Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Artistic taste, in relation to intellect?

  • 22-05-2011 11:59PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭The Pontiac


    Quite curious about this really.

    Like, is someone who listens to Oasis less intelligent to someone who, for example, listens to Elliott Smith? Smith was largely influenced by The Beatles, as were Oasis, but anyone with a half a brain cell will know the Gallaghers copied The Beatles, whereas Elliott made his own music. Smith's music was/is beautiful and timeless. His fans were nice and decent people. Head off to an Oasis concert and you've got díckheads wearing hoodies and looking for a scrap. They probably never even listened to Elliott Smith.

    Or, is someone who prefers Desperate Housewifes, to say, The Wire, less aware (for want of a better word)?

    Are the folk who watch Pop Idol, X Factor et at. seriously lacking? The garbage they're watching - an 'artist' standing up on stage doing a cover of song, and folk at home voting for them. Art was never about competition. Alexandra Burke did an appalling version of Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah a few years ago and it made the Christmas No. 1. The John Cale version was great, as was the Rufus Wainwright version. The Jeff Buckley version is the best of all. But the people watching this shít (X factor) never even heard the original.

    It really would make you wonder.

    I'm not classing myself as an intellect by any means (I'm not an intellect). I'm just classing the 'others' as more stupid than I. Thanks.


«1345

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,029 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Better to not try to judge people by their taste in TV or music imo.

    So what if you're more 'intelligent' than other people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    Quite curious about this really.

    Like, is someone who listens to Oasis less intelligent to someone who, for example, listens to Elliott Smith? Smith was largely influenced by The Beatles, as were Oasis, but anyone with a half a brain cell will know the Gallaghers copied Oasis, whereas Elliott made his own music. Smith's music was/is beautiful and timeless. His fans were nice and decent people. Head off to an Oasis concert and you've got díckheads wearing hoodies and looking for a scrap. They probably never even listened to Elliott Smith.

    Or, is someone who prefers Desperate Housewifes, to say, The Wire, less aware (for want of a better word)?

    Are the folk who watch Pop Idol, X Factor et at. seriously lacking? The garbage they're watching - an 'artist' standing up on stage doing a cover of song, and folk at home voting for them. Art was never about competition. Alexandra Burke did an appalling version of Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah a few years ago and it made the Christmas No. 1. The John Cale version was great, as was the Rufus Wainwright version. The Jeff Buckley version is the best of all. But the people watching this shít (X factor) never even heard the original.

    It really would make you wonder.

    I'm not classing myself as an intellect by any means (I'm not an intellect). I'm just classing the 'others' as more stupid than I. Thanks.

    When you say something is "better" than something else, what are you basing that on?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭brummytom


    It depends on why they like them.


    If it's because everyone else does, then yes they're less intelligent. Look at Oliner and Oliner's study on locus of control (basically independent thought) and intelligent, it's interesting. Sorry, I've a psychology exam this week :pac:

    But yeah. Liking Oasis for the music - they're wrong but not stupid. Liking Oasis because everyone does - Idiot.

    It's all a bit Emperor's New Clothes really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Some stuff is more challenging than other stuff, for sure. I think much of someone's taste reflects their personality rather than their intellect, though. Of course, someone's intellect influences their personality too, so taste and intelligence aren't independent.

    The fact that someone enjoys X-factor doesn't make them a moron. If they only enjoyed X-factor, you might have to start asking questions though.

    Edit: I wouldn't be so sure the best of Elliott Smith is better than the best of Oasis by any means. He's a bit whiney, is Elliott.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭The Pontiac


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    When you say something is "better" than something else, what are you basing that on?

    Common sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    Common sense.

    I smell an intellectual snob :D

    How do you measure common sense?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭blow69


    A lot of the stuff you described OP is easily accessible. It doesn't require much brainpower.

    Does it mean that people who watch are of low intelligence? No. It's just usually marketed heavily to appeal to a higher subset of people. This means people from different backgrounds absorb it.

    For example, I would consider myself somewhat of a music snob. And I don't deny this.
    However, the odd time, you would catch me nodding my head to a bit of Black Eyed Peas (who critically are fcuking terrible) etc.



    Can't suffer the X Factor though. Now that is braindead TV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    From personal experience I'd say yeah. But theres large crossover.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Thatnastyboy


    So OP,

    You are basically saying that you look down on people because of their taste in popular culture, t.v and music?

    What the fook has taste in music got to do with intelligence?


    Opinions of people should be formed on their character, not their background, 'intelligence', taste in whatever their into, social status, clothes they wear etc etc...

    Maybe im taking what your post up wrong, i hope i am, if im not, you're just a d1ckhead

    edit. intelligence: the ability to not have ones head stuck up ones hole when forming opinions of people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    excellent troll :cool:

    so if we can find someone who likes a little from each category you theory is blown to pieces eh?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭spinandscribble


    someone else could come along and say common sense dictates only those who listen to classical music are intelligent.... this whole idea of relating musical tastes to intellect is a bit stupid. Personal taste is all it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,526 ✭✭✭m@cc@


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    It really would make you wonder.

    It really doesn't. For the most part, I try to indulge myself in the music and tv which I enjoy as opposed to using other people as a benchmark upon which to base my interests.


  • Posts: 3,539 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    OP, your post is a jumble of sweeping generalisations, presentation of opinion as fact, and most notably of all, irony.

    You say you're wondering are people with bad taste less intelligent. The answer is no.

    Your representation of what bad taste is, is unfounded.
    Your representation of what intelligence is, is flawed.

    It seems that you think that the ignorance of others towards TV shows/Artists that you like, suggests they lack the intelligence to appreciate them. In fact it's you who is exhibiting ignorance, towards the fact that the Wire is a TV show and Desperate Housewives is a TV show. The only relevant distinction between the two in this situation is that you like one and not the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,192 ✭✭✭Unpossible


    brummytom wrote: »
    If it's because everyone else does, then yes they're less intelligent. Look at Oliner and Oliner's study on locus of control (basically independent thought) and intelligent, it's interesting
    [turkish] Well f**k me Tommy. What have you been reading? [/turkish]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,305 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Stephen Fry likes snooker and darts so it is possible to like more "commoner things" and appreciate the talent without being obnoxious or superior about it.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭The Pontiac


    So OP,

    You are basically saying that you look down on people because of their taste in popular culture, t.v and music?

    What the fook has tatse in music got to do with intelligence?


    Opinions of people should be formed on their character, not their background, 'intelligence', taste in whatever their into, social status, clothes they wear etc etc...

    Maybe im taking what your post up wrong, i hope i am, if im not, you're just an asshole

    What a stupid post. Character? This is precisely what makes a person's character.

    Read my opening post again, please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Taste and perceived intellect are both absolutely subjective


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭TaraFoxglove


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    Quite curious about this really.

    Like, is someone who listens to Oasis less intelligent to someone who, for example, listens to Elliott Smith? Smith was largely influenced by The Beatles, as were Oasis, but anyone with a half a brain cell will know the Gallaghers copied The Beatles, whereas Elliott made his own music. Smith's music was/is beautiful and timeless. His fans were nice and decent people. Head off to an Oasis concert and you've got díckheads wearing hoodies and looking for a scrap. They probably never even listened to Elliott Smith.

    Or, is someone who prefers Desperate Housewifes, to say, The Wire, less aware (for want of a better word)?

    Are the folk who watch Pop Idol, X Factor et at. seriously lacking? The garbage they're watching - an 'artist' standing up on stage doing a cover of song, and folk at home voting for them. Art was never about competition. Alexandra Burke did an appalling version of Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah a few years ago and it made the Christmas No. 1. The John Cale version was great, as was the Rufus Wainwright version. The Jeff Buckley version is the best of all. But the people watching this shít (X factor) never even heard the original.

    It really would make you wonder.

    I'm not classing myself as an intellect by any means (I'm not an intellect). I'm just classing the 'others' as more stupid than I. Thanks.

    You band name-check good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Thatnastyboy


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    What a stupid post. Character? This is precisely what makes a person's character.

    Read my opening post again, please.

    so someone who doesnt watch certain types of tv programme or listen to a specific musical genre has no character?

    character is based on a lot more than taste...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭spinandscribble


    Taste and perceived intellect are both absolutely subjective


    really thats all there is to it.

    This topic is like something off the back of the school bus by the boys who just discovered their dads cd collection....
    i've known doctors who giddily excitedly watched it. they aren't dumb, not by any imagination, but their musical taste might be questionable...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    <Ollie> wrote: »
    Or, is someone who prefers Desperate Housewifes, to say, The Wire, less aware?

    The intellectuals prefer Desperate Housewives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 143 ✭✭smugchik


    I think that it is dangerous to generalise. People tend to see things as a personal attack and react without actually reading the threads. As it has been said in an earlier post, if someone only enjoyed xfactor etc. then, yes there is something sadly lacking. (almost like someone onlyliking books with pictures in them?) I rarely watch tv but have watched these types of programmes when staying with friends and enjoyed them for what they are - candyfloss for the brain. (If I was going to comment on the programme to someone else the next day, I would start the sentence with "I'm ashamed to say that I watched ???? last night....")

    I am a member of a film group when it is available and enjoy films from other countries that do not make it to the mainstream cinema. I have been teased by some about this calling me a film snob etc. That doesn't mean that I didn't laugh out loud when watching The Hangover while travelling on a boat. I thought it was the funniest thing that I had ever seen and it relieved the stress and sadness of my summer holiday coming to an end.

    Music, a little more conservative maybe. There are 'types' associated with certain music. I cannot stand the Gallagher brothers and find them offensive and vulgar. Money not cancelling out the 'Shameless' upbringing that they had. However, I do like some of their music and own a couple of cd's. I would not go to one of their concerts though as I would not feel comfortable with their followers.

    I too find it irritating when people do not realise that their favourite song is a cover version, or worse still, when they stare blankly when I try to tell them that their favourite film is an adaptation of a book and the ending is wrong. I know that they haven't got the natural curiosity to learn and I realise that I cannot change that and avoid them in my personal life wherever possible.


    There is a taste issue with food choices too..(pardon the pun) but I think I have said enough for one posting....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭The Pontiac


    i've known doctors who giddily excitedly watched it. they aren't dumb, not by any imagination, but their musical taste might be questionable...

    I don't know any, sorry. It's wouldn't be their musical taste that's in question, as there's no actual music on show in the X Factor.

    I've also encountered some woeful GP's, that have absolutely no-clue in real life matters. Some people have lost their lives as a result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭Teddy_Picker


    Hmm, but what about those who love The Wire but also enjoy what you perceive to be less "highbrow" entertainment? They must really rock your world!
    You might enjoy The Wire for its quality but still enjoy Housewives as a bit of fluff, nothing too taxing on the brain.

    As for music snobbery, gah, music snobs can drown in a vat of piss. Yes, I like and appreciate geniuses like The Beatles, Dylan etc. etc. but I also can love genuinely great pop songs, or as the case may be, ****e and cheesey ones that I can dance to at 1am on a weekend night. It doesn't say anything about my intellect.

    Anyway,
    /rant


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    Who da **** is dis elliate smith bitch. i ****ing love oasis der bleedin deadly you big gay you.
    the gallaghers are legends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭The Pontiac


    As for music snobbery, gah, music snobs can drown in a vat of piss. Yes, I like and appreciate geniuses like The Beatles, Dylan etc. etc. but I also can love genuinely great pop songs, or as the case may be, ****e and cheesey ones that I can dance to at 1am on a weekend night. It doesn't say anything about my intellect.

    Anyway,
    /rant

    This is what písses me off. It's not music "snobbery". Jesus fúcking christ, go out and buy Elliott Smith's Figure 8, and compare it to Osais's (What's the story) Morning Glory? And then you might see the point I'm trying to make. If you don't, then you're exactly the person I was talking about in my opening post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    Taste and perceived intellect are both absolutely subjective
    Taste is subjective. Intelligence is hard to define but people can generally tell the difference between and idiot and a genius.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭Randomer.


    People tend to get their backs up very easily when this topic comes up but there is some blunt truth to it.

    To put it another way, those of a certain degree of intelligence seek intellectual stimulation, and yes, a tv show like the wire is far more intellectually stimulating than desperate housewives. Of course there are cross overs , but there are those people out there who have no desire to be intellectually stimulated ever and I find it amusing people would get defensive and cry out that such people are equally as intelligent as a person who constantly seeks intellectual stimulation.

    Imo when you have a certain degree of intelligence , you feel the need to feed it.

    brummytom wrote: »

    It's all a bit Emperor's New Clothes really.

    You been playing LA Noire by any chance? :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,739 ✭✭✭✭starbelgrade


    Elliot Smith is shit.

    So are Oasis.

    What's the point again?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    People who listen to metal are more intelligent....FACT!


Advertisement
Advertisement