Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Unoffiical IRA thread

2

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    In the interests of transparency I presume you are also going to do background checks on all the other candidates across all political parties? They all have a few contenders in there, I'm sure you'll want us to know about them too?

    This isn't a thread about Fianna Fáil or Provisional Sinn Féin or any others.

    I would also like to see some links between Gilmore and these organisations that have existed within the past 20 years.

    So you mean forget about anything before 1981?
    I don't witness anyone doing that for Bin Laden Gerry Adams The Arms Trial etc. so I don't think Official IRA prior to 1991 are off limits or irrelevant.
    I was anti-abortion when I was 16, have been actively campaigning on the pro-choice side for about 15 years now. People mature. Not if they keep their tinfoil hats on though...

    So you claim that Gilmore was linked to the Official IRA and Marxism but just changed his mind? When did he tell everyone else about this?
    By the way the claim that being for women being allowed abortion should they want one isn't necessarily a "more mature" position as having no abortion but this isn't a thread about abortion either.

    Your basic point is still "we should forget about anything before 1991". This is just nonsensical. The last person to try that "year zero" lark was Pol Pot!
    clln wrote: »
    I know boards does not fall under the rules broadcasters have to follow during a GE but really the OP seems to be intent on character destruction more than following the politics charter.

    any chance Gilmore could be alerted to this to at least give him the right of reply?

    I won't discuss my personal motivations for posting this thread here as they are not the subject of the thread either. I am happy to discuss them elsewhere. they are on record so I can prove I had the reasons before I posted the thread.
    when you don't want to deal with the issues do you always resort to attacking the poster who outlines those issues?
    clln wrote: »
    I know boards does not fall under the rules broadcasters have to follow during a GE but really the OP seems to be intent on character destruction more than following the politics charter.

    If you have a complaint about not following the charter then that isn't for discussion here either!
    Nor are allegations of defamation or libel. I posted what is published and already available .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    nesf wrote: »
    So, even if one accepts the OP as true, which I don't really (the dates are mostly accurate as far as I can see but I'm not seeing any evidence of Gilmore being linked to much of what's mentioned), doesn't this just boil down to simply a man being more radical in his youth mellowing with age and drifting more right?

    Are you referring to Gerry Adams? That is not the person the thread is about. If you refer to Gilmore, where is your evidence of Gilmore saying he had no time for the OIRA or rejecting socialism or Marxism? I have posted evidence to people who held senior positions in organisations and secret membership of other organisations and denied the existence of the OIRA. Gilmore was one of a group of people who had links to "Group B" just as others are today accused of having links to the PIRA. But this isnt a thread about the others linked to the PIRA. It is about OIRA and people linked to them.
    CoalBucket wrote: »
    A character assassination is one thing, providing evidence is another. A serious lack of links bar to one dubious wikipedia link.

    It's a bit of a joke tbh.

    Come on OP lets see some proof or factual links to back up your claims

    The book from which I source most of my references is added to the OP. I will supply more references as I get time to. I posted sources about a tenth of the material I have in print. Don't worry I can post loads more and will get around to it. Thanks for asking.

    It isn't a joke. the authors didn't write the book for a joke. They are respected writers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    clln wrote: »
    well then let all parties have somebody working for them appoint a rep to reply here.it shows just how stale this GE is that they have not done so already.

    any party that takes exception to something said on radio contacts the station within minutes!

    Your suggestion that the Labour Party are not "managing the media" now to the best of their ability and getting media to support their bias even more is evidence which supports the double standards issue of "attack PIRA ignore OIRA" . and i havent even poisted the RTE sources and media control references yet! :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Commrade, you can't post blatant falsehoods.
    His wife, which I accept is him, joined at the hip wise, sold one plot of land at the going rate.
    agreed at a "going rate" of under 100k and sold atter when the "going rate" had increased (due to FF policy that Labour were criticising at the time and in particular criticising the selling of inflated land to schoolks) of over 500k?

    and then selling anothe plot to the same school for 10 k so they could park cars there?

    the point about it is it clearly demonstrates she does not represent workers or marxism but represents the landed class of the bosses. Something many of the proles would not like.
    The amout of FFailers pushing this one, making up 'the facts' as they go is getting boring.

    Them's the facts above. going rate was five times the original going rate and inflated according to Labour due to FF policy! Criticise the policy but benefit personally from it. A bit like Enda "sitting TD's should not have pensions except when they are not FF TD's"
    Kenny?
    See calling someone out on blatant wrong doing, backed up with facts, can be seen as attacking, but justifiably.

    It is not a question of wrong doing. It is a question of wearing siocialist clothes and looking for PBP votes and also being a millionaire benefitting from capitalist policies while criticising the same policies. No smoke without salmon.
    Smearing is attempting to put someone in a bad light using little or nothing and colouring it to a silly extent, due to lack of pressing and/or factual material.

    I'm not aware of Gilmore saying he rejected marxism and didn't represent working class people. Is it a case of "Do as I say don't do as I do"?

    the fact is she made over 500k totally legally selling land to a school at about five timers what she had initally argeed to . the price went up because of delays in rezoning. at the same time Labour was critisising FF for supporting people who benefited by selling land to schools at inflated prices due to rezoning.

    It isnt a moral right /wrong issue. It is a question of principles and whether you indicate when you change them.
    I accept Gilmore in practice is far away from the working classes and marxist roots. The think is that they still want votes from such people. Joe Higgins made much the same statement about Bertie being a "socialist". Imagine for example of Gilmore's running mate realised there were a load of anti abortion votes in the constituency and claimed she was anti abortion and represented their view when in practice she doesn't?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    If you could get back to backing up the OP, preferably the 'control of RTE' bit.......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    ISAW wrote: »
    the point about it is it clearly demonstrates she does not represent workers or marxism but represents the landed class of the bosses.
    She is not the leader of the Labour party. Even were she, the Labour party does not represent Marxism.
    I'm not aware of Gilmore saying he rejected marxism and didn't represent working class people.
    Gilmore is the leader of a non-Marxist party. Is that not a pretty clear indication that he has tied his flag to something other then Marxism?

    If not, then lets also bear in mind that Gilmore left the Workers Party to join The Deocratic Left when it was founded. DL was founded on a principle of acceptance of free market economics, as opposed to the Workers Party who remained committed to Marxist principles.

    So...Gilmore did clearly reject marxism, and equally showed his support for free market economics...the very thing that his wife profited from, which you're criticising him for.
    It is a question of principles and whether you indicate when you change them.
    Gilmore is currently the leader of a non-Marxist party.
    He was previously a member of a left-wing party which supported free market economics.

    What greater indication could you have?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    whippet wrote: »
    ...
    He seems to think that dealings his wife had regarding huge sums of money paid over to her for school sites (when she was a senior member of a VEC) had nothing to do with him IT Linky ...

    Your argument is premised on the idea that a wife be subservient to her husband.

    And your "facts" are wrong, and the imputation of impropriety is serious to the point where it might be actionable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Nearly every politician in Ireland has some direct link to some form of the IRA, or has a family member that was active in Ireland. This is a cheap pop at Gilmore. I don't vote for labour, and have intentions of doing so - but the intent of this thread is quite clear.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Nearly every politician in Ireland has some direct link to some form of the IRA, or has a family member that was active in Ireland. This is a cheap pop at Gilmore. I don't vote for labour, and have intentions of doing so - but the intent of this thread is quite clear.

    Is it really?
    If it is so clear how about you saying what it is?
    I be happy to prove you wrong if you make a clear statement of what you think my intentions are but care to deal with the thread and not the intent behind it for the moment.

    And it isn't only about Gilmore. It is about the Official IRA and Workers Party etc. and links to secret control of unions , forgery, racketeering etc.

    It isn't about provisional IRA or about Provisional Sinn Féin or Fianna Fail or the PDs or the Green Party.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    ISAW wrote: »
    Is it really?
    If it is so clear how about you saying what it is?
    I be happy to prove you wrong if you make a clear statement of what you think my intentions are but care to deal with the thread and not the intent behind it for the moment.

    And it isn't only about Gilmore. It is about the Official IRA and Workers Party etc. and links to secret control of unions , forgery, racketeering etc.

    It isn't about provisional IRA or about Provisional Sinn Féin or Fianna Fail or the PDs or the Green Party.

    Are you going to back up your OP anytime soon?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    ISAW wrote: »
    Is it really?
    If it is so clear how about you saying what it is?

    Pre-election tarnishing. I thought that much was obvious. At least it is to the majority of the posters in this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Wolfe Tone


    Where SF really pro soviet USSR in the late 70s? I was under the impression they were not.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Nodin wrote: »
    Are you going to back up your OP anytime soon?

    I gave the reference to the book.

    Do you want page references?


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Nearly every politician in Ireland has some direct link to some form of the IRA, or has a family member that was active in Ireland.

    But this isnt a thread about nearly every politician. it is about the Official IRA Workers Party communists etc. who became part of the establishment.

    dlofnep wrote: »
    Pre-election tarnishing. I thought that much was obvious. At least it is to the majority of the posters in this thread.

    So you are saying i am trying to tarnish whom? I haven't gotten around to Harris yet who was a Fianna Fáil apointee to the Senate. Ironically I suppose he will be derided by the same people that say I am trying to tarnish others whom they support. It seems ther is a different standard for the ex commies who support Labour and for the ones that support anyone else e.g SF or Fianna Fáil.

    Wolfe Tone wrote: »
    W[h]ere SF really pro soviet USSR in the late 70s? I was under the impression they were not.

    Sovient links with OIRA 1976 - Anatoly Kaplan ambassodor in dublin guest at Davitt commemeration; Party members attend functions in Bulkgarian and Soviet embassies in Loindon; Sept - SF meet North Korean iofficials in Brussels; SF office opens in Rome to liase with Italian communists; linmks with Namibian SWAPO; SF links wiht cuba,Ghana, Vietnam ( Hanly book referenced in in the OP page 334)

    Eamon Gilmore and Johnny Curann were then president and education officer of USI. Official SF had a motion challenging linkis with soviets defeated at the 1976 congress.
    ( same book page 326)

    SFWP influence on Students executives ( p. 348)

    I can quote from that page report their internal as they began to loise theri grip in 1979
    The position of the party within the USI is strong in terms of powerThe Officer board and principal staff positions are filled by people who are , at least , sympathetic to the party position

    People like Rabbitte who had such student positions of power had not yet joined the Party but subsequently did.

    The report goes on to outline strategies for maintaining control over Students and using them for recruitment and training of left wing party members.

    Later seventies SF influence with students also included Gerry granger, Padraig Mannion, John Ryan. while thy didnt have a mojority on the executive they could count on influence of other non party left wing student leaders sympathetic to them(page 348)

    GArland (OIRA leader) visits Romania in oct. 1978 and SFWP buillkd relations with East German SUP.

    SFWP leadership held the soviet party line. In 1979 Russia invaded Afghanistan. If they criticised imperialism they made sure to criticise US and Chinese imperialism in afghanistan.

    In the 1980 SFWP form links with french communists, mourn Brezhnev's death, send congratulations to his successor Andropov (page 461)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    People probably don't have a copy of the book ISAW, if you want to reference something you need to come up with references that we can all access and peruse. This isn't academics where book references are acceptable as a sole means of backing up your point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 971 ✭✭✭CoalBucket


    I agree with the OP, its all a lefty communist marxist beardy socialist terrorist labour republican plot to take over the world run by Gilmore himself.

    I have a book that says it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    There was investigative program made by the BBC(panorama?) or ITV, which traced links to former members of the workers party who were allegedly laundering North Korean counterfeit U.S. Dollars.

    Does anybody know the name or have a link to this program? it was aired about 6-8 years ago, i'd love to get the names of those accused and see what links they have to Eamon Gilmore.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/3822005.stm


    These people would have been associates of Gilmore, I wonder did he hear about any of these alleged goings on??

    yes he did

    http://www.politics.ie/labour/146474-eamon-gilmore-opposed-extradition-elderly-comrade-sean-garland.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    ISAW wrote: »
    care to deal with the thread

    I've already asked you to do just this...it being your thread and all. So far, you've ignored that request, so it seems a bit out of place for you to be making the same request of others.
    And it isn't only about Gilmore. It is about the Official IRA and Workers Party etc. and links to secret control of unions , forgery, racketeering etc.
    Maybe you could explain why its about both. The two are - thus far - no more then tangentially related by anything, so one really does have to wonder at the point of starting a thread about both.
    It isn't about provisional IRA or about Provisional Sinn Féin or Fianna Fail or the PDs or the Green Party.
    Rather then selecting a small handful of the infinite things its not about, why don't you tell us what the thread is about, ISAW? Is it about multiple vaguely-related topics? Is it about some as-yet-unestablished relationship which makes it all one valid topic?

    What are you trying to discuss???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    ISAW wrote: »
    I gave the reference to the book.

    Do you want page references?

    In your OP you stated
    I will post more and welcome links or will incorporate material on
    Group B - OIRA Racketeering and criminal activity
    Soviet and Marxist Stalinist and Maoist links
    Links with Saddam Hussein and Baathists
    control of RTE and media outlets
    and Secret membership control of unions and students groups similar to their control in RTE.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=70593064&postcount=1

    I'm particularily interested in the allegations in relation to RTE.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    So, if this all points to underground shenanigans set in place decades ago to turn Ireland into some marxist/fascist shangrila for whackos...em, how do you explain the last few decades of the worst right wing corruption the state has ever seen?

    Top of my head;
    Haughey and the arm smuggling.
    Haughey sending Lawlor to meet Saddam with an introductory letter from his excellency Charles Haughey.
    Bertie claiming to be a socialist.
    Bertie sending an FFail trade deligation, and going himself, to communist China.
    Cowen and FFail destroying our country through personal gain/corruption.

    LOL! But this thread is not about them it is about the official IRA workers party commies etc.
    Your thread is a joke.

    You might possibly be on to something there. I expected that when i started it that
    - people would immediately attack me instead of addressing the topic
    - claim it was an orchastrated smear campaign
    -claim it was irrelevant
    - claim that others did similar things and thy to change the topic to discussing the others

    Ironically the same mindset will post things about the Church, Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin, and when someoine else says "but Labour/Workers Party/lefties" did similar they will claim it isnt about the others.

    I predicted all this would happen and it did.
    Is this where FFail are taking this election run up when we need serious resolution to serious issues?

    LOL tick the box of "orchestrated by FF" :) above

    This discussion is entirely of my own making and people were told abou
    t it and the predictions made in advance of what would happen if I posted it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Nodin wrote: »

    I'm particularily interested in the allegations in relation to RTE.

    1971 the Officials set up a Republican trade Union Group in ITGWU
    Des Geraghty is a key operator
    The make moves on RTE
    Eoghan is chair of Workers Group of Ireland Branch at RTE
    He appeared on the Late Late show and denounced the EEC
    He is involved in Feedback and internal RTE leftie magasine
    Also invlved with him are John Caden and Ferghal Costello and Oliver Donohoe ( whio was in The Labour Party but is symopathetic to Official Sinn Féin ( Lost revolution page 243)

    Official IRA involved ion bombings in north Tipperary Martin O Leary OIRA man electrocuted during bombing. Cathal Goulding arrested and charged. OIRA try to rig the Jury by getting addresses through tenants associations and intimidating them. ( page 243-4)

    Republican Industrial Intelligence Division ridd connected with some RTE people sets up anti EEC station in Dublin. (paGE 247)

    tHE nED sTAPELTOIN CUMANN in RTE is a secret cumann to which this type of activity is being reported. Harris and Donohoe are members
    (page 276)

    In the early 1980s Ned Stapelton cumman (NSC) are active in RTE. They begin to lose control of WUI RTE branch due to infighting with NUJ "trots and provos" ( page 371-2)

    NUJ is not without SFWP people. Padraig Yeates, Gerry Flynn, Paddy Woodsworth, are viewed with suspiscion by NSC some NUJ in RTE who are sympathetic with "stickies" include Charlie Bird, Patrick Kinsella and rodney Rice ( page 372-3)


    today tonight comes on air in late 80s and SFWO sympathisers are involved Trish Barry, Joe Mulholland, ( keen Marxist and pal of Sean Garland) who recruits NSC members to the show - Gerry Gregg, Barry O Haloran, Joe Little, David Blake Knox, Una Claffey
    ( page 373)


    That's about a third of the RTE stuff - more later


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    bonkey wrote: »
    I've already asked you to do just this...it being your thread and all. So far, you've ignored that request, so it seems a bit out of place for you to be making the same request of others.

    What request do you claim I ignored?

    Maybe you could explain why its about both.

    I didnt claim it is about both . I claimed it is about the Official IRA and Workers Party etc. Note the "etc."

    i.e. people involved in commie marxist terrorist illegal leftie socialist and other similar activities but not Republican such as the PIRA, Fianna Fail Provisional Sinn Fein or similar.

    That is what it is about.
    Rather then selecting a small handful of the infinite things its not about, why don't you tell us what the thread is about, ISAW? Is it about multiple vaguely-related topics? Is it about some as-yet-unestablished relationship which makes it all one valid topic?

    I already have. Official IRA Official Sinn Fein and the groups to which they were linked . Their party Organisation and the people involved and their subsequent and co incident involvement in Sinn Fein the Workers PArty the Workers Party New Agenda Democratic :Left and the Irish Labour Party
    What are you trying to discuss???
    [/quote]

    The stickies - their history and their subsequent associations.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    ISAW wrote: »
    That's about a third of the RTE stuff - more later

    I'll refrain from comment until the remainder emerges.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭Corsendonk


    He wouldn't be the only politician to change his politics over time or to be associated with more radical elements in his younger days. The ex Maoist Jose Manuel Barroso springs to mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭femur61


    I'm in my mid 40's, I was going to go to protest against nulcear power plants in my 20's now I think they are a great thing. I won't be voting Labour in the GE, think unions have their part in the destruction of our country, doesn't a person have different views at 40+ than when they were 20.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Corsendonk wrote: »
    He wouldn't be the only politician to change his politics over time or to be associated with more radical elements in his younger days. The ex Maoist Jose Manuel Barroso springs to mind.


    What makes you he changed his politics? Similar to Blair, JMB is New Maoist and the present Socialist agenda of the EU is right up his street... as it is for irish stickies


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    CoalBucket wrote: »
    I agree with the OP, its all a lefty communist marxist beardy socialist terrorist labour republican plot to take over the world run by Gilmore himself.

    I have a book that says it.

    Really?
    What is the title of that book?
    Who wrote it?
    are the an established and respected author?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Nodin wrote: »
    I'll refrain from comment until the remainder emerges.

    That will take some time. maybe a few weeks but thanks for telling me you will comment.
    Ill post biots as I go along.
    ther is a lot of other stuff to post and people wanted to hear about that too.
    Others are also beginning to post different sources.
    I'm sure we can continue the thread if and when Labour party people are Minister of Justice.
    If Gerry Adams was proposed as Minister of Justice they would be posting similar background info about him but this isnt about Adams or Provisional SF.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    Corsendonk wrote: »
    He wouldn't be the only politician to change his politics over time or to be associated with more radical elements in his younger days. The ex Maoist Jose Manuel Barroso springs to mind.

    As did Dev and Mussolini. but this discussuion isn't about them. ~It is about the Official IRA and marxists who eventually became millionaires and still claim to represent the proles.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    femur61 wrote: »
    I'm in my mid 40's, I was going to go to protest against nulcear power plants in my 20's now I think they are a great thing. I won't be voting Labour in the GE, think unions have their part in the destruction of our country, doesn't a person have different views at 40+ than when they were 20.

    Maybe they do. when did you hear the ex Marxist Labour people saying they rejected socialism and all its evil works and all its evil deeds and renew their baptism into constitional politics and capitalist economics?
    And when did doing like the developers and money changers become de rigeur?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭Corsendonk


    ISAW wrote: »
    As did Dev and Mussolini. but this discussuion isn't about them. ~It is about the Official IRA and marxists who eventually became millionaires and still claim to represent the proles.

    I can't wait for your SF thread so.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement