Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish women forced to cancel assisted-suicide trip

2»

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    I didn't mean to make it look like you did actually. I apologise. Just wanted to point out that they weren't forced to cancel their trip.

    No problem. :)

    Certainly if they cancelled their trip, I would hazard a guess that some sort of pressure from the Gardi was applied to do so.
    Some might use the word "forced" in that context then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 199 ✭✭CD.


    how can she be prosecuted for something that is illegal here, but is legal in the country that it was commited in?

    i do not understand how ireland would have any jurisdiction in a case like that?

    by those standards if i went to amsterdam and tried hash i could be prosecuted here because it's illegal here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Amalgam wrote: »
    My understanding is that Dignitas have a system where the 'patient' starts the process themselves, through 'body input', visual, or some sort of mechanism, blowing into a tube, etc..

    What kind of charge could they level at the partner, being in the same room, accessory?
    jc84 wrote: »
    it doesn't even come under there jurisdiction surely
    ShooterSF wrote: »
    Is Dignitas illegal in Switzerland or do our national laws now extend our boundaries? :confused:
    It's illegal to aid & abet someone in committing suicide or attempting to commit suicide. The word "abet" is the important one, because it basically means that if you provide any support or encouragement, then you have committed an offence. Travelling with someone who is intent on ending their life would be seen as providing support & encouragement. That is, if you didn't want them to do it, you wouldn't go with them.

    It doesn't matter where the suicide takes place so long as the "aid & abet" bit takes place in Ireland.

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1993/en/act/pub/0011/sec0002.html#sec2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,310 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    KH25 wrote: »
    I wonder how did the gardaí find out about their plans?
    I'd say some pro-lifer or "good christian" informed the Gardai.

    Apart from walking in front of a high-speed train (happens every few months, it seems), there's not much she'll be able to do.


  • Posts: 11,928 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The women, one of whom is in the final stage of multiple sclerosis

    MS is only directly life threatening in less than 1% of cases.
    It is a degenerative condition, there is no final stage as such.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    the_syco wrote: »
    I'd say some pro-lifer or "good christian" informed the Gardai.
    I'm guessing but I might say it could be more close to home?
    A member of family who got wind of the poor inflicted persons actions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭g_moriarty


    TheZohan wrote: »
    Only one would be dead. It's an emotive subject, especially when the lady in question is suffering, and that's the key word, from MS.

    I had been suffering with MS for years, finally made the switch to Ubuntu 11.04 and have been happier since :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    the_syco wrote: »
    Apart from walking in front of a high-speed train (happens every few months, it seems), there's not much she'll be able to do.
    There's plenty she can do and may end up doing. But she clearly wanted to die with some painless dignity and instead the law requires that she opts for more painful methods (both for her and her loved ones).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    What implications does this have for women who travel abroad for abortions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    mconigol wrote: »
    What implications does this have for women who travel abroad for abortions?
    None.

    It's not a precedent or any kind of new thing. Despite the headline, no-one has been "forced" to do anything.

    The women were informed of the law and what may happen on the living woman's return. They were not however actually prevented from going abroad, and they certainly cannot stop the ill woman from going on her own.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    mconigol wrote: »
    What implications does this have for women who travel abroad for abortions?
    There was a case a number of years ago when a girl wanted to travel to England for an abortion.
    She was stopped.
    It ended up in the Irish courts and its was decided that her right to travel had been infringed upon.
    At the time it was a so called landmark case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,822 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    seamus wrote: »
    It's illegal to aid & abet someone in committing suicide or attempting to commit suicide. The word "abet" is the important one, because it basically means that if you provide any support or encouragement, then you have committed an offence. Travelling with someone who is intent on ending their life would be seen as providing support & encouragement. That is, if you didn't want them to do it, you wouldn't go with them.

    It doesn't matter where the suicide takes place so long as the "aid & abet" bit takes place in Ireland.

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1993/en/act/pub/0011/sec0002.html#sec2

    Thanks for clarifying the law.

    That is terrible. So she has to leave her family and friends and go to another country alone to die yet no political party seems concerned over our lack of rights when it comes to euthanasia :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    seamus wrote: »
    None.

    It's not a precedent or any kind of new thing. Despite the headline, no-one has been "forced" to do anything.

    The women were informed of the law and what may happen on the living woman's return. They were not however actually prevented from going abroad, and they certainly cannot stop the ill woman from going on her own.

    Yeah I understand that.

    I'm just wondering if it's a similar crime to "assist" with an abortion for example?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    Biggins wrote: »
    There was a case a number of years ago when a girl wanted to travel to England for an abortion.
    She was stopped.
    It ended up in the Irish courts and its was decided that her right to travel had been infringed upon.
    At the time it was a so called landmark case.

    Yeah I seem to remember that now actually.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    mconigol wrote: »
    Yeah I seem to remember that now actually.
    Flashback:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6618911.stm


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,424 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    Sounds like it coulda been the holiday of a lifetime...

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭aido179


    g_moriarty wrote: »
    I had been suffering with MS for years, finally made the switch to Ubuntu 11.04 and have been happier since :)

    I really don't want to laugh at that but that was funny...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭endabob1


    What a Farce, it's the Miss X case all over again, how can the Govt restrict an individual's right to travel.
    I voted in that referendum in the early 90's that was supposed to allow travel for abortion, surely this falls under the same categorisation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    mconigol wrote: »
    I'm just wondering if it's a similar crime to "assist" with an abortion for example?
    No, the last constitutional amendment on abortion specifically made it legal to make information services on abortion available within the state. If it was illegal to "aid, abet, assist in procuring" an abortion, then that would be in direct conflict with the constitution.

    Afaik, the "Offences against the Person Act 1861" is still the law on abortion in this country. Which goes to show just how behind we are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    seamus wrote: »
    No, the last constitutional amendment on abortion specifically made it legal to make information services on abortion available within the state. If it was illegal to "aid, abet, assist in procuring" an abortion, then that would be in direct conflict with the constitution.

    Afaik, the "Offences against the Person Act 1861" is still the law on abortion in this country. Which goes to show just how behind we are.

    Ah right, thanks for the explanation, cheers!

    Don't really see how assisted suicide should be treated any different then to be honest. At least the person has the choice in that case!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    ...So she has to leave her family and friends and go to another country alone to die yet no political party seems concerned over our lack of rights when it comes to euthanasia :(
    ...And you will see no time soon, any of the main parties wishing to get involved with this issue either.
    All will be trying to avoid total involvement/comment/opinion of the matter for their own party reasons.

    Best not to rock the boat and effect any one voting community that might shy away from them giving their any possible stance on the issue!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭Cool_CM


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    Is Dignitas illegal in Switzerland or do our national laws now extend our boundaries? :confused:

    Not illegal, but generally viewed as the ryanair of assisted suicide organisations in Switzerland. They are also the reason that I don't go swimming in Lake Zurich.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,822 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    Cool_CM wrote: »
    Not illegal, but generally viewed as the ryanair of assisted suicide organisations in Switzerland. They are also the reason that I don't go swimming in Lake Zurich.

    Interesting read. I'd much rather they go to a landfill tbh but why would you not go swimming? the ashes are hardly an environmental risk. You're not afraid of a Cartman and Kenny situation are you? :P (Sorry if you don't get the reference)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,048 ✭✭✭vampire of kilmainham


    id just kill myself at home and wouldent involve anyone fcuking governments and laws stating that you should live in agoney load of bollix


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    The women would be dead....how could they be charged?
    Actually not so long back suicide was a crime in this country. (technically speaking someone was murdered, even if by themselves)


    Not sure if true but I've heard that way way back in Europe you'd be hanged if you attempted suicide and failed :confused:


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,589 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Biggins wrote: »
    Aye, a strange case.
    If they were forced to cancel their trip, I think there are legal implications here that need to be looked at again by someone!
    Switzerland isn't in the EU.
    If it were somewhere in the EU then the whole goods and services thing applies


    Is this the whole right to travel refernedum again ?

    [edit] oh yeah seen your other post :)


Advertisement
Advertisement