Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Who snitched on Padraig Harrington?

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 414 ✭✭danh789




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    danh789 wrote: »

    an annoying craze on here, im surprised some clown hadnt posted it earlier in the thread :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,916 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    bm365 wrote: »
    What kind of pathetic, sad individual sitting at home feels the need to phone in and report Padraig Harrington for unwittingly moving his ball a few millimetres?

    I am astounded at the disqualification of Padraig in Abu Dhabi. As a regular golfer myself I have to wonder is there no allowence for common sense in the world of sport any more? He gained no advantage whatsoever and it was totally accidental. And compare that to the overpaid diva soccer players such as Drogba diving every other week to deceive refs. What Harrington did was nothing.

    Harrington is forever the gentleman. One of the nicest sports personalities you could meet. It was great to finally see him back on form after such a tough time in his career.

    With so much doom and gloom, idiots and cheats in Government, it was great to have someone from Ireland that we could be proud of on the International stage. And that is why I have posted this in After Hours. I am appealing to the people of Ireland to help me expose the snitch who got Padraig disqualified. Lets shame this bitter person. And if we cant do that then lets just hope karma does exist and he gets reported for something himself very soon and suffers serve consequences.

    Treason!

    Proud of someone who got disqualified from a golf tournament?

    I understand that the disqualification was harsh and he did take it well but don't you think you're overstating this just a tad.

    After all the rules are the same for everyone in golf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,916 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    3DataModem wrote: »
    It was done at the behest of a gambler, or more likely a bookie. In golf the big layers employ spotters to review footage for exactly this sort of thing. Some LATAM or APACS bookie had a big position on Harrington... then gets a friend of a friend to drop a dime (or in this case, an email).

    Golf is unique in that rulings are made retrospectively, and games are over several days. Note; if the email was sent during play that day the Harrington could correct his card with the penalty. He was not disqualified for the moving ball, he was DQ'd for submitting a card with an incorrect score. Thats why the email was sent after end of play.

    Golf is the new boxing - rife for gambling "intervention".

    In boxing you just pay one boxer to take a fall. It's relatively simple to rig a boxing bout.

    Golf can be far more complicated for gamblers to "intervene" as you put it. What if Padraig Harrington had put 4 65's together without breaking the rules. What happens then?

    If a bookmaker can have a player disqualified retrospectively why not change the rules to counteract this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,778 ✭✭✭Pauleta


    aDeener wrote: »
    clearly he is overpaid as no one should be paid that much so as to afford to be able to do that!

    You are better off in North Korea you socialist


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭poisonated


    That is well harsh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭upandcumming


    He should have called it himself. While unintentionally, he cheated. Disqualification was probably a bit harsh, those are the rules.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 295 ✭✭john t


    Ball moved without touch of club, so foul. Simplicity at its finest..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭upandcumming


    aDeener wrote: »
    clearly he is overpaid as no one should be paid that much so as to afford to be able to do that!
    No he isn't overpaid. Simple as that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭namelessguy


    aDeener wrote: »
    sure does, a millimetre however, does not :rolleyes:

    It in fact makes .0254 of a difference.

    Good day!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    Firm but fair. He'd be the first to say it, you can't go setting any precedents to contradict the rules


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,494 ✭✭✭citizen_p


    is it because the ball rolled when he lifted the coin?

    damm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    "You're going to go ballistic - Miles Byrne

    Ian Woosnams caddy who packed an extra club in his bag causing him to lose a tournament, I remember this got quote of the week in some paper. Golf can be cruel, worth the read :D
    TWO Irishmen will remember the 130th Open Championship for the rest of their days but for entirely different reasons.

    For Des Smyth it was a dream of a day. For Bray caddie Miles Byrne it was a nightmare. He had Ian Woosnam's bag and there was a air of elation when the wee Welshman knocked his opening tee shot to six inches for a birdie.

    However, on the second tee Byrne discovered that there were two drivers in the bag which meant he had 15 clubs, one more than the rules. It carries an automatic two stroke penalty. Instead of starting with two he now had a four on his card. It was a devastating blow for Woosnam. "It is the ultimate sin for a caddie," he said after finishing in a tie for third place with five others including Darren Clarke.

    "Miles said to me walking off the second tee 'you're going to go ballistic.' 'Why? I asked.' We have two drivers in the bag.

    "I felt like I had just been kicked in the teeth. It took me a few holes to get over and probably cost me another couple of shots. I felt liking picking up the ball and walking off. But you just have to get on with it. That's the fighting spirit in me. I love a good fight, in all sorts of ways. But I never really shook it off."

    Byrne was gutted. He did want to talk about it and said simply: "It was my fault. The buck stops with me. I don't know how the driver got in there, If I did it wouldn't had stayed there."

    It appears that Woosie took two drivers to the practice range.

    "He should have counted the clubs that's what he's paid for. I'll give him a good bollocking when I get him inside.

    "It is the biggest mistake he will ever make and he knows it. He's a good caddy, a good lad and he's good at reading the lines." He's also a lucky caddy. Woosie said he won't sack him. Byrne is an experienced caddy. He has been around for quite a while but had just taking two years off and only came back at Benson and Hedges at the Belfry. Woosnam's woe cost him dearly. Those two shots cost him second place on his own and it meant a financial difference of £218,334. That would also have guaranteed his place on the Ryder Cup team. Instead of being 12th he would have moved to fifth.

    For the other Irishman it was a week to remember. "I had a wonderful week," said Smyth after shooting 71 for a four under par total and a share of 13th place.

    "I could not have asked for better. After coming through qualifying the way I did with 64 in the second round. Then shooting 65 in the second round here. I played really well week.

    "It was great. The crowds were amazing. I had a lot of support out there walking down that 18th sent shivers down my spine. I really don't know what I'm going to do next week. I'm entered for the Dutch Open but it will take me a while to come down after this. We'll just wait and see"

    The big bonus for Smyth in his 21st Open is that he will be back next year. The top 15 finishers and ties are automatically exempt for next year's championship at Muirfield in Scotland. He also pocketed a cheque for £40,062.

    "I am very happy. The putting didn't work for me today but the rest of my game was in good. I actually played better than when I shot 65. I had much more control.

    "I got one really bad break on the 14th when I just eight yards off the fairway but I was buried. Unplayable. I did well to make bogey in the end. I made a mistake a the seventh when I got the yardage wrong. But I proved that I can still play in that kind of competition. It was very satisfying."

    Much less so for Paul McGinley and Pádraig Harrington. McGinley had a dreadful day. He failed to make a single birdie and finished with 76 to be five over par for the tournament. Harrington played the last eight holes really well.

    He was three under par for than part of the journey but the day was only worth 71 for a two over aggregate. He took a share of 37th place winning £16,300 while McGinley was shared 54th spot for £8,943.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Mousey- wrote: »
    is it because the ball rolled when he lifted the coin?

    damm

    His hand made contact with the ball when he lifted the coin, he was aware there was contact, but unaware it had moved forward, he thought it had just osolated slighty on the spot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    No he isn't overpaid. Simple as that.

    ...and you are more than likely one for criticising what politicians receive :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,796 ✭✭✭KungPao


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Rules are rules. Golf is a precise game, every inch makes a difference.

    Imperial measurement.

    The definition of precision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    KungPao wrote: »
    Imperial measurements.

    The definition of precision.

    You're about three roods and a perch off precision


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭Senna


    Unfortunately golf isn't like other sports, judgements an be made after the round has finished and its just unlucky for Padraig. I didn't hear any interviews, but i'm sure he's seen the footage and will take the ruling in his stride. Its only January and there's plenty of more tournaments this year for Padraig to win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,796 ✭✭✭KungPao


    You're about three roods and a perch off precision

    I'm so metric I don't even know what you're talking about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,228 ✭✭✭epgc3fyqirnbsx


    KungPao wrote: »
    I'm so metric I don't even know what you're talking about.

    neither do I tbh :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭upandcumming


    aDeener wrote: »
    ...and you are more than likely one for criticising what politicians receive :rolleyes:
    Wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,859 ✭✭✭✭Sharpshooter


    In his own words.
    Padraig Harrington reckoned he was 'a dimple and a half out' after he was thrown out of the Abu Dhabi Open for an infringement on the green in Thursday's first round.

    The Dubliner conceded he was aware his ball had moved after he had brushed it with the back of his hand on the seventh hole, but concluded that it had rolled back into its original position before he took his shot.
    Instead television replays showed otherwise.

    “In slow motion it's pretty clear the ball has moved three dimples forward and it's come back maybe a dimple and a half,” Harrington said facing the press yesterday.

    “At the end of the day that's good enough, but I wouldn't have done anything differently — there was nothing I could do about it at that moment in time.

    “If I'd called a referee over it would have been pointless because if he'd asked me where my ball was I'd have said it was there. As far as I was concerned it didn't move.”

    As Harrington did not call a penalty on himself he ended up signing for the wrong score — and it was that transgression which ultimately cost him his place in the tournament.

    There is more discussion here.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement