Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Moment of truth for leftists (except scumlord because he likes The Zohan)

11011121416

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    I think you'll find most people arguing against you in this thread are just pro justice and people not having their human rights denied.


    Its hard to talk about "pro justice & human rights" and the Palestinians in the one breath.

    Extremists on both sides are as bad as each other, however I'd rather Israeli justice & human rights over Palestinian any day of the week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Its hard to talk about "pro justice & human rights" and the Palestinians in the one breath.

    Extremists on both sides are as bad as each other, however I'd rather Israeli justice & human rights over Palestinian any day of the week.

    ...unless you were a Palestinian, in which case things would take a grim turn. It is true, though, that as far as their organisations go, they are no angels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Nodin and the fixed anti Israeli commenters: I think I misunderstood some of you from the start. You are not intrested in seeing the conflict from both sides. You are here to defend the Palestinian side no matter what. An answer justifying them will always come. Israeli bad actions will be underlined, Palestinian bad action will be sweeped under the carpet or not mentioned at all.
    That's the problem with all human conflict. You defend the Israeli side they defend the Palestinian side and it then becomes a battle of who can outdo the other side. It's not about peace it's about winning.

    Both sides are wrong, it takes two to tango and until both sides admit they are just as wrong as the other side this argument will go on and on and on.

    I could quite easily argue either side of this debate with more or less the same argument. "Mammy he hit me" "No she hit me first" "but he took my bouncy ball" "She eat my biscuit"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Nodin wrote: »
    ...unless you were a Palestinian, in which case things would take a grim turn. It is true, though, that as far as their organisations go, they are no angels.

    Don't know about that either tbh..

    Leaving the settlements aside, I'm no expert on them and no Israeli I've ever spoken to has agreed with them.

    But I've known enemies of Israel being imprisoned after due process (sometimes!! - in the case of Lebanon, probably never), sentenced and released at the end of their sentence - alive.

    Sadly we can't say that about the enemies, or perceived enemies of the Palestinians.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    If I haven't done so before, let me recommend Joe Sacco's "Palestine"; an enlightening book on life in the area.

    There are plenty of Israelis who are concerned over the treatment meted out to Palestinians - some of the soldiers who are conscripted to the IDF are known as refuseniks for their stance on the situation. And then of course; Mordechai Vanunu who blew the whistle on Israel's WMDs.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    ScumLord wrote: »
    That's the problem with all human conflict. You defend the Israeli side they defend the Palestinian side and it then becomes a battle of who can outdo the other side. It's not about peace it's about winning.

    Both sides are wrong, it takes two to tango and until both sides admit they are just as wrong as the other side this argument will go on and on and on.
    Bingo. Plus whatever side you support is more based on fluke than anything else. Sometimes it can even throw up interesting dichotomies in folks. I'm gonna pick on Makikomi* as an example of that. From my reading of your posts over the years would it be fair to say you would be more of a republican than not? More a man proud of your fellow Irish men and women and their fight to remove themselves from the yoke of the English crown? Yet because of your Jewish heritage you are more a supporter of Israel, when most republicans(indeed a majority of Irish even) would be more supportive of the Palestinians as the aforementioned are much more like the Irish of the past under crown rule and the Israeli's are much more like the planters of Ulster and elsewhere(but Ulster in particular has major parallels).

    Hey I'm confused myself :D I grew up with Jews as mates, had rellies who saw the results first hand of the Austrian corporals madness, so would have backed Israel rather than the PLO of my peers. I still would too. Like you say given a choice between Israel a modern "western" democracy and the majority of Arab states I'd defo want to live in the former. Hell one university in Tel Aviv produces more doctoral thesis' in a year than the whole of the rest of the middle east. I really hope the various current revolutions in some of the Arab nations changes that, but I won't hold my breath.

    What rankles with me is the hypocrisy and blinkered thinking in Israel. Certainly the official line. If they admited that they're intent on a Jew only Israel, more to the point a non Arab one, I'd have far more respect for them. For all their bowler hatted sash wearing insanity at least the Orange men were pretty clear about their aims. Israel is like the school bully using the weaker kids own fist to punch him in the face, all the while saying ". It's all you fault, why are you punching yourself?".





    *not based on reality. He's fooking huuge, so he is. :eek: :D

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Its hard to talk about "pro justice & human rights" and the Palestinians in the one breath.

    Extremists on both sides are as bad as each other, however I'd rather Israeli justice & human rights over Palestinian any day of the week.

    Reading this thread and a few Irish Republican ones here lately, remind me how much I hate extremism. Bad and all as the North is, the extremists are less and less and things are moving on.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    K-9 wrote: »
    Reading this thread and a few Irish Republican ones here lately, remind me how much I hate extremism. Bad and all as the North is, the extremists are less and less and things are moving on.
    They are now. I wouldn't like to have been around in the 17th century though. Add in modern automatic weapons and it would have been "fun" up north. But yea we dont really go in for real mad extremes. Actually that goes for these two islands. We're not quite as batshít crazy as some other countries. :D

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭The Israeli


    Nodin wrote: »
    I'm not condemning it, I'm pointing out that criticizing Abbas for 'celebrating' terrorism is rather hypocritical.

    As for 'role models' - Irgun veterans are recognized by a medal from the state as are the even more extreme Lehi.
    You aren't condemning encouragement of terror?! Why?
    You see, that Irgun (organization in Hebrew) existed before 1948. Things that were allowed then, are not allowed now. Irish people committed terror attacks against the British before you got your independence too. Things were more controversial in back those days, and I really hope that the world has advanced since then.
    Israel can't be retroactively bad to "resistance" fighters. Also, the main organization was the Palmach, which held much higher standards towards human lives.
    Nodin wrote: »
    Quote:
    The Palestinians are to be blamed for-
    1) The Palestinians don't agree to put the "right of return" on the table at the moment...
    Quote:
    The Palestinian Authority's anger over the leak of confidential documents about the stricken Middle East peace process is likely to be matched by outrage among many Palestinians at the revelation that their negotiators privately agreed that a token number of refugees, just 10,000, would be allowed to return to Israel.
    Quote:

    2) They don't agree to discuss on any territory that Israel holds in Western Jerusalem which houses many thousands of Israelis. Not even to discuss?
    You mean east Jerusalem.
    Quote:
    Palestinian negotiators secretly agreed to allow Israel to annex all but one of the settlements built in occupied East Jerusalem in the most far-reaching concessions ever made over the bitterly contested city. The offer was turned down by Israel's then foreign minister as inadequate.

    Palestinian Authority leaders also privately discussed giving up part of the flashpoint Arab neighbourhood of Sheikh Jarrah, according to leaked documents. And they proposed a joint committee to take over the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount holy sites in the Old City of Jerusalem – the highly sensitive issue that, along with refugee rights, sank the Camp David talks in 2000 and triggered the second Palestinian intifada.
    That was my biggest point in defending Israel so far. I don't intend to defend Israel in all cases also. As I have been reading I've found out that: Yes, the Palestinians were fair towards Israel with their offers to give up on and exchange territories in Jerusalem.
    Though there were several very problematic points on which Israeli citizens would not probably agree: The Palestinians demand sovereignty in the old city, but are willing to leave the jews quarter and parts of the Armenian quarter. Also, they proposed a united council that will manage the holy places.
    Look, I'm very liberal, and I think that this offer is nice on paper. In reality, I'm not sure if it can hold because it leaves both sides bind to each other and it's enough to throw a match to set everything on fire again. Also there is a huge problem of protecting the Israeli places, and you can be sure that some people would like to harm.
    In my opinion, the most realistic solution is a complete separation in borders. It's the most stable one, but we can't agree upon one like that.
    Regarding the rest of the territories there wasn't much of a real progress. Accordingly to what I have read the Palestinian leadership suggested that some settlements would be transferred to Palestine and their citizens would become Palestinian citizens. Well, this won't work. Israel would not be able to guarantee their security. Who are the people that would like to become Palestinian citizens.. Totally impractical. The direction of that solution should be lands exchange and giving ups of both sides.
    If you are asking me: if so, what do you suggest? what is practical to you? how would you know that you can't give territory A but you can exchange territory B with territory C and so on?
    Well I can't. I'm not a highly ranked officer in the army nor a politition. Nor anyone of you in this forum. I hope that in the high ranks sit people that over time will be able to overcome these problems.
    Nodin wrote: »
    Syria is a pariah state under UN sanctions, isn't it?
    Well, you represent yourself as a justice fighter. You better be an all rounded one…
    People are dying there. Maybe you can help to turn the attention of the world to that too..
    Maybe the sanctions aren't helping to save those people….
    Regarding the rest I told my opinion and what I know from absorbing the daily life in Isael. You don't have to accept it.


    I would really like to comment to all, but I don't have so much spare time at the moment. I'm thankful to all the people that are really trying to understand both sides, and think about real solutions to the problem.
    I don't want to mention their nick names, because it would seem to some that we are "working together". What binds us is just a desire to be reasonable, and show that both sides are right and wrong in their own ways.


    And something possitive: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=301G8fTOvYs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    You aren't condemning encouragement of terror?! Why?

    "terror" is a convenient term used to demonise the opposition. Both sides have used such tactics and still do, though in more advanced forms.
    You see, that Irgun (organization in Hebrew) existed before 1948. Things that were allowed then, are not allowed now.

    ...a lot of things happened between then and now.
    Irish people committed terror attacks against the British before you got your independence too.

    I'm fully aware of that, and since I haven't condemned Israeli "terror", I don't know why you keep bringing it up.
    Things were more controversial in back those days, and I really hope that the world has advanced since then.

    Not much.

    Israel can't be retroactively bad to "resistance" fighters. Also, the main organization was the Palmach, which held much higher standards towards human lives.

    I'm not asking or expecting you or "Israel" to be "bad" to anyone. I'm pointing out that between the two sides, theres not much by way of moral high ground.
    That was my biggest point in defending Israel so far. I don't intend to defend Israel in all cases also. As I have been reading I've found out that: Yes, the Palestinians were fair towards Israel with their offers to give up on and exchange territories in Jerusalem.

    Though there were several very problematic points on which Israeli citizens would not probably agree: The Palestinians demand sovereignty in the old city, but are willing to leave the jews quarter and parts of the Armenian quarter. Also, they proposed a united council that will manage the holy places.

    Look, I'm very liberal, and I think that this offer is nice on paper. In reality, I'm not sure if it can hold because it leaves both sides bind to each other and it's enough to throw a match to set everything on fire again.

    ......this may come as a shock, but regardless of what kind of agreement is reached (if one is reached at all), yez are going to be stuck beside each other. In fact, its the one certainty.
    Also there is a huge problem of protecting the Israeli places, and you can be sure that some people would like to harm.

    The only threat these days comes from the Hamas side. Abbas has essentially pacified the west bank. The IDF seem to be doing a rather thorough job themselves.
    In my opinion, the most realistic solution is a complete separation in borders.

    I'm afraid I'm not sure what you mean by that.

    It's the most stable one, but we can't agree upon one like that.

    Regarding the rest of the territories there wasn't much of a real progress. Accordingly to what I have read the Palestinian leadership suggested that some settlements would be transferred to Palestine and their citizens would become Palestinian citizens. Well, this won't work. Israel would not be able to guarantee their security. Who are the people that would like to become Palestinian citizens.. Totally impractical.



    I'm unaware of that in the current negotiation position. If you had a source?

    This shows what was offered recently.
    http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/2011122114239940577.html

    Well, you represent yourself as a justice fighter. You better be an all rounded one…

    I've never referred to myself in such terms, directly or otherwise, here or elsewhere.

    There are tools available on the public profile of each user. If you wish to imply that certain parties are focussed on only one issue, I'd suggest using them and starting a thread. Otherwise you might want to drop it.







  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭ascanbe


    Its hard to talk about "pro justice & human rights" and the Palestinians in the one breath.

    Extremists on both sides are as bad as each other, however I'd rather Israeli justice & human rights over Palestinian any day of the week.

    Wait a minute, Brooklynn Unkempt Postage. I normally wouldn't bring an argument from one thread into another, but in this case, i feel, it's justifiable.
    Weren't you, in a thread not so long ago, going to great lengths to explain why, exactly, those who joined the IRA in the north, becoming 'terrorists' in the process, did what they did?
    And, unless my memory fails me, you were getting quite irate at some of those who wouldn't countenace any understanding of this?
    Is there not a fairly obvious correlation between the position of the Palestinians and the position of Northern Catholics at the time the 'troubles' flared up in the North?
    I'd say yes; the only real difference being that what the Palestinians are currently going through would seem to make the position of Catholics in N. Ireland at that time look somewhat idyllic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,604 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Its hard to talk about "pro justice & human rights" and the Palestinians in the one breath.

    very true. This is sadly the crux of the problem, to many right wing Israelis it's fine to deny Palestinians of their rights. It's a convenient narrative for them to cast the majority of palestinians as terrorists and extremtists because they do not really seem to want a solution, due to it interfering with their vision of a greater Israel.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Nodin wrote: »
    ......this may come as a shock, but regardless of what kind of agreement is reached (if one is reached at all), yez are going to be stuck beside each other. In fact, its the one certainty.
    Maybe not. The Palestinian land and population is dropping. They're being squeezed into smaller and smaller areas. I can see a time where within the borders of Israel their'll be very very few left. Jerusalem yes as the temple of th mount is there, but beyond that? Maybe not.
    ascanbe wrote: »
    Wait a minute, Makikomi. I normally wouldn't bring an argument from one thread into another, but in this case, i feel, it's justifiable.
    Weren't you, in a thread not so long ago, going to great lengths to explain why, exactly, those who joined the IRA in the north, becoming 'terrorists' in the process, did what they did?
    And, unless my memory fails me, you were getting quite irate at some of those who wouldn't countenace any understanding of this?
    Is there not a fairly obvious correlation between the position of the Palestinians and the position of Northern Catholics at the time the 'troubles' flared up in the North?
    I'd say yes; the only real difference being that what the Palestinians are currently going through would seem to make the position of Catholics in N. Ireland at that time look somewhat idyllic.
    Yep well ahead of you :) But it's down to individual perception of this stuff. I'd come from a largely republican background, yet because I grew up with Jews as mates I would be more a supporter of Israel in general. As someone who also thinks Islam hasn't been any use to civilisation since the middle ages I know which state in that part of the world I'd rather live in too(though I think the black hat wearing ringletted Zionist eejits are just as bad).

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    ascanbe wrote: »
    Wait a minute, Makikomi. I normally wouldn't bring an argument from one thread into another, but in this case, i feel, it's justifiable.
    Weren't you, in a thread not so long ago, going to great lengths to explain why, exactly, those who joined the IRA in the north, becoming 'terrorists' in the process, did what they did?
    And, unless my memory fails me, you were getting quite irate at some of those who wouldn't countenace any understanding of this?
    Is there not a fairly obvious correlation between the position of the Palestinians and the position of Northern Catholics at the time the 'troubles' flared up in the North?
    I'd say yes; the only real difference being that what the Palestinians are currently going through would seem to make the position of Catholics in N. Ireland at that time look somewhat idyllic.


    I'm not really getting you at all.

    If you think I ever justified terrorism here or anywhere else, or made excuses for IRA actions against anyone your very wrong.

    I detest the IRA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭The Israeli


    If you have already mentioned the IRA - have you all seen the movie "Bloody Sunday"? A very powerful and 'heavy' movie.

    off topic:
    I watched it without subtitles and it was so hard for me to understand the Northern Irish accent! When the British were talking, i was like: oh well, normal English, heh. Do you all understant all those accents? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    If you have already mentioned the IRA - have you all seen the movie "Bloody Sunday"? A very powerful and 'heavy' movie.

    off topic:
    I watched it without subtitles and it was so hard for me to understand the Northern Irish accent! When the British were talking, i was like: oh well, normal English, heh. Do you all understant all those accents? :)

    Depends on the English accent, Liverpool "Scouser", Newcastle "Geordie" and a strong Manchester one can be even harder to understand.

    I do notice most Irish Republican posters here tend to sympathise with Palestinians, probably because they can empathise with them because of events like that.

    I wouldn't live far away from Derry and the stories of harassment of people from here going to the Bloody Sunday funerals, by British soldiers at border checkpoints, are still remembered.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭The Israeli


    Manchester accent, heh. You're quite right. I'm catching up on all "Shameless" seasons (just discovered the series), and sometimes it's a big challenge .
    Here we have different accents too but they differ not by the geographical location but by usually the origin of your parents / grandparents. For instance: there is the normal Ashkenazi accent, Moroccan, Iraqi, Persian, Arabic of the non jews, Russian and some more.

    Yea, I agree that there should be a correlation between the Irish past and the Palestinian past and present. People always identify themselves with those whose they think have similar experiences.

    I want to show you a blog of an English young woman who had traveled to south America and met there an Israeli guy. She followed him to Israel and ended up spending here 8 years during not easy times. What makes it interesting is that she wasn't an Israeli biased or anything of that kind.. Just a regular English girl who knew how to write well.
    It's an off topic again for people who would like to know more about Israel through non political eyes:

    http://www.onejerusalem.com/2006/10/12/not-jewish-what-are-you-doing-here-part-17-farewell/

    At the top right you will find all the first 17 parts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭AskMyChocolate


    Katkatim wrote: »
    What a sad statement and what a twisted logic. How anyone can find justification for strapping a bomb on someone's child and sending them to die is beyond my understanding.

    If the shoe was on the other foot and America was giving Hamas $3bn a year to buy fighter jets I imagine they would use these rather than suicide bombers. Also, if Palestine was refusing to accept the Israeli state as set out in 1948, and was using its military superiority in an attempt to drive Israel into the sea, how would you describe the Israelis who did their best to defend their state with the few mortars and rockets they had at their disposal? Would you call them "terrorists" or "resistance fighters" ?

    I would imagine you know from my previous post that I am neutral (some would say pro-Israeli). I know I would describe them as resistance fighters, I am just wondering how you would classify them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    I want to show you a blog of an English young woman who had traveled to south America and met there an Israeli guy. She followed him to Israel and ended up spending here 8 years during not easy times. What makes it interesting is that she wasn't an Israeli biased or anything of that kind..

    A little off topic here too..

    As a teen I thought I hated Israel, I hated Jew's, I was into neo-Nazi BS and thought I knew it all - damn its not a secret on boards - I still have a swastika tattoo from that period of my life.

    I remember sitting in traffic in Netanya, and looking around me at people getting on with their every day lives - both Arab and Jew a like. And it hit me like a ton of bricks that everything I'd believed to this point was bullsh*t.

    It hit me really hard that someone had planned on the total annihilation of the Jews.

    The more time I spent in Israel the more I fell in love with the country, sure the people can be hard work.. Reading Leon Uris 'Exodus' and he liken's Israeli's to a fruit out there whose name I can't spell - basically its hard & torny on the outside, but soft & sweet inside.

    Everyday I long for the day I return.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    I'd have been quite the Republican in my day, well able to quote about Bloody Sunday, gerrymandering, Castlereagh, Shoot to kill, bias against the GAA etc. etc. I realised there's more to it and what it boiled down to in the mid to late 80's, hatred on all sides.

    The choice was hatred and Gibraltar, Milltown and Casement or back Hume, Reynolds and other trying to talk and get an agreement.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭The Israeli


    If the shoe was on the other foot and America was giving Hamas $3bn a year to buy fighter jets I imagine they would use these rather than suicide bombers. Also, if Palestine was refusing to accept the Israeli state as set out in 1948, and was using its military superiority in an attempt to drive Israel into the sea, how would you describe the Israelis who did their best to defend their state with the few mortars and rockets they had at their disposal? Would you call them "terrorists" or "resistance fighters" ?

    I would imagine you know from my previous post that I am neutral (some would say pro-Israeli). I know I would describe them as resistance fighters, I am just wondering how you would classify them.
    Well, the Palestinians tried to drive us away from the country in 1948. They just didn't succeed. Israelis defended the state with everything they could, which wasn't much, true. The objective was to survive, but the means weren't killing civilians. I assume that many civilians died during that but it wasn't a tactic.
    Israel fights against Palestinian armed forces, and during those operations sometimes civilians get killed. Terrorists are people who deliberately harm unarmed civilians.
    Recent example – two teens were killed by Israeli mortar shells which were fired to the point from which Palestinians launched rockets towards Israeli civilians.
    The terrorists don't seek in many operations to harm security forces. Example – the example from before + the bomb in Jerusalem last week that killed a British 60 years old woman + the murders in Itamar (5 family members).
    This is a very barbaric way of resistance. It should be condemned. Not understood.
    If they wish to resist, they should attack only armed forces like the IDF. I, of course, don't support it, but because of the fact that IDF can protect itself and it's its job, then it's legitimate.
    Personally, I think that you are a nice person. It's just this point that I wanted to make clear.
    Second, the Palestinians aren't facing a danger of being kicked out of the country. Israel doesn't conquer existing Palestinian cities and villages. In fact, in the future agreements Israel will return lands. The war that the Palestinian terror organizations are having can't be described as survival war. At most, they can be described as "saving the non-habitant lands from Israeli expanding occupation and trying to roll back to before 48 position.
    A little off topic here too..

    As a teen I thought I hated Israel, I hated Jew's, I was into neo-Nazi BS and thought I knew it all - damn its not a secret on boards - I still have a swastika tattoo from that period of my life.

    I remember sitting in traffic in Netanya, and looking around me at people getting on with their every day lives - both Arab and Jew a like. And it hit me like a ton of bricks that everything I'd believed to this point was bullsh*t.

    It hit me really hard that someone had planned on the total annihilation of the Jews.

    The more time I spent in Israel the more I fell in love with the country, sure the people can be hard work.. Reading Leon Uris 'Exodus' and he liken's Israeli's to a fruit out there whose name I can't spell - basically its hard & torny on the outside, but soft & sweet inside.

    Everyday I long for the day I return.
    Can you share and tell what made you come to Israel in the first place giving your starting point? Sounds interesting!
    K-9 wrote: »
    I'd have been quite the Republican in my day, well able to quote about Bloody Sunday, gerrymandering, Castlereagh, Shoot to kill, bias against the GAA etc. etc. I realised there's more to it and what it boiled down to in the mid to late 80's, hatred on all sides.

    The choice was hatred and Gibraltar, Milltown and Casement or back Hume, Reynolds and other trying to talk and get an agreement.
    Hey, if I liked Bloody Sunday what other one or two movies you can recommend on to me?
    thanks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Can you share and tell what made you come to Israel in the first place giving your starting point? Sounds interesting!

    I served on the Lebanese/Israeli border with UNIFIL, first time was in 1988 - last time was 2000-2001.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Second, the Palestinians aren't facing a danger of being kicked out of the country. Israel doesn't conquer existing Palestinian cities and villages. In fact, in the future agreements Israel will return lands. The war that the Palestinian terror organizations are having can't be described as survival war. At most, they can be described as "saving the non-habitant lands from Israeli expanding occupation and trying to roll back to before 48 position.
    Nice way to avoid the really obvious. Again how do you and your fellow countrymen and women explain this map? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qLZCK7dYhVA/TLtg9dUosbI/AAAAAAAAAiU/2xmpO0wMUfA/s1600/israel_palestine_map.jpg The green areas have gotten smaller and smaller and smaller and continue to do so. This is an indisputable fact, so how can you state "Israel doesn't conquer existing Palestinian cities and villages"? It makes all of your other (good) arguments look daft.

    The other thing is that if that was any other state they would have been declared a rogue state and UN sanctions would have been in force. Oh wait... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel More UN sanctions condeming Israel than any other nation combined. Yet nothing has been done. Yet other nations have been or are currently under western military force of arms on a lot less provocation. Arab state with UN sanctions and condemnation? Send in the tanks or kick off a "no fly zone". Israel with more than any other state combined? Ah sure let's trade with them. Now do you see why a lot of people, especially Arabs are against your state and feel they're being bullshítted?
    Here we have different accents too but they differ not by the geographical location but by usually the origin of your parents / grandparents. For instance: there is the normal Ashkenazi accent, Moroccan, Iraqi, Persian, Arabic of the non jews, Russian and some more.
    Kinda like the perception of the Jewish culture itself by outsiders. When you ask most in the west to picture a Jew they usually picture some pale bald bloke in ringlets with a bushy beard dressed in a black overcoat and like you say there are loads of other cultures involved. For a start no Irish Jew I've known looked like that. Well they looked like Irish people mostly because they were. Even a couple of red heads. Poor poor bastards. :D Then again a fair few Jews worldwide have red hair IIRC. Woody Allen is one I think. Wonder is it the same mutation that the Irish, Scots and Basques have?

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    A little off topic here too..

    As a teen I thought I hated Israel, I hated Jew's, I was into neo-Nazi BS and thought I knew it all - damn its not a secret on boards - I still have a swastika tattoo from that period of my life.

    I remember sitting in traffic in Netanya, and looking around me at people getting on with their every day lives - both Arab and Jew a like. And it hit me like a ton of bricks that everything I'd believed to this point was bullsh*t.

    It hit me really hard that someone had planned on the total annihilation of the Jews.

    The more time I spent in Israel the more I fell in love with the country, sure the people can be hard work.. Reading Leon Uris 'Exodus' and he liken's Israeli's to a fruit out there whose name I can't spell - basically its hard & torny on the outside, but soft & sweet inside.

    Everyday I long for the day I return.
    Which is cool M, but it can also be too easy to go all "reformed whore" about things if you know what I mean? Where one extreme view of youth is usurped by reality, the temptation is to swing the other extreme and miss the middle path.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Well, the Palestinians tried to drive us away from the country in 1948. They just didn't succeed. Israelis defended the state with everything they could, which wasn't much, true. The objective was to survive, but the means weren't killing civilians. I assume that many civilians died during that but it wasn't a tactic.

    Nice of you to ignore all the ethnic cleansing by Zionist colonists. What did you expect the Palestinians to do, lay down and allow themselves to be driven from there homes, by recently arrived colonists, whose justification was some stuff written in the Bible? What Zionists did (and are still doing) to the Palestinians is no different than what Europeans did to Native American's. You can't expect peace when you stealing other peoples land, and you can't call yourself a victim either, when you are stealing other peoples land, that what people tend to call aggression. None of this btw justifies Palestinian attacks on civilians, but I fail to see what was wrong with Palestinians being unwilling to give up there land to a group of recently arrived colonists. I fail to see what right Zionists had to any land in Palestine to set up there own country.

    Also, civilians were attacked as a tactic, to force them from there homes, for example the Deir Yassin masscre. The Zionists have never been any better, than there enemies when it comes to killing civilians. I always find the denial to be incredible, considering that the only way for someone to come to such a conclusion, is either to ignore facts, or to lie about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin



    Well, the Palestinians tried to drive us away from the country in 1948. They just didn't succeed. Israelis defended the state with everything they could, which wasn't much, true. (...............)condemned. Not understood.

    For my own reasons I try to avoid what I refer to as the "atrocity olympics" whereby (a) mentions some act and (b) counters, though occassionally I do the stupid thing and get sucked in. However I feel obligated to point out now that if one looks at the list of casualties and specifically (a seemingly favourite event) the dead children, Palestinian deaths far and away outstretch Israeli.

    Trying to justify it by means of 'o the terrorists were hiding behind them' tends not to work when talking about a single shot to the head of a 12 year old in broad daylight, so I wouldn't go down that route either.

    You might also consider that the majority here aren't saying the Palestinians are saints, and by way of returning the favour, stop pissing on peoples heads and telling them its raining. In a similar vein -
    Second, the Palestinians aren't facing a danger of being kicked out of the country. Israel doesn't conquer existing Palestinian cities and villages. In fact, in the future agreements Israel will return lands. The war that the Palestinian terror organizations are having can't be described as survival war. At most, they can be described as "saving the non-habitant lands from Israeli expanding occupation and trying to roll back to before 48 position.

    "non-habitant lands"?

    According to a report released late last year by the Israeli campaign group Peace Now, Mr Zidane is not alone.
    Nearly 40% of the Jewish settlements in the West Bank are built on privately owned Palestinian land, the report states. Peace Now accuses the government of building settlements on land that has been "effectively stolen".
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6181119.stm
    The human rights group B'tselem has published a report in which it states that almost 60% of the settlement of Ofra has been built on land which remains in private Palestinian ownership.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7795139.stm
    Mobile homes for an illegal Israeli settlement in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) got the go-ahead within a week of Israeli bulldozers demolishing Palestinian homes and property in the area. It emerged last Wednesday (26 March) that Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak has approved the transfer of five mobile homes to the Israeli settlement of Teneh Omarim in the region.
    http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/feature-stories/unlawful-homes-israeli-settlers-demolitions-palestinians-20080331

    Not looking very "non-inhabited" as far as I can see.

    'But some Palestinians sold their land to us since 1967' - I wonder why they'd do that.................
    SALIM al-Adra opens a plastic bag to display the green pellets that Palestinian villagers in the West Bank village of Tuwani say signify a dramatic and deadly escalation of attacks by Israeli settlers.
    The pellets, according to laboratory tests, are 2-fluoroacetamide, a rat poison banned or severely restricted in many countries but produced by two Israeli factories
    ..............
    The problem was highlighted this week by Amnesty International which called on Israeli authorities to investigate recent incidents of poisoning of Palestinian fields and the increasingly frequent attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinian villagers in the West Bank
    http://news.scotsman.com/world/Palestinian-farmers-say-settlers-poison.2621646.jp
    Abed Al-Fatah Al-Hindi, a resident of the Nablus-area village of Tal, reaches the main highway between the Hawara and Git junctions, near the Gilad Farm. An International Red Cross crew stands waiting for him. He is bleeding from a large scalp wound, and his left eye is swollen.
    A paramedic bandages his head, and a volunteer from Rabbis for Human Rights cleans his face. "Every year there's a mess," the villager tells Haaretz. "It's just the first day of the olive harvest, and six settlers attacked me. There wasn't much we could do."

    This week, Yesh Din sent a letter to the overall army's West Bank commander and the commander of the West Bank police district, demanding they take action to safeguard the olive harvest, prevent attacks on Palestinian farmers, and prosecute law breakers seeking to disrupt the harvest.
    Yesh Did studied a series of incidents last year between settlers and Palestinian harvesters, finding that not a single indictment was filed from investigations of the attacks.
    In response, police spokesman Poleg says Yesh Din's list of demands has yet to reach the police district office, and that the group's complaints will be examined.
    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/bitter-olive-harvest-justice-falls-short-in-the-west-bank-1.231373




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Hey, if I liked Bloody Sunday what other one or two movies you can recommend on to me?
    thanks

    Hidden Agenda (1990) - IMDb

    Is very good, based on the Shoot to kill policy and cover up in NI in the early 80's.

    Hunger (2008) - IMDb

    About the Hunger strikes is good but very grim obviously!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    K-9 wrote: »
    [u
    Hunger (2008) - IMDb

    About the Hunger strikes is good but very grim obviously!

    Excellent movie.

    Was it you who recommended in the Bobby Sands thread that I read 'A Killing Rage' ?.. Almost finished it, gripping read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    Shocked by the Isreali's interpreyation of history. Too often ''Zionism'' is blamed for the conflict and death of people in the region. Let me remind everyone that every adult is responsible for their actions. Spouting this deluded propoganda may someday be a criminal offence, the same as holocaust denial I hope.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Even where there isn't Illegal Israeli settlements in the westbank and Gaza there's massive jewish only highways interconnecting them, so even those maps that show the land that's taken are kinda inaccurate, as to move freely the Palestinians are forced to take complex routes to other parts.

    I watched a documentary on it there a couple weeks back and it's heart breaking to watch, a Zionist settler just walking onto a Palestinian mans land and cutting down the guys Olive trees.. these things takes years to produce fruit, and all the while he's flanks by IDF soldiers. the Palestinian man literally crying his heart out with his children watching. it's very upsetting to watch.


Advertisement