly was and everyone should take offence to it and still watch the movie.

Was "******" actually a racist word at the time, though? Or was it just a neutral descriptor which could be applied in either a racist or non-racist context depending on the intent of the user?

I believe, for example, that "Oriental" is still a fairly acceptable term in Ireland. Is it racist? Try saying it in San Francisco.

[Edit: Sunova... The frigging anti-offence filter on boards can't even allow an etymological discussion on the word. Heaven forbid someone might see it an take offence at the word and not the intent behind it]

NTM

CatFromHue · 15-06-2011 06:19PM

many black rappers refer to each other n*****r and want their friends to refer to them as one too

the dog is black maybe he wants his friends to call him that too.

has anyone thought of the dogs feeling in all this or are they being just to racist to whitey with the word we cant use but they can. man im such a honky!

Where To · 15-06-2011 06:34PM

Meleftone wrote: »

They are still going to have to use the N word as The mission codes (transmitted in morse) were: Goner, meaning "bomb dropped"; N****r, meaning that the Möhne was breached and; Dinghy meaning that the Eder was breached. They used N****r as the dog was killed the morning of the mission.

You've just ruined the film!!!!:mad::mad::mad:

:pac:

arybvtcw0eolkf · 15-06-2011 07:01PM

When I was growing up most people with a black dog called it 'blackie' or 'Nigger', thats how it was.

People used to also call Velcro 'niggers hair'.

Kiwi polish also produced a polish called 'Negro'.

But things are different now, tbh I think its fair enough to change the dogs name in the movies remake - whats the point in offending someone when it can be avoided?.

Ditch · 15-06-2011 07:33PM

If Gibson had originally named his 'Labrador Of Colour' " Gypo ". " Knacker ". Or " Pikey " ..... would this thread even exist?

Err ..... Yes. I Am indicating a sense of " One rule for some .... ".

entropi · 15-06-2011 07:39PM

So Peter Jackson, the director known for trying to keep as faithful to the original story as possible, fell to pressure...what a flake!

Should have told the execs to go fcuk themselves, and stop re-writing history as they see fit.

MagicSean · 15-06-2011 07:43PM

Dymo wrote: »

Well it would be great to keep the historical references, BUT this would cause too much offense and not PC to do so

Unlike every rap song ever made.

dresden8 · 15-06-2011 07:47PM

wandatowell wrote: »

was the original film any good?

Excellent. Star Wars was a piss poor re-make.

hidinginthebush · 15-06-2011 07:50PM

Meleftone wrote: »

They are still going to have to use the N word as The mission codes (transmitted in morse) were: Goner, meaning "bomb dropped"; N****r, meaning that the Möhne was breached and; Dinghy meaning that the Eder was breached. They used N****r as the dog was killed the morning of the mission.

N!gger isn't dead when they decide upon the codenames

The dog was Guy Gibson's, and also the squadron's mascott for a time, that's why they used it, not because he was dead.

hidinginthebush · 15-06-2011 07:52PM

Ditch wrote: »

If Gibson had originally named his 'Labrador Of Colour' " Gypo ". " Knacker ". Or " Pikey " ..... would this thread even exist?

Err ..... Yes. I Am indicating a sense of " One rule for some .... ".

Well if they decided to change the dog's name in the re-make from Gypo to Hippo, or Knacker to Packer, or Pikey to Bikey for PC reasons, then, yes, I'm sure this thread would still exist.

Ditch · 15-06-2011 07:59PM

hidinginthebush wrote: »

yes, I'm sure this thread would still exist.

Possibly so. Only, in my experience, probably more aligned with being allowed to 'call a spade a spade'.

I still sense double standards.

tricky D · 15-06-2011 08:17PM

American market says 'Do(h)'

mikemac · 15-06-2011 08:24PM

Just watched that youtube clip on Page 1, ****** was killed

evil_seed · 15-06-2011 08:32PM

Context ffs. The word on it's own is fine. It's the context it's used in that's the problem. I hate this PC bull**** brigade

(N/D)igger the dog.

Comments