Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Bloody Sunday (1920)

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭Herodotus


    That same mentality that dismisses, mocks and scorns those who question the agreed concensus is the same that has allowed so much to go wrong since the founding of the state.

    But, thankfully, things are slowly changing.

    People are opening their minds to views, people and beliefs that generations before them would never dare to entertain.

    That is something to be proud of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Notorious97


    RachaelVO wrote: »
    OH GOD!!!!

    Why are we so obsessed with a non political figure head saying sorry??????

    She made huge steps in her speech last night, and I for one, am glad she made it, and it did acknowledge the atrocities of the past! I think she has done a lot to help repair and cement relationships between the two nations. Whether we like it or not, we are neighbours, on the periphery of europe. In the EU yes, but not part of schengen. Our histories and our economic futures are all tied up in each other.

    Anyone still bearing a grudge against an 85 year old woman needs to seriously build a fecking bridge.....

    I said i was republican in my beliefs, but skeptical of her trip before it happened, and i can honestly say she has made more gestures on this trip than i ever thought she would, i havent any complaints about the visit as she paid her respects to our patriot dead, gave a warm speech, but i still hope for one day when there is a united Ireland, regardless of moving forward, that to me is progress.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RachaelVO


    I said i was republican in my beliefs, but skeptical of her trip before it happened, and i can honestly say she has made more gestures on this trip than i ever thought she would, i havent any complaints about the visit as she paid her respects to our patriot dead, gave a warm speech, but i still hope for one day when there is a united Ireland, regardless of moving forward, that to me is progress.

    You've a very gracious republican stand point, nice to see a republican not sticking to the staunch "NO TO THE QUEEN" stance, and you've recognised the respect she's paid as genuine. Without sounding patronising that's very refershing!

    You would love to see a united Ireland, but do you think it will happen in our life time? I don't think it will. I think it will come long after we're all dead and gone!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Notorious97


    RachaelVO wrote: »
    You've a very gracious republican stand point, nice to see a republican not sticking to the staunch "NO TO THE QUEEN" stance, and you've recognised the respect she's paid as genuine. Without sounding patronising that's very refershing!

    You would love to see a united Ireland, but do you think it will happen in our life time? I don't think it will. I think it will come long after we're all dead and gone!

    There are a good few others who are republican onhere but are probably more wise than me, just some dont like to admit it lol

    Seeing a united ireland in our lifetime, depends how old you are :P lol im mid 20's, i believe i will see it, i think by the time i hit 50 it will be, but of course thats just what i hope for lol, but i think Ulster needs a stable period before anything like that is raised

    then me and keithAFC will be drinking guinness and he will have the green flag wrapped around him singing :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    For what it is worth I'm younger then notorious97 and I believe that we will see a Utd Ireland in my lifetime. Its unfortunate that the tactic is now to basically out breed the protestants it should never have been like this, and its a shame that the IRA couldn't complete what it set out to do.

    Hopefully Gerry knows what he is doing and won't eventually become a figure like Michael Collins, ie signing everything away.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    For what it is worth I'm younger then notorious97 and I believe that we will see a Utd Ireland in my lifetime. Its unfortunate that the tactic is now to basically out breed the protestants it should never have been like this, and its a shame that the IRA couldn't complete what it set out to do.

    Absolutely despicable! :mad:

    The people of this island voted on the issue and the IRA were shown to be completely out-of-touch with the wishes of the vast majority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭sdanseo


    For all the faults in Collins' tactics..which the brits only loved to call Murder at the time...he never ever targeted a civilian. What the brits did that day was terrorism too, only a worse kind than COllins was even capable of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RachaelVO


    There are a good few others who are republican onhere but are probably more wise than me, just some dont like to admit it lol

    Seeing a united ireland in our lifetime, depends how old you are :P lol im mid 20's, i believe i will see it, i think by the time i hit 50 it will be, but of course thats just what i hope for lol, but i think Ulster needs a stable period before anything like that is raised

    then me and keithAFC will be drinking guinness and he will have the green flag wrapped around him singing :pac:

    I am slightly older than ya, but when you're 50, in theory I should still be around talking sh1te ;) I might just join you and KeithAFC for a pint, I promise I'll leave my zimmer frame outside:p

    I am a republican in as much as I don't agree with a monarchy! I often find that you can't have a decent talk with staunch Irish republicans, there's no give, and I find that frustrating.

    Like most of us, I have family ties to Irish republicanism and the OLD IRA! I'm proud that some of my family were honoured in the garden of remembrance yesterday, and cos I know their names and have seen their pictures as young men a tear came to my eye when the queen laid that wreath, I found it very poignant, and I mentioned their names out loud. Dunno why, I just felt it had to be done. My great uncle who is dead about 20 years or so, had an IRA military salute at his funeral. He was apparently a big wig in the old IRA.

    So if there is a united Ireland, I hope it's blood and tear free (and I suppose economically viable)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Absolutely despicable! :mad:

    The people of this island voted on the issue and the IRA were shown to be completely out-of-touch with the wishes of the vast majority.
    I make no apologies for saying that its a shame that the IRA could not drive the Brits out. Its a damn shame the much romanticized "Old IRA" couldn't do it either.

    However the time for armed campaign is over it has taken us as far as it can.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    I make no apologies for ........

    Interesting.........and yet you'll demand them from others.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    It's quite perverse to consider that a naturally formed majority is somehow less desirable than than taking control of a territory against majority wishes through campaign of violence and murder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,042 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    For what it is worth I'm younger then notorious97 and I believe that we will see a Utd Ireland in my lifetime. Its unfortunate that the tactic is now to basically out breed the protestants it should never have been like this, and its a shame that the IRA couldn't complete what it set out to do.

    Hopefully Gerry knows what he is doing and won't eventually become a figure like Michael Collins, ie signing everything away.

    You need to learn some Irish History...

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭POINTBREAK


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    Amazing how some people are perfectly happy and satisfied with Collins saying such a thing yet if Gerry Adams or someone came out with that line he would be berated from upon high.
    -
    Yeah, you see Gerry wasn't in the IRA. No matter what he says is dismissed as a fairy story now because his credibility is knackered.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    Interesting.........and yet you'll demand them from others.
    Obtuse as ever I see.

    The IRA has apologised for killing civilians. They do not need to apologise for fighting back against oppression, pogroms and all kinds of discrimination at the hands of unionists with British blessing.

    Apologise for many of the events which occurred yes, but not for taking up arms.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    You need to learn some Irish History...
    I don't think I would be alone in wishing that the war of independence resulted in a 32 county republic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    'Sunday Bloody Sunday'. What a great song. It really encapsulates the frustration of a Sunday, doesn't it? You wake up in the morning, you've got to read all the Sunday papers, the kids are running round, you've got to mow the lawn, wash the car, and you think "Sunday, bloody Sunday!"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    Obtuse as ever I see.

    The IRA has apologised for killing civilians. They do not need to apologise for fighting back against oppression, pogroms and all kinds of discrimination at the hands of unionists with British blessing.

    The usual strawmanning. Had they "fought back against oppression" then they wouldn't have been despised. They murdered civilians.

    But we weren't talking about the IRA. We were talking about you saying that you wouldn't apologise for supporting them. Something others find unacceptable.

    Which is an exact mirror of your stance against the Queen of England (and that's even assuming that she "supported" what went on, which is a stretch in itself).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    Amazing how some people are perfectly happy and satisfied with Collins saying such a thing yet if Gerry Adams or someone came out with that line he would be berated from upon high.

    You cannot equate Michael Collins with Gerry Adams. Gerry Adams is just a thug. The leaders of 1916, signed and read out the deceleration of independence at the GPO. Collins was 2nd in command. The provos could only manage to make threats behind bavaclavas and use nicknames. Gerry Adams wont even admit he a member. The Old IRA had the support of the people. Adams and co did not. Provisional Sinn Fein could not even beat the SDLP during the troubles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    The usual strawmanning. Had they "fought back against oppression" then they wouldn't have been despised. They murdered civilians.

    But we weren't talking about the IRA. We were talking about you saying that you wouldn't apologise for supporting them. Something others find unacceptable.

    Which is an exact mirror of your stance against the Queen of England (and that's even assuming that she "supported" what went on, which is a stretch in itself).
    What I have said, and always have, is that she should apologize for the BA murdering civilians and the terrible acts her army have done. Thats it, nothing more, nothing less. Before you ask yes, the IRA should apologize for killing civilians, and if the apology they issued is not good enough then they should do another, more satisfactory one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    mgmt wrote: »
    You cannot equate Michael Collins with Gerry Adams. Gerry Adams is just a thug. The leaders of 1916, signed and read out the deceleration of independence at the GPO. Collins was 2nd in command. The provos could only manage to make threats behind bavaclavas and use nicknames. Gerry Adams wont even admit he a member. The Old IRA had the support of the people. Adams and co did not. Provisional Sinn Fein could not even beat the SDLP during the troubles.
    I think Gerry Adams is a lot more like Michael Collins than you think. Except he managed to take nearly all the IRA with him.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    I make no apologies for saying that its a shame that the IRA could not drive the Brits out. Its a damn shame the much romanticized "Old IRA" couldn't do it either.

    However the time for armed campaign is over it has taken us as far as it can.
    Which is pretty much where we were in 1925. It's a shame so many people died along the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    mgmt wrote: »
    You cannot equate Michael Collins with Gerry Adams. Gerry Adams is just a thug. The leaders of 1916, signed and read out the deceleration of independence at the GPO. Collins was 2nd in command. The provos could only manage to make threats behind bavaclavas and use nicknames. Gerry Adams wont even admit he a member. The Old IRA had the support of the people. Adams and co did not. Provisional Sinn Fein could not even beat the SDLP during the troubles.

    1916 didn't bring about the Government of Ireland Act. The war of independence where Collins used similar tactics to the provos did.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    What I have said, and always have, is that she should apologize for the BA murdering civilians and the terrible acts her army have done. Thats it, nothing more, nothing less. Before you ask yes, the IRA should apologize for killing civilians, and if the apology they issued is not good enough then they should do another, more satisfactory one.

    But you still won't apologise for supporting a group that murdered many of my fellow Irishmen ?

    I find that unacceptable and I demand that apology.

    Can you not see where stances like that lead us ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭ascanbe


    Why would this government apologise or why would the 'free-state' government/s have apologised for what happened in 1920? How could they, for starters?
    What you refer to with regards Collins/the Cairo gang occurred during the War of Independence: before the formation of the 'free-state'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Liam Byrne wrote: »
    But you still won't apologise for supporting a group that murdered many of my fellow Irishmen ?

    I find that unacceptable and I demand that apology.

    Can you not see where stances like that lead us ?
    You would think I was asking the queen to denounce her army rather than acknowledge that they murdered civilians etc.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    I think Gerry Adams is a lot more like Michael Collins than you think. Except he managed to take nearly all the IRA with him.

    Yeah. If Collins hadn't been killed you could have just seen him running protection rackets and laundering diesel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    1916 didn't bring about the Government of Ireland Act. The war of independence where Collins used similar tactics to the provos did.

    The 1918 general election gave consent to Michael Collins. Gerry Adams never had the same mandate for his actions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Notorious97


    RachaelVO wrote: »
    I am slightly older than ya, but when you're 50, in theory I should still be around talking sh1te ;) I might just join you and KeithAFC for a pint, I promise I'll leave my zimmer frame outside:p

    I am a republican in as much as I don't agree with a monarchy! I often find that you can't have a decent talk with staunch Irish republicans, there's no give, and I find that frustrating.

    Like most of us, I have family ties to Irish republicanism and the OLD IRA! I'm proud that some of my family were honoured in the garden of remembrance yesterday, and cos I know their names and have seen their pictures as young men a tear came to my eye when the queen laid that wreath, I found it very poignant, and I mentioned their names out loud. Dunno why, I just felt it had to be done. My great uncle who is dead about 20 years or so, had an IRA military salute at his funeral. He was apparently a big wig in the old IRA.

    So if there is a united Ireland, I hope it's blood and tear free (and I suppose economically viable)

    The nosey side of me would love to know who you are related to but i wont ask on here lol, i have no family ties to it that i know of, but since i was a child i have loved history, which just kept growing.

    I pay tax for these eejits im bailing out, id happily pay a bit more for a united Ireland ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭mgmt


    el tonto wrote: »
    Yeah. If Collins hadn't been killed you could have just seen him running protection rackets and laundering diesel.

    And only allowing his niece to go to a solicitor to report his sex predator father.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,152 ✭✭✭✭Liam Byrne


    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    You would think I was asking the queen to denounce her army rather than acknowledge that they murdered civilians etc.

    Ah but she did acknowledge it. Your earlier gripe was that she didn't apologise.

    Good to see that you're improving. :) Keep it up!


Advertisement
Advertisement