Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What would you do to sort out the country?

  • 20-09-2010 11:15PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 560 ✭✭✭


    Firstly, I would have Brian Cowen removed as Taoiseach, and a more favourable, competant leader who could sort the country out. I would choose David McWilliams, as he is honest, knows the state of the economy, and I believe he could make a considerable difference with sorting the country out.
    I would look into Public Sector cuts, and also cuts on high paid civil servants. This costs the country an awful lot of money, and some of the jobs are not necessarily needed. People in the banking sector, directors etc are extremely overpaid, and that is another issue that needs to be looked at and paycuts needed for them, and appropriate tax to hit them, like the normal working people in this country. Just because they earn a fortune should no entitle them to pay F*ck all tax. In my view, the more you earn the more you should be taxed.
    I think that NAMA should be scrapped, as it will bring every working person in this country to its knees, and even more recession. The 26billion that NAMA are requiring to sort out the banks should be invested in small business enterprises who can then provide employment for people, and should also bail out the irish people with their mortages.....26billion could go along way with this regard, but what exactly will it do for sorting out the banks??
    The government, the financial regulator, and the bankers caused this terrible recession that we are all stuck in, and the irish tax payer should not have to bail them out because of their incompetance, and greed during the Celtic Tiger.


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,461 ✭✭✭Peanut


    Bear in mind that McWilliams is more talented than most of his contemporaries at getting his point across to the public - but this doesn't necessarily mean he would be the best person for the job.

    He advocates Ireland abandoning the euro which is a radical option. It may or may not be the lesser of two evils, but it seems politically (at both the Irish and EU level) unfeasible right now. It would cause enormous upheaval, panic and uncertainty, which is probably the last thing the country needs right now.

    The problem with taxing the ultra rich is that there are not enough of them. It just wouldn't save enough money to make any tangible difference, however as some sort of "social fairness" measure, it would indirectly make tax increases on lower and middle earners more palatable.

    But with such a tax you might also risk pushing out of the country employers who are creating jobs. It's a small step from there to a policy of socialist distribution of wealth, which doesn't usually work fantastically for attracting inward investment, or developing indigenous business.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    McWilliams? really :rolleyes:

    thats the same guy who was pushing hard for a guarantee that has proven to be such a disaster? the same guy who thinks dropping out of euro would do us good?

    we all have an agenda, his is to sell more books and plays, im very suspicious of a person who brands himself as a top economist but has no peer reviewed papers to his name


    nah checkout this guy here instead

    the videos of himself at the Dail committee hearing might still be around


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 Insomniac_


    Nuke it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭Sea Sharp


    Privatise the HSE.
    Cut social welfare in half and reduce minimum wage by 25%.
    The money spent containing the riots would be a tiny fraction of the money saved.
    Legalise and regulate non-fatal recreational drugs and watch the tourist pour in.
    Then invest on a massive on-line education system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    What would I do to sort out the country?

    We face ruin in modern day Ireland, we throw the word billion around like its pennys without fully grasping the meaning of word.

    That for me is the biggest issue we face as a nation, but how do we get out of the mess we're in? Put simply we can't unless radical change flows through our people primarily and secondly our political system.

    The people of Ireland have failed themselves, we as a nation have allowed our political system to run free with no true governance in place. Look at another republic in the EU, oui the French. They have been up in arms and rightfully so about their state of affairs. They ahve stood united against the banks, developers and the politicians. What have we done other than bicker amongst ourselves and denounce anyone who wants to stand up for the people as being mad hippies.

    So what we need is a revolution and we are edging ever closer to one happening. The people need to stand up and say NO we're not letting this happen again. A government who's corrupt, a political system that is equally corrupt and supports only a me fein policy since our republics inception. We need to have mass protests together Public & Private Sector and the Unions as one. Failing positive action from a national strike we need to take radical anarchistic measures to overthrow our failed systems. To put a message across the world that this once proud republic may have lost its way but the will and the resolve of its people are still the same as those who once stood up for the same. Equality and freedom for all, Parnel Pearse Connolly would be on their soap boxes already in the heart of Dublin crying out for reform. Where are those people now? No where to be seen because our political system has failed.

    Now putting aside fantasy as we all know we are not united as a nation let alone as a people it will never happen. In reality this is what needs to happen....

    We need to stop this farce that is Anglo and let it go to the wall. Let its debtors be called up and let them know their investment is gone that they are going to share the brunt with the Irish people. This will send a message to other financial institutes that we dont mess about.

    We need to hold a general election, we need to make sure FF & FG dont have a chance of taking power again for at least the next 8 years. Look towards a new coalition government, Labour, SF, independants, let them work together to ensure real change. I say FG because while they are the natural choice to lead this country they are equally as bad as their FF buddies and will only repeat the same corrupt issues again.

    The Public and Private sectors need to be held accountable for their actions. In other words the Financial Regulator needs to do their job. But at the same time they need to be empowered to implement harsh punishment on those who do not perform or keep within the boundaries that ensure our continued economic growth and stability. It is within the FR/CBI culture that needs to change, internally they dont have any Accountability or true governance models in place. People need to be sacked and no longer should hide behind fat private sector handshakes or perminant jobs within the public sector. People need to know that if they do not peform their will be consequences. To date none of this is there, it is at the very core as to why our country has fallen to its knees and will soon be on its back as the IMF step in.

    The Public sector needs to be shaken up, not the front line services. That would be economic sucide. The culture of obtaining senior postions due to time served needs to be halted. The outsourcing of decisions to Consultants is pure folly and a waste of time. We need to leverage the highly educated people within the public sector to make these decisions themselves. Again its all a waste of tax payers money. LIke the private sector, those in the public sector need to be put on performance measures to ensure their quality of work is kept at a high standard, thus changing the culture to one that breeds innovation and efficencies within their organisations.

    Public sector pensions: How these are governed is a joke, especially those higher up the food chain. I see no reason why a minister should receive their state pension along with a private one. Also if a minister or anyone is discharged from their role they shoulnd't be entitled to a state pension end of story. We fork out billions on pensions every year tothose who dont need it and those who dont deserve it. We the tax payer pay these pensions and we the tax payer can't afford our own at the moment. Therefore a pension freeze needs to be put in place on all Public sector pensions. The funds then should be redirected into a stimulus package to promote growth in education, small business and employment. At least until we start to see positive growth again. It makes no sense as to why we the tax payer should pay what is really a bonus to a failed public system. Similar to what has happend to those inthe private sector.

    We need to take the 25 (25 thousand million euro) billion we're spending on Anglo and redirect it to Policing, Health Care, Education and infrastructure (public transport, fibre optic broadband, nuclear power stations etc etc). Funds from the fire sell of NAMA should also be used for these investments.

    We also need to look at our constitution, we need to amend it so it clearly includes accountability on all fronts of our economic stability.

    We need to stay in Europe and if failing any of the above. Allow them to take over our state of affairs until we are in the black once more. We are the laughing stock of Europe we are worse than Greece and Portugal combined. Our reputation as a EU lead country needs to be restored and we have 2 choices take charge now and implement redical change or let the EU do it for us.

    Just my opinion, i am sure it'll get torn to shreds by boards but hey such is boards.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,629 ✭✭✭NullZer0


    Why do anything?

    Nobody has done anything about it yet so I think we deserve it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,715 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    nicegirl wrote: »
    and should also bail out the irish people with their mortages.....26billion could go along way with this regard, but what exactly will it do for sorting out the banks??

    putting aside the rest, why should anyone with a mortgage be bailed out. they have no-one to blame but themselves for getting it in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 154 ✭✭Gus99


    Look towards a new coalition government, Labour, SF, independants...

    People need to be sacked and no longer should hide behind ... permanent jobs within the public sector..... People need to know that if they do not peform their will be consequences.... those in the public sector need to be put on performance measures to ensure their quality of work is kept at a high standard, thus changing the culture to one that breeds innovation and efficencies within their organisations..... a pension freeze needs to be put in place on all Public sector pensions.

    I think I have spotted a problem ..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    putting aside the rest, why should anyone with a mortgage be bailed out. they have no-one to blame but themselves for getting it in the first place.

    I remember reading a central bank paper from 2007 or so, its still on their site (table on page 136)

    one thing that stood out

    25% of mortgages are speculative Buy-To-Let mortgages by the end of 2006


    I wonder why having a quarter of the mortgages (probably even more another year later before **** hit fan) being taken out for the purposes of nothing more than property speculation didnt ring any alarm bells by the people drawing up the above linked document



    I will not stand for any bailout of mortgage holders with such a high ratio of speculators among them, whats worse we are already subsidising this lot thru' all sorts of schemes that could be better spend on job creation for these people!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    I remember reading a central bank paper from 2007 or so, its still on their site (table on page 136)

    one thing that stood out

    25% of mortgages are speculative Buy-To-Let mortgages by the end of 2006


    I wonder why having a quarter of the mortgages (probably even more another year later before **** hit fan) being taken out for the purposes of nothing more than property speculation didnt ring any alarm bells by the people drawing up the above linked document



    I will not stand for any bailout of mortgage holders with such a high ratio of speculators among them, whats worse we are already subsidising this lot thru' all sorts of schemes that could be better spend on job creation for these people!

    Buy to let is not the same as property speculation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    putting aside the rest, why should anyone with a mortgage be bailed out. they have no-one to blame but themselves for getting it in the first place.

    This attitude is just spiteful and only works with the benefit of hindsight. No one could see what was coming, our banks and our government reassured us all that all was sweet.

    Regardless of that people need somewhere to live. All these dopes who spout off hahahah you deserve it yis are mongos for getting into it everyone knew it was going to collapse are just silly people. Who love to shout na na i told you so....

    As a tax payer I would prefer to have our monies given to those who need it. And yup mortgage owners, small businesses need it most. it would cost roughly 40 billion to wipe clean the average house price off every home bought over the last 10 years. Impossible of course, but at the same time where would you like to see your money go? To those who caused it? Or those who need it? I back the people any time and find these comments childish and not in touch with reality.

    I agree its impossible to do but its a nice idea all the same all beit in la la land.

    If you happen to get cancer, should I say hahahahaha you deserve it for not watching your diet and smoking (duno if you do either but hey u know what i mean).

    Solidarity brother/sister thats what we need not finger pointing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    Gus99 wrote: »
    I think I have spotted a problem ..

    My opinion only Gus, in your opinion do you think FF / FG are the ones to lead us out of this mess?

    Oh and what in your opinion is the problem with the other selected areas? Can i assume you're a public sector worker?

    Easy to comment but it would be benefical if you backed up your statement with fact or a decent rebutal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    OMD wrote: »
    Buy to let is not the same as property speculation.

    BTL is a form of speculation!


    Your taking a mortgage from bank at interest rate %X
    and renting out property in which you have no intention of living for rent at rate of X+Y%
    profit of Y%


    yes it is speculation, with you speculating that rental yields stay above the bank rate and of course you find tenants....

    i don't see why we should bailout this crowd? which was the epitome of Irish cute whoorery at the bubble

    25% of mortgage holders up to 2006 thought it was a great way of making money now they can eat **** for all i care


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,715 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    This attitude is just spiteful and only works with the benefit of hindsight. No one could see what was coming, our banks and our government reassured us all that all was sweet.

    don't be so naive, plenty of people saw it coming and were just laughed away. anyone who thought a 30k house was worth 600k has no-one to blame but themselves. I could easily have gotten a house in the last 5 years but no way would I pay anywhere close to the insanely insane prices that were asking, its only a house after all.

    As a tax payer I'd prefer that neither the banks nor mortgage holders got our money, either way is flushing it down the toilet. But at least the banks (Anglo aside) will pay it back over the next 30 years


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,715 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    OMD wrote: »
    Buy to let is not the same as property speculation.

    eh, yes it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    BTL is a form of speculation!


    Your taking a mortgage from bank at interest rate %X
    and renting out property in which you have no intention of living for rent at rate of X+Y%
    profit of Y%


    yes it is speculation, with you speculating that rental yields stay above the bank rate and of course you find tenants....

    i don't see why we should bailout this crowd? which was the epitome of Irish cute whoorery at the bubble

    25% of mortgage holders up to 2006 thought it was a great way of making money now they can eat **** for all i care

    Totally agree that those who were investors should be let rot. However there are those home owners who only have 1 property to live in. Who due to all the speculative BTL investors out there had the property market shoot up to crazy levels. Its not really their fault that they had to buy a house that was so expensive. Again banks do checks on these properties to validate their value. Did anyone say "Sorry but you're paying too much for that home" nope, instead they were told " sure no problem we'll give you 8 times your salary at 100% mortgage ".

    I feel sorry for those who are now faced with homelessness beacuse of issues beyond their control. Investors ont he other hand know the risks and as such need to accept the outcome.

    Unfortunately others dont see it split that way and instead lable anyone who bought a house as idiots when really they were just part of the market at the time and unlucky rather than foolish.

    Again a nation divided.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 butler1


    they could always instaed of bailing out the banks in the way they are doing pay off 25% of everyone with a morgage morgages straight to the bank and then cut everyones wage by 25% as this is the biggest problem in the country defaulting dept now i know 25% is high but if it was 2% then cut wages by 2% you can get my drift

    now i understand that people got themselfs in to high morgages and thats their own fault but saying thats their own stupitity doesn't really solve anything the mess is there it just needs to be cleaned and taxing people that can't afford to keep up their morgage repayment is only going to cause more people to default and cost the government more(our tax) money and that doesn't just affect the morgage holder it effects everyone in the country

    if the prices of house and commercial property were lowered due to this it would mean rents would be lower which means companies would not have to earn as much to keep businesses going which you'd expect to translate to lower food and services prices and cause peoples morgages and rent wouldn't be as high people wouldn't need to earn as much but the problem in this country is if you ownly work on one problem at a time you allow all the other one get worse

    i will say one more thing if iwas to loose my house through default i would leave this country and probably never come back i would n't be a burden on the state ie dole, rent allowance but i would be leaving them it the price of my house which is why i made the other points above

    it might sound stupit but its just one guys thoughts on the subject not like anyone would be interested in the government in my opinion as we seem to be just something they can see from their clowds, you know like insects.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Totally agree that those who were investors should be let rot. However there are those home owners who only have 1 property to live in. Who due to all the speculative BTL investors out there had the property market shoot up to crazy levels. Its not really their fault that they had to buy a house that was so expensive. Again banks do checks on these properties to validate their value. Did anyone say "Sorry but you're paying too much for that home" nope, instead they were told " sure no problem we'll give you 8 times your salary at 100% mortgage ".

    I feel sorry for those who are now faced with homelessness beacuse of issues beyond their control. Investors ont he other hand know the risks and as such need to accept the outcome.

    Unfortunately others dont see it split that way and instead lable anyone who bought a house as idiots when really they were just part of the market at the time and unlucky rather than foolish.

    Again a nation divided.

    OF course there are exceptions and people in all sorts of exceptional circumstances

    but that's a matter for people in question and their banks and the courts to sort out, the government really should be concentrating on more pressing matters, you know that saying "teach a man to fish or give a man a fish..." you want to tackle this private debt problem then tackle the employment problem and let the people work their way out of the debt they signed themselves up to, anything else would create a serious moral hazard which could lead to even bigger issues

    you might have the best intentions but in the end you might endup creating a bigger mess


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    don't be so naive, plenty of people saw it coming and were just laughed away. anyone who thought a 30k house was worth 600k has no-one to blame but themselves. I could easily have gotten a house in the last 5 years but no way would I pay anywhere close to the insanely insane prices that were asking, its only a house after all.

    As a tax payer I'd prefer that neither the banks nor mortgage holders got our money, either way is flushing it down the toilet. But at least the banks (Anglo aside) will pay it back over the next 30 years

    Naieve lol dont be daft I agreed with you but also tried to rationalise your thinking yet you call me naieve, come off it.

    Dont you see that some sort of bailout would free up disposable income for those who are now screwed? That disposable income would then fuel growth in the retail sector and have a domino affect on our economy that would only be in a positive way.

    Regardless its a mute point, it would never work and there isn't a soul in Ireland who would push it forward.

    The issue I have is you using the benefit of hindsight to back up your statment. Its just down right ignorant especially when you're talking about real peoples lives not entities like banks. These are you neighbours, your family your friends. LIke it or lump it we're all in the same boat and comments/opinions like yours only widen the gap in society.

    So what would you do as the OP asked? Would you rather dismantle peoples opinions to bolster your own? Or would you rather contribute to a pretty good question in a constructive adult way?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    butler1 wrote: »
    they could always instaed of bailing out the banks in the way they are doing pay off 25% of everyone with a morgage morgages straight to the bank and then cut everyones wage by 25% as this is the biggest problem in the country defaulting dept now i know 25% is high but if it was 2% then cut wages by 2% you can get my drift

    now i understand that people got themselfs in to high morgages and thats their own fault but saying thats their own stupitity doesn't really solve anything the mess is there it just needs to be cleaned and taxing people that can't afford to keep up their morgage repayment is only going to cause more people to default and cost the government more(our tax) money and that doesn't just affect the morgage holder it effects everyone in the country

    if the prices of house and commercial property were lowered due to this it would mean rents would be lower which means companies would not have to earn as much to keep businesses going which you'd expect to translate to lower food and services prices and cause peoples morgages and rent wouldn't be as high people wouldn't need to earn as much but the problem in this country is if you ownly work on one problem at a time you allow all the other one get worse

    i will say one more thing if iwas to loose my house through default i would leave this country and probably never come back i would n't be a burden on the state ie dole, rent allowance but i would be leaving them it the price of my house which is why i made the other points above

    it might sound stupit but its just one guys thoughts on the subject not like anyone would be interested in the government in my opinion as we seem to be just something they can see from their clowds, you know like insects.

    Paying off their debt with someone elses money doesn't solve anything either :rolleyes: if anything it creates bigger issues

    there's no such thing as free lunch

    i already pointed out if personal debt is to be tackled it needs to be address via improved personal bankruptcy legislation going forward and employment prospects for those out of jobs

    anything else would be a cruel joke on people/companies who werent reckless and would break the camel's back


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    OF course there are exceptions and people in all sorts of exceptional circumstances

    but that's a matter for people in question and their banks and the courts to sort out, the government really should be concentrating on more pressing matters, you know that saying "teach a man to fish or give a man a fish..." you want to tackle this private debt problem then tackle the employment problem and let the people work their way out of the debt they signed themselves up to, anything else would create a serious moral hazard which could lead to even bigger issues

    you might have the best intentions but in the end you might endup creating a bigger mess


    Again i find myself agreeing with you :) I definately think you've got some strong points there. But I did also say it would never work. Personally its fraught with risks/danger and has the potential as you say to cause an even bigger mess.

    Just on the subject of banks/mortgages. Already banks have been looking at taking over toxit debt from Irelands property boom. These banks know that there is no way in hell of recouping the full amount and are already analysing the debt owed and writing off part of it so the mortgage holder will pay at least a large percentage of it back rather than defaulting on it completely. This is the only way and legal way it will work but again its not government its down to the bank who will buy own and manage the debt. THis is the legal and financial process that manages debt worldwide. ITs a matter of choice however "Do we get paid any money? or do we agree to write off X to get Y".

    But jasus dont get me wrong here folks I like the idea of a government bail out but I recognise its impossible to do and would cause bigger issues.

    I just have a bit of an issue with people sayin "ha told you so you're to blame yourself"

    I have a mortgage and I recognise it is a life long commitment. I am not too worried about 10% or 20% or 30%... negitive equity. Its all relitive to the markets and like all markets it goes up and down. Its the people out there who banked their pensions or futures on investment properties that are true screwed. I for one can afford my mortgage and will continue to do so regardless of negitive equity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,715 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    So what would you do as the OP asked? Would you rather dismantle peoples opinions to bolster your own? Or would you rather contribute to a pretty good question in a constructive adult way?

    posted previously in a thread the same as this one
    cut dole by 40%
    reduce minimum wage by 20%
    reduce rent supplement by 50%
    more stringent criteria for claiming various social welfare benefits
    Increase PAYE rates
    Increase PAYE bands downwards and create third band for higher earners
    Privatise CIE
    Reform ESB
    Abolish HSE and replace with new organisation, allowing no guaranteed admin jobs to be transfer before thorough investigation into need
    cut TD numbers to 80-100
    Merge City and county councils into 4 regions and Dublin
    Reduce Senead remuneration to 50% of current
    Reduce TD remuneration to 50% current
    Abolish TD expenses
    Redirect DF funding to support Navy first and foremost
    Reduce employer PRSI and other "anti employment" taxes and red tape
    Abolish/merge 60-70% of Quangos
    Sell Aer Lingus to Ryanair
    Build more prisons
    Remove concurrent sentencing
    Minimum jail terms for repeat offences
    Public service pay cuts, by grade starting at 10% up to 40%
    Cease excessive pension benefits for new PS workers
    Proper investigation into nuclear generation options
    Increase motorway speed limits and other reforms (weather dependant limits, minimum speed etc)
    Remove Anglo from guarantee and allow to die
    Allow at least one of the other banks to die
    Support the rest on the understanding that 75%+ of any profits goes to gov until debt repaid


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭Mister men


    Arrest Cowen,Bertie and Lenihan as they are the ones directly responsible for the current mess. Charge them with treason againest the state and it's people.

    New national government to be set up.

    All social welfare to be cut for the long term unemployed (5 years and over) by 50%, all those under 21 recieve no benefits of any kind.

    Food vouchers instead of cash to be given out as a percentage of your dole payment.

    PS pay cut by 50% for all those earning 100k a year and over. All those earning between 50-100k a year cut by 40%, 30-40k a year by 20% and anyone under this to be left untouched.

    All TD's pay cut by 65%

    Huge wind and wave power projects to be set up and any skilled workers presently on the dole to be offered 500 euro per week to help in the construction of said project. Anyone who rejects this offer to be thrown off the dole. Projects to be funded by increased taxes.

    Visable arrest and jailing of those in the property sector directly involved in price fixing and overpricing of houses and retail units in the last 10 years.


    The immediate closing of Anglo.

    The arrest and jailing of the top bankers who fueled the hysteria that has lead the country to ruin.

    All this is just for starters. We do it or the IMF will be harsher. It's our call.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    posted previously in a thread the same as this one

    cut dole by 40%
    reduce minimum wage by 20%
    reduce rent supplement by 50%
    more stringent criteria for claiming various social welfare benefits


    ah ha nice one Cookie i thought you were just a thread jacker lol.

    Some really good suggestions there but I wasn't privy to your opinion so i had to ask :)

    I would say a lot of what you say makes total sense but at the same time the cuts you propose on those who need it most doesn't make sense (social welfare cuts). What would happen to those who are on those benefits? Let them go homeless? Thus increasing their need on state support and making it even more impossible for them to contribute to society in the future? Seriously flawed there mate...

    Other cuts for sure makes sense but would all of that get us out of the mess we're in without a Stable Governement and a secure governnace structure behind it (governance: Decisions, accountability and management of resources). Currently we have no true governance structure in place which has gotten us into this mess. Wihtout one any change thats put in place will fail yet again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    Mister men wrote: »
    Arrest Cowen,Bertie and Lenihan as they are the ones directly responsible for the current mess. Charge them with treason againest the state and it's people.

    New national government to be set up.

    All social welfare to be cut for the long term unemployed (5 years and over) by 50%, all those under 21 recieve no benefits of any kind.

    Food vouchers instead of cash to be given out as a percentage of your dole payment.

    PS pay cut by 50% for all those earning 100k a year and over. All those earning between 50-100k a year cut by 40%, 30-40k a year by 20% and anyone under this to be left untouched.

    All TD's pay cut by 65%

    Huge wind and wave power projects to be set up and any skilled workers presently on the dole to be offered 500 euro per week to help in the construction of said project. Anyone who rejects this offer to be thrown off the dole. Projects to be funded by increased taxes.

    Visable arrest and jailing of those in the property sector directly involved in price fixing and overpricing of houses and retail units in the last 10 years.


    The immediate closing of Anglo.

    The arrest and jailing of the top bankers who fueled the hysteria that has lead the country to ruin.

    All this is just for starters. We do it or the IMF will be harsher. It's our call.

    Accountability whoooohooooooo its needed and defo public humiliation of those responsible. The yanks are doing it why cant we?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,968 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Mister men wrote: »
    All those earning between 50-100k a year cut by 40%, 30-40k a year by 20% and anyone under this to be left untouched.

    Do you have friends earning 45k, as they are exempt under this plan :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,715 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    I would say a lot of what you say makes total sense but at the same time the cuts you propose on those who need it most doesn't make sense (social welfare cuts). What would happen to those who are on those benefits? Let them go homeless? Thus increasing their need on state support and making it even more impossible for them to contribute to society in the future? Seriously flawed there mate...

    welfare being so high here artificially props up lots of markets. the rental market is the obvious one, with the gov contolling 50% of rent effectively. lower this and rents will fall. Lower min wages (and the dole to encourange pepole to work for less. We've seen articles stating that people won't take 25k jobs cos benefits are too good) and lots of products will fall, lower welfare benefits and every major company producing needed good will adjust its prices downwards to maintain sales. Its happened already and many major companies (notably the food sector: Tesc, Dunnes etc) still have much higher margins here than elsewhere because they know there is no real price pressure on them.
    ESB is another one, makes a large profit and has extremely high average wage, pressure need to be put on them to drop prices further, reform of the company and customers with less money are the two best ways to force them to lower the stupidly high prices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    welfare being so high here artificially props up lots of markets. the rental market is the obvious one, with the gov contolling 50% of rent effectively. lower this and rents will fall. Lower min wages (and the dole to encourange pepole to work for less. We've seen articles stating that people won't take 25k jobs cos benefits are too good) and lots of products will fall, lower welfare benefits and every major company producing needed good will adjust its prices downwards to maintain sales. Its happened already and many major companies (notably the food sector: Tesc, Dunnes etc) still have much higher margins here than elsewhere because they know there is no real price pressure on them.
    ESB is another one, makes a large profit and has extremely high average wage, pressure need to be put on them to drop prices further, reform of the company and customers with less money are the two best ways to force them to lower the stupidly high prices.

    At the epicentre of all of what you say is the Financial Regulator (Centre Bank) having no control or input. they have failed us on a grand scale. However there are those on welfare for a very good reason and the only way to sort it out is to means test the lot of them. Blanket changes as you propose would cause even bigger social and economic issues. While they all make sense for those who use welfare for profit or fraud it would only mess those who need it most up.


    Oh Cookie Monster I see your from Cabo, where abouts I am from there too :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Income tax:

    Scrap all tax credits
    Scrap PRSI and Income Levy
    Introduce the four following tax rates/bands

    €0-€20,000 – 10%
    €20,001 - €40,000 – 20%
    €40,001 - €100,000 – 30%
    €100,001 plus - 40%


    Other
    - Reduce both VAT rates by 2%
    - Reduce CT by 2.5%

    Spending
    - Reduce minimum wage by 5-10% a year, and eventually abolish it
    - Target social welfare cuts of 5-10% a year (focus on the won’t works, but don’t hurt the can’t-works as much as possible)
    - Target reduction in public sector pay bill of 5% a year until it’s reached a sustainable level


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭NOGMaxpower


    Income tax:

    Scrap all tax credits
    Scrap PRSI and Income Levy
    Introduce the four following tax rates/bands

    €0-€20,000 – 10%
    €20,001 - €40,000 – 20%
    €40,001 - €100,000 – 30%
    €100,001 plus - 40%


    Other
    - Reduce both VAT rates by 2%
    - Reduce CT by 2.5%

    Spending
    - Reduce minimum wage by 5-10% a year, and eventually abolish it
    - Target social welfare cuts of 5-10% a year (focus on the won’t works, but don’t hurt the can’t-works as much as possible)
    - Target reduction in public sector pay bill of 5% a year until it’s reached a sustainable level

    I like the income tax brackets, especially the 30% lol.... but in all seriousness that all makes sense and what would be fair. However it still doesn't address those earning 200K+ t hey are the real feckers who need reigning in. They should have to pay 50% tax. Those over 500k should have levys applied also to bring them closer to 55 or 60%.


Advertisement
Advertisement